Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 102
Filtrar
3.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 30(4): 256-257, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27849403
5.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 30(3): 184-94, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27541383

RESUMEN

This study compared patient characteristics and health care costs between newly treated diabetic painful neuropathy (DPN) patients receiving mono- pharmacotherapy and those receiving combination pharmacotherapy. A retrospective cohort was developed through Inovalon's Medical Outcomes Research for Effectiveness and Economics Registry (MORE2) database. Patients included were ≥18 years on the date of first DPN prescription: tricyclic antidepressant, opioids, duloxetine, gabapentin, pregabalin, or lidocaine. The authors conducted a simple proportional hazards model comparing times to discontinuation, switch, or addon. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of combination pharmacotherapy. There were 7145 patients on mono-pharmacotherapy and 421 patients on combination pharmacotherapy. Patients receiving combination pharmacotherapy were 130% more likely to discontinue their medications than patients receiving mono-pharmacotherapy. Female patients and those with > 7 comorbidities were more likely to be started with combination pharmacotherapy. Elderly patients were less likely to be started with combination pharmacotherapy. The total cost of care difference between mono- and combination pharmacotherapy was not statistically significant (P = .66); therefore, newly treated DPN patients should add on another medication sooner than 30 days when considering combination pharmacotherapy. All first-line medications have similar efficacy; for this reason, cost should be considered in the treatment decision.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Analgésicos/economía , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Neuropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/economía , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
6.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 30(3): 237-9, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27559633
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27007581
13.
Pain ; 156(8): 1382-1395, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25985142

RESUMEN

Enriched enrolment, randomised withdrawal (EERW) pain trials select, before randomisation, patients who respond by demonstrating a predetermined degree of pain relief and acceptance of adverse events. There is uncertainty over the value of this design. We report a systematic review of EERW trials in chronic noncancer pain together with a critical appraisal of methods and potential biases in the methods used and recommendations for the design and reporting of future EERW trials. Electronic and other searches found 25 EERW trials published between 1995 and June 2014, involving 5669 patients in a randomised withdrawal phase comparing drug with placebo; 13 (median, 107 patients) had a randomised withdrawal phase of 6 weeks or less, and 12 (median, 334) lasted 12 to 26 weeks. Risks of bias included short duration, inadequate outcome definition, incomplete outcome data reporting, small size, and inadequate dose tapering on randomisation to placebo. Active treatment was usually better than placebo (22/25 trials). This review reduces the uncertainty around the value of EERW trials in pain. If properly designed, conducted, and reported, they are feasible and useful for making decisions about pain therapies. Shorter, small studies can be explanatory; longer, larger studies can inform practice. Current evidence is inadequate for valid comparisons in outcome between EERW and classical trials, although no gross differences were found. This systematic review provides a framework for assessing potential biases and the value of the EERW trials, and for the design of future studies by making recommendations for the conduct and reporting of EERW trials.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/etiología , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Incertidumbre
19.
Am Surg ; 80(3): 219-28, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24666860

RESUMEN

Despite advances in pharmacologic options for the management of surgical pain, there appears to have been little or no overall improvement over the last two decades in the level of pain experienced by patients. The importance of adequate and effective surgical pain management, however, is clear, because inadequate pain control 1) has a wide range of undesirable physiologic and immunologic effects; 2) is associated with poor surgical outcomes; 3) has increased probability of readmission; and 4) adversely affects the overall cost of care as well as patient satisfaction. There is a clear unmet need for a national surgical pain management consensus task force to raise awareness and develop best practice guidelines for improving surgical pain management, patient safety, patient satisfaction, rapid postsurgical recovery, and health economic outcomes. To comprehensively address this need, the multidisciplinary Surgical Pain Congress™ has been established. The inaugural meeting of this Congress (March 8 to 10, 2013, Celebration, Florida) evaluated the current surgical pain management paradigm and identified key components of best practices.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Congresos como Asunto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA