Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Haematol ; 147(2): 186-197, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37989116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones (FQ) is commonly used in patients with acute leukemia (AL) during neutropenia. This practice is supported by an older meta-analysis reporting reduced mortality using FQ prophylaxis. Later meta-analyses have failed to reproduce this finding, presumably due to higher background FQ resistance rates limiting their effectiveness. SUMMARY: This article reviews the pros and cons of FQ prophylaxis mainly in patients with AL. Most current guidelines do not support universal prophylaxis but rather recommend a selective approach, weighing the benefits against the risks. This recommendation is based on the lack of mortality benefit reported in more recent meta-analyses. FQ prophylaxis was demonstrated to reduce bacteremia and febrile neutropenia episodes, although mostly in trials performed in low-resistance settings (<20%), whereas current FQ resistance rates may reach 30-60%. Other disadvantages of FQ include potential adverse events, antibiotic resistance development, cost, increase in Gram-positive infections and resistant Gram-negative infections following prophylaxis, Clostridioides difficile infection, and an effect on gut microbiota. KEY MESSAGES: Taking the above into consideration, alternative approaches other than universal FQ prophylaxis should be considered. Centers with high FQ resistance rates may consider either withholding prophylaxis or providing selective prophylaxis for high-risk patients screened negative for FQ-resistant bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Neutropenia , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/etiología , Metaanálisis como Asunto
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 128: 58-60, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36529372

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize overlooked cases of patients with monkeypox infection in the 2022 outbreak. METHODS: Clinical characteristics of 26 patients who were misdiagnosed with other diseases were described. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients who were misdiagnosed, six (23%) were given a diagnosis of bacterial tonsillitis, six (23%) were diagnosed with primary syphilis, five (19.2%) with oral or genital herpes, and four (15.3%) with bacterial proctitis or anal abscess. The average time interval between missed and right diagnosis was 4.4 days. There was no difference in the missed cases between the early and the later month of the outbreak. CONCLUSION: Monkeypox might still be commonly overlooked, especially in patients presenting with fever and sore throat or solitary ulcer as sole manifestations.


Asunto(s)
Herpes Genital , Mpox , Proctitis , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mpox/epidemiología , Herpes Genital/epidemiología , Proctitis/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Homosexualidad Masculina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...