Identification of early risk factors for anti-citrullinated-protein-antibody positive rheumatoid arthritis-a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals positive for anti-cyclic-peptide-antibodies (anti-CCP) and musculoskeletal complaints (MSK-C) are at risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study we aimed to investigate factors involved in arthritis progression. METHODS: Anti-CCP2-positive individuals with MSK-C referred to a rheumatologist were recruited. Individuals lacked arthritis at clinical and ultrasound examination and were followed for ≥three years or until clinical arthritis diagnosis. Blood samples from inclusion were analyzed for; nine anti-citrullinated-protein-antibody (ACPA) reactivities (citrullinated α-1-enolase, fibrinogen, filaggrin, histone, vimentin and tenascin peptides); 92 inflammation-associated proteins; and HLA-shared epitope alleles. Cox regression was applied to the data to identify independent predictors in a model. RESULTS: 267 individuals were included with median follow up of 49 months (IQR: 22-60). 101 (38%) developed arthritis after median 14 months (IQR: 6-27). The analysis identified that presence of at least one ACPA reactivity (HR 8.0, 95% CI 2.9-22), ultrasound detected tenosynovitis (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.0-6.0), IL6 levels (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8) and IL15-Rα levels (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9) are significant independent predictors for arthritis progression in a prediction model (Harrell's C 0.76 [SE 0.02], AUC 0.82 [95% CI 0.76-0.89], cross-validated AUC 0.70 [95% CI 0.56-0.85]). CONCLUSION: We propose a high-Risk-RA phase characterized by presence of ACPA reactivity, tenosynovitis, IL6, and IL15-Rα and suggest that these factors need to be further investigated for their biological effects and clinical values, to identify individuals at particular low risk and high risk for arthritis progression.

Register-based observational study of associations between inflammatory remission, formal treatment targets and the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs among patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between inflammatory remission, formal treatment targets and the likelihood of starting a new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), among patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with RA were identified in the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (n=11 784). Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and DMARD-treatment were assessed at RA diagnosis and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter. Inflammatory remission was defined as: swollen joints (0-28)=0 and C reactive protein <10 mg/L and normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The primary treatment target was DAS28 remission (<2.6). The proportion of patients in inflammatory remission who failed to reach DAS28 targets was assessed at each follow-up visit, and their likelihood of starting a new DMARD was compared with patients in inflammatory remission who reached the treatment target. rate ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were estimated with modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Overall, 34%, 39%, 44% and 47% were in inflammatory remission at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Among these, 20%, 22%, 20% and 19%, respectively, failed to reach DAS28 remission. Patients who failed to reach DAS28 remission despite being in inflammatory remission were more likely to start a new DMARD treatment (RR (95% CI) at 6 months=1.59 (1.29 to 1.96), 12 months=1.52 (1.23 to 1.87)) and 24 months=1.47 (1.20 to 1.80). CONCLUSION: Failing to reach formal treatment targets, despite being in inflammatory remission, is common among patients with early RA, and is associated with an increased likelihood of starting a new DMARD-treatment.

Certolizumab pegol, abatacept, tocilizumab or active conventional treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week clinical and radiographic results of the investigator-initiated randomised controlled NORD-STAR trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal first-line treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is debated. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of active conventional therapy with each of three biological treatments with different modes of action. METHODS: Investigator-initiated, randomised, blinded-assessor study. Patients with treatment-naïve early RA with moderate-severe disease activity were randomised 1:1:1:1 to methotrexate combined with (1) active conventional therapy: oral prednisolone (tapered quickly, discontinued at week 36) or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in swollen joints; (2) certolizumab pegol; (3) abatacept or (4) tocilizumab. Coprimary endpoints were week 48 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (CDAI ≤2.8) and change in radiographic van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score, estimated using logistic regression and analysis of covariance, adjusted for sex, anticitrullinated protein antibody status and country. Bonferroni's and Dunnet's procedures adjusted for multiple testing (significance level: 0.025). RESULTS: Eight hundred and twelve patients were randomised. Adjusted CDAI remission rates at week 48 were: 59.3% (abatacept), 52.3% (certolizumab), 51.9% (tocilizumab) and 39.2% (active conventional therapy). Compared with active conventional therapy, CDAI remission rates were significantly higher for abatacept (adjusted difference +20.1%, p<0.001) and certolizumab (+13.1%, p=0.021), but not for tocilizumab (+12.7%, p=0.030). Key secondary clinical outcomes were consistently better in biological groups. Radiographic progression was low, without group differences.The proportions of patients with serious adverse events were abatacept, 8.3%; certolizumab, 12.4%; tocilizumab, 9.2%; and active conventional therapy, 10.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with active conventional therapy, clinical remission rates were superior for abatacept and certolizumab pegol, but not for tocilizumab. Radiographic progression was low and similar between treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01491815.

Unmet Needs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Subgroup of Patients With High Levels of Pain, Fatigue, and Psychosocial Distress 3 Years After Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to identify subgroups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on their health status 3 years after diagnosis and to assess potential associations to clinical presentation at diagnosis. METHODS: This observational study included patients with RA with 3-year follow-up data from the Swedish Epidemiological Investigation of RA study, collected from 2011 to 2018. Hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis, based on symptoms of pain, fatigue, sleep quality, mood disturbances, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL), was used to identify subgroups 3 years after diagnosis. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between the subgroups and patient characteristics at diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 1055 individuals constituted the study population, of whom 1011 had complete data on the clustering variables and were therefore eligible for analysis (73% women, median age 58 years). The following three clusters were identified: cluster 1 (466 patients with good health status), cluster 2 (398 patients in an intermediate group), and cluster 3 (147 patients with high levels of pain and fatigue together with markedly impaired HRQoL). Cluster 3 was associated to higher baseline pain (RR: 3.71 [95% CI: 2.14-6.41]), global health (RR: 6.60 [95% CI: 3.53-12.33]), and the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (RR: 4.40 [95% CI: 2.46-7.87]), compared with cluster 1 (highest compared with lowest quartiles). An inverse association was seen for baseline swollen joint count (RR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.34-0.85]). CONCLUSION: A subgroup of patients with RA experience high levels of pain, fatigue, and psychosocial distress 3 years after diagnosis. This subgroup already displayed pronounced pain and functional disabilities at diagnosis.

Active conventional treatment and three different biological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis: phase IV investigator initiated, randomised, observer blinded clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING: Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS: Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI≤2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS: 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18.7%) for abatacept, and -0.6% (-10.1% to 8.9%) for tocilizumab. Key secondary outcomes showed no major differences among the four treatments. Differences in CDAI remission rates for active conventional treatment versus certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not abatacept, remained within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15% (per protocol population). The total number of serious adverse events was 13 (percentage of patients who experienced at least one event 5.6%) for active conventional treatment, 20 (8.4%) for certolizumab pegol, 10 (4.9%) for abatacept, and 10 (4.9%) for tocilizumab. Eleven patients treated with abatacept stopped treatment early compared with 20-23 patients in the other arms. CONCLUSIONS: All four treatments achieved high remission rates. Higher CDAI remission rate was observed for abatacept versus active conventional treatment, but not for certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment. Other remission rates were similar across treatments. Non-inferiority analysis indicated that active conventional treatment was non-inferior to certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not to abatacept. The results highlight the efficacy and safety of active conventional treatment based on methotrexate combined with corticosteroids, with nominally better results for abatacept, in treatment naive early rheumatoid arthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT2011-004720-35, NCT01491815.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients display B-cell dysregulation already in the naïve repertoire consistent with defects in B-cell tolerance.

B cells are postulated to be central in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we use exploratory mass cytometry (n = 23) and next-generation sequencing (n = 19) to study B-cell repertoire shifts in RA patients. Expression of several B-cell markers were significantly different in ACPA+ RA compared to healthy controls, including an increase in HLA-DR across subsets, CD22 in clusters of IgM+ B cells and CD11c in IgA+ memory. Moreover, both IgA+ and IgG+ double negative (IgD- CD27-) CD11c+ B cells were increased in ACPA+ RA, and there was a trend for elevation in a CXCR5/CCR6high transitional B-cell cluster. In the RA BCR repertoire, there were significant differences in subclass distribution and, notably, the frequency of VH with low somatic hypermutation (SHM) was strikingly higher, especially in IgG1 (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, both ACPA+ and ACPA- RA patients had significantly higher total serum IgA and IgM compared to controls, based on serology of larger cohorts (n = 3494 IgA; n = 397 IgM). The observed elevated Ig-levels, distortion in IgM+ B cells, increase in double negative B cells, change in B-cell markers, and elevation of unmutated IgG+ B cells suggests defects in B-cell tolerance in RA. This may represent an underlying cause of increased polyreactivity and autoimmunity in RA.