Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Tissue Viability ; 32(1): 130-135, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36464578

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers cause significant, detrimental effects on personal wellbeing. They represent a serious health and social care burden. Nurses and those working in support roles are primarily accountable for preventing pressure ulcers. Healthcare support workers are an expanding group of key workers in the UK. OBJECTIVE: To examine healthcare support workers' knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure ulcer prevention. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2020 to June 2021, using Knowledge and Attitudes toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention Assessment Tool. RESULTS: A total of 164 participants completed the questionnaire fully. A low mean knowledge score of 0.42 ± 0.14, but a positive attitude score of 0.76 ± 0.10 per item were reported. The weakest areas of knowledge include aetiology, risk assessment and addressing pressure-reducing interventions for patients at risk. Higher mean scores per item in knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention were reported in participants working in acute hospital wards and nursing homes (0.468 ± 0.15, 0.47 ± 0.08 respectively) than those in other settings (p < 0.05). Participants working in primary care scored lowest (0.33 ± 0.12). The scores of participants with more positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention significantly correlated with higher score of knowledge (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: While positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention exist among healthcare support workers, this is overshadowed by significant knowledge deficits. Findings highlight the importance of continuing structured education for support workers across both acute and community settings. A future national survey and interventional study are needed to examine support workers' pressure ulcer knowledge and to inform a national continuous education strategy.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera por Presión , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Reino Unido
2.
Nurs Inq ; 30(1): e12512, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35831942

RESUMEN

Language tests for overseas registered nurses (ORN) working outside their home country are essential for patient safety, as communication competency needs to be established in any workforce. We argue that the current employment of existing language tests is structurally and institutionally racist and disadvantages ORNs from non-European Union (EU) and non-White countries seeking to work in the United Kingdom. Using Critical Race Theory (CRT), we argue that existing English language tests for ORNs seeking registration in the United Kingdom are discriminatory due to the UK's racist migration policies and a regulatory body for nursing and midwifery that fails to acknowledge and understand its own institutionally racist practices.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Internacionales , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Humanos , Condiciones de Trabajo , Racismo Sistemático , Reino Unido
3.
J Tissue Viability ; 30(2): 244-249, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631705

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop and examine the reliability, and validity of a questionnaire measuring concordance for performing pressure-relief for pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention in people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). METHODS: Phase I included item development, content and face validity testing. In phase II, the questionnaire was evaluated for preliminary acceptability, reliability and validity among 48 wheelchair users with SCI. RESULTS: Thirty-seven items were initially explored. Item and factor analysis resulted in a final 26-item questionnaire with four factors reflecting concordance, perceived benefits, perceived negative consequences, and personal practical barriers to performing pressure-relief activities. The internal consistency reliability for four domains were very good (Cronbach's α = 0.75-.89). Pearson correlation coefficient on a test-retest of the same subjects yielded significant correlations in concordance (r2 = 0.91, p = .005), perceived benefit (r2 = 0.71, p < .04), perceived negative consequences (r2 = 0.98, p < .0001), personal barriers (r2 = 0.93, p= .002). Participants with higher levels of concordance reported a greater amount of pressure-relieving performed. Individuals viewing PrU as a threatening illness were associated with higher scores of concordance and tended to report a greater amount of pressure-relieving performance which provides evidence of criterion related validity. CONCLUSION: The new questionnaire demonstrated good preliminary reliability and validity in people with SCI. Further evaluation is necessary to confirm these findings using larger samples with follow-up data for predictive validity. Such a questionnaire could be used by clinicians to identify high risk of patients and to design individualised education programme for PrU prevention.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Psicometría/normas , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 6(8): e1904, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30254830

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since BREAST-Q was developed in 2009, it has been widely used by clinicians and researchers to capture information regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient satisfaction related to breast surgery. Yet clinical guidelines regarding the use of BREAST-Q for assessment of success of surgery in women with breast cancer remain limited. To maximize the benefits of using BREAST-Q to inform clinical decision making, this systematic review aimed to identify and appraise current evidence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed by BREAST-Q associated with breast oncoplastic surgery. METHODS: A detailed search strategy was implemented and electronic databases searched include PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Review was limited to peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2009 to January 2018. Any interventional and observational studies that used BREAST-Q to assess PROs in the assessment of breast oncoplastic surgery were included. RESULTS: Fifty-four peer-reviewed articles met inclusion criteria. Fifty-three studies were observational, 1 study was interventional. Current comparative studies using BREAST-Q indicated that abdominal flap, buttock flap, or thigh flap reconstruction offered highest satisfaction with breast; contralateral prophylactic mastectomy with immediate reconstruction offered higher levels of satisfaction with breast, but poor postsurgical physical well-being. Silicone implant and no radiation therapy offered higher level satisfaction and HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence showed that BREAST-Q can effectively measure patient's satisfaction and HRQoL in relation to different type of breast oncoplastic surgeries. BREAST-Q captured meaningful and reliable information from the patients' perspective and may be useful for clinical decision making.

5.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 471(6): 1946-54, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23516030

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Wide variation exists in reported prevalence estimates and management standards of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Discrepancies in diagnosticians' opinions may explain some of this variation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine (1) the consistency with which pediatric orthopaedic surgeons rate the importance of diagnostic criteria for DDH, and (2) whether there were geographic differences in how the diagnostic criteria were rated by surgeons. METHODS: One hundred ninety-seven of 220 members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society and 100 of 148 members of the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery treating children with DDH participated in this cross-sectional study across 35 countries (15 regions). Each rated 37 items in four domains that specialists previously had identified as the most important features associated with DDH in early infancy. We determined consistency using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; two-way random-effects model) interpreted as poor (0-0.40), acceptable (0.41-0.74), or good (≥ 0.75). RESULTS: Poor consistency among surgeons was found in rating the 37 diagnostic criteria (ICC, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24-0.45). Consistency was poor for three domains (patient characteristics/history: ICC, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16-0.58; ultrasound: ICC, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.52; radiography: ICC, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.95) and acceptable for one (clinical examination: ICC, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33-0.73). Surgeons in particular regions appeared to have a concept of DDH diagnosis that distinguished them from specialists of other regions; consistency in eight regions was greater (ICC ≥ 0.40) than consistency among all 15 regions. CONCLUSIONS: The consistency of specialists in rating diagnostic criteria for DDH was lower than expected, and there was considerable geographic variation in terms of how specialists assigned importance ratings of the diagnostic criteria; these findings are somewhat counterintuitive, given the frequency with which this condition is diagnosed. These inconsistencies could explain, partly, the widely differing prevalence estimates and management standards of DDH.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/diagnóstico , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/terapia , Ortopedia/métodos , Pediatría/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Ortopedia/normas , Pediatría/normas , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
6.
Transpl Int ; 26(3): 300-6, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23279054

RESUMEN

The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was developed to improve the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our primary aim was to assess to what extent reports of RCTs in solid organ transplantation adhere to the 2010 CONSORT statement. Secondly, we investigated the relationship between CONSORT adherence, methodological quality and some other factors. We included 290 RCTs that were published between 2007 and 2009. We examined to what extent trial reports complied with 30 items of the CONSORT statement. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale plus allocation concealment and whether data analysis was by randomized group (intention to treat). On average, trial reports addressed 47% of the CONSORT items. Forty-three per cent of RCTs was considered to be of good quality according to Jadad scale, and the items allocation concealment and data analysis were satisfied in approximately one-third of trials. Good quality RCTs reported on more CONSORT items than poor quality trials. The methodological quality and adherence to the CONSORT statement of RCTs published in journals that endorse the CONSORT statement was superior to those in journals without CONSORT endorsement. Overall compliance with the CONSORT statement and the methodological quality of RCTs in organ transplantation remains unsatisfactory.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Órganos/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Trasplante de Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido
7.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 469(12): 3451-61, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21952742

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinicians use various criteria to diagnose developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in early infancy, but the importance of these various criteria for a definite diagnosis is controversial. The lack of uniform, widely agreed-on diagnostic criteria for DDH in patients in this age group may result in a delay in diagnosis of some patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our purpose was to establish a consensus among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons worldwide regarding the most relevant criteria for diagnosis of DDH in infants younger than 9 weeks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 212 potential criteria relevant for diagnosing DDH in infants by surveying 467 professionals. We used the Delphi technique to reach a consensus regarding the most important criteria. We then sent the survey to 261 orthopaedic surgeons from 34 countries. RESULTS: The response rate was 75%. Thirty-seven items were identified by surgeons as most relevant to diagnose DDH in patients in this age group. Of these, 10 of 37 (27%) related to patient characteristics and history, 13 of 37 (35%) to clinical examination, 11 of 37 (30%) to ultrasound, and three of 37 (8%) to radiography. A Cronbach alpha of 0.9 for both iterations suggested consensus among the panelists. CONCLUSION: We established a consensus regarding the most relevant criteria for the diagnosis of DDH in early infancy and established their relative importance on an international basis. The highest ranked clinical criteria included the Ortolani/Barlow test, asymmetry in abduction of 20° or greater, breech presentation, leg-length discrepancy, and first-degree relative treated for DDH. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/diagnóstico , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Radiografía , Ultrasonografía
8.
Transpl Int ; 24(12): 1216-30, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21955006

RESUMEN

mTOR inhibitors have been associated with wound complications and lymphoceles. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare these outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients. Relevant medical databases were searched to identify RCTs in solid organ transplantation comparing mTOR inhibitors with an alternative therapy reporting on wound complications and/or lymphoceles. Methodological quality of RCTs was assessed. Pooled analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirty-seven RCTs in kidney, heart, simultaneous pancreas-kidney and liver transplantation were included. Pooled analyses showed a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 1.77, CI 1.31-2.37) and lymphoceles (OR 2.07, CI 1.62-2.65) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). There was also a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 3.00, CI 1.61-5.59) and lymphoceles (OR 2.13, CI 1.57-2.90) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with antimetabolites. Heart transplant patients receiving mTOR inhibitors together with CNIs also reported more wound complications (OR 1.82, CI 1.15-2.87). We found a higher incidence of wound complications and lymphoceles after kidney transplantation and a higher incidence of wound complications after heart transplantation for immunosuppressive regimens that included mTOR inhibitors from the time of transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Linfocele/etiología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina , Everolimus , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados
9.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 93(24): e145, 2011 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22258780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a major potential complication following the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. It remains unclear if the radiographic changes associated with osteonecrosis are clinically relevant. METHODS: In the present cross-sectional study, we determined the relationship between morphological changes on radiographs (classified with use of the Bucholz-Ogden system) and health-related quality of life (assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 [HUI3]; maximum score, 1), physical function (assessed with the Activities Scale for Kids [ASK]; maximum score, 100), and hip function (assessed with the Children's Hospital Oakland Hip Evaluation Scale [CHOHES]; maximum score, 100). The study group included seventy-two children (mean age, 14 ± 2.5 years) with a diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the hip secondary to the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Patient assessments were standardized (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.93). Radiographs were graded by three experts according to consensus. Analyses were adjusted for the number of previous surgical procedures on the hip and for the severity of residual hip dysplasia. RESULTS: The median ASK score was 97 (interquartile range, 93 to 100), the median CHOHES score was 86 (interquartile range, 77 to 96), and the median HUI3 score was 1 (interquartile range, 0.9 to 1). The ASK summary scores were nearly equal (median, >90) across all radiographic grades. Adjusted mean scores showed a downward shift with worse radiographic grades. The ASK scores (p = 0.004) and CHOHES scores (p = 0.006) differed across radiographic grades, with Bucholz-Ogden grade-I and II hips demonstrating significantly better scores than grade-III and IV hips. DISCUSSION: Osteonecrosis secondary to the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip is a relatively benign condition in children and teenagers. While it was associated with limited hip function, it was not associated with physical disability. However, we speculate that this function will decline with increasing age. With regard to clinical outcome, Bucholz-Ogden grade-I hips are similar to grade-II hips and grade-III hips are similar to grade-IV hips.


Asunto(s)
Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/epidemiología , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/etiología , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Seguimiento , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Osteotomía/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Radiografía , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...