Individual thrombin generation and spontaneous bleeding rate during personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: For individuals with haemophilia A, prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) is typically directed towards trough activity >1 IU/dL; however, some patients still experience spontaneous bleeding events (sBEs). AIM: Aims were to evaluate relationships of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and FVIII:C with occurrence of clinical bleeding. METHODS: GENA-21 was a prospective, open-label, phase IIIb study investigating the safety and efficacy of Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) in previously treated adults with severe haemophilia A. The study included a 72-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation phase and a 6-month personalized prophylaxis phase in which treatment was guided by PK parameters. This subanalysis assessed FVIII:C by one-stage assay and ETP by thrombin generation assay in blood samples. RESULTS: Baseline mean ETP was lower in the 7 patients who experienced sBEs during personalized prophylaxis versus 25 who did not (n = 32 with data from PK phase and prophylaxis phase; P = .0002). During personalized prophylaxis (n = 49), only patients with lower median trough ETP experienced sBEs (8/49 patients; ROC AUC = 0.9421; P < .0001); there was no significant relationship for FVIII:C in predicting sBEs (ROC AUC = 0.5838; P = .4750). Directly following infusion of human-cl rhFVIII, ETP was lower in patients who experienced sBEs versus those who did not (P = .0002), whereas FVIII:C did not differ significantly between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with severe haemophilia A and reduced thrombin generation, increased frequency of spontaneous bleeding was observed irrespective of trough FVIII levels. Thus, personalized prophylaxis should take into account variables other than FVIII:C. Large prospective trials are needed to verify ETP as a marker for spontaneous bleeding.

Pharmacokinetics, clot strength and safety of a new fibrinogen concentrate: randomized comparison with active control in congenital fibrinogen deficiency.

Essentials Congenital afibrinogenemia causes a potentially life-threatening bleeding and clotting tendency. Two human fibrinogen concentrates (HFCs) were compared in a randomized pharmacokinetic study. Bioequivalence was not shown for AUCnorm , which was significantly larger for the new HFC. Increases in clot strength were comparable, and no thromboses or deaths occurred in the study. SUMMARY: Background Human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC) corrects fibrinogen deficiency in congenital a-/hypofibrinogenemia. Objectives To assess pharmacokinetics (PK), effects on thromboelastometry maximum clot firmness (MCF), and safety of a new double virus-inactivated/eliminated, highly purified HFC vs. active control. Patients/Methods In this multinational, randomized, phase II, open-label, crossover study in 22 congenital afibrinogenemia patients aged ≥ 12 years, 70 mg kg-1 of new HFC (FIBRYGA, Octapharma AG) or control (Haemocomplettan® P/RiaSTAP™, CSL Behring GmbH) were administered, followed by crossover to the other concentrate. Fibrinogen activity, PK and MCF in plasma were assessed. Results The concentrates were not bioequivalent for the primary endpoint, AUCnorm (mean ratio, 1.196; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.117, 1.281). Remaining PK parameters (Cmaxnorm , IVR, t1/2 , MRT) reflected bioequivalence between concentrates, except for clearance (mean ratio, 0.836; 90% CI, 0.781, 0.895) and Vss (mean ratio, 0.886; 90% CI, 0.791, 0.994). Mean AUCnorm was significantly larger for the new HFC (1.62 ± 0.45 vs. 1.38 ± 0.47 h kg g L-1  mg-1 , P = 0.0001) and mean clearance was significantly slower (0.665 ± 0.197 vs. 0.804 ± 0.255 mL h-1  kg-1 , P = 0.0002). Mean MCF increased from 0 mm to 9.68 mm (new HFC) and 10.00 mm (control) 1-hour post-infusion (mean difference, -0.32 mm; 95% CI, -1.70, 1.07, n.s.). No deaths, thromboses, viral seroconversions or serious related adverse events occurred. Conclusions Bioequivalence was not demonstrated for AUCnorm , clearance and Vss . Larger AUCnorm and slower clearance were observed for the new HFC. Remaining pharmacokinetic parameters reflected bioequivalence to control. Safety profiles and increases in clot strength were comparable between concentrates.

PK-guided personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) in adults with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) is a 4th generation recombinant human FVIII, without chemical modification or protein fusion, produced in a human cell-line. AIMS/METHODS: This study (NuPreviq) was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, phase IIIb study of the efficacy and safety of personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq® in 66 previously treated adults with severe haemophilia A. NuPreviq had three phases: (i) a 72-h pharmacokinetic (PK) phase; (ii) a 1-3 month standard prophylaxis phase; and (iii) a 6-month personalized prophylaxis phase. The personalized prophylaxis regimen was based on individual PK modelling for each patient according to whether their PK profile most closely fitted a two- or one-compartment model (NuPreviq approach). In cases of uncertainty, a noncompartment model was applied. RESULTS: The median dosing interval during personalized prophylaxis was 3.5 days, with 57% of patients on ≤2 weekly dosing. Mean annualized bleeding rates during personalized prophylaxis were 1.45 (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 0 [0, 1.9]) for all bleeds, 0.79 (median [IQR]: 0 [0, 0]) for spontaneous bleeds, and 0.91 (median [IQR]: 0 [0, 0]) for joint bleeds. During personalized prophylaxis, 83.1% of patients were spontaneous bleed-free. Compared with standard prophylaxis, median weekly prophylaxis dose was reduced by 7.2% from 100.0 to 92.8 IU kg-1 during the last 2 months of personalized prophylaxis. There were no FVIII inhibitors or treatment-related serious or severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: PK-guided personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq® provided bleeding protection and enabled the dosing interval to be extended to twice weekly or less in many patients and an overall dose reduction.

Natural history and clinical characteristics of inhibitors in previously treated haemophilia A patients: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Development of inhibitors is the most serious complication in haemophilia A treatment. The assessment of risk for inhibitor formation in new or modified factor concentrates is traditionally performed in previously treated patients (PTPs). However, evidence on risk factors for and natural history of inhibitors has been generated mostly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). The purpose of this study was to examine cases of de novo inhibitors in PTPs reported in the scientific literature and to the EUropean HAemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) programme, and explore determinants and course of inhibitor development. METHODS: We used a case series study design and developed a case report form to collect patient level data; including detection, inhibitor course, treatment, factor VIII products used and events that may trigger inhibitor development (surgery, vaccination, immune disorders, malignancy, product switch). RESULTS: We identified 19 publications that reported 38 inhibitor cases and 45 cases from 31 EUHASS centres. Individual patient data were collected for 55/83 (66%) inhibitor cases out of 12 330 patients. The median (range) peak inhibitor titre was 4.4 (0.5-135.0), the proportion of transient inhibitors was 33% and only two cases of 12 undergoing immune tolerance induction failed this treatment. In the two months before inhibitor development, surgery was reported in nine (22%) cases, and high intensity treatment periods reported in seven (17%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: By studying the largest cohort of inhibitor development in PTPs assembled to date, we showed that inhibitor development in PTPs, is on average, a milder event than in PUPs.

Prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with Nuwiq(®) (Human-cl rhFVIII) in adults with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia A is treated with FVIII, either prophylactically or on demand. Prophylaxis is the gold standard in children and evidence is accumulating in adults. AIMS/METHODS: The aim of this analysis was to compare prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with Nuwiq(®) (Human-cl rhFVIII), a new-generation rFVIII expressed in a human cell line, in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A. Data were analysed from two similarly designed, multinational, prospective, open-label studies with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria and comparable patient demographics. Human-cl rhFVIII was administered either prophylactically in a study of 32 adults or on-demand in a study of 22 patients (20 adults and two adolescents). RESULTS: Patients treated prophylactically experienced 36 bleeds compared with 997 bleeds in patients treated on-demand (mean observation periods: 180 and 335 days respectively). Based on a negative binomial regression model, annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during prophylaxis was 2.30 (95% CI: 1.54, 3.44) compared with 57.74 (95% CI: 43.36, 76.91) during on-demand treatment, which equates to a 96% lower ABR during prophylaxis. 'Excellent' or 'good' efficacy in the treatment of bleeds was achieved with Human-cl rhFVIII in 100% of 28 evaluated bleeds during the prophylaxis study and 94.5% of 985 evaluated bleeds during the on-demand study. No inhibitors, treatment-related serious adverse events or severe adverse events were recorded during prophylaxis or or-demand treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with Human-cl rhFVIII reduces recurrent bleeding in adult PTPs with severe haemophilia A and adds further supportive evidence for the benefits of prophylaxis in adults.

Novel, human cell line-derived recombinant factor VIII (human-cl rhFVIII; Nuwiq® ) in adults with severe haemophilia A: efficacy and safety.

INTRODUCTION: Nuwiq® [human cell line-derived recombinant factor VIII (human-cl rhFVIII)] is a new generation rFVIII protein, without chemical modification or fusion to any other protein, produced in a human cell line. AIM/METHODS: This prospective, open-label, multinational phase III study assessed the efficacy and safety of human-cl rhFVIII in 32 adult previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A during standard prophylaxis for ≥6 months and ≥50 exposure days. Efficacy in treating bleeds and during surgical prophylaxis was also assessed. RESULTS: Prophylactic efficacy, based on mean monthly bleeding rate, was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' in 97% of patients for all bleeds and in 100% of patients for spontaneous bleeds. Mean (SD) annualized bleeding rate was 2.28 (3.73) [median = 0.9] for all bleeds, 1.16 (2.57) [median = 0] for spontaneous bleeds and 1.00 (1.79) [median = 0] for traumatic bleeds. There were no bleeds in 50% of patients and there were no major, life-threatening bleeds. Efficacy was 'excellent' or 'good' in treating 28 (100%) of 28 bleeds. Overall efficacy was rated as 'excellent' during four surgical procedures (three major, one minor) and 'moderate' during one major surgery. Incremental in vivo recovery (IVR) data were comparable with the one-stage and chromogenic assays. IVR was >2.0% per IU kg-1 for all measurements and stable over 6 months. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors and there were no treatment-related serious or severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: These results in adult PTPs indicate that human-cl rhFVIII is effective for the prevention and treatment of bleeds in adults with severe haemophilia A.

Results of a phase I/II open-label, safety and efficacy trial of coagulation factor IX (recombinant), albumin fusion protein in haemophilia B patients.

INTRODUCTION: rIX-FP is a coagulation factor IX (recombinant), albumin fusion protein with more than fivefold half-life prolongation over other standard factor IX (FIX) products available on the market. AIM: This prospective phase II, open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of rIX-FP for the prevention of bleeding episodes during weekly prophylaxis and assessed the haemostatic efficacy for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated patients with haemophilia B. METHODS: The study consisted of a 10-14 day evaluation of rIX-FP pharmacokinetics (PK), and an 11 month safety and efficacy evaluation period with subjects receiving weekly prophylaxis treatment. Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of related adverse events, and immunogenic events, including development of inhibitors. Efficacy was evaluated by annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR), and the number of injections to achieve haemostasis. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects participated in the study, 13 received weekly prophylaxis and 4 received episodic treatment only. No inhibitors were detected in any subject. The mean and median AsBR were 1.25, and 1.13 respectively in the weekly prophylaxis arm. All bleeding episodes were treated with 1 or 2 injections of rIX-FP. Three prophylaxis subjects who were treated on demand prior to study entry had >85% reduction in AsBR compared to the bleeding rate prior to study entry. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the efficacy for weekly routine prophylaxis of rIX-FP to prevent spontaneous bleeding episodes and for the treatment of bleeding episodes. In addition no safety issues were detected during the study and an improved PK profile was demonstrated.

Efficacy and safety of a recombinant factor IX (Bax326) in previously treated patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B undergoing surgical or other invasive procedures: a prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicentre, phase III study.

Haemostatic management of haemophilia B patients undergoing surgery is critical to patient safety. The aim of this ongoing prospective trial was to investigate the haemostatic efficacy and safety of a recombinant factor IX (rFIX) (Bax326) in previously treated subjects (12-65 years, without history of FIX inhibitors) with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B, undergoing surgical, dental or other invasive procedures. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed according to a predefined scale. Blood loss was compared to the average and maximum blood loss predicted preoperatively. Haemostatic FIX levels were achieved peri- and postoperatively in 100% of subjects (n = 14). Haemostasis was 'excellent' intraoperatively in all patients and postoperatively in those without a drain, and 'excellent' or 'good' at the time of drain removal and day of discharge in those with a drain employed. Following the initial dose, the mean FIX activity level rose from 6.55% to 107.58% for major surgeries and from 3.60% to 81.4% for minor surgeries. Actual vs. predicted blood loss matched predicted intraoperative blood loss but was equal to or higher than (but less than 150%) the maximum predicted postoperative blood loss reflecting the severity of procedure and FIX requirements. There were no related adverse events, severe allergic reactions or thrombotic events. There was no evidence that BAX326 increased the risk of inhibitor or binding antibody development to FIX. BAX326 was safe and effective for peri-operative management of 14 subjects with severe and moderately severe haemophilia B.

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of BAX326, a novel recombinant factor IX: a prospective, controlled, multicentre phase I/III study in previously treated patients with severe (FIX level <1%) or moderately severe (FIX level ≤2%) haemophilia B.

BAX326 is a recombinant factor IX (rFIX; nonacog gamma) manufactured without the addition of any materials of human or animal origin, and with two viral inactivation steps (solvent/detergent treatment and 15 nm nanofiltration). The aim of this prospective trial was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, haemostatic efficacy and safety of BAX326 in previously treated patients aged 12-65 years with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B. BAX326 was safe and well tolerated in all 73 treated subjects; adverse events considered related to treatment (2.7% incidence, all non-serious) were transient and mild, and no hypersensitivity reactions, inhibitor formation or thrombotic events were observed. Pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence (n = 28) between BAX326 and a licensed rFIX was confirmed in terms of the ratio of geometric mean AUC(0-72) h per dose. Twice-weekly prophylaxis [mean duration 6.2 (±0.7) months; 1.8 (±0.1) infusions per week, 49.5 (±4.8) IU kg(-1) per infusion] was effective in preventing bleeding episodes, with a significantly lower (79%, P < 0.001) annualized bleed rate (4.2) compared to an on-demand treatment in a historical control group (20.0); 24 of 56 subjects on prophylaxis (43%) did not bleed throughout the study observation period. Of 249 total acute bleeds, 211 (84.7%) were controlled with one to two infusions of BAX326. Haemostatic efficacy at resolution of bleed was rated excellent or good in 96.0% of all treated bleeding episodes. The results of this study indicate that BAX326 is safe and efficacious in treating bleeds and routine prophylaxis in patients aged 12 years and older with haemophilia B.

Head-to-head comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of a high-purity factor IX concentrate (AlphaNine®) and a recombinant factor IX (BeneFIX®) in patients with severe haemophilia B.

Head-on comparative studies of factor IX (FIX) concentrates performed under standardized conditions are rarely conducted regardless of being a valuable instrument guiding health care providers towards better informed and cost-effective decisions. This study is an extension of a multicentre study that assessed the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AlphaNine(®) in 25 previously treated patients with severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2%). After a washout period ≥ 7 days following the last PK performed with AlphaNine(®) after a dose of 65-75 IU kg(-1) , an identical PK study was performed with BeneFIX(®) on 22 of the same patients. Venous blood samples for analysis were taken at baseline and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 24, 48, 72 and 74 h post infusion. The outcomes of the comparison of the PK parameters were as follows: Mean (± SD) in vivo recovery (IVR) was 1.3 ± 0.4 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for AlphaNine(®) and 1.0 ± 0.3 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for BeneFIX(®) (P < 0.01). Mean terminal half-life, mean residence time, area under the curve, clearance and volume of distribution of BeneFIX(®) were 36.0 ± 12.8 h, 39.3 ± 13.9 h, 1631 ± 467 IU h dL(-1) , 0.046 ± 0.01 dL kg(-1) min(-1) and 1.75 ± 0.52 mL kg(-1) respectively. These values were not significantly different to those observed in AlphaNine(®), although BeneFIX(®) displayed higher than expected IVR values and lower than expected clearance values. In conclusion, AlphaNine(®) showed a comparable half-life, but an IVR significantly higher than that of BeneFIX(®). This dissimilarity may have implications on dosing requirements for on-demand treatment regimes affecting optimal resource allocation.

Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART).

BACKGROUND: The benefits of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with factor VIII products have not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials in older patients with hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: To report results from a preplanned analysis of data from the first year of the 3-year SPINART study, which compares routine prophylaxis with on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS). PATIENTS/METHODS: SPINART is an open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multinational trial. Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 days of exposure to FVIII, no FVIII inhibitors, no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years and 6-24 bleeding episodes in the preceding 6 months were randomized 1 : 1 to rFVIII-FS prophylaxis (25 IU kg(-1) , three times weekly) or on-demand treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint, number of total bleeding episodes in the intent-to-treat population, was analyzed after the last patient had completed 1 year of follow-up. A negative binomial model was used for the primary endpoint analysis; analysis of variance was used for confirmatory analysis of annualized bleeding rates. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled and analyzed (n = 42 per group; mean age, 30.6 years; median treatment duration, 1.7 years). The median number of total bleeding episodes and total bleeding episodes per year were significantly lower with prophylaxis than with on-demand treatment (total, 0 vs. 54.5; total per year, 0 vs. 27.9; both P < 0.0001). No treatment-related adverse events occurred, and no patients developed FVIII inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS leads to a significant reduction in bleeding as compared with on-demand treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the established rFVIII-FS safety profile.

A clinical study assessing the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of AlphaNine(®) , a high-purity factor IX concentrate, in patients with severe haemophilia B.

Effective treatment with factor IX (FIX) requires a thorough consideration of the properties of the concentrate to be used as replacement therapy, to date, the only available treatment for haemophilia B. The aim of the study was to determine the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety in routine clinical use of AlphaNine(®) , a high-purity human FIX concentrate. This open, single-arm, multicentre, non-randomized trial included 25 subjects (age ≥ 12) with moderate/severe haemophilia B. Pharmacokinetics was assessed at baseline and after a 6-month follow-up. The degree of haemostasis control achieved was evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Safety was evaluated in terms of tolerance, thrombogenicity, immunogenicity and viral safety. Mean recovery was 1.01 ± 0.19 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) at baseline and 1.23 ± 0.34 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) 6 months later. Terminal half-life was 34.5 ± 6.2 h and 33.7 ± 5.4 h, respectively. Ratios of each parameter between the two pharmacokinetic studies were all close to 1. A total of 1,576,890 IU AlphaNine(®) were administered in 889 infusions (mean dose per infusion: 1774 IU; 3.2 infusions per month per patient). The main reasons for infusion were mild/moderate bleeding (62.3%) and prophylaxis (20.5% continuous, 15.6% intermittent). Overall, 93.0% of the efficacy assessments were rated as excellent/good and 88.8% of bleedings resolved after the first infusion. Twenty-one adverse events were reported in eight patients, none of which was considered related to the study medication. AlphaNine(®) showed a pharmacokinetic profile in agreement with that of other plasma-derived FIX concentrates and provides safe and clinically effective substitution therapy for patients with haemophilia B.

An open clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of Factor IX Grifols, a high-purity Factor IX concentrate, in patients with severe haemophilia B.

SUMMARY: Factor IX Grifols is a new high-purity plasma-derived FIX concentrate with two specific pathogen elimination steps. Until this study was performed, there were no detailed reports with an adequate number of patients on the clinical evaluation of this product. To determine the efficacy and safety of Factor IX Grifols for replacement therapy in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia B, this open, multicentre and non-randomized study included 25 male subjects over the age of 12 with severe haemophilia B. Patients underwent prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes with Factor IX Grifols for 1 year. The clinical efficacy and safety of this product were assessed. Forty percent of the patients were children and adolescents (12-17 years old). During the 12 months follow-up, 1 446 000 IU of Factor IX Grifols were administered in 961 infusions (range 12-83 infusions per patient): 31% for prophylaxis and 69% for bleeding episodes. Only five major bleeding events were reported in two patients. These haemorrhages were successfully treated with a mean of 2900 IU per bleed (range 1500-4000 IU), and 1-3 infusions per bleed. The average time elapsed from the first infusion to resolution of bleeding was 43 h (median). Overall, haemostasis was rated as excellent or good by the investigator in 96% of the infusions. No product-related adverse events were reported. Factor IX Grifols is an effective and safe Factor IX concentrate and can be considered as a first line option for replacement therapy in haemophilia B patients.

Pharmacokinetic study of a high-purity factor IX concentrate (Factor IX Grifols) with a 6-month follow up in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia B.

Optimal replacement treatment in haemophilia B patients requires a good understanding of the pharmacokinetics of factor IX (FIX). The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of Factor IX Grífols, a highly purified human FIX concentrate with two specific pathogen inactivation/removal steps, to that of available FIX preparations. The study was an open, non-randomized trial including 25 male subjects older than 12 years of age with severe haemophilia B. Pharmacokinetic profile of the FIX preparation regularly used by the subjects was determined as control. Pharmacokinetic profile of Factor IX Grifols was determined twice, one 7-15 days after control assessment and second after a 6 months period had elapsed. Results showed that all products had peak plasma levels of FIX:C within 30 min. Mean recovery was 1.3 +/- 0.3 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for Factor IX Grifols and 1.0 +/- 0.3 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for control products (P < 0.001). The mean terminal half-life (t(1/2)) for Factor IX Grifols was 26.7 h and 26.8 h for control product. Pharmacokinetic parameters after 6 months of treatment with Factor IX Grifols did not statistically differ from the parameters obtained with the first infusion. There were no adverse events related to Factor IX Grifols for the duration of the study. In conclusion, Factor IX Grifols has adequated pharmacokinetic properties comparable to the control plasma-derived FIX and these parameters remain stable after 6 months of treatment. Factor IX Grifols can be an effective and safe plasma-derived FIX concentrate for replacement therapy in haemophilia B patients.

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of IMMUNATE solvent/detergent (IMMUNATE S/D) in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A: results of a prospective, multicenter, open-label phase III study.

BACKGROUND: IMMUNATE Solvent/Detergent (S/D) is a plasma-derived, human factor VIII (FVIII)/von Willebrand factor (VWF) complex subjected to S/D and vapor heat treatment. METHODS: This prospective clinical study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) (compared to IMMUNATE), efficacy and safety of IMMUNATE S/D in 56 previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Subjects received IMMUNATE S/D either on-demand (47/56), as a prophylactic regimen (49/56), or both (40/56). RESULTS: IMMUNATE and IMMUNATES/D were equivalent with respect to the FVIII and VWF PK parameters assessed. Bleeding episodes (623) were reported in 47/56 subjects. For 89% of episodes, subjects required only 1 infusion with a mean dose of 29.6 IU/kg and 96% of episodes had an excellent or good response. The duration of prophylaxis ranged from 0.1 to 5.2 months. The median number of bleeds per month in subjects on prophylaxis was 0 (range 0-10). No FVIII inhibitory antibodies were observed in 56 subjects after 2,646 treatment exposure days. No related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The introduction of S/D treatment did not alter the PK characteristics and function of VWF and FVIII molecules in IMMUNATE S/D which is effective and safe for treatment of bleeding episodes, management of surgical procedures and prophylaxis.

Randomized, prospective clinical trial of recombinant factor VIIa for secondary prophylaxis in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilic patients with factor VIII (FVIII) and FIX inhibitors suffer from frequent bleeding episodes and reduced quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether secondary prophylaxis with activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) can safely and effectively reduce bleeding frequency as compared to conventional on-demand therapy. METHODS: Thirty-eight male patients entered a 3-month preprophylaxis period to confirm high baseline bleeding frequency (mean > or = 4 bleeds per month). Twenty-two patients were randomized 1:1 to receive daily rFVIIa prophylaxis with either 90 or 270 microg kg(-1) for 3 months, followed by a 3-month postprophylaxis period. RESULTS: Bleeding frequency was reduced by 45% and 59% during prophylaxis with 90 and 270 microg kg(-1), respectively (P < 0.0001); however, there was no significant difference detected between doses. The majority of this reduction was maintained during the postprophylaxis period. Although all types of bleed were similarly reduced, the effect was most pronounced for spontaneous joint bleeds. Patients reported significantly fewer hospital admissions and days absent from work/school during prophylaxis as compared to the preprophylaxis period. No thromboembolic events were reported during prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant reductions in bleeding frequency during prophylaxis as compared to conventional on-demand therapy were achieved without raising safety concerns. These results provide evidence for the concept of secondary rFVIIa prophylaxis in inhibitor patients with frequent bleeds.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of Immunate solvent detergent in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A.

Immunate Solvent Detergent (S/D) is a plasma derived, purified, human factor VIII (FVIII) - von Willebrand factor (VWF) complex subjected to two virus inactivation/removal processes: S/D and vapor heat treatment. This prospective, multicentre, three-part clinical study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (in comparison to the predecessor product Immunate), efficacy and safety of Immunate S/D in 56 previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A. Subjects received Immunate S/D on-demand, as a prophylactic regimen or both. The results of the pharmacokinetic population demonstrate that Immunate and Immunate S/D were equivalent with respect to the FVIII - and to the retrospectively VWF - parameters assessed. A total of 623 bleeding episodes were reported in 47/56 subjects. The duration of prophylaxis ranged from 0.1-5.2 months with a total of 175.6 months. The median number of bleeds per month in subjects on prophylaxis was 0 (range 0-10). Ninety-six percent of bleeding episodes were rated as having an excellent or good response. For most bleeding episodes (89%), subjects required only one infusion with a mean dose of 29.6 IU kg(-1). No FVIII inhibitory antibodies were observed in any subject. No related serious adverse events were reported. Thus, the introduction of S/D treatment did not alter the PK characteristics and function of VWF and FVIII molecules of Immunate S/D which is effective and safe for treatment of bleeding episodes, management of surgical procedures, and prophylaxis.

Phase-I/II study to evaluate dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and tolerability of bendamustine HCl in pre-treated patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Binet stages B and C) requiring therapy.

PURPOSE: Bendamustine hydrochloride, an anti-neoplastic agent with unique mechanism of action, is known to cause impressive remissions in relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Optimal bendamustine dosing for CLL patients had not been finally established and a phase I/II study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of bendamustine. METHODS: The open-label, single-centre phase I/II study was conducted from March 2001 to September 2002 in Sofia, Bulgaria. The 15 study patients were extendedly pre-treated, but fludarabine-naive (3 female, 12 male, 47-72 years of age, 61 years on average). Bendamustine was given at a starting dose of 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks based on the previous results in lymphoma. RESULTS: Bendamustine was well tolerated in spite of heavy pre-treatment of the study participants. Toxicity corresponded to the known safety profile of bendamustine, with the exception of bilirubin elevation. The level of 110 mg/m2 was established as MTD. A bendamustine dose of 100 mg/m2 is the recommended dose for further clinical investigations. A 4-week interval is recommended to allow for sufficient recovery. Efficacy results confirmed powerful anti-neoplastic activity of bendamustine even in extendedly pre-treated CLL patients. Based on the remission criteria, nine patients were defined as responders (four CRs, two PR, three NC) and two patients as nonresponders to therapy. Four patients were not evaluable for response, because they had received less than three courses bendamustine. After a follow-up period of 15 months, the four patients with CR were still in remission. One patient with PR had relapsed, the other had ongoing response. CONCLUSIONS: Bendamustine is a very active and well-tolerated drug in patients with pre-treated and refractory CLL. Fludarabine-naivity of patients appears to markedly improve their bendamustine tolerability. First-line use of bendamustine is a safe option for CLL-patients requiring treatment, because bendamustine-owing to its unique pharmacodynamics-(1) is highly effective, (2) reasonably safe, and (3) does hardly produce cross-resistance against other anti-neoplastic drugs effective in this indication.

Phase II study of ISIS 3521, an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to protein kinase C alpha, in patients with previously treated low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ISIS 3521, an antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotide to protein kinase C alpha in patients with relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients received ISIS 3521 (2 mg/kg/day) as a continuous infusion over 21 days of each 28-day cycle. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 53 years (range 37-77). Histological subtypes were low-grade follicular lymphoma (n = 22) and B-cell small lymphocytic lymphoma (n = 4). Twenty-one (81%) had stage III/IV disease. The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was two (range one to six). A total of 87 cycles of ISIS 3521 were administered. Twenty-three patients were assessable for response. Three patients achieved a partial response. No complete responses were observed. Ten patients had stable disease. Grade 3-4 toxicity was as follows: neutropenia (3.8%) and thrombocytopenia (26.9%). CONCLUSIONS: ISIS 3521 has demonstrated anti-tumour activity in patients with relapsed low-grade NHL. There may be a potential role for this agent in combination with conventional chemotherapy for advanced low-grade lymphoma, and further trials are warranted.

In vivo transfection and/or cross-priming of dendritic cells following DNA and adenoviral immunizations for immunotherapy of cancer--changes in peripheral mononuclear subsets and intracellular IL-4 and IFN-gamma lymphokine profile.

In order to provoke an immune response, a tumor vaccine should not only maximize antigen-specific signals, but should also provide the necessary "co-stimulatory" environment. One approach is to genetically manipulate tumor cells to either secrete lymphokines (GM-CSF, IL-12, IL-15) or express membrane bound molecules (CD80, CD86). Furthermore, patient dendritic cells can be loaded with tumor-associated antigens or peptides derived from them and used for immunotherapy. Genetic modification of dendritic cells can also lead to presentation of tumor-associated antigens. Transfection of dendritic cells with DNA encoding for such antigens can be done in vitro, but transfection efficiency has been uniformly low. Alternatively, dendritic cells can also be modulated directly in vivo either by "naked" DNA immunization or by injecting replication-deficient viral vectors that carry the tumor specific DNA. Naked DNA immunization offers several potential advantages over viral mediated transduction. Among these are the inexpensive production and the inherent safety of plasmid vectors, as well as the lack of immune responses against the carrier. The use of viral vectors enhances the immunogenicity of the vaccine due to the adjuvant properties of some of the viral products. Recent studies have suggested that the best strategy for achieving an intense immune response may be priming with naked DNA followed by boosting with a viral vector. We have successfully completed a phase I and phase II clinical trials on immunotherapy of prostate cancer using naked DNA and adenoviral immunizations against the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and phase I clinical trial on colorectal cancer using naked DNA immunization against the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The vaccination was tolerated well and no side effects have been observed so far. The therapy has proven to be effective in a number of patients treated solely by immunizations. The success of the treatment clearly depends on the stage of the disease proving to be most efficient in patients with minimal disease or no metastases. A panel of changes in the phenotype of peripheral blood lymphocytes and the expression of intra-T-cell lymphokines seems to correlate with clinical improvement.