Association of refractive outcome with postoperative anterior chamber depth measured with 3 optical biometers.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the relationship between refractive outcomes and postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from corneal epithelium to lens) measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Scheimpflug devices under the undilated pupil. METHODS: Patients undergoing cataract phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a hospital setting were enrolled. Postoperative ACD (postACD) was performed with an SS-OCT device, an OLCR device, and a Scheimpflug device at least 1 month after cataract surgery. After adjusting the mean predicted error to 0, differences in refractive outcomes were calculated with the Olsen formula using actual postACD measured from 3 devices and predicted value. RESULTS: Overall, this comparative case study included 69 eyes of 69 patients, and postACD measurements were successfully taken using all 3 devices. The postACD measured with the SS-OCT, OLCR, and Scheimpflug devices was 4.59 ± 0.30, 4.50 ± 0.30, and 4.54 ± 0.32 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences in postACD were found among 3 devices (P < 0.001), with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman showing good agreement. No significant difference in median absolute error was found with the Olsen formula using actual postACD obtained with 3 devices. Percentage prediction errors were within ± 0.50 D in 65% (OLCR), 70% (Scheimpflug), and 67% (SS-OCT) calculated by actual postACD versus 64% by predicted value. CONCLUSION: Substantial agreement was found in postACD measurements obtained from the SS-OCT, OLCR, and Scheimpflug devices, with a trend toward comparable refractive outcomes in the Olsen formula. Meanwhile, postACD measurements may be potentially superior for the additional enhancement of refractive outcomes.

Let-7c-3p suppresses lens epithelial-mesenchymal transition by inhibiting cadherin-11 expression in fibrotic cataract.

Fibrotic cataract, including anterior subcapsular cataract (ASC) and posterior capsule opacification, always lead to visual impairment. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a well-known event that causes phenotypic alterations in lens epithelial cells (LECs) during lens fibrosis. Accumulating studies have demonstrated that microRNAs are important regulators of EMT and fibrosis. However, the evidence explaining how microRNAs modulate the behavior and alter the cellular phenotypes of the lens epithelium in fibrotic cataract is insufficient. In this study, we found that hsa-let-7c-3p is downregulated in LECs in human ASC in vivo as well as in TGFß2-induced EMT in vitro, indicating that hsa-let-7c-3p may participate in modulating the profibrotic processes in the lens. We then demonstrated that overexpression of hsa-let-7c-3p markedly suppressed human LEC proliferation and migration and attenuated TGFß2-induced EMT and injury-induced ASC in a mouse model. In addition, hsa-let-7c-3p mediated lens fibrosis by directly targeting the CDH11 gene, which encodes cadherin-11 protein, an important mediator in the EMT signaling pathway. It decreased cadherin-11 protein expression at the posttranscriptional level but not at the transcriptional level by binding to a specific site in the 3-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of CDH11 mRNA. Moreover, blockade of cadherin-11 expression with a specific short hairpin RNA reversed TGFß2-induced EMT in LECs in vitro. Collectively, these data demonstrated that hsa-let-7c-3p plays a clear role in attenuating ASC development and may be a novel candidate therapeutic for halting fibrosis and maintaining vision.

Prediction of postoperative effective lens position using iris root depth in primary angle-closure diseases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of a new parameter, iris root depth (IRD), in intraocular lens power calculation using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in primary angle-closure diseases (PACDs), and to compare the accuracy of 6 formulas in PACDs: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Haigis, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF) v. 3.0, Hoffer Q, Kane and Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical (SRK)/T. SETTING: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PACDs who had undergone cataract surgery were reviewed to first evaluate the performance of 6 formulas. Then preoperative UBM examinations of 58 eyes were used to measure IRD and predict effective lens position (ELP) to generate the Haigis IRD formula. The accuracy of Haigis IRD was compared with BUII, Haigis and Kane formulas. The SD of predicted error was the main indicator evaluating formula performance, according to heteroscedastic analysis. RESULTS: 103 eyes (103 patients) were included. The SDs of Kane (0.59, P = .01), RBF 3.0 (0.61, P = .02) and SRK/T formula (0.62, P = .04) were significantly lower than Hoffer Q. Modified with IRD, Haigis IRD generated the lowest SD (0.41), which was significantly lower than Haigis formula (0.54, P = .03) and was equal to Kane formula (0.45, P = .37). CONCLUSIONS: Kane, RBF 3.0 and SRK/T were more accurate in PACD eyes. Optimized with IRD, Haigis IRD formula achieved the lowest SD and had comparable accuracy with Kane formula. IRD could be a promising parameter to improve accuracy of IOL power calculation for PACDs.

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Total Keratometry in Patients With Flat and Steep Corneas.

PURPOSE: To analyze the accuracy of the current intraocular lens power calculation formulas using standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) data in patients with flat and steep corneas. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive cross-sectional study. METHODS: An optical biometer with swept-source optical coherence tomography was used in this retrospective study. The standard deviation (SD), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the proportion of eyes with prediction error (PE) within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.5 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D were calculated to evaluate the refractive outcomes of each formula. RESULTS: A total of 231 eyes from 231 patients were included. In the entire study cohort, the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) formula using TK data showed the lowest SD (0.383) and MAE (0.30) and the highest percentage of cases with a PE within ±0.5 D (81.4%). In the flat keratometry group, the EVO (P = .042), Haigis (P = .043), Hoffer Q (P = .038) and Holladay 1 (P = .013) formulas using TK data had significantly lower SD than using K data. The EVO formula using TK data showed the lowest SD (0.357) and MAE (0.28). In the steep keratometry group, the Hoffer Q (P = .036) and SRK/T (P = .029) formulas using TK data had significantly lower SD than using K data. The BUII TK formula showed the lowest SD (0.431), MedAE (0.26), and MAE (0.32). CONCLUSION: The TK data set showed a better trend of refractive outcomes, especially in the flat and steep keratometry groups. EVO (TK) and BUII TK formulas were suggested for eyes with K values lower than 42 D and K values higher than 46 D, respectively.

Impact of lens opacity and axial length on concomitant screening of maculopathy by swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.

Background: Preoperative evaluation of macular disorders is crucial to predict postoperative visual outcomes among patients with cataract. The swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based optical biometer was proved to be useful in screening macular pathology, while the impact of lens opacities and axial lengths on macular disease screening using SS-OCT based optical biometer remained unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of lens opacities and axial lengths on foveal image quality detected by SS-OCT-based optical biometer, as well as sensitivity and specificity for the detection of macular diseases. Methods: This was a diagnostic accuracy study that retrospectively included patients who underwent preoperative cataract examinations at our hospital between November 2020 and June 2021. All patients underwent SS-OCT based optical biometer and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). The SD-OCT was the golden standard for diagnosing macular diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were calculated to evaluate the value of foveal SS-OCT scans for the detection of macular disease. Results: Of the 224 eyes enrolled in the study, 82 eyes were diagnosed with macular disease by SD-OCT. The foveal image was almost indistinguishable due to poor quality when the mean grayscale of the image was less than 40. The posterior subcapsular opacity score and the axial length were significantly correlated with the gray density of the foveal image (r=-0.70, P<0.0001 and r=-0.40, P<0.0001). After excluding cases with indistinguishable foveal images (subcapsular opacities score ≥3.5, axial length ≥28.9 mm), the SS-OCT yielded 68% (95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.79) sensitivity and 87% (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.92) specificity in 136 eyes. Conclusions: Routine SS-OCT based biometric measurement for the evaluation of macular pathology simultaneously prior to cataract surgery is suggested except for patients with advanced cataract (posterior subcapsular opacities score ≥3.5) and long axial length (≥28.9 mm).

Effect of cataract surgery on vision-related quality of life among cataract patients with high myopia: a prospective, case-control observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of cataract surgery on vision-related quality of life (VR-QOL) in cataract patients with high myopia (HM). METHODS: In this prospective study, 90 patients with bilateral HM (HM group, mean [SD] age, 62.9 [9.7] years) and 90 age-matched patients with normal axial lengths (ALs) (control group) who underwent phacoemulsification surgery were consecutively included. The VR-QOL was evaluated using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. During the same periods, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the BCVA improved significantly in the HM group, with 78 patients (86.7%) achieving improvements ≥0.2 logMAR units, higher than that in the control group (61.1%, P < 0.001). Although the preoperative NEI-VFQ-25 composite score was lower in the HM group than in the control group (65.8 ± 4.7 [95% CI] versus 77.3 ± 3.8, P < 0.001), the postoperative composite score was not significantly different between the two groups (87.5 ± 2.6 versus 90.4 ± 1.6, P = 0.126); changes in composite score and scores of 7 subscales were greater in the HM group than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). In the HM group, but not in the control group (r = -0.019, P = 0.860), patient age was negatively associated with the change in composite score (r = -0.235, P = 0.026). Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was positively associated with changes in composite score for both groups (r = 0.796 and 0.714, respectively, P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: VR-QOL is significantly impaired in cataract patients with HM and is remarkably improved by cataract surgery. The improvement is greater than that in normal AL cases.

Refractive outcomes of second-eye adjustment methods on intraocular lens power calculation in second eye.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the refractive outcomes of second-eye adjustment (SEA) methods in different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for second eye following bilateral sequential cataract surgery. METHODS: This retrospective consecutive case-series study included 234 eyes from 234 patients who underwent bilateral sequential phacoemulsification and implantation of enVista MX60 in a hospital setting. Postoperative refraction outcomes calculated by standard formulas (SRK/T and Barrett Universal II, BUII) with SEA method were compared with those calculated by an artificial intelligence-based IOL power calculation formula (PEARL DGS) under second eye enhancement (SEE) method. The median absolute error (MedAE), mean absolute error (MAE) and percentage prediction errors (PE) of eyes within ±0.25 diopters (D), ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D and ± 1.00 D were determined. RESULTS: Overall, the improvement in MedAE after SEA was significant for PEARL DGS (p < 0.01), SRK/T (p < 0.001) and BUII (p = 0.031), which increased from 74.36, 71.37, and 77.78% to 83.33, 80.34, and 79.49% of eyes within a PE of ±0.50 D, respectively. For first eyes with a medium axial length (22-26 mm), PEARL DGS with SEE had the lowest MedAE (0.21 D). For a first-eye MAE over 0.50 D, SEA method led to significant improvement in the second eye (p < 0.01). Interocular axis length differences exceeding 0.3 mm were associated with weaker effects using SEA in the studied formulas (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Either SEA method with SRK/T and BUII formulas or second-eye enhancement method based on the PEARL DGS formula can improve postoperative refractive outcomes in second eye.

Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in primary angle-closure disease: comparison of 7 formulas.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas Barrett Universal II (BUII), Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF) 3.0, Kane, Ladas Super Formula (LSF), Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T in primary angle-closure disease (PACD). METHODS: A total of 129 PACD eyes were enrolled. Prediction refraction was calculated for each formula and compared with actual refraction. Accuracy was determined by formula performance index (FPI), median absolute error (MedAE) and percentage of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ± 0.50D. Subgroup analysis was performed according to axial length (AL). RESULTS: Overall, FPI was ranked as follows: Kane (0.067), RBF 3.0 (0.064), Haigis (0.062), SRK/T (0.060), BUII (0.058), Hoffer Q (0.055), and LSF (0.049). Kane got the highest (71.3%) percentage of eyes with PE within ± 0.50 D. In medium AL eyes (22 mm < AL ≤ 25 mm), FPI ranked the same as in total group. MedAEs were equal across all formulas (P = 0.121). In short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm), FPI was Kane (0.055), RBF 3.0 (0.050), SRK/T (0.050), Haigis (0.049), BUII (0.047), Hoffer Q (0.045), and LSF (0.033). MedAEs were significantly different across all formulas (P = 0.033). Haigis showed the lowest MedAE (0.35 D), Haigis and Kane got the highest percentage (63.6%) of eyes with PE within ± 0.50 D. CONCLUSION: Kane outperformed in total PACD eyes; RBF 3.0, Haigis, and SRK/T achieved satisfying performance. When dealing with PACD eyes shorter than 22 mm, Kane achieved the best accuracy. RBF 3.0, SRK/T, Haigis, and BUII achieved comparable outcomes. No formula showed superiority over others for medium AL PACD eyes.

Retinitis pigmentosa-associated anterior subcapsular cataract: morphological features and visual performance.

PURPOSE: To investigate the morphological features and surgical outcomes of retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-associated anterior subcapsular cataract (ASC). METHODS: Consecutive RP-associated ASC cases were reviewed, and one hundred patients (171 eyes) were included. Anterior segment photographed images by slit-lamp microscope were reviewed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded. The cases were classified according to preoperative best BCVA, the area (central, midperipheral and peripheral) and the density (Grade 1, vacuolar/bubble-like; Grade 2, plaque-like/translucent; and Grade 3, fibrotic/opaque) of ASC; subgroup analysis of surgical outcomes was then performed. RESULTS: The mean age was 52.1 ± 13.7 years, and the 41-50-year group had the best BCVA. 13.5% of eyes had BCVA better than 20/63, 30.4% were between 20/400 and 20/63, and 56.1% were worse than 20/400. The percentage of ASCs in the central, midperipheral and peripheral areas was 55.0%, 37.4% and 7.6%, respectively. Postoperative BCVA was improved in the central and midperipheral groups (P < 0.001) but was not in the peripheral group (P = 0.07). The percentage of ASCs in density of Grade 1, 2 and 3 was 11.1%, 38.6% and 50.3%, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 achieved improved postoperative BCVA (P < 0.001), but Grade 1 did not (P = 0.693). CONCLUSIONS: Mostly, ASC is located at the center of the pupillary area and affected the residual vision of RP patients. The patients benefited from cataract removal except for those with ASC extended to peripheral area. Surgery was also recommended for RP with ASC developed to be plaque-like and even fibrotic.

Evaluation of preoperative corneal astigmatism using swept-source optical biometry in Chinese cataract surgery candidates with high myopia: a prospective, comparative observational study.

BACKGROUND: High myopia and cataracts are major causes of blindness in East and Southeast Asia. Corneal astigmatism is a major contributor to uncorrected poor vision after cataract surgery in patients with high myopia. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the demographic characteristics and distribution of preoperative corneal astigmatism in Chinese cataract surgery candidates with high myopia. METHODS: Swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometry was performed preoperatively in consecutive cataract surgery candidates who were classified by axial length (AL) into a high myopia group (defined as AL ≥26.0 mm) and a control group (normal ALs). The demographics, ALs, and keratometry values were recorded. RESULTS: Among 15,063 cataract surgery candidates (15,063 eyes), 1,921 patients (12.8%, 1,921 eyes) in the high myopia group and 11,880 patients (11,880 eyes) in the control group were enrolled. In the high myopia group, the mean age was 59.8±12.6 (standard deviation) years, which was younger than that in the control group (69.1±11.0 years, P<0.001). In the high myopia group, the mean corneal astigmatism was 1.20±0.83 dioptre (D), which was greater than that in the control group (0.93±0.69 D, P<0.001). In the high myopia group, 82.2% had corneal astigmatism ≥0.50 D, 51.4% ≥1.00 D, 27.4% ≥1.50 D and 14.4% ≥2.00 D, all of which were higher than the respective proportions in the control group (P<0.001 for all). In the high myopia group, 66.8% had moderate to high corneal astigmatism, and 42.8% had "with-the-rule" astigmatism, and both of these proportions were higher than the respective proportions in the control group (P<0.001 for both). In the high myopia group, corneal astigmatism tended to increase with increasing age (r =0.134, P<0.001) after the age of 50, which was consistent with the tendency in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A significant burden of preoperative corneal astigmatism was observed in Chinese cataract surgery candidates with high myopia. Moderate to high corneal astigmatism was more common in highly myopic eyes than in normal AL eyes.

Refractive Outcomes and Anterior Chamber Depth after Cataract Surgery in Eyes with and without Previous Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

Purpose: To compare the differences in refractive outcome and anterior chamber depth (ACD) after phacoemulsification between eyes with and without previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).Materials and Methods: Patients who had significant cataracts after PPV were included in the study group, and patients with a matched axial length (AL) who had cataracts without PPV were selected as the control group. The performance of new generation intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (Barrett Universal II, Kane, Ladas Super formulas), and the traditional formulas (SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, Haigis) with and without the Wang-Koch (WK) AL adjustment were compared between the two groups. The postoperative ACD was measured using the Scheimpflug imaging system with manual correction at least three months after surgery. Results: In total, there were 193 eyes from 193 patients in each group. The mean prediction errors (MEs) of the new generation formulas had no significant systemic bias in the study group; the hyperopic shift was displayed in the traditional formulas for eyes with AL > 26mm. However, the difference of MEs between the two groups among all the formulas were not significant. The absolute prediction error (MAE) and median prediction error (Med AE) in the study group were larger than those in the control group among all the formulas. The postoperative ACD of the study group was deeper but not significant than that of the control group. Conclusions: There was no refractive shift in vitrectomized eyes compared with non-vitrectomized eyes no matter in new generation formulas or traditional vergence formulas. The prediction error among all the formulas in vitrectomized eyes were significantly higher than those in non-vitrectomized eyes. The ACD after phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes was not significantly different from non-vitrectomized eyes.

Comparison of early changes in ocular surface markers and tear inflammatory mediators after femtosecond lenticule extraction and FS-LASIK.

AIM: To compare the short-term impacts of femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) on ocular surface measures and tear inflammatory mediators. METHODS: This prospective comparative nonrandomized clinical study comprised 75 eyes (75 patients). Totally 20 male and 15 female patients (age 21.62±3.25y) with 35 eyes underwent FLEx, and 26 male and 14 female patients (age 20.18±3.59y) with 40 eyes underwent FS-LASIK. Central corneal sensitivity, noninvasive tear breakup time, corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer I test, tear meniscus height, and ocular surface disease index were evaluated in all patients. Tear concentrations of nerve growth factor (NGF), interleukin-1α (IL-1α), transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) were assessed by multiplex antibody microarray. All measurements were performed preoperatively, and 1d, 1wk, and 1mo postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients who underwent FLEx exhibited a more moderate reduction in central corneal sensation and less corneal fluorescein staining than those in the FS-LASIK group 1wk after the procedure (P<0.01). NGF was significantly higher 1d and 1wk after surgery in the FS-LASIK group than in the FLEx group (P<0.01). By contrast, compared to those in the FLEx group, higher postoperative values and slower recovery of tear TGF-ß1, IL-1α, and TNF-α concentrations were observed in the FS-LASIK group (P<0.01). Tear concentrations of NGF, TGF-ß1, TNF-α, and IL-1α were correlated with ocular surface changes after FLEx or FS-LASIK surgery. CONCLUSION: There is less early ocular surface disruption and a reduced inflammatory response after FLEx than after FS-LASIK. NGF, TGF-ß1, TNF-α, and IL-1α may contribute to the process of ocular surface recovery.

Vitreoretinal surgeons' experience and time interval from pars-plana vitrectomy to cataract extraction.

AIM: To identify the association of the vitreoretinal surgeons' experience with the time interval between pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) and cataract extraction (CE). METHODS: Eyes with prior PPV and following CE were included in this retrospective cohort study. The years of practice and the annual case volume were used to describe the surgeons' experience. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between surgeons' experience and the time interval adjusted for the patients age, gender, intraocular tamponade, and case complexity. RESULTS: Of 132 430 eyes, 1445 eyes were included in this study. In multivariable linear regression analysis, cases performed by surgeons with >20 practice years had longer time intervals compared with surgeons with <10 practice years after adjusted for other variables (ß=0.329, 95%CI: 0.113 to 0.549, P=0.003). No difference in time interval was detected for comparing the lowest with the highest volume groups (ß=0.089, 95%CI: -0.164 to 0.343, P=0.343). The surgeons' practice years were not directly with the volume. For complicated surgery, the higher-practice-year surgeons had longer time interval than lower-practice-year surgeons. CONCLUSION: The time intervals from PPV to CE is longer in higher-practice-year surgeons. The surgeons' practice years may have a greater effect on the time interval than annual case volume in high-complexity cases. Matching the complexity of vitreoretinal diseases with the surgeons' practice year should be considered.

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Formulas and Axial Length Adjustments for Highly Myopic Eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of artificial intelligence formulas (Kane formula and Radial Basis Function [RBF] 2.0) and other formulas, including the original and modified Wang-Koch (MWK) adjustment formulas for Holladay 1 (H1-MWK) and SRK/T (SRK/T-WK and SRK/T-MWK), the Barrett Universal II (BUII), the emmetropia-verifying optical (EVO), and the Haigis equation in highly myopic eyes. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case-series study. METHODS: A total of 370 eyes with an axial length (AL) ≥26.0 mm of 370 patients were enrolled, and subgroup analyses was performed based on ALs. The median absolute error (MedAE), the percentages of eyes with hyperopic outcome and within ±0.25 diopters (D), ±0.50 D, and ±1.00 D of prediction error were determined. RESULTS: Overall, the Kane equation had the lowest MedAE (0.26 D), followed by H1-WK (0.27 D) and H1-MWK (0.28 D). There were no significant differences in MedAE among the Kane equation, the RBF 2.0, the BUII, the H1-MWK, and the H1-WK, whereas the Kane equation had a significantly lower MedAE than EVO (P < .001), SRK/T-MWK (P = .001), SRK/T-WK (P = .006), and Haigis (P < .001). In extremely myopic eyes with an AL ≥30.0 mm (n = 115), the Kane equation had a significantly lower MedAE than the RBF 2.0 (P = .001), the EVO (P = .019), the BUII (P = .013), and the Haigis method (P = .005), whereas no significant differences were found among the Kane, H1-MWK, and H1-WK equations. CONCLUSIONS: The Kane equation was comparable to RBF 2.0, BUII, H1-MWK, and H1-WK in highly myopic eyes and was better than RBF 2.0 and BUII in extremely myopic eyes. The Kane, H1-MWK, and H1-WK methods were equally accurate in eyes with high to extreme myopia.

Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas for segmented multifocal intraocular lens.

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of eight different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for a segmented multifocal IOL. METHODS: A total of 53 eyes of 41 adult cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with the SBL-3 segmented multifocal IOL between January 1, 2017 and January 31, 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative biometry measurements were obtained using an IOL Master. Manifest refraction was performed at least 4wk postoperatively. Accuracy of the eight formulas [Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T] was analyzed. RESULTS: Using current lens constants, all formulas exhibited errors of slight myopic shift in refractive prediction. The Barrett Universal II formula had a significantly lower median absolute error (MedAE) than did Holladay 1 (P=0.02), Kane (P=0.001) and Hill-RBF 2.0 (P<0.001) formulas. The Haigis formula had a lower MedAE value than did the Hill-RBF 2.0 formula (P=0.005). Differences in MedAE values among SRK/T, EVO and Hoffer Q formulas were not significant. After optimizing lens constants, the MedAE values of all formulas were reduced; significant changes were noted for EVO (P=0.022), Haigis (P=0.048), Hill-RBF 2.0 (P=0.014), Holladay 1 (P=0.045) and Kane (P=0.022) formulas. All formulas performed equally well after optimization of lens constants (P=0.203). CONCLUSION: All eight formulas tend to result in a myopic shift when using current lens constants. Optimized lens constants improve the accuracy of these formulas among adult Chinese patients.

Refractive Predictability Using the IOLMaster 700 and Artificial Intelligence-Based IOL Power Formulas Compared to Standard Formulas.

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS: Eyes with biometry measurement by IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), uncomplicated phacoemulsification, and IOL implantation were enrolled in this retrospective study. Newly released artificial intelligence-based formulas including Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF) 2.0, Kane, and PEARL-DGS were compared with Gaussian optics-based standard formulas. The refraction predicted by each formula was compared with the actual refractive outcome in spherical equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 410 eyes of 410 patients were included in this study. Using optimized constants for SS-OCT biometry led to a significant decrease in median absolute error (MedAE) for Barrett, Haigis, and Hoffer Q formulas compared with using User Group for Laser Interference Biometry constants (P < .05). Overall, Olsen (0.283 diopters [D]) and Kane (0.286 D) formulas had significantly lower MedAEs than RBF 2.0 (0.314 D), Haigis (0.322 D), SRK/T (0.371 D), Holladay 1 (0.376 D), and Hoffer Q (0.379 D) formulas under constant optimization (P < .05). The first four formulas with the lowest standard deviations of prediction error were Kane (0.451 D), Olsen (0.456 D), EVO 2.0 (0.460 D), and Barrett (0.470 D). Olsen (47.1%), Barrett (45.9%), Kane (45.4%), and EVO 2.0 (45.1%) formulas had greater proportions of eyes within ±0.25 D of the predicted refraction than Hoffer Q (35.9%), SRK/T (35.9%), and Holladay 1 (33.4%) formulas (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Constant optimization for SS-OCT biometry further improves the performance of formulas. The most accurate prediction of postoperative refraction can be achieved with Barrett, EVO 2.0, Kane, and Olsen formulas. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(7):466-472.].

An investigation on the current patterns of using consumables and sterilizing accessories in phacoemulsification in China.

PURPOSE: To survey the routine application of consumables and sterilized accessories of phacoemulsification in mainland China. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. A questionnaire link was sent to Chinese ophthalmologists via the most widely used social communication tool (WeChat platform). RESULTS: A total of 815 questionnaires were determined to be valid and were included in the final analysis. The majority of respondents were from Guangdong, Shandong, Zhejiang, Hebei, and Henan provinces. A number of hospitals (48.22%) reused the fluidics management system (FMS) after sterilization. Among the hospitals using disposable FMS, 38.03% reused tubing after sterilization. Most respondents' hospitals (70.43%) sterilized the handpiece for each operation. Only 38.77% of the respondents' hospitals adopted irrigation fluid antibiotics and/or intracameral antibiotics intraoperatively. Greater single usage of FMS was significantly associated with higher provincial gross domestic product (GDP), government hospitals, provincial hospitals, and disposable tubing (P < 0.05). The adoption of irrigation fluid/intracameral antibiotics was correlated with the financial type of the hospital, the daily volume of phacoemulsification, and the usage of silicone tubing (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results show a wide variation in the application of consumables and the sterilization of accessories in phacoemulsification in mainland China. Only half of the hospitals adopted interfusion/intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis, despite its efficacy having been confirmed. These data revealed potential safety issues of the sterilization of phacoemulsification instruments and the risk of intraocular infection.

Accuracy evaluation of objective refraction using the wavefront aberrometer in pseudophakic eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of wavefront-derived objective refraction in pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: Retrospective case series. A total of 356 eyes (356 patients) that underwent phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation were included. Noncycloplegic subjective manifest refraction (MR) and objective refraction results from the wavefront aberrometer were obtained and compared. Subgroup analysis of objective refraction at 2.6-mm zone was performed based on axial length (AL) and average keratometry. RESULTS: The biases (at the 2.6-mm, 3-mm, and 4-mm zones) were - 0.29 ± 0.37 D, - 0.53 ± 0.41 D, and - 0.51 ± 0.60 D for sphere; - 0.27 ± 0.36 D, - 0.52 ± 0.38 D, and - 0.53 ± 0.51 D for spherical equivalent (SE); 0.03 ± 0.20 D, 0.03 ± 0.22 D, and 0.04 ± 0.27 D for J0; and 0.01 ± 0.16 D, 0.03 ± 0.22 D, and 0.01 ± 0.22 D for J45, respectively. Objective refraction for sphere, SE, and J0 (at 2.6 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm) was significantly different from MR (P < 0.05), while J45 values were equal. The objective refraction at 2.6 mm was the most accurate in short eyes (≤ 22.5 mm) with a minimum bias for SE (- 0.15 ± 0.28 D) and highest percentage of SE within ± 0.25 to ± 0.75 D of MR. However, there was no difference between the keratometry subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The wavefront aberrometer achieved the best accuracy at 2.6 mm in pseudophakic eyes with short AL. It still needs modification to be used as a substitute for MR in such patients.

Accuracy of Modified Axial Length Adjustment for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Chinese Axial Myopic Eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of modified Wang-Koch adjustment for intraocular lens power calculation in axial myopic eyes at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cataract patients with axial lengths (ALs) over 25.0 mm were enrolled. The accuracies of SRK/T and Holladay 1 with modified Wang-Koch AL adjustment were compared with those calculated with optimized lens constants for long eyes and lens constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry. They were also compared with Barrett Universal II (Barrett) and Haigis. The median absolute error (AE), mean absolute error (MAE) and proportions of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ±0.25 diopter (D), ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D were determined. RESULTS: In total, 325 eyes from patients with a mean age of 58.62 ± 13.51 years and a mean preoperative AL of 27.65 ± 2.05 mm were included. For SRK/T, Wang-Koch adjustment did not increase the proportion of eyes within the given diopter of PE in any AL subgroup and led to worse outcomes for ALs between 27.0 mm and 30.0 mm (n = 129; P = .001) compared to the method of using measured AL and optimized constant. For Holladay 1, comparison of PEs within ±0.50 D favored AL adjusted eyes in all subgroups. Moreover, the median AE of Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment in eyes with ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm was lower than that of Barrett (n = 146; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The modified Wang-Koch adjustment had better performance than constant optimization for Holladay 1 but not for SRK/T. Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment was more accurate than Barrett for ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm.