The role of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases.

AIM: To identify by means of clinical and histopathological features a subset of breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph-node (sN) micrometastases and metastatic disease confined only to the sN in order to spare them an unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2004, 116 patients with sN micrometastases underwent standard ALND for early-stage (T1-2 N0 M0) invasive breast cancer; clinical and histopathologic parameters were prospectively collected and evaluated by means of univariate and logistic regression analysis in order to identify which patients with sN micrometastases were free of metastasis in axillary non-sN. RESULTS: Sixteen of 116 patients with sN micrometastases had tumour involvement of non-sN, with six and 10 patients having non-sN micrometastases and macrometastases, respectively. None of 19 patients with primary tumour measuring

The prognostic role of the sentinel lymph node in clinically node-negative patients with cutaneous melanoma: experience of the Genoa group.

AIM: To define the benefit of intraoperative frozen section examination of the sentinel lymph node (sN), and to assess its prognostic value in clinically node-negative melanoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1993 and December 2001, 214 patients with Stage I-II cutaneous melanoma underwent sN biopsy; complete follow-up data are available in 169 of 175 patients who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, lymphatic mapping with Patent Blue-V and radio-guided surgery (RGS). RESULTS: In an initial subset, the sN was identified in 35 out of 39 patients; in the principal group of 169 patients, the sN was detected in all patients. The benefit of frozen section examination, that is the proportion of all patients having intraoperative histologic examination who tested positive, was 17.2% (29/169); notably, in patients with pT(1-2) vs pT(3-4) melanoma the corresponding values were 2.3 and 33.3%, respectively, (P=0.000). Cox regression analysis for overall survival indicated that sN-positive patients had a two-fold increased risk of death; the most significant predictors of relapse-free survival were sN status (P=0.004), age (P=0.015), and T stage grouping (P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The sN is a reliable predictor of regional lymph node status in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Frozen section examination can be useful in avoiding a 'two-stage' operative procedure in patients with tumour-positive sN, but its greatest benefit seems to be restricted to patients with pT(3)-pT(4) primary melanoma.

Phase II study of weekly oxaliplatin and high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) has proven efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although the optimal dosage and administration schedule are still unclear. This phase II trial investigated the tolerability and activity of weekly oxaliplatin, high-dose infusional 5-FU and LV in pretreated patients with metastatic CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received weekly courses of i.v. oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 (1-h infusion), LV 100 mg/m2 (1-h infusion) and 5-FU 2100 mg/m2 (24-h infusion) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NCI-CTC criteria were used for assessment of side-effects (at each cycle) and WHO criteria for assessment of tumour response (every 8 cycles). For descriptive purposes, time to progression, overall survival and duration of objective response were also calculated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled and received a total of 606 cycles (median 13/patient, range 4-33), and 70% of courses (421/606) were delivered at 100% of the planned dose. The most frequent side-effects were gastrointestinal and neurological and incidence rates were: diarrhoea 66% (grade III: 29%), nausea/vomiting 54%, neurotoxicity 34% (grade III: 2%), fatigue 27%, mucositis 22%, leucopenia 14%. No grade IV toxicity was observed. Objective response rates were: partial response 23% (10 patients), stable disease 59% (26) and progressive disease 11% (5). Median time to progression was 7 months, overall survival 13 months and the duration of partial response and stable disease were 9 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that this regimen has a favourable tolerability profile and is an active combination in the pretreated metastatic CRC patient, deserving further evaluation in phase III trials.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colon cancer: randomized multicenter trial of the Italian National Intergroup of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer (INTACC).

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the addition of leucovorin to the combination 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole prolongs disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with radically resected colon cancer (Dukes' B(2-3) and C). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (1703) were accrued between March 1992 and February 1995 in a large-scale clinical trial within five Italian cooperative groups. After stratification for center, patients were randomized as follows: arm A, 5-fluorouracil [450 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on days 1-5] and levamisole (150 mg orally for 3 days, every 14 days for 6 months) versus arm B, 6-S-leucovorin (100 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5) followed by 5-fluorouracil (370 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5), plus levamisole (as arm A), every 4 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 6.4 years no significant difference was seen for either disease-free survival (58% versus 60%, not significant) or 5-year overall survival (68% versus 71%, not significant), respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity (World Health Organization grade 3/4) was more frequent in arm B (8% versus 18%, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial the schedules used showed no statistically significant differences in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Impact of the treating institution on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation.

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible impact of the treating institution on the survival of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy alone or concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation. The National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa (IST) was the coordinator of two multicentre randomised trials comparing an alternating chemotherapy and radiation approach to radiotherapy alone with standard fractionation (HN-8 trial: 157 patients) or accelerated fractionation (HN-9 trial: 136 patients) in patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A single database of the two studies was created and a univariate analysis was performed. The Cox regression model, adjusted for the effect of other prognostic factors, was used to test the impact of the treating institution on survival. Three-year overall survival was 46% for patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation at the coordinating centre and 27% for those treated with the same approach at the affiliated centres (P=0.0001). No difference was detected between patients treated with radiation alone at the coordinating centre or outside (23% versus 21%: P=0.52). The hazard ratio of death for patients treated at the affiliated centres with concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation was 2.15 (95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) 1.45-3.18), while it was 1.003 (95% C.I. 0.65-1.55) for those treated with radiation alone. In our experience, the treating institution had a significant impact only on the prognosis of patients treated with the multidisciplinary approach. This finding has implications, both in terms of clinical research and clinical practice.

First-line chemotherapy with epidoxorubicin, paclitaxel, and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: A combination of carboplatin (CBDCA) and paclitaxel (TAX) is the standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients. Epidoxorubicin (EDX) is an active treatment in AOC and exhibits nonoverlapping toxicities with CBDCA and TAX; moreover, when added to platinum-based chemotherapy, it improves long-term survival. We have therefore conducted a phase II study to evaluate the tolerability and antitumor activity of an EDX/TAX/CBDCA (ETC) triplet in AOC patients. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed suboptimal stage III-IV ovarian cancer who had not previously received cytotoxic drugs were treated with TAX (175 mg/m(2) in a 3-h iv infusion), CBDCA (AUC 6, Calvert formula), and EDX (75 mg/m(2) iv bolus) all given on day 1 every 28 days for a maximum of six courses on an outpatient basis. EDX dosage was chosen after a pilot phase I study. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were registered, of whom 5 were determined ineligible bacause of age. Forty-two of the 50 are evaluable for response; 27 (64%) achieved a clinical complete response (CR) and 9 (21%) a partial response (PR) for a response rate of 86% (95% CI 71-94%). Thirty-three patients underwent a secondary debulking procedure after a median of 6 courses (range 2-6). Pathological CR and PR were observed in 9 (27.3%) and 21 (63.6%), respectively; among patients with persistent disease a successful cytoreduction (<1 cm) was obtained in 53.8% of patients. At a median follow up of 35.6 months (range 0-55.5) median progression-free survival is 19.5 months and median overall survival is 36 months. The most common adverse effects were G3-4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia which occurred in 59 and 37% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ETC combination given according to the outlined doses and schedule is highly active in AOC patients with poor prognostic factors and deserves further study.

Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3 weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm B) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.

Alternating chemoradiotherapy versus partly accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from a phase III randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously have found that in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN), alternating chemoradiotherapy (ALT) was superior to low-total-dose conventional radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the same chemoradiotherapy approach with high-total-dose partly accelerated radiotherapy. METHODS: During 6 years, 136 consecutive patients with previously untreated unfavorable Stage II or Stage III-IV (International Union Against Cancer) SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to chemotherapy consisting of 4 cycles of intravenous cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) of body surface area per day for 5 consecutive days) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2) per day for 5 consecutive days; weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) alternated with three 2-week courses of radiotherapy (20 grays [Gy] per course, 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week; ALT, 70 patients) or to partly accelerated radiotherapy with final concomitant boost technique (75 Gy/40 fractions in 6 weeks; partly accelerated radiotherapy [PA-RT], 66 patients). RESULTS: At the median follow-up of 60 months (range, 30-102 months), no statistical differences were observed in overall survival, progression free survival, or locoregional control between the 2 treatments. Actuarial 3-year overall survival and progression free survival were 37% and 35%, respectively, in the ALT group and 29% and 27%, respectively, in PA-RT group. The median overall survival and progression free survival were 24 and 15 months, respectively, in the ALT arm and 18 and 11 months, respectively, in PA-RT arm. Actuarial 3-year locoregional control rates were 32% in the ALT group and 27% in the PA-RT group. At multivariate analysis, tumor classification was the only factor that emerged as a significant independent variable affecting overall survival. Patients treated in the PA-RT arm experienced higher Grade 3+ (World Health Organization) acute skin and mucosal reactions than patients in the ALT arm. Moreover, local late mucosal and skin toxicities occurred more often in patients treated with PA-RT. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to disclose statistically significant differences in the outcome of patients treated with either ALT or PA-RT. Therefore, definitive conclusions could not be made. However, acute skin effects and late mucosal and skin toxicities above the clavicles appeared to be significantly lower with chemoradiotherapy.

Identification of the highest dose of docetaxel associable with active doses of epirubicin. Results from a dose-finding study in advanced breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel in combination with fixed doses of epirubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were given docetaxel, 60 mg/m2 in escalated doses by steps of 10 mg/m2, in association with two fixed doses of epirubicin (90 mg/m2, and 75 mg/m2). Since neutropenia was foreseen to be the most likely DLT, a third group with prophylactic G-CSF support was planned to define the MTD of docetaxel with 90 mg/m2 of epirubicin. Selected patients underwent pharmacokinetic evaluation of docetaxel. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients entered the study. At the first step (90 mg/m2 of epirubicin) the MTD was obtained at 60 mg/m2 of docetaxel. At the second step (75 mg/m2 of epirubicin) the MTD of docetaxel was 80 mg/m2. At the third step (epirubicin 90 mg/m2) G-CSF allowed a safe escalation of docetaxel up to 90 mg/m2. Neutropenia was the most common hematological adverse event. Without G-CSF, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 69% of cycles, of which 11% was complicated by fever. In G-CSF group, grade 4 neutropenia and neutropenic fever occurred in 31% and 3%, respectively. Most frequent non-hematological adverse effects were asthenia (45%), nausea (39%) and mucositis (36%). No patient developed congestive heart failure. Two toxic deaths occurred. Overall response rate was 73% in 42 out of 58 patients, with no apparent epirubicin dose-related effect. No statistically significant effect of the two doses of epirubicin was observed in docetaxel pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the toxicity profile, the docetaxel pharmacokinetics and the response rate observed, epirubicin 75 mg/m2 combined with docetaxel 80 mg/m2 can be recommended for further studies.

Combined regimen of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and alpha-2b interferon in the treatment of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: a Phase II multicenter trial of the Italian Group on Rare Tumors (GITR) and the Italian Lung Cancer Task Force (FONICAP).

BACKGROUND: The cisplatin-doxorubicin combination has shown moderate activity in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM; objective response, 25%), and preclinical studies suggest that interferons (IFNs) may have an antiproliferative effect on mesothelioma cell lines with a marked increase in cisplatin cytotoxicity. Therefore, the combined chemoimmunotherapy regimen is an worthwhile approach to evaluate in a Phase II trial. METHODS: From December 1995 to June 1999, 37 previously untreated patients with MPM were treated with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Day 1 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2), recycled every 3-4 weeks and IFN-alpha-2b, 3 x 10((6)) international units subcutaneously 3 times a week for a total of 6 courses or until progression. Inclusion criteria were histologic diagnosis of MPM and measurable disease defined by computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 35 for efficacy according to World Health Organization criteria. One hundred thirty-five courses were administered with a median of 4 cycles per patients. Seventy-six percent of patient presented at least 1 episode of severe myelosuppression (Grade 3 and 4). Severe anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 30% and 24% of patients, respectively. Sixty percent of patients presented constitutional symptoms. In the 35 patients assessable for response, the overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval, 15-47%). The median duration of response was 8.4 months. With a median follow-up of 19.6 months, the median survival was 9.3 months. One- and 2-year survival was 45% and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This combined regimen has definite activity in MPM. However, toxicity, particularly myelosuppression and fatigue, is not negligible and may limit its application.

Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) chemotherapy regimen with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces a higher activity and efficacy compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IV breast cancer patients were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days (CEF21) or accelerated-intensified CEF (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 14 days (HD-CEF14) with the support of G-CSF. Treatment was administered for eight cycles. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were randomized (74 patients on the CEF21 arm and 77 on the HD-CEF14 arm). In both arms, the median number of administered cycles was eight. The dose-intensity actually administered was 93% and 86% of that planned, in CEF21- and HD-CEF14-treated patients, respectively. Compared with the CEF21 arm, the dose-intensity increase in the HD-CEF14 arm was 80%. Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were higher in the HD-CEF14 arm than in the CEF21 arm. During chemotherapy, four deaths occurred in the HD-CEF14 arm. No difference in overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was observed: 49% and 51% in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.94). A slightly non-statistically significant higher percentage of complete response was observed in the HD-CEF14 arm (20% v 15%). No difference in efficacy was observed. The median time to progression was 14.3 and 12.8 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.69). Median overall survival was 32.7 and 27.2 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.16). CONCLUSION: In metastatic breast cancer patients, an 80% increase in dose-intensity of the CEF regimen, obtained by both acceleration and dose intensification, does not improve the activity and the efficacy compared with a standard dose-intensity CEF regimen.

Advanced ovarian cancer in the elderly: results of consecutive trials with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

From 1982 through 1996, 547 untreated advanced ovarian cancer patients were entered onto Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest (GONO) consecutive randomized trials including cisplatin-based chemotherapy. End points of analysis included the influence of age on prognosis, toxicity, clinical/surgical response rates, progression-free survival and survival. Of the entire study group, 116 patients were 65 years of age or older at diagnosis. WHO main toxicity (any grade) consisted of: emesis (93% of patients), myelotoxicity (leukopenia in 52%, anemia in 51% and thrombocytopenia in 17% of patients), nephrotoxicity in 13% of patients and neurotoxicity in 10% of patients. No significant difference in toxicity was evident between patients > or = or <65 years. Refusal of CT and early (< or =2 courses) interruption of CT due to toxicity were more frequent in elderly patients (3.4 vs. 1.4%; 3.4 vs. 0.7%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 71 months no difference was observed in survival and progression-free survival between younger and older patients. Cox multiple regression analysis of the entire study population demonstrated that age >65 years per se was not a negative prognostic factor.

Thymidine labeling index analysis in early breast cancer patients randomized to receive perioperative chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify through a substudy of a larger, multicenter study of adjuvant treatment in primary operable breast cancer patients any possible correlation between cellular proliferation rate, measured by thymidine labeling index (TLI), and perioperative chemotherapy (periCT). METHODS: TLI was measured in slices of early breast carcinoma patients. The main trial was designed to randomize patients after primary surgery to receive one cycle of periCT consisting of cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil, or no periCT. RESULTS: Of 600 patients randomized into the main study, 197 were eligible for inclusion in this substudy. Characteristics of patients were quite similar to those of the entire population entered into the main study. The TLI cutoff value in our series was 0.7% expressed as the median percentage ratio of thymidine-labeled cells undergoing DNA synthesis in the tumor cell population of specimens from the 197 patients. No differences were observed in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after grouping the patients by TLI value (low and high) and by treatment. Among node-negative patients, a significant improvement in terms of OS (p = 0.02), but not RFS (p = 0.06), was seen in patients with a high-TLI value who underwent periCT versus controls. CONCLUSIONS: TLI may be a useful tool for the identification of node-negative patients with high-TLI values who may benefit from periCT.

Preliminary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of adjuvant postoperative RT vs. postoperative RT plus 5-FU and levamisole in patients with TNM stage II-III resectable rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Two-hundred eighteen patients with TNM stage II-III resectable rectal cancer, enrolled into a randomized clinical trial, were assessed for efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy (RT) vs. those of combined RT and chemotherapy (CT), with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole. End points were overall survival, disease-free survival, the rate of loco-regional recurrence, and treatment-related toxicity. METHODS: Patients in arm I underwent RT (50 Gy) in daily fractions of 2 Gy, 5 days/week for 5 weeks. Patients in arm II began with 5-FU (450 mg/m(2)/day intravenous bolus, days 1-5) plus levamisole (150 mg/day orally, days 1-3); postoperative RT was delivered during week 2 at the same dosage and schedule as in arm I. The other five cycles of CT (5-FU every 28 days and levamisole every 15 days for the length of 5-FU administration) continued after the end of RT if clinical and hemato-biochemical parameters were normal. RESULTS: RT was completed or modified in 170 (90%) of 189 evaluable patients undergoing RT (both treatment groups). Only 44 (59%) of 75 evaluable patients of arm II completed or had an adjustment of the CT schedule; the remaining 31 patients (41%) had to stop or never started the CT regimen. Patients undergoing combined RT and CT had more severe toxicity (enteritis, P = 0.03). There was one CT-related death (gastrointestinal bleeding) in this subset. No significant difference was observed in outcome of patients in the two study groups, nor for pattern of recurrence (heterogeneity chi(2) = 4.82; d.f. = 2; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest a similar efficacy, coupled with less morbidity, of postoperative RT alone compared with a combined regimen of postoperative RT and CT in patients undergoing radical surgery for stage II-III rectal cancer.

[Guidelines: some considerations on one of the cultural instruments on which the switch in the National Health System can be based]. / Le linee guida: alcune considerazioni su uno degli strumenti culturali su cui si potrebbe fondare la svolta del Sistema Sanitario Nazionale.

In the last few years there has been an explosion of interest in guidelines, reflected in a vivid debate in the international literature. Guidelines for medical practice are not innovative tools, since their history began at least 20 years ago. They are produced with increasing frequency in North America, and similar developments are taking place in Europe. The concept of improving the quality of the services in the National Health System through the production and implementation of valid clinical guidelines has been recognized in Italy by the Ministry of Health, who introduced such a concept in the last reform of the law on the Sanitary Health System. Many international authors deem that clinical guidelines are a way to support effective clinical practice. If this still holds, and we believe it does, then we must ensure that these guidelines are effective. Also for the enthusiast, the entire process from the development to the dissemination, implementation, and evaluation is not an easy task. Guidelines should be written correctly by a multidisciplinary panel of experts, should be peer reviewed and updated. Guidelines should become the common field in which the four major parties of the sanitary "market" (a market far from ideal today) meet: the patient, the doctor, the manager, and the industry involved in medical technology. Guidelines should be disseminated and implemented: simply having evidence available does not necessarily mean that it will be used. Thus, the key question is not so much related to the acceptance of best practice, but the extent to which a guideline is cost-effective. In this review we have tried to discuss such points, taking into consideration all the steps, the discussions, the controversial points, and the unsolved questions which are smoldering under both the potential benefit of practice guidelines (also in the light of appropriateness of medical practice), and all the possible effects on clinical autonomy, health care costs, clinical practice satisfaction, legal implications, and conflicts of interest. It is crucial for medical associations, and indeed for all physicians, to take up this problem and constructively try to play an active part in the process, avoiding the possibility that controversial guidelines be imposed by the regulatory authorities.

Single agent epirubicin as first line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients.

In order to better explore the toxicity and the activity of high dose epirubicin (120 mg/m2, 3 weeks) we analyzed a population of 127 metastatic breast cancer patients, treated in a randomized clinical trial conducted to evaluate the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against epirubicin induced cardiotoxicity. All the patients had a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer, an ECOG performance status < or = 2 and normal hematologic, renal, hepatic and cardiac function. No prior adjuvant chemotherapy including anthracycline was allowed. Epirubicin was given at the dose of 120 mg/m2 i.v. bolus every 3 weeks. One hundred twenty five patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Seventeen patients (11%) had a complete response and 47 patients (37%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 48%. The median progression free and overall survivals were 8.3 months and 18.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia were observed in 8% and 7% of the patients, respectively. The most frequent nonhematological grade 3 toxicities were alopecia (87%), nausea and vomiting (16%), and mucositis (8%). Cardiotoxicity, defined as occurrence of congestive heart failure, decrease in resting left ventricular ejection fraction (L-VEF) to < or = 45%, or 20 EF units decrease from baseline L-VEF, was observed in 19% of the patients, after a median cumulative dose of epirubicin of 720 mg/m2 (range 120-1440). This study confirms in a large series of patients the activity of high dose epirubicin; however, the high incidence of cardiotoxicity requires a careful evaluation of cardiac risk factors before treatment.

Increasing dose of continuous infusion ifosfamide and fixed dose of bolus epirubicin in soft tissue sarcomas. A study of the Italian group on rare tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of ifosfamide when given as a continuous infusion and in combination with fixed doses of bolus 4'-epidoxorubicin in advanced previously untreated adult soft tissue sarcoma patients. METHODS: Treatment consisted of epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2 days one and two, and ifosfamide, 1.5 g/m2 every 12 hrs as a 72-hr infusion, at the first level. Further levels of ifosfamide were defined as increments of 12 hrs of the same infusion program. G-CSF 300 microg/die was administered from days +7 to +14. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: G4 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia of > or =5 days; any G3 neuro or nephrotoxicity; G4 toxicity of any kind. Patients had to complete at least 2 consecutive cycles, and MTD was defined as the level in which 20% of patients developed a DLT; 10-15 patients were entered in each level. RESULTS: First level: overall, 13 patients entered, 3 were not assessable for MTD, and only one developed a DLT. Second level: 18 patients entered, 3 were not assessable for MTD. Hematologic DLT was observed in 3/15 assessable patients. Therefore, the MTD was found at the ifosfamide level of 10.5 g/m2 given in 84 hrs. Eight patients of 29 assessable for response achieved an objective response: 1 complete and 7 partial. The overall response rate was 28% (95% CI: 13-47%). CONCLUSIONS: If we accept 4-day G4 leukopenia as a reliable cutoff for safety, ifosfamide intensification cannot be substantially exploited over already available schedules with the combination of ifosfamide and anthracyclines.

Immunohistochemical quantitation of thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether immunohistochemical thymidylate synthase (TS) quantitation predicts for clinical outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated by fluorouracil (FUra)-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TS levels were measured immunohistochemically on archival specimens of colorectal cancer metastases from 48 patients homogenously treated by bolus FUra plus methotrexate alternating with continuous-infusion FUra plus leucovorin. These measurements were retrospectively correlated with patient characteristics and clinical outcome. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between intratumoral TS expression and all the parameters of clinical outcome analyzed. In patients whose tumors had low (n = 27) and high (n = 21) TS levels, the overall response rates were 67% and 24%, respectively (P =.003). The percentage of tumor shrinkage after chemotherapy was linearly related to TS immunoreactivity (r =.56, P =.00004), and its mean values were 65% and 14% with low and high TS levels, respectively (P =.0001). By logistic regression analysis, low TS expression was the single best predictor of response to chemotherapy (relative probability, 5.0). In patients with low and high TS expression, the median time to progression was 9.6 months v 6.2 months (P =.005) and the median survival time 18.4 months v 15.4 months (P =.02), respectively. Two- and 3-year survival rates were 41% v 15% and 19% v 0% (P =.02), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of homogenously treated patients, intratumor TS content was a major predictor of clinical outcome. Immunohistochemical TS quantitation provides a convenient, low-cost technique for identifying patients unresponsive to TS inhibitors who may be candidates for alternative chemotherapy regimens.

Adoptive immunotherapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2 plus interferon alfa-2a for melanoma patients with nonresectable distant disease: a phase I/II pilot trial. Melanoma Istituto Scientifico Tumori Group.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of our previous experience, we designed this study to determine the activity and toxicity of outpatient treatment with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) together with intermediate-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and low-dose recombinant interferon alfa-2a (rIFN-alpha2a), for patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Between April 1992 and October 1994, we processed 38 melanoma samples derived from 36 patients with metastases. Proliferative cultures of expanded lymphocytes (TIL) were infused only once into patients with metastatic melanoma. rIL-2 was administered subcutaneously for 1 month, starting on the day of TIL infusion, at an escalating dose of 6-18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day for the first week and at the maximum-tolerated dose for the subsequent 3 weeks and then, after a 15-day interval, for 1 week/month for 3 months. rIFN-alpha2a was administered subcutaneously at 3 X 10(6) IU three times each week until progression. RESULTS: Of 38 melanoma samples, 19 (50%) resulted in proliferative cultures and were infused. The median number of expanded lymphocytes was 18 x 10(9) (range, 1-43 x 10(9)), and the median period of culture was 52 days (range, 45-60). rIL-2 was administered at doses ranging between 6 and 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day. Toxicity was mild or moderate, and no life-threatening side effects were encountered. Two of 19 treated patients experienced complete responses of their metastatic sites (soft tissue), 10 had stable disease, and 7 showed progressive disease. The response rate was 11% (95% confidence interval, 2-35%). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment with TIL plus rIL-2 and rIFN-alpha2a is feasible, although, within the context of the small sample size, the activity of the combination was no different from the reported activity of any of the components used alone.

Lack of Activity of Docetaxel in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of a Phase II Study of the Italian Group on Rare Tumors.

Purpose. The prognosis of advanced soft tissue sarcoma is poor, only a few drugs showing some activity with response rates around 15- 25%. Consequently drug development seems mandatory to improve treatment outcome. Following previous favourable EORTC experience, the Italian Group on Rare Tumors started a phase II study with docetaxel to confirm the activity of this drug in soft tissue sarcoma.Patients and methods. Thirty-seven patients with soft tissue sarcoma resistant to at least one anthracyclinecontaining regimen were enrolled in a phase II multicenter study evaluating docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) in a 1-h i.v. infusion q(3) weeks.Results.Thirty-seven patients were enrolled onto this phase II study and 36 were evaluable for response. Only one partial remission was observed [2.8% with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1- 16.2%]. Median progression-free and overall survival were 42 and 350 days, respectively. Neutropenia and leukopenia as well as cutaneous manifestations were the most common toxicities.Discussion. The results of this phase II study do not confirm a previous EORTC repor t on the activity of docetaxel in soft tissue sarcoma, but are consistent with other more recent phase II studies. The accumulated evidence does not justify the use of this drug in the management of patients suffering from this disease, resistant to anthracyclinecontaining regimens.