RESUMEN
Summary The concomitance between coronary artery disease and carotid artery disease is known and well documented. However, it is a fact that, despite the screening methods for these conditions and the advances in surgical treatment, little has been achieved in terms of reducing the risk of complications in the perioperative period. Publications are scarce, being mostly composed of reports or case series. There is little agreement on the best initial therapeutic approach (myocardial versus carotid revascularization) or the best technique to be used (surgery with or without extracorporeal circulation, hybrid treatments, etc.). The authors performed a review of the evidence in this clinical scenario, raising pragmatic questions that help in the therapeutic decision.
Resumo A concomitância entre doença arterial coronária e doença carotídea é conhecida e já bem documentada. Fato é, porém, que, a despeito dos métodos de rastreio dessas condições e da evolução do tratamento cirúrgico, pouco se tem conseguido em termos de redução de risco de complicações no perioperatório. As publicações são escassas, sendo em sua maior parte compostas por relatos ou séries de caso. Há pouco consenso sobre qual a melhor abordagem terapêutica inicial (revascularização miocárdica versus carotídea), bem como sobre a melhor técnica a ser empregada (cirurgia com ou sem uso de circulação extracorpórea, tratamentos híbridos, etc.). Os autores realizaram uma revisão da evidência nesse cenário clínico, pontuando questões pragmáticas que ajudem na decisão terapêutica.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Revascularización Miocárdica , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The concomitance between coronary artery disease and carotid artery disease is known and well documented. However, it is a fact that, despite the screening methods for these conditions and the advances in surgical treatment, little has been achieved in terms of reducing the risk of complications in the perioperative period. Publications are scarce, being mostly composed of reports or case series. There is little agreement on the best initial therapeutic approach (myocardial versus carotid revascularization) or the best technique to be used (surgery with or without extracorporeal circulation, hybrid treatments, etc.). The authors performed a review of the evidence in this clinical scenario, raising pragmatic questions that help in the therapeutic decision.