RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Scale-up of insecticide-based interventions has averted more than 500 million malaria cases since 2000. Increasing insecticide resistance could herald a rebound in disease and mortality. We aimed to investigate whether insecticide resistance was associated with loss of effectiveness of long-lasting insecticidal nets and increased malaria disease burden. METHODS: This WHO-coordinated, prospective, observational cohort study was done at 279 clusters (villages or groups of villages in which phenotypic resistance was measurable) in Benin, Cameroon, India, Kenya, and Sudan. Pyrethroid long-lasting insecticidal nets were the principal form of malaria vector control in all study areas; in Sudan this approach was supplemented by indoor residual spraying. Cohorts of children from randomly selected households in each cluster were recruited and followed up by community health workers to measure incidence of clinical malaria and prevalence of infection. Mosquitoes were assessed for susceptibility to pyrethroids using the standard WHO bioassay test. Country-specific results were combined using meta-analysis. FINDINGS: Between June 2, 2012, and Nov 4, 2016, 40â000 children were enrolled and assessed for clinical incidence during 1·4 million follow-up visits. 80â000 mosquitoes were assessed for insecticide resistance. Long-lasting insecticidal net users had lower infection prevalence (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·63, 95% CI 0·51-0·78) and disease incidence (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 0·62, 0·41-0·94) than did non-users across a range of resistance levels. We found no evidence of an association between insecticide resistance and infection prevalence (adjusted OR 0·86, 0·70-1·06) or incidence (adjusted RR 0·89, 0·72-1·10). Users of nets, although significantly better protected than non-users, were nevertheless subject to high malaria infection risk (ranging from an average incidence in net users of 0·023, [95% CI 0·016-0·033] per person-year in India, to 0·80 [0·65-0·97] per person year in Kenya; and an average infection prevalence in net users of 0·8% [0·5-1·3] in India to an average infection prevalence of 50·8% [43·4-58·2] in Benin). INTERPRETATION: Irrespective of resistance, populations in malaria endemic areas should continue to use long-lasting insecticidal nets to reduce their risk of infection. As nets provide only partial protection, the development of additional vector control tools should be prioritised to reduce the unacceptably high malaria burden. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and UK Department for International Development.
Asunto(s)
Culicidae , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida , Malaria , Control de Mosquitos , Mosquitos Vectores , Piretrinas , Adolescente , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Culicidae/efectos de los fármacos , India/epidemiología , Resistencia a los Insecticidas , Internacionalidad , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/transmisión , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Mosquitos Vectores/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Prospectivos , Piretrinas/farmacología , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
Insecticide-based interventions have contributed to â¼78% of the reduction in the malaria burden in sub-Saharan Africa since 2000. Insecticide resistance in malaria vectors could presage a catastrophic rebound in disease incidence and mortality. A major impediment to the implementation of insecticide resistance management strategies is that evidence of the impact of resistance on malaria disease burden is limited. A cluster randomized trial was conducted in Sudan with pyrethroid-resistant and carbamate-susceptible malaria vectors. Clusters were randomly allocated to receive either long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) alone or LLINs in combination with indoor residual spraying (IRS) with a pyrethroid (deltamethrin) insecticide in the first year and a carbamate (bendiocarb) insecticide in the two subsequent years. Malaria incidence was monitored for 3 y through active case detection in cohorts of children aged 1 to <10 y. When deltamethrin was used for IRS, incidence rates in the LLIN + IRS arm and the LLIN-only arm were similar, with the IRS providing no additional protection [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-3.0; P = 0.96)]. When bendiocarb was used for IRS, there was some evidence of additional protection [interaction IRR = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.40-0.76; P < 0.001)]. In conclusion, pyrethroid resistance may have had an impact on pyrethroid-based IRS. The study was not designed to assess whether resistance had an impact on LLINs. These data alone should not be used as the basis for any policy change in vector control interventions.
Asunto(s)
Anopheles , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Insecticidas , Malaria Falciparum , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Nitrilos , Fenilcarbamatos , Piretrinas , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Insecticidas/economía , Insecticidas/farmacología , Malaria Falciparum/economía , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Masculino , Nitrilos/economía , Nitrilos/farmacología , Fenilcarbamatos/economía , Fenilcarbamatos/farmacología , Piretrinas/economía , Piretrinas/farmacología , Sudán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The use of pyrethroid insecticides in malaria vector control has increased dramatically in the past decade through the scale up of insecticide treated net distribution programmes and indoor residual spraying campaigns. Inevitably, the major malaria vectors have developed resistance to these insecticides and the resistance alleles are spreading at an exceptionally rapid rate throughout Africa. Although substantial progress has been made on understanding the causes of pyrethroid resistance, remarkably few studies have focused on the epidemiological impact of resistance on current malaria control activities. As we move into the malaria eradication era, it is vital that the implications of insecticide resistance are understood and strategies to mitigate these effects are implemented.
Asunto(s)
Anopheles/microbiología , Resistencia a los Insecticidas , Insecticidas/farmacología , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Piretrinas/farmacología , Animales , Humanos , Insectos Vectores/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Different procedures for drying polyamide (nylon) hammock nets (approximately 10 m2) posttreatment were evaluated. Forty-three nets were soaked for 10 min in a plastic bowl containing a solution of water and lambdacyhalothrin 0.05% (target dose of 10 mg/m2). Twenty-two freshly treated nets were put to dry in the sun: 13 of them hung vertically with the roof of the hammock net at the top and the hem at the bottom, and the other 9 were folded and laid flat on a plastic sheet. The rest of the nets (21) were dried in the shade: 11 of them hung vertically and 10 were folded flat on a plastic sheet. After 6-7 h, 2 15-cm2 samples of each net were cut, one on top of the lateral side and one 40 cm from the edge. Concentrations of lambdacyhalothrin were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry on subsamples of netting (1 cm2). The mean insecticide concentrations of samples were compared between nets that were dried in the sun or in the shade, and placed to dry either hanging vertically or folded flat. In general, no differences were found between the mean insecticide concentrations of nets that were dried vertically in the sun or in the shade, or those dried flat in the shade. However, the mean dose was considerably lower in the remaining nets, which were dried flat in the sun. The reason for this is unclear but is hypothesized to be an effect of temperature. Results indicated that nets hung vertically either in the sun or shade dried faster than those laid flat. Based on the time to dry and mean insecticide extracted, it is recommended to hang treated nets vertically in the sun for drying.