Low-dose aspirin improves endometrial receptivity in the midluteal phase in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in Doppler parameters and pregnancy outcomes, if any, and to determine the predictive accuracy of such indices, as well as the effects of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (URPL). METHODS: An observational study was conducted at Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai, China, from May 2015 to December 2016. The endometrial thickness, and the pulsatility index (PI), resistive index (RI), and systolic-to-diastolic ratio (S/D) values of endometrial and uterine artery blood flow were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to analyze data from URPL patients (three or more first-trimester spontaneous abortions with unknown etiology) and patients with normal fertility. A second ultrasonography examination was performed in URPL patients who had received daily LDA for 2 months. RESULTS: There were 190 URPL patients and 35 control patients. Endometrial thickness was significantly thinner in URPL patients than control patients (P=0.005). The PI, RI, and S/D values for endometrial blood flow and the mean PI, RI, and S/D values for uterine arteries were significantly higher in URPL patients (P<0.001). The predictive accuracy of the indices mentioned above were 0.660, 0.802, 0.852, 0.837, 0.784, 0.929, and 0.929, respectively. Following LDA supplementation, URPL patients showed a significant reduction in resistance to endometrial and uterine artery blood flow (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: URPL patients had impaired uterine perfusion. Doppler parameters are valuable in predicting women at high risk of URPL. LDA could be effective in improving endometrial receptivity.

Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to delivery in a Chinese han population.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sonographic-estimated fetal weights (EFW) calculated with the Hadlock formula and with the Woo formula in a group of Chinese pregnant women. METHODS: We prospectively recruited term pregnancies for sonographic biometric examination. EFWs were calculated according to two formulas and compared with the corresponding birth weight (BW). We also assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EFW for the diagnosis of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonates. RESULTS: A total of 374 subjects who delivered within 7 days after the sonographic examinations was recruited. Using the Hadlock formula, the median absolute difference between EFW and BW was 182 g (15-308 g) and the median percentage difference was 5.3% (0.5-9.1%), whereas it was 230 g (62-367) and 7.1% (2.1-10.4%) for the Woo formula (p < 0.001). Several factors, namely the fetal presentation, gender, and high amniotic quantity, showed no evident impact on this predictive difference. Among the 175 women who delivered within 2 days after ultrasound, the sensitivity and specificity of Hadlock EFW were 100% and 97.1% for the detection of SGA and 48.1% and 97.3% for the detection of LGA, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 44.4% and 100.0% for the detection of SGA and 76.5% and 91.1% for the detection of LGA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EFWs calculated using the Hadlock formula for our research subjects were as accurate as those reported for other populations. The predictive performance showed a high NPV for the diagnosis of SGA and a relatively acceptable PPV for the diagnosis of LGA. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:465-471, 2017.