The effects of a cancer diagnosis on the health of a patient's partner: a population-based registry study of cancer in Sweden.

The aim of this population-based registry study was to explore how cancer influences the health of partners, by examining the onset of new diagnoses for partners, health care use and health care costs among partners living with patients with cancer. The sample consisted of partners of patients with cancer (N = 10 353) and partners of age- and sex-matched controls who did not have cancer (N = 74 592). Diagnoses, health care use and health care costs were studied for a continuous period starting 1 year before the date of cancer diagnosis and continued for 3 years. One year after cancer diagnosis, partners of patients with cancer had significantly more mood disorders, reactions to severe stress and ischaemic heart disease than they exhibited in the year before the diagnosis. Among partners of patients with cancer, the type of cancer was associated with the extent and form of increased health care use and costs; both health care use and costs increased among partners of patients with liver cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer and miscellaneous other cancers. The risk of poorer health varied according to the type of cancer diagnosed, and appeared related to the severity and prognosis of that diagnosis.

Understanding adherence to official guidelines on statin prescribing in primary health care--a multi-level methodological approach.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the role that municipalities and out-patient health care centres (HCCs) have in understanding adherence to official guidelines on statin prescribing. Our hypothesis was that after guideline publication, adherence to recommended statin prescription would increase and variance among HCCs and municipalities would decrease. Since multi-level regression analysis (MLRA) is a relatively new methodology in pharmacoepidemiology, we also aimed to explore the application of MLRA in our investigation. METHODS: We obtained data from the Swedish Corporation of Pharmacies record of sales regarding all initial prescriptions of statins issued between April and December 2003. We applied multi-level analysis on 34,514 individual prescriptions (level 1) nested within 226 HCCs (level 2), which in turn were nested within 33 municipalities (level 3). Temporal trends and gender differences were investigated by means of random slope analysis. Variance was expressed using median odds ratio (MOR) and interval odds ratio. RESULTS: HCCs appeared to be more relevant than municipalities for understanding the physicians' propensity to prescribe a recommended statin (MOR(HCC) = 1.96 and MOR(Municipality) = 1.41). Overall prevalence of adherence was very low (about 20%). After publication of the guidelines, prescription of recommended statins increased, and variance among HCCs decreased but only during the first 4 months of the observation period. CONCLUSION: The publication of official guidelines in the county of Scania exerted a positive influence on statin prescription but, at the end of the observation period, adherence was still low and practice variation high. These facts may reflect inefficient therapeutic traditions and suggest that more intensive interventions may be necessary to promote rational statin prescription.

Country of birth, socioeconomic position, and healthcare expenditure: a multilevel analysis of Malmö, Sweden.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The principle of equity aims to guarantee allocation of healthcare resources on the basis of need. Therefore, people with a low income and persons living alone are expected to have higher healthcare expenditures. Besides these individual characteristics healthcare expenditure may be influenced by country of birth. This study therefore aimed to investigate the role of country of birth in explaining individual healthcare expenditure. DESIGN: Multilevel regression model based on individuals (first level) and their country of birth (second level). SETTING: The city of Malmö, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: All the 52 419 men aged 40-80 years from 130 different countries of birth, who were living in Malmö, Sweden, during 1999. MAIN RESULTS: At the individual level, persons with a low income and persons living alone showed a higher healthcare expenditure, with regression coefficients (and 95% confidence intervals) being 0.358 (0.325 to 0.392) and 0.197 (0.165 to 0.230), respectively. Country of birth explained a considerable part (18% and 13%) of the individual differences in the probability of having a low income and living alone, respectively. However, this figure was only 3% for having some health expenditure, and barely 0.7% with regard to costs in the 74% of the population with some health expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Malmö is a socioeconomically segregated city, in which the country of birth seems to play only a minor part in explaining individual differences in total healthcare expenditure. These differences seem instead to be determined by individual low income and living alone.

[Multilevel analysis of regional disparities in survival after heart failure: differences between county health services affect little patients' prognosis]. / Multinivåanalys av regionala skillnader i överlevnad efter hjärtsvikt: landstingens egenskaper har föga inflytande på patientens prognos.

The prognosis for patients suffering from heart failure in Sweden differs from county to county, indicating a need for a comparative study in order to uncover the reasons. Conventional single-level analytical methods, however, underestimate the statistical uncertainty in such studies, leading to an inappropriate ranking of regions. Consequently, public opinion and decision-making may be misled. Conventional methods are also unable to disentangle the extent to which differences in prognosis may depend on individual or regional factors. Multilevel analysis, on the other hand, provides a better estimate of statistical uncertainty, and can both identify and quantify the extent to which differences in prognosis depend on either patient-related or regional factors. Using multilevel analysis, we examined the one-year mortality of 38,343 heart failure patients for the period 1992-1995 in every county in Sweden. Regional differences in one-year mortality were found to be very small, the most relevant factors being individual ones. The limited differences distinguishable at the county level may be explained in part by physician density: the more physicians in a county, the better an individual patient's prognosis.

Benzodiazepine prescribing patterns in a high-prescribing Scandinavian community.

Sales statistics indicate large variations in benzodiazepine consumption between the Scandinavian countries: the current difference between Denmark (highest) and Sweden (lowest) is almost two-fold. There are also large within-country variations: e.g. benzodiazepine sales in the Swedish city of Helsingborg, which is close to Denmark, were at the average Danish level and were the highest in Sweden. Repeated prescription analyses were carried out in Helsingborg, and register data were used to compare the extent of psychiatric morbidity and psychosocial problems in this city with those in neighbouring cities. Benzodiazepine consumption was higher than the national average in all age groups. However, neither the choice of the predominant benzodiazepine agents nor the dose size or number of doses per prescription showed any major deviation. Hence, Helsingborg may have a larger proportion of benzodiazepine users or longer exposure periods among users. The latter is supported by the fact that about 40% of all benzodiazepine prescriptions were repeated. Psychiatric morbidity, suicide rate, alcohol-related diseases, unemployment and the proportion of socially isolated subjects were higher than the county average. On the other hand, within the county, there were cities that despite lower benzodiazepine sales had an equal or higher rate of suicide, unemployment and alcohol-related diseases. Of all benzodiazepine prescriptions processed in Helsingborg, > 30% were issued by < 5% of the prescribers (> or = 15 prescriptions per prescriber and per week). Thus, the higher usage of benzodiazepines in Helsingborg may partly be related to higher psychiatric morbidity and more psychosocial problems, but deviant prescribing habits among a minority of physicians are also important.

Impairment of grip function in rheumatoid arthritis--studies with a simple hand test.

A new, simple and quick method for assessment of impaired grip function was evaluated in a rheumatology department, 208 of 211 patients with definite rheumatoid arthritis were unable to do the test, 48 of these patients had regarded their hands as unaffected when questioned. The impairment of grip function was closely related to clinical and functional observations but not related to the most common laboratory tests. The study confirms the hypothesis that almost all patients with RA are unable to do the hand test, even those who consider their hand function as normal.

Construction of a simple test for assessment of hand function in primary care. Theories and experimental trials for the test situation.

This paper describes a hand test consisting of three steps to test the subject's ability to grasp firmly another person's hand to hold a pencil firmly with fingers II-V with straight knuckles and maximally flexed finger joints, while the investigator pulls the pencil to hold on to a piece of paper with a rounded pinch grip between thumb and index finger while the investigator pulls the paper with a rounded pinch grip with submaximal strength. All three steps must be performed with each hand without causing pain. The test was an adequate parameter for the grip function, and at the same time could register work-load elicited pain, strength, and mobility. The test can be carried out by healthy subjects, but not by patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The test is logically constructed and has a high validity and reliability.

Hand handicap and rheumatoid arthritis in a fish-eating society (the Faroe Islands).

In the county of Klaksvik, the Faroes, a simple hand test was used for screening all inhabitants between the ages of 40 and 74 years. With its high sensitivity and specificity it revealed a diagnostic panorama entirely different from that seen in previous investigations in other nordic countries. In Klaksvik the prevalence of hand handicap was about 40%, which is due to the high incidence of osteoarthrosis. The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis was 1.1%. The high functional capacity and the lower occurrence of rheumatic nodules and erosions found in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis as compared with previous studies suggest that the disease takes a milder course in Klaksvik. This should support the hypothesis that RA patients benefit from a diet rich in fish.

Chronic arthritis. Prevalence, severity and distribution between primary care and referral centres in a defined rural population.

By a simple self-administered hand test, hand handicap was revealed in 689 out of a population of 5262 individuals aged 40-70 years. Subsequent medical examination showed inflammatory hand disease in 119, 67 of whom had previously been in contact with the public health service at some level because of hand dysfunction. These 67 patients formed the material for our study, whose purpose was to analyse the distribution, treatment and follow-up of patients with inflammatory joint disease on different health care levels. In primary health care, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was found to be underreported. For half the cases the interval between onset of disease and assessment by a rheumatologist exceeded 5 years, and follow-ups were few and far between. In the referral centres, RA cases were dealt with more adequately. The prevalence of definite and probable RA was found to be 0.7 and 0.4%, respectively.

Detection of suspected inflammatory joint disease with a new simple self-administered hand test.

A self-administered hand test was used to screen 5262 persons aged 40-70 living in a rural district in southern Sweden. It revealed evidence of hand impairment in 13%. The prevalence of RA was 1.1%. At the screening procedure a subgroup of 48 previously unrecognized individuals with inflammatory joint disease was identified. They were assessed by a rheumatologist, who established the following diagnoses: four definite RA, eight probable RA, three psoriatic arthritis, one unclassifiable arthritis, 10 osteoarthritis and 22 non-specific arthralgia. No advanced RA was detected. Two were seropositive and another was erosive. One with RA, one with psoriatic arthritis and three with arthralgic symptoms were unable to work. Most had only a minor need for further medical aid. The test was thus able to identify persons with hand impairment. Follow-up studies will address the practical implications of the screening procedure.

Utility of a population-based case-control study model with a limited number of patients in estimating risks of hypertension.

A population-based case-control study of the risks of hypertension was carried out in a primary care district where data on all patients have been registered in out- and in-patient computer schemes and where extensive studies and treatment programs regarding blood pressure have been performed for more than a decade. The results of the study, which comprised a limited number of patients, accord with those of more extensive and prospective studies. The hypertensives had high risks of developing myocardial infarction and stroke even though they were treated according to internationally accepted norms regarding blood pressure. The estimated population-attributable risk of hypertension in men was 30% with regard to myocardial infarction and 68% with regard to stroke. Smoking and hypertension were found to be independent risk indicators of myocardial infarction in men and hypertension was a strong risk indicator of stroke. Thus, a case-control study carried out in this way in a primary care district gives valid results regarding the efficacy of an antihypertensive treatment program and may therefore serve as a model for future studies in primary health care.