Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(2): 200-208, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33347769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Under the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program, bundled paymtents for lower-extremity joint replacement (LEJR) are associated with 2% to 4% cost savings with stable quality among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. However, BPCI may prompt practice changes that benefit all patients, not just fee-for-service beneficiaries. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between hospital participation in BPCI and LEJR outcomes for patients with commercial insurance or Medicare Advantage (MA). DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study using Health Care Cost Institute claims from 2011 to 2016. SETTING: LEJR at 281 BPCI hospitals and 562 non-BPCI hospitals. PATIENTS: 184 922 patients with MA or commercial insurance. MEASUREMENTS: Differential changes in LEJR outcomes at BPCI hospitals versus at non-BPCI hospitals matched on propensity score were evaluated using a difference-in-differences (DID) method. Secondary analyses evaluated associations by patient MA status and hospital characteristics. Primary outcomes were changes in 90-day total spending on LEJR episodes and 90-day readmissions; secondary outcomes were postacute spending and discharge to postacute care providers. RESULTS: Average episode spending decreased more at BPCI versus non-BPCI hospitals (change, -2.2% [95% CI, -3.6% to -0.71%]; P = 0.004), but differences in changes in 90-day readmissions were not significant (adjusted DID, -0.47 percentage point [CI, -1.0 to 0.06 percentage point]; P = 0.084). Participation in BPCI was also associated with differences in decreases in postacute spending and discharge to institutional postacute care providers. Decreases in episode spending were larger for hospitals with high baseline spending but did not vary by MA status. LIMITATION: Nonrandomized studies are subject to residual confounding and selection. CONCLUSION: Participation in BPCI was associated with modest spillovers in episode savings. Bundled payments may prompt hospitals to implement broad care redesign that produces benefits regardless of insurance coverage. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/estadística & datos numéricos , Episodio de Atención , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Programas Voluntarios/economía , Programas Voluntarios/organización & administración , Programas Voluntarios/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Am J Transplant ; 20(2): 382-388, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31550420

RESUMEN

Implementing uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCDD) in the United States could markedly improve supply of donor lungs for patients in need of transplants. Evidence from US pilot programs suggests families support uDCDD, but only if they are asked permission for using invasive organ preservation procedures prior to initiation. However, non-invasive strategies that confine oxygenation to lungs may be applicable to the overwhelming majority of potential uDCDD donors that have airway devices in place as part of standard resuscitation. We propose an ethical framework for lung uDCDD by: (a) initiating post mortem preservation without requiring prior permission to protect the opportunity for donation until an authorized party can be found; (b) using non-invasive strategies that confine oxygenation to lungs; and (c) maintaining strict separation between the healthcare team and the organ preservation team. Attempting uDCDD in this way has great potential to obtain more transplantable lungs while respecting donor autonomy and family wishes, securing public support, and enabling authorized persons to affirm or cease preservation decisions without requiring evidence of prior organ donation intent. It ensures prioritization of life-saving, the opportunity to allow willing donors to donate, and respect for bodily integrity while adhering to current ethical norms.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante/ética , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Preservación de Órganos/ética , Donantes de Tejidos/ética , Muerte , Selección de Donante/métodos , Selección de Donante/organización & administración , Humanos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Estados Unidos
4.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 29(6): 1461-5, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26342271

RESUMEN

OBJECTISVES: The purpose of this study was to identify the independent risk factors for fast-track failure (FTF) in cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. SETTING: A university-affiliated heart center. PARTICIPANTS: In a 2-year period, 1,704 consecutive preselected patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were treated according to the local fast-track protocol in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), bypassing the intensive care unit (ICU). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Independent risk factors for FTF in the univariate regression analysis were tested in a multivariate regression analysis. FTF was defined as any transfer of the preselected patient to the ICU. FTF was primary when the patient was transferred directly from the postanesthetic care unit to the ICU and secondary when the patient was transferred from the intermediate care unit or ward to the ICU. FTF rate was 11.6% for primary and 5.6% for secondary FTF. In the multivariate regression analysis, age>70 years, female sex, prolonged surgery, and prolonged cross-clamp time could be defined as independent risk factors for FTF. CONCLUSIONS: In a preselected patient population, fast-track treatment could be done with a low FTF rate. Independent risk factors for FTF are age, female sex, prolonged surgery, and prolonged cross-clamp time.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA