Mismatch repair deficiency, chemotherapy and survival for resectable gastric cancer: an observational study from the German staR cohort and a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: In a post hoc analysis of the MAGIC trial, patients with curatively resected gastric cancer (GC) and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (MMRd) had better median overall survival (OS) when treated with surgery alone but worse median OS when treated with additional chemotherapy. Further data are required to corroborate these findings. METHODS: Between April 2013 and December 2018, 458 patients with curatively resected GC, including cancers of the esophagogastric junction Siewert type II and III, were identified in the German centers of the staR consortium. Tumor sections were assessed for expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 by immunohistochemistry. The association between MMR status and survival was assessed. Similar studies published up to January 2021 were then identified in a MEDLINE search for a meta-analysis. RESULTS: MMR-status and survival data were available for 223 patients (median age 66 years, 62.8% male), 23 patients were MMRd (10.3%). After matching for baseline clinical characteristics, median OS was not reached in any subgroup. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd and MMRp had a HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.13-3.37, P = 0.63) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.66-3.13, P = 0.36), respectively. The meta-analysis included pooled data from 385 patients. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd had an improved OS with a HR of 0.36 (95% CI 0.14-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas those with MMRp had a HR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.89-1.58, P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Our data support a positive prognostic effect for MMRd in GC patients treated with surgery only and a differentially negative prognostic effect in patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy. MMR status determined by preoperative biopsies may be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients for perioperative chemotherapy in curatively resectable GC.

[Investigations on in-hospital mortality in pancreatic surgery : Results of a multicenter observational study]. / Untersuchungen zur Hospitalletalität in der Pankreaschirurgie : Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie.

BACKGROUND: The rate of hospital mortality (in-hospital mortality) after complex pancreatic resections cannot be used as a decision-making criterion with no further analysis and specification. Such analysis has to provide a risk-adjusted benchmarking including a continuous evaluation taking into account the frequency of a surgical procedure and its competent perioperative management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As part of the Prospective Evaluation study Elective Pancreatic surgery (PEEP), overall 2003 patients were enrolled over a 3-year time period from 01 January 2006 to 12 December 2008, who underwent elective pancreatic surgery in 27 surgical departments. Included in the study were only hospitals which perform pancreatic resections. In addition to the analysis of the current situation of the operative treatment of pancreatic diseases, the complex aspects of the in-hospital mortality as a main outcome parameter were investigated. RESULTS: Out of all enrolled patients (n = 2003), 75 patients (3.7%) died during the hospital stay. In the group of 1045 patients with partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), 43 patients did not survive the hospital stay (4.1%). Similarly, such low in-hospital mortality rates were observed after total pancreatoduodenectomy (3.8%) and after left-sided resection of the pancreas (1.9%). With respect to a univariate risk stratification, advanced age and an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 and 4 had a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Multivariate regression analysis within the PD group revealed an increased need for blood transfusions and a delay in oral feeding as factors closely associated with specific complications with a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Significant differences in the in-hospital mortality rates were found when comparing hospital volume groups, such as 10-20 vs. >20 cases/year for the 831 Kausch-Whipple procedures for adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis. DISCUSSION: An adequate in-hospital mortality rate in the continuous benchmarking represents an acceptable quality level of structural and therapeutic predictions in pancreatic resections. The participation of surgical departments with complex oncosurgical interventions in clinical multicenter observational studies as a contribution to research on surgical care appears reasonable and recommendable since the results of such studies can provide a contribution to decision-making processes in daily surgical practice.

[Gender-specific differences of the early postoperative and oncosurgical long-term outcome in rectal cancer-data obtained in a prospective multicenter observational study]. / Genderspezifische Unterschiede im frühpostoperativen und onkochirurgischen Langzeitoutcome nach Rektumkarzinomresektion.

BACKGROUND: Gender-specific aspects have been increasingly considered in clinical medicine, also in oncological surgery. AIM: To analyze gender-specific differences of early postoperative and oncological outcomes after rectal cancer resection based on data obtained in a prospective multicenter observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As part of the multicenter prospective observational study "Quality assurance in primary rectal cancer", data on tumor site, exogenic and endogenic risk factors, neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedures, tumor stage, intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients with the histological diagnosis of rectal cancer were registered. Data from the years 2005-2006 and 2010-2011 were investigated with respect to gender-specific differences of postoperative morbidity, hospital mortality, local recurrency rate, disease-free and overall survival by univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Overall, data from 10,657 patients were evaluated: 60.9% of the patients were male, who were significantly younger (p < 0.001). Men had a significantly higher rate of alcohol (p < 0.001) and nicotine abuse (p < 0.001) as well as a trend to a higher body mass index (BMI) compared with women. Although, there was no significant difference in the distribution of various tumor stages comparing men and women, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was used significantly more often in male patients (p < 0.001). In addition, male patients underwent an abdominoperineal rectum exstirpation more often, whereas creation of an enterostoma and Hartmann's procedure were more frequently used in women (p < 0.001 each). Multivariate analysis revealed that male patients developed a higher overall morbidity (odds ratio, OR: 1.5; p < 0.001) during both study periods and from 2010-2011 a higher hospital mortality (OR: 1.8; p < 0.001). After a median follow-up period of 36 months, gender did not have a significant impact on overall survival, disease-free survival or on the local tumor recurrency. The 5­year overall survival was 60.5%, disease-free survival 63.8% and local recurrency rate was 5%. CONCLUSION: Independent of other variables, gender differences were found with respect to early postoperative outcome but not to oncological long-term results after surgery of rectal cancer.

[Hospital volume effects in surgical treatment of gastric cancer : Results of a prospective multicenter observational study]. / "Hospital-volume"-Effekt in der operativen Behandlung des Magenkarzinoms : Ergebnisse einer prospektiven multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie.

BACKGROUND: The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on the treatment outcome based on data obtained from cohort and register studies has been controversially discussed in the international literature. The results of large-scale prospective observational studies within the framework of clinical healthcare research may lead to relevant recommendations in this ongoing discussion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the framework of the prospective multicenter German Gastric Cancer Study 2 (QCGC 2), from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009 a total of 2897 patients with the histological diagnosis of gastric cancer from 140 surgical departments were registered and analyzed. The departments were subdivided according to the number of cases into 4 volume groups: I) <5, II) 5-10, III) 11-20 and IV) >20 patients with surgical interventions per year. RESULTS: Overall 1163 patients (65.6 %) underwent surgical interventions in the departments of groups III and IV. Of the patients 521 (18 %) were scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment but with no significant differences among the various volume groups. In the departments of volume groups I and II subtotal gastric resection was performed significantly more often. Transthoracic extended surgical interventions in cases of a proximal tumor site were significantly more frequent in departments from volume group IV (p <0.001). The proportion of intraoperative fresh frozen sections correlated with the case volume: group I 23.2 % vs. group IV 61.2 %. Overall hospital mortality was 6.1 % and slightly higher in volume group I with 7.8 %. The median survival time and the 5­year survival rate showed no significant differences between the various volume groups independent of tumor stages. There was a tendency towards a longer median survival time in volume group IV only for proximal tumor sites, i.e. adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Using Cox regression analysis hospital volume did not have an independent impact on long-term survival. CONCLUSION: Hospital volume effects could only be detected for the treatment of AEG. To improve oncological long-term outcome, centralization of treatment of proximal gastric cancer appears to be recommendable.

[Sealing of the hepatic resection area using hemostat devices does not improve results of adequate surgery]. / Versiegelung der Leberresektionsfläche mit Gewebsklebematerialien bewirkt keine weitere Verbesserung adäquater Chirurgie.

PURPOSE: In hepatic resections, there has been a high quality demand. The aim of this systematic clinical, prospective, unblinded unicenter observational study with two arms in an unselected patient cohort was to investigate whether hemostat device can significantly improve outcome in resective liver surgery, in particular, in high risk patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients (mean age, 60.5 [range, 17 - 96] years) who underwent hepatic resection (ntotal = 770) were prospectively documented in a computer-based registry at a university hospital (tertiary center) over a time period of 10 years and retrospectively evaluated specifically with regard to the use (-/+; in daily practice and intraoperative decision-making) of hemostat device (Tissucol(®), n = 59/Tachocomb(®), n = 202/combination, n = 55) indicated (among others) by drainage volume, inflammatory parameters and rate of specific complications (nvalidated = 541 [100 %]). RESULTS: Most frequently, (a-)/typical segmental resections were used: n = 192/90 (3-segment resection, only n = 38). 1) For the assignment of patients to the two different groups (-/+ hemostat device), weight loss and type of resection were found as significant factors (trend: ASA, cirrhosis), for the amount of drainage volume, ASA, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale and also type of resections using independent distributed statistical tests (such as χ(2), U test [Mann/Whitney]; H test [Kruskal-Willis]; correlation coefficient by Spearman) - no impact: smoking, diabetes, BMI, ethanol. 2) Not taking into account these parameters, the use of hemostat device was characterized by an increased drainage volume (negative control < Tissucol = Tachocomb < combination). 3) Using multifactorial analysis of variance, it was found even under correction by the factors with significant impact elucidated in the single test that the application of hemostat device onto the hepatic resection area resulted unexpectedly rather in an increase than a decrease of the drainage volume but 4) under accompanying more pronounced increase of the white blood cell count (leucocytosis). 5) General and specific complications such as postoperative bleeding, biliary fistula and subhepatic abscess were not further lowered in a significant manner using hemostat device. CONCLUSION: Adequate surgery in the operative management of hepatic resection area cannot further be improved or optimized using hemostat device. In this context, drainage volume may not be considered a sufficient rather an orienting parameter. However, there is an inflammatory response detectable most likely indicated by a(n un-)specific effusion and increase of white blood cell count, which can be interpreted as a) being characteristic for the problematic group of patients, in whom hemostat device was decided to be useful and was finally used in daily prectice, or b) reactive inflammation to foreign material.

[Palliative surgery in visceral medicine. Exemplified by colorectal and gastric cancer]. / Palliativchirurgie in der Viszeralmedizin. Am Beispiel des kolorektalen und des Magenkarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of primary tumor resection in metastatic disease remains a matter of debate. Existing data are almost exclusively limited to results from retrospective analyses. Data from prospective, randomized trials are currently not available. AIM: The results from two prospective observational studies involving gastric and rectal cancer patients are presented and discussed in the context of the available literature. METHOD: Based on data collected within the prospective quality assurance studies on gastric and rectal cancer conducted by the Institute for Quality Assurance in Surgery at Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany, the long-term outcome after palliative primary tumor resection in patients with International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage IV rectal cancer (2005-2008, n = 2046) and metastatic gastric cancer (2007-2009, n = 687) was analyzed and compared to published data. RESULTS: The median survival time following palliative primary tumor resection of UICC stage IV rectal cancer in the patients analyzed was 20 months. In patients with hepatic metastases undergoing metastasectomy the median survival was 38 months. This increased to 58 months for patients with lymph node negative primary tumors. In metastatic gastric cancer patients undergoing palliative (R2) gastric resection and also patients not undergoing surgery showed a prognostic benefit from palliative chemotherapy; however, the median survival time was significantly prolonged if palliative chemotherapy was preceded by resection of the primary tumor (11 versus 7 months, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Together with previously published data, the results from the two observational studies on rectal and gastric cancer presented here suggest a prognostic benefit from palliative resection of the primary tumor in metastatic disease.

[Antibiotic Consumption and the Development of Antibiotic Resistance in Surgical Units]. / Antibiotikaverbrauch und Resistenzentwicklung in der Chirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistence is increasing worldwide. AIM: A longitudinal analysis of the influence of the density of antibiotic use on the development of resistance in surgical units was undertaken. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over five years the incidence of pathogens and the resistance rates of isolates from patients of normal surgical units and those of a surgical ICU at a university hospital were examined. The resistence rates were correlated with the density of antibiotic use - calculated from the antibiotic consumption (in DDD) and the number of patient-days. RESULTS: At both units, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococci were mostly cultured. Among the Enterobacteriaceae, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus mirabilis and Enterobacter predominated. In the group of Enterococci, E. faecalis predominated at wards whereas at ICU E. faecium was the most frequent. Anaerobes ranked third at normal wards and Candida spp. at ICU. From 2007 to 2011, there was an increasing resistance against ciprofloxacin in P. mirabilis (r = 0.87; p = 0.054) and against imipenem (r = 0.86; p = 0.06) and piperacillin (r = 0.81; p = 0.09) in P. aeruginosa at normal wards. At ICU, the resistance rates of imipenem in P. aeruginosa rose (r = 0.88; p = 0.049). Resistance against ciprofloxacin in E. coli increased (r = 0.65; p = 0.23). Due to the increasing use of ciprofloxacin and meropenem at normal wards, the density of antibiotic usage rose 1.4 %/year (r = 0.94; p = 0.02). Despite the increase of meropenem use at ICU (r = 0.9; p = 0.035), the total antibiotic uptake rate remained almost constant. The antibiotic usage density was 3-fold higher at ICU than at normal wards. At normal wards, the ciprofloxacin usage correlated with the rate of resistance against ciprofloxacin in P. mirabilis P. m. At ICU, an association was detected between the uptake rate of ceftazidime and the rate of resistance against cefotaxime in the CES group. In P. aeruginosa, the use of piperacillin and the rate of resistance against piperacillin correlated. CONCLUSION: The high uptake rates of fluoroquinolones and carbapenems were accompanied by increases in resistances. The resistance rates are influenced by hygiene management and microbiological diagnostics. The extensive use of carbapenems should be reassessed on both units to counter further development of antibiotic resistance.

[Current Situation of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Obesity and Metabolic Surgery - Data Analysis from the Study for Quality Assurance in Operative Treatment of Obesity in Germany]. / Aktueller Stand der Antibiotikaprophylaxe in der Adipositas- und metabolischen Chirurgie - Datenanalyse aus der Studie zur Qualitätskontrolle der operativen Therapie der Adipositas in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Since January 2005, the situation of metabolic and obesity surgery in Germany has been constantly evaluated by the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR). Data registration is performed using an internet online database with prospective data collection. All registered data were analysed in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. METHODS: Data collection includes primary and revision/redo-procedures. A main focus of the current study is the analysis of data regarding the perioperative management, in particular, administration of antibiotics. RESULTS: Since 2005 a significant increase of primary bariatric procedures has been reported. For evaluation of the antibiotic regimen 12 296 primary operations including 684 balloons (BIB), 2950 gastric bandings (GB), 5115 Roux-en-Y-gastric bypasses (RYGBP), 120 Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversions (BPD), 164 duodenal switches (DS), 3125 sleeve gastrectomies (SG) and 138 other procedures were analysed. In total 77.3 % of the patients with primary procedures received perioperative antibiotics. Patients without concomitant comorbidities received antibiotics significantly less often compared to those with comorbidities. Wound infection rates were comparable for patients who underwent either gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: Surgery has been accepted step by step as a treatment for morbid obesity and its comorbidities in Germany during the last few years. There is only little experience in the literature regarding antibiotic therapy as well as prophylaxis in bariatric surgery. Based on the results of the current study we recommend rather the selective than the routine use of antibiotics depending on different parameters, e.g., operative time, preoperative BMI and concomitant comorbidities.

[Completeness and quality of baseline data and follow-up in cancer registry--an analysis on the example of colorectal cancer]. / Vollständigkeit und Qualität der Basisdaten und der Nachbeobachtung im Krebsregister--Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des kolorektalen Karzinoms.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In Germany, data of cancer patients are recorded not only in epidemiological registers but also in clinical cancer registers. To ensure the networking of all included medical partners, quality control, and clinical research it is necessary that cancer cases are captured more or less completely. The aim of the present study was to compare the data sets of two registers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients with colorectal cancer from two large surgical clinics in Magdeburg are recorded in two registers - the Clinical Cancer Registry Magdeburg and the Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. Here we compared the data sets in order to check the completeness of data capturing and to determine factors influencing the degree of completeness. RESULTS: From all patients captured in the Institute of Quality Assurance, 78.9% are found also in the clinical cancer registry. The percentage improves over the course of time, but also depends on diagnostic criteria such as the staging. There are some differences between both registries, explainable by their specific objectives. Particularly, it is demonstrated that incomplete follow-up record may bias estimates of survival rates from registries. CONCLUSION: Ensuring the completeness and correctness of data is a major challenge for cancer registries. It has distinct influence on estimated quality parameters such as survival rates.

[Palliative treatment of advanced gastric cancer from surgical point of view]. / Palliative Behandlung des fortgeschrittenen Magenkarzinoms aus chirurgischer Sicht.

Data are available on two multicenter observational studies, the East German Gastric Cancer Study (EGGCS) '02 (surgical interventions only) and the German Gastric Cancer Study II (QCGC) from 2007 to 2009 (after inauguration of multimodal therapeutic concepts) with regard to palliative treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Through the first investigation period from January to December 2002 (EGGCS) overall 1139 patients with primary gastric cancer were registered and evaluated and then from 2007 to 2009 (QCGC) another 2897 patients were included. Comparing both time periods, there were no significant changes in the distribution of tumor sites and stages according to the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) classification, in particular, there was no significant reduction of advanced tumor stages. From 2007 to 2009 in total 521 patients (18 %) received neoadjuvant therapy, 401 patients (13.9 %) out of the group with curative intention and 120 (4.1 %) out of the group of patients with palliative intention. The proportion of palliative patients who underwent chemotherapy (with neoadjuvant intention and/or postoperatively) was 32.5 % (n = 223). Thus, the rate of palliative treatment (rate of no R0 resection status 29.6 %, rate of patients who did not undergo surgical intervention at all 9.5 %) could be diminished from almost 40 % in 2002 to 24.5 % through the time period from 2007 to 2009. Taking all patients together (with curative and palliative intention) an increase of the 4-year survival probability from 40.0 % to 48.5 % was observed after inauguration of multimodal therapy. After a 5-year follow-up median survival time was 34 months during the investigation period from 2007 to 2009 considering all study subjects. Patients who had undergone palliative surgical interventions benefited from postoperative palliative chemotherapy; however, as expected this was of greater benefit to patients with resecting surgical interventions than those with non-resecting operations. Palliative tumor resection (even R2 resection status) should be part of a concept of multimodal palliative therapy in cases of acceptable perioperative risk.

[Treatment reality with respect to laparoscopic surgery of colonic cancer in Germany]. / Versorgungsrealität in der laparoskopischen Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Prospective randomized studies and meta-analyses have shown that laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer is equivalent to open resection with respect to the oncological results and has short-term advantages in the early postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether laparoscopic colonic resection has become established as the standard in routine treatment. METHODS: Data from the multicenter observational study "Quality assurance colonic cancer (primary tumor)" from the time period from 1 January 2009 to 21 December 2011 were evaluated with respect to the total proportion of laparoscopic colonic cancer resections and tumor localization and specifically for laparoscopic sigmoid colon cancer resections. A comparison between low and high volume clinics (< 30 versus ≥ 30 colonic cancer resections/year) was carried out. RESULTS: Laparoscopic colonic cancer resections were carried out in 12 % versus 21.4 % of low and high volume clinics, respectively (p < 0.001) with a significant increase for low volume clinics (from 8.0 % to 15.6 %, p < 0.001) and a constant proportion in high volume clinics (from 21.7 % to 21.1 %, p = 0.905). For sigmoid colon cancer laparoscopic resection was carried out in 49.7 % versus 47.6 % (p = 0.584). Differences were found between low volume and high volume clinics in the conversion rates (17.3 % versus 6.6 %, p < 0.001), the length of the resected portion (Ø 23.6 cm versus 36.0 cm, p < 0.001) and the lymph node yield (Ø n = 15.7 versus 18.2, p = 0.008). There were no differences between the two groups of clinics regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality. The postoperative morbidity and length of stay were significantly lower for laparoscopic sigmoid resection than for conventional sigmoid resection. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic access route for colonic cancer resection is not the standard approach in the participating clinics. The laparoscopic access route has the highest proportion for sigmoid colon resection. The differences in the conversion rates, length of the resected portion and the number of lymph nodes investigated between the low volume and high volume clinics must be viewed critically and must be interpreted in connection with the long-term oncological results.

International quality assurance project in colorectal cancer-unifying diagnostic and histopathological evaluation.

PURPOSE: Several European countries are undertaking quality control projects in colorectal cancer. These efforts have led to improvements in survival, but a comparison between different projects reveals questionable results. The aim of this study is the presentation of results from hospitals in three different European countries participating in the International Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer (IQACC) project. METHODS: For this publication, patients with cancer of the colon or rectum treated in 2009 and 2010 and recorded in the IQACC (Germany, Poland and Italy) were analysed. The comparison included number of patients, age, preoperative diagnostics (CT of the abdomen and thorax, MRI, colonoscopy, ultrasound, tumour markers), surgical approach, metastasis, height of rectal cancer and histopathological examination of a specimen (T stage, N stage and MERCURY classification for rectum resection). For short-term outcomes, general complications, wound dehiscence, tumour-free status at discharge, anastomotic leakage and in-hospital mortality were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 12,691 patients (6,756 with colon cancer, 5,935 with rectal cancer) were included in the analysis. Preoperative diagnostics differed significantly between countries. For pT and pN stages, several quality differences could be demonstrated, including missing stages (colon cancer: pT 5.7-12.5 %, pN 2.5-11.0 %; rectal cancer: pT 1.1-5.6 %, pN 1.1-15.5 %). The most relevant differences for short-term outcomes in colon cancer were found in general complications (4.2-22.8 %) and tumour-free status at discharge (74.5-91.7 %). In-hospital deaths ranged between 2.5 and 4.3 % and did not show significant differences. For rectal cancer, the country with the highest percentage of tumours localised less than 4 cm from the anal verge (16.0 %) showed the lowest frequency of amputation (8.5 %). Outcome differences were found for general complications (3.2-18.8 %), anastomotic leakage (0-4.3 %) and tumour-free status at discharge (72.9-87.6 %). In-hospital deaths ranged between 1.1 and 3.2 %. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of an international quality assurance project in colorectal cancer. This concept ensures data analysis based on a comparable data input. Differences in preoperative diagnostics, completeness of histopathological evaluation and short-term outcomes for Germany, Poland and Italy might result from disparities in socioeconomic factors and implementation of existing guidelines. Further activities are necessary to warrant the use of common standards in outcome control.

[Is there a role for surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes?]. / Welche Rolle spielt die Chirurgie bei der Therapie des Diabetes mellitus Typ 2?

Typ 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can be regarded as a chronic and progressive disease which is rapidly increasing worldwide. There is a significant coincidence of T2DM and obesity, the latter playing a major role in the development of insulin resistance. Medical treatment comprises lifestyle counseling, weight management and an increased physical activity, frequently in combination with pharmacotherapy. However, especially in obese patients, metabolic aims are frequently not achieved which can be attributed to the lack of significant weight reduction. Currently, pancreas transplantation plays only a minor role in the treatment of patients with T2DM. Bariatric surgery has been proven to be a safe and effective therapeutic option in obese patients that leads to a significant weight loss. Moreover, in the majority of obese diabetics, a complete or partial remission of T2DM is observed. The significant weight loss is associated with improved insulin sensitivity. There is some evidence that alterations of gut hormones play an additional role in the amelioration of T2DM. However, little is known about the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on diabetes remission. Bariatric procedures should be considered in obese patients with T2DM (BMI > 35 kg/m²) and poorly controlled metabolic status. Despite the encouraging results in normal weight or overweight patients with T2DM, surgery can not yet be recommended in these patients. Intensive research about the impact of bariatric surgery on diabetes remission offers a unique opportunity to understand pathophysiology of T2DM. Furthermore, it may help to develop less invasive interventions and to identify new therapeutic targets for the treatment of T2DM.

Bariatric surgery in adolescents and young adults--safety and effectiveness in a cohort of 345 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and effectiveness of adolescent bariatric surgery and to improve treatment recommendations for this age group. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal registry. Since January 2005, patients undergoing bariatric surgery in Germany are enlisted in an online registry called 'study for quality assurance in obesity surgeries'. SUBJECTS: Adolescents and young adults up to the age of 21 years, operated from January 2005 to December 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Weight, BMI, comorbidities, complication rates. RESULTS: N=345 primary procedures were recorded by 58 hospitals. N=51 patients were under the age of 18 years. Follow-up information was available for 48% (n=167) of patients, with an average observation period of 544±412 days (median: 388 days). The most common surgical techniques were gastric banding (n=118, 34.2%), gastric bypass (n=116, 33.6%) and sleeve gastrectomy (n=78, 22.6%). Short-term complications (intra-operative; general postoperative; specific postoperative) were slightly lower for gastric banding (0.8%; 2.5%; 0.8%) than for gastric bypass (2.6%; 5.2%; 1.7%) or sleeve gastrectomy (0%; 9.0%; 7.7%). In accordance with published findings, weight and BMI reduction were lower for gastric banding (-28 kg; -9.5 kg m(-2)) compared to gastric bypass (-50 kg; -16.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001 or sleeve gastrectomy (-46 kg; -15.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001. Outcomes did not differ between the <18 and ≥18-year-old patients. CONCLUSION: Like in adults, bariatric surgery has low short-term complication rates and results in sustained weight loss in adolescents. However, the missing long-term observations prohibit a final conclusion about lasting effectiveness and safety. Clinical trials with structured follow-up programs and mechanisms to ascertain patient adherences are needed.

[Carcinoma of the pararenal gland infiltrating the surrounding tissue and involving the inferior vena cava]. / Organüberschreitendes Nebennierenrindenkarzinom mit Beteiligung der Vena cava inferior.

UNLABELLED: ▼HISTORY AND ADMISSION FI NDINGS: A 61-year-old woman presented with a 2-month-history of progressive deterioration, increasing exertional dyspnoea and pain in the right upper abdomen (past medical history: bronchial asthma and hypertension). The physical examination showed mild generalized weakness, tenderness in the right upper abdomen, and ascites. INVESTIGATIONS: Laboratory studies did not reveal any hormonal abnormalities. A CT angiogram revealed a mass of the right adrenal gland with distinct invasion into the inferior vena cava, and tumour thrombosis that extended proximally into the right atrium. Distally, the tumour ended at the caudate lobe of the liver with an extensive peripherally engulfed thrombus from the inferior vena cava down to the common iliac -veins. TREATMENT AND COURSE: An open right adrenalectomy with resection of the periadrenal tissue and exstirpation of the intracaval tumour thrombus (by cavotomy under digital occlusion of the blood flow from the vena cava into the right atrium - cardiac surgeon) was carried out with no significant postoperative complications. Subsequently, the patient underwent adjuvant mitotane therapy for 3 years. So far, no recurrence has occurred during a course of 7 years. CONCLUSION: Tumour induced thrombotic occlusion of the inferior vena cava and other veins is rare, especially with right atrium involvement. In the absence of other effective treatment options, the combination of radical resection and adjuvant mitotane therapy remains the only successful curative treatment for primary invasive pararenal gland carcinoma.

[Surgical treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction - results achieved in multicentre studies]. / Multizentrische Ergebnisse der chirurgischen Therapie der Karzinome des ösophagogastralen Übergangs.

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction are increasingly being considered as a separated tumour entity. The prognosis is rather poorer compared with that for distal gastric cancer. Data from a multicentre study as part of research on clinical care aim to reflect the current situation in surgical treatment after inauguration of neoadjuvant modalities. PATIENTS AND METHOD: As part of the ongoing prospective multicentre observational study QCGC 2 (German Gastric Cancer Study 2), 544 adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG 1-3) were registered from 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2009. RESULTS: Patients underwent surgical intervention in 108 (76.6 %) of the 141 surgical departments which provided data to the study. In 391 patients (82.5 %), R0 resection was achieved. Almost 60 % of the carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction were approached in departments with no more than 10 of these tumour lesions through the whole study period (3 years). Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 283 cases (53 %); the rate of neoadjuvant treatment was 34.4 % (n = 187). Intraoperative fresh frozen section was only included in intraoperative decision-making in 242 patients (60.8 %). In the revealed heterogeneous spectrum of surgical interventions, a limited number of transthoracic approaches (20 %) and a mediastinal lymphadenectomy rate of only 47 % were found. Hospital lethality was 6.6 %. In the adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction, a significantly lower median survival (25 months) compared with distal gastric cancer (38 months) was observed depending on the tumour stage. In addition, 5-year survival rate of AEG patients (33.1 %) was distinctly lower than for patients with distal gastric cancer (41.4 %). There was no significantly better survival by neoadjuvant treatment in the group of investigated patients. CONCLUSION: The results in the treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction in the multicentre setting including surgical departments of each profile and region even after introduction of multimodal therapeutic concepts are not satisfying. In particular, modern diagnostic and surgical strategies need to be widely used or their percentage has to be increased. In this context, centralisation of the surgical care of this specific tumour entity appears reasonable.

How preservation time changes the linear viscoelastic properties of porcine liver.

The preservation time of a liver graft is one of the crucial factors for the success of a liver transplantation. Grafts are kept in a preservation solution to delay cell destruction and cellular edema and to maximize organ function after transplantation. However, longer preservation times are not always avoidable. In this paper we focus on the mechanical changes of porcine liver with increasing preservation time, in order to establish an indicator for the quality of a liver graft dependent on preservation time. A time interval of 26 h was covered and the rheological properties of liver tissue studied using a stress-controlled rheometer. For samples of 1 h preservation time 0.8% strain was found as the limit of linear viscoelasticity. With increasing preservation time a decrease in the complex shear modulus as an indicator for stiffness was observed for the frequency range from 0.1 to 10 Hz. A simple fractional derivative representation of the Kelvin Voigt model was applied to gain further information about the changes of the mechanical properties of liver with increasing preservation time. Within the small shear rate interval of 0.0001-0.01 s⁻¹ the liver showed Newtonian-like flow behavior.