EGFR Genotyping of Matched Urine, Plasma, and Tumor Tissue in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Rociletinib, an EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor.

PURPOSE: Liquid biopsies represent an attractive alternative to tissue biopsies, particularly rebiopsies, in determining patient eligibility for targeted therapies. Clinical utility of urine genotyping, however, has not been explored extensively. We evaluated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M detection in matched urine, plasma, and tissue and the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with rociletinib. METHODS: Tissue (n = 540), plasma (n = 482), and urine (n = 213) were collected from evaluable patients enrolled in TIGER-X, a phase I/II study. Genotyping was performed by therascreen EGFR testing in tissue, BEAMing in plasma, and a quantitative short footprint assay (Trovera) in urine, which was used to further examine discordant samples. RESULTS: Positive percent agreement with tissue T790M results was similar for urine (82%; 142 of 173) and plasma (81%; 313 of 387) genotyping. Urine and plasma together identified more patients who were T790M positive (92%) than tissue alone (83%) among matched samples (n = 177). The ability to identify mutations in plasma was strongly associated with M stage (P < .001); rate of T790M detection for patients with M1a/M0 disease increased from 54% for plasma alone to 85% when urine and plasma were both examined. Objective response rates of patients who were T790M positive were comparable between tumor (34%), plasma (32%), and urine (37%). CONCLUSION: Clinical response to rociletinib was comparable irrespective of whether T790M status was identified by liquid or tissue biopsy. Combined, urine and plasma identified a higher percentage of patients who were T790M positive than tumor genotyping alone and improved detection of T790M, particularly in the absence of distant metastases. These findings support the noninvasive analysis of urine and plasma before tumor rebiopsy when assessing T790M status.

Pharmacovigilance and biosimilars: considerations, needs and challenges.

INTRODUCTION: Biosimilars are biologic medicines that are highly similar to approved biologics, notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components. Since 2007, biosimilars have been approved for use in patients in the European Union (EU) and other regions. European experience provides several lessons as the United States (US) healthcare system prepares for biosimilar approvals. These lessons emphasize the need for adequate efficacy and safety studies, post-marketing surveys and a robust pharmacovigilance system that can accurately track and trace biologics, including biosimilars and their reference products, from the patient to the manufacturer. AREAS COVERED: We review the EU experience with biosimilar pharmacovigilance and discuss the implications for biosimilar pharmacovigilance in the USA. Furthermore, we review several aspects of biosimilar pharmacovigilance, including cohort event monitoring, traceability, biosimilar interchangeability, pharmacovigilance system development, nomenclature and counterfeit tracking. EXPERT OPINION: The availability of biosimilars as lower-cost biologics must carefully consider issues of safety, efficacy and traceability. Stringent pharmacovigilance procedures are required to detect potential differences in safety signals between biosimilars and their reference products. Pharmacovigilance of biologics should include processes that are easily used by prescribing practitioners to ensure that data are consistent and new safety signals are properly reported and assigned to the correct product.

Comparability and biosimilarity: considerations for the healthcare provider.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers use recombinant biologics such as monoclonal antibodies to treat a variety of serious illnesses. Manufacturing of approved biotechnology products is complex, and the quality of the resulting biologic is dependent on careful control of process inputs and operating conditions. Biosimilars, which are similar but not identical to innovator biologics, are entering regulatory evaluation, approval, and marketing in regions with biosimilar approval pathways. SCOPE AND FINDINGS: This article describes the evaluation and potential impact of manufacturing process changes and biosimilar product development, and explores the similarities and distinctions between the two. Regulatory agencies generally require a comparability exercise following a manufacturing process change. This comparability is focused primarily on analytical characterization of the approved product before and after the manufacturing process change, with non-clinical and clinical confirmation required when determined necessary. When developing a biosimilar, the manufacturer does not have access to key information including the innovator manufacturer's cell line, cell culture conditions, purification procedures, and fill and finish processes. Further, the biosimilar manufacturer does not have access to information about the innovator manufacturer's product development history, including knowledge about the quality attributes of lots used in non-clinical and clinical development. We define the biosimilar manufacturer's lack of information as the knowledge gap. As a result, a biosimilarity exercise to compare a biosimilar to an approved innovator biologic requires a rigorous evaluation to ensure the safety and efficacy of the biosimilar. CONCLUSION: Given the knowledge gap under which biosimilars are developed, data to establish biosimilarity should go beyond a simple comparability exercise.

Activated NOTCH2 is overexpressed in hepatoblastomas: an immunohistochemical study.

Hepatoblastoma is a pediatric malignancy characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature hepatocytes (hepatoblasts). This disease is diagnosed primarily in children younger than 5 years and is disproportionately observed in former premature infants. Cytogenetically, hepatoblastoma is characterized by numerical aberrations, as well as unbalanced translocations involving the proximal region of chromosome 1q. The NOTCH2 gene has been mapped to this locus, and it is well established that the NOTCH gene family is an important regulator of several developmental pathways. Specifically, the NOTCH2 protein is known to delay hepatoblast maturation during early hepatic organogenesis, and the reduction of NOTCH2 expression correlates with the differentiation of hepatoblasts into hepatocytes and biliary cells in the developing liver. We hypothesized that NOTCH2 is involved in the pathogenesis of hepatoblastoma by maintaining a population of undifferentiated hepatoblasts. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of NOTCH2 and its isoforms NOTCH1, NOTCH3, and NOTCH4 and the NOTCH2 primary ligand JAGGED1 in hepatoblastomas. Compared with the normal liver, an increased level of NOTCH2 expression was seen in 22 of 24 (92%) hepatoblastomas. There was no significant staining for other NOTCH isoforms and JAGGED1 in hepatoblastomas. Therefore, we suggest that NOTCH2 expression and activation, independent of JAGGED1 expression, may contribute to the pathogenesis of hepatoblastoma. In the hepatoblastoma sinusoidal vasculature, we saw NOTCH3 and NOTCH1 expression. These observations have potential implications with regard to therapeutic targeting of the NOTCH signaling pathway in hepatoblastomas.

Liver tumors in children.

Malignant liver tumors account for slightly >1% of all pediatric malignancies, with roughly 150 new cases of liver tumors diagnosed in the U.S. annually. The embryonal tumor, hepatoblastoma, accounts for two thirds of malignant liver tumors in children. Other liver malignancies in children include hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcomas, germ cell tumors, and rhabdoid tumors. Benign tumors of the liver in children include vascular tumors, hamartomas, and adenomas. There is an apparent increase in the incidence of hepatoblastoma with perinatal exposures and decreased premature infant mortality as postulated causes for this increased risk. The known causes and associations of liver tumors in children as well as the approaches to diagnosis and treatment of children are discussed in this review article.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia presenting in fulminant hepatic failure.

A previously healthy 4-year-old boy was admitted because of acute liver failure. He was icteric, lethargic, had elevated ammonia and abnormal liver function tests. Serology was negative for viral hepatitis. There was no history of hepatotoxic drugs. Family history was unremarkable. The child was taken to the operating room for a living-related hepatic transplant. Frozen section showed massive hepatic leukemic infiltration and hepatocellular necrosis. Bone marrow aspiration confirmed the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Transplant was withheld and chemotherapy was attempted. He died the following day due to systemic leukemic infiltration, cerebral edema, and severe anoxic ischemic encephalopathy.