RESUMEN
Hepatotoxicity remains an as yet unsolved problem for adenovirus (Ad) cancer therapy. The toxic effects originate both from rapid Kupffer cell (KCs) death (early phase) and hepatocyte transduction (late phase). Several host factors and capsid components are known to contribute to hepatotoxicity, however, the complex interplay between Ad and liver cells is not fully understood. Here, by using intravital microscopy, we aimed to follow the infection and immune response in mouse liver from the first minutes up to 72 h post intravenous injection of three Ads carrying delta-24 modification (Ad5-RGD, Ad5/3, and Ad5/35). At 15-30 min following the infusion of Ad5-RGD and Ad5/3 (but not Ad5/35), the virus-bound macrophages demonstrated signs of zeiosis: the formation of long-extended protrusions and dynamic membrane blebbing with the virus release into the blood in the membrane-associated vesicles. Although real-time imaging revealed interactions between the neutrophils and virus-bound KCs within minutes after treatment, and long-term contacts of CD8+ T cells with transduced hepatocytes at 24-72 h, depletion of neutrophils and CD8+ T cells affected neither rate nor dynamics of liver infection. Ad5-RGD failed to complete replicative cycle in hepatocytes, and transduced cells remained impermeable for propidium iodide, with a small fraction undergoing spontaneous apoptosis. In Ad5-RGD-immune mice, the virus neither killed KCs nor transduced hepatocytes, while in the setting of hepatic regeneration, Ad5-RGD enhanced liver transduction. The clinical and biochemical signs of hepatotoxicity correlated well with KC death, but not hepatocyte transduction. Real-time in vivo tracking for dynamic interactions between virus and host cells provides a better understanding of mechanisms underlying Ad-related hepatotoxicity.
RESUMEN
Oncolytic viruses are designed to specifically target cancer cells, sparing normal cells. Although numerous studies demonstrate the ability of oncolytic viruses to infect a wide range of non-tumor cells, the significance of this phenomenon for cancer virotherapy is poorly understood. To fill the gap, we summarize the data on infection of non-cancer targets by oncolytic viruses with a special focus on tumor microenvironment and secondary lymphoid tissues. The review aims to address two major questions: how do attenuated viruses manage to infect normal cells, and whether it is of importance for oncolytic virotherapy.
RESUMEN
Ad5-delta-24-RGD is currently the most clinically advanced recombinant adenovirus (rAd) for glioma therapy. We constructed a panel of fiber-modified rAds (Ad5RGD, Ad5/3, Ad5/35, Ad5/3RGD, and Ad5/35RGD, all harboring the delta-24 modification) and compared their infectivity, replication, reproduction, and cytolytic efficacy in human and rodent glioma cell lines and short-term cultures from primary gliomas. In human cells, both Ad5/35-delta-24 and Ad5/3-delta-24 displayed superior infectivity and cytolytic efficacy over Ad5-delta-24-RGD, while Ad5/3-delta-24-RGD and Ad5/35-delta-24-RGD did not show further improvements in efficacy. The expression of the adenoviral receptors/coreceptors CAR, DSG2, and CD46 and the integrins αVß3/αVß5 did not predict the relative cytolytic efficacy of the fiber-modified rAds. The cytotoxicity of the fiber-modified rAds in human primary normal cultures of different origins and in primary glioma cultures was comparable, indicating that the delta-24 modification did not confer tumor cell selectivity. We also revealed that CT-2A and GL261 glioma cells might be used as murine cell models for the fiber chimeric rAds in vitro and in vivo. In GL261 tumor-bearing mice, Ad5/35-delta-24, armed with the immune costimulator OX40L as the E2A/DBP-p2A-mOX40L fusion, produced long-term survivors, which were able to reject tumor cells upon rechallenge. Our data underscore the potential of local Ad5/35-delta-24-based immunovirotherapy for glioblastoma treatment.
RESUMEN
Accumulation of liposomal drugs into human tumors has substantial variability influencing the probability of positive response to the therapy. Therefore, it becomes very important to identify the eligibility of patients for various treatment options. The existing strategies of tumor stratification using companion diagnostics are based on the assumption that the initial and subsequent doses of nanoparticles (NP) behave in a sufficiently similar manner to enable a valuable prognosis. Here, we use a combination of in vivo imaging techniques to validate the applicability of magnetic liposomes (ML) as a reliable tool to predict whether or not the tumor would respond to nanomedicine therapy. The results demonstrated that liposome biodistribution, interactions with immune cells, and extravasation behavior in tumors were not affected by the pretreatment with liposomes 24 h prior to the repeat dosing. Co-administration of liposomal doxorubicin (DXR) and liposomes loaded with maghemite NP resulted in a high colocalization rate between two nanomedicines in tumors suggesting that neither contrast agent, nor chemotherapeutics altered biodistribution of liposomes. Based on magnetic resonance imaging of 4T1 tumors performed before and 6 h after ML treatment, animals were classified into high and low accumulation subgroups. Higher ML deposition in tumors was associated with a reduction in lesion size and enhanced survival in animals treated with liposomal DXR, but not with DXR alone. Given that liposomes are the most numerous class of clinically approved nanomedicines the development of safe and cost-effective liposomal companion diagnostic suitable for non-invasive imaging is of paramount importance for improving the efficacy of cancer therapy.
