Efficacy and safety of sovleplenib (HMPL-523) in adult patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia in China (ESLIM-01): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Sovleplenib, a novel spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor, showed promising safety and activity in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia in a phase 1b/2 trial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovleplenib in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (ESLIM-01) was done in 34 clinical centres in China. Eligible patients, aged 18-75 years, had chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and received one or more previous treatments. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral sovleplenib or placebo, 300 mg once daily, for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline platelet counts, previous splenectomy, and concomitant treatment for anti-immune thrombocytopenia at baseline. The primary endpoint was durable response rate (proportion of patients with a platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L on at least four of six scheduled visits between weeks 14 and 24, not affected by rescue treatment) assessed by intention-to-treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05029635, and the extension, open-label phase is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Sept 29, 2021, and Dec 31, 2022, 188 patients were randomly assigned to receive sovleplenib (n=126) or placebo (n=62). 124 (66%) were female, 64 (34%) were male, and all were of Asian ethnicity. Median previous lines of immune thrombocytopenia therapy were 4·0, and 134 (71%) of 188 patients had received previous thrombopoietin or thrombopoietin receptor agonist. The primary endpoint was met; durable response rate was 48% (61/126) with sovleplenib compared with zero with placebo (difference 48% [95% CI 40-57]; p<0·0001). The median time to response was 8 days with sovleplenib compared with 30 days with placebo. 125 (99%) of 126 patients in the sovleplenib group and 53 (85%) of 62 in the placebo group reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and most events were mild or moderate. Frequent TEAEs of grade 3 or higher for sovleplenib versus placebo were platelet count decreased (7% [9/126] vs 10% [6/62]), neutrophil count decreased (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]), and hypertension (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]). Incidences of serious TEAEs were 21% (26/126) in the sovleplenib group and 18% (11/62) in the placebo group. There were no deaths in the study. INTERPRETATION: Sovleplenib showed a clinically meaningful sustained platelet response in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, with a tolerable safety profile and improvement in quality of life. Sovleplenib could be a potential treatment option for patients with immune thrombocytopenia who received one or more previous therapy. FUNDING: HUTCHMED and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality.

Zuberitamab, an innovative anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, for patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia in China: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.

Background: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease, and rituximab (RTX) induces long-term effect as second-line treatments. Zuberitamab is an innovative anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, which was first developed in China and launched in diffuse large B lymphoma. This study aimed to investigate the safety, efficacy, and anticipated therapeutic dose of zuberitamab in Chinese ITP patients. Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study was conducted at 26 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years, had primary immune thrombocytopenia for more than 6 months, and did not respond or relapsed after previous treatment and had a pre-treatment platelet count of <30 × 109/L. Patients randomly received zuberitamab in a dose escalation (100/300/600 mg) or placebo once-weekly for 4 weeks and followed up to 24 weeks. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L at week 8. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients with platelet counts ≥50 × 109/L or ≥100 × 109/L at least once within week 12/24, the proportion of patients experiencing platelets increased twice more than baseline as well as ≥30 × 109/L at least once during the treatment. Adverse events, pharmacokinetic, B cell depletion and immunogenicity were also assessed. This study is registered with https://www.chictr.org.cn/as ChiCTR2100050513. Findings: From October 2021 to March 2023, 50 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 32 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to placebo (n = 4), zuberitamab 100 mg (n = 10), 300 mg (n = 8) and 600 mg (n = 10) groups. The primary endpoint (PLT ≥50 × 109/L at week 8) was achieved by 40% of patients in the 100 mg group, while none in the other groups. Within 12 weeks, the proportions of patients in each treatment group achieving at least one instance of platelet count ≥50 × 109/L or ≥100 × 109/L or an increase twice more than baseline as well as ≥30 × 109/L were (70%, 38%, 50%), (60%, 13%, 30%), and (80%, 50%, 70%) in zuberitamab 100/300/600 mg groups, respectively. By week 24, the proportions of patients achieving these secondary endpoints remained relatively stable or showed a mild increase of around 10%. The anticipated therapeutic dose of zuberitamab was 100 mg. The plasma concentration of zuberitamab showed an increasing trend with dose (100 mg-600 mg) and linear pharmacokinetic behavior. CD19+ B cells and CD20+ B lymphocytes rapidly declined to 0% within one week and consistently maintained reduced levels throughout the entire treatment phase in three groups. Adverse events occurred in all patients with most of them were mild to moderate, no severe infections occurred. A slight decrease in immunoglobulins was observed in the 600 mg group, but gradually recovered at week 20. Three patients (2 in 100 mg and 1 in 600 mg group) were tested positive for anti-zuberitamab antibodies. We also observed that women, disease duration <12 months, and MAIPA + patients may have higher response rates. Interpretation: This study preliminarily confirmed that 100 mg zuberitamab was safe and effective in treating ITP and was recommended to support further investigation. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China and Zhejiang Bioray Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

Safety and efficacy of jaktinib (a novel JAK inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis who are intolerant to ruxolitinib: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2, multicenter study.

Although ruxolitinib improves splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), a substantial proportion of patients discontinue ruxolitinib because of intolerance. This phase 2 trial investigated the safety and efficacy of jaktinib, a novel JAK inhibitor in patients with ruxolitinib-intolerant MF. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) at week 24. The secondary endpoints included change of MF-related symptoms, anemic response, and safety profiles. Between December 18, 2019, and November 24, 2021, 51 patients were enrolled, 45 treated with jaktinib 100 mg bid (100 mg bid group) and six received non-100 mg bid doses (non-100 mg bid group). The SVR35 at week 24 in the 100 mg bid group was 43.2% (19/44, 95% CI 29.7%-57.8%). There were 41.9% (13/31) of transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin (HGB) ≤100 g/L who had HGB elevation ≥20 g/L within 24 weeks. The proportion of patients with a ≥50% decrease in the total symptom score (TSS 50) at week 24 was 61.8% (21/34). The most commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the 100 mg bid group were anemia 31.1%, thrombocytopenia 22.2%, and infectious pneumonia 17.8%. A total of 16 (35.6%) in the 100 mg bid group had serious adverse events, and 4 (8.9%) were considered possibly drug related. These results indicate jaktinib can provide a treatment option for patients with MF who are intolerant to ruxolitinib.

Safety and efficacy of jaktinib (a novel JAK inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis who are relapsed or refractory to ruxolitinib: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2, multicenter study.

Ruxolitinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). However, substantial number of patients may not respond after 3-6 months of treatment or develop resistance over time. In this phase 2 trial, patients with a current diagnosis of intermediate or high-risk MF who either had an inadequate splenic response or spleen regrowth after ruxolitinib treatment were enrolled. All patients received jaktinib 100 mg Bid. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR 35) at week 24. The secondary endpoints included change of MF-related symptoms, anemic response, and safety profile. From July 6, 2021, to January 24, 2022, 34 ruxolitinib-refractory or relapsed patients were enrolled, 52.9% (18 of 34) were DIPSS intermediate 2 or high risk. SVR 35 at week 24 was 32.4% (11 of 34, 95% CI 19.1%-49.2%) in all patients and 33.3% (6 of 18, 95% CI 16.3%-56.3%) in the intermediate 2 or high-risk group. A total of 50% (8 of 16) transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin (HGB) <100 g/L at baseline had HGB elevation ≥20 g/L within 24 weeks. Furthermore, 46.4% (13 of 28) of patients had a ≥ 50% decrease in the total symptom score (TSS 50) at week 24. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were thrombocytopenia (32.4%), anemia (32.4%), and leukocytosis (20.6%). In total, 13 (38.2%) of 34 patients had serious adverse events (SAE), of which drug-related SAEs were found in 5 patients (14.7%). These results indicate that jaktinib can be a promising treatment option for patients with MF who have either become refractory to or relapsed after ruxolitinib treatment.

Cyclosporine plus eltrombopag in the treatment of aplastic anemia with or without antithymocyte immunoglobulin: A multicenter real-world retrospective study.

AIMS: To compare cyclosporine (CSA) combining eltrombopag (EPAG) with or without antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in aplastic anemia (AA) patients in the real world. METHODS: AA patients who received ATG combining CSA and EPAG (Group A) and CSA + EPAG (Group B) as front-line treatment in 13 medical centers in China were enrolled. The efficacy and safety were compared. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were enrolled with 51 patients in Group A and 38 patients in Group B. The 6-month overall response (OR)/complete response (CR) was 73.3%/24.4% and 60.6%/27.3% in Groups A and B (p > .1). For severe AA patients, the 6-month OR was 74.1% versus 50% and 6-month CR was 25.9% versus 20% in Groups A and B (p > 0.1). Multivariate analysis showed gender affects the 6-month OR with females better OR (p = .017, OR 6.045, 95% CI: 1.377-26.546) and time from disease onset to treatment affected the 12-month CR (p = .026, OR 0.263, 95% CI: 0.081-0.852). No difference was found in side effects except ATG infusion reaction and serum sickness. Mortality was 7.8% in Group A and no patient died in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: CSA + EPAG had a similar response and less side effects compared with standard immunosuppressive therapy + EPAG in newly diagnosed AA.

Effect of miR-223-3p on cell pyroptosis in myelodysplastic syndrome and its mechanism via regulating the expression of NLRP3.

This study aimed to investigate the regulatory mechanism of the miR-223-3p/NLRP3 signaling axis in the progression of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). For this purpose, SKM-1 cells were transfected and three groups were set up according to different transfection protocols: si-NC group (NLRP3 silencing negative control plasmid), si-NLRP3 group (NLRP3 silencing plasmid), miR-223-3p mimic-NC group (miR-223-3p overexpressing negative control plasmid), miR-223-3p mimic group (miR-223-3p overexpressing plasmid), miR-223-3p mimic+oe-NLRP3 group and miR-223-3p mimic+oe-NLRP3 group (NLRP3 silencing combined with miR-223-3p overexpressing plasmid). Normal bone marrow cells were used as the control. qRT-PCR was used to detect relative expressions of NLRP3 and miR-223-3p; and Western blot to detect Ki67, Caspase-1, Gasdermin D, IL-1ß, IL-18 and MMP-9 expressions. Cell proliferation detection used CCK-8 assay, cell cycle distribution detection adopted flow cytometry, and cell migration and invasion analyses relied on Transwell assay. Dual-luciferase reporter assay verified the relationship between NLRP3 and miR-223-3p. An animal experiment was finally conducted to confirm the results obtained in cells. Results showed that compared with normal bone marrow cells and K562 cells, there were significantly upregulated NLRP3 expression and upregulated expression of miR-223-3p in SKM-1 cells (all P<0.05). Compared with the si-NC group and mimic-NC group respectively, the si-NLRP3 group and miR-223-3p mimic group showed inhibited proliferation, blocked cells in the G0/M phase, reduced cells in S phase, inhibited cell invasion and migration, decreased expressions of Ki67, Caspase-1, Gasdermin D, IL-1ß and IL-18, and MMP-9 (all P<0.05). NLRP3 was the direct target of miR-223-3p. Moreover, compared with the miR-223-3p mimic group, the miR-223-3p mimic+oe-NLRP3 group showed obviously increased expressions of NLRP3, Ki67, Caspase-1, Gasdermin D, IL-1ß, IL-18 and MMP-9, promoted proliferation, invasion and migration, and increased cells in S phase (all P<0.05). The animal test revealed that compared with the mimic-NC+ oe-NC group, miR-223-3p mimic+ oe-NC group showed reduced tumor volume and decreased Ki67 expression (both P<0.05); while compared with miR-223-3p mimic+ oe-NC group, miR-223-3p mimic+ oe-NLRP3 group had increased tumor volume and increased Ki67 expression (both P<0.05). It was concluded that overexpression of miR-223-3p can effectively inhibit the expression of NLRP3 and cell pyroptosis in MDS.

Qualitative analysis on a proposal for key specific medical treatment for aplastic anemia.

OBJECTIVE: By reviewing the medical treatments for aplastic anemia (AA, Suilao Disease), which is the important research interest of Collaborative Group, Key Department of Blood Disease, State Administration of Chinese medicine, the consensus on the diseases have been reached among the different units of the collaborative group. METHODS: Using qualitative analysis, we determined the characteristics, location and pathogenesis of Suilao disease. We discovered the ways of traditional Chinese medical treatment in curing Suilao disease. RESULTS: Acute AA (acute suilao) and chronic AA (chronic suilao) diseases require different treatment. Acute AA requires 3 phrases of treatments, which are "cold", "warm" and "hot". However, chronic AA requires a dialectic treatment, which involves reinforcement of the Shen (Kidney). Suitable Chinese medical treatments for curing Suilao disease were discussed and reached a consensus. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that a summarized therapy approved by many experts could be widely used.

[Effect of lingdankang composite combined dendritic cell-cytokine induced killer cells in treating leukemia].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and safety of Chinese herbal medicine Lingdankang Composite (LDK) combined dendritic cell-cytokine induced killer cells (DC-CIK) in treating leukemia. METHODS: Subjects were selected from leukemia patients who achieved hematological complete remission (HCR) but not achieved molecular biological remission (MBR), or with minimal residual leukemia (MRL) positive. Twenty patients, 19 of acute leukemia and 1 of chronic myelocytic leukemia, were enrolled. DC and CIK from patient's peripheral blood monocyte were separated respectively by blood cell separator, then DC-CIK was obtained through respective culture followed with mixed cultivation of them, and was infused back to the patient self via intravenous injection. The back infusion of DC-CIK was performed once every 15-20 days for 4-6 times in total. Meantime, LDK was administered orally every day. RESULTS: In the 20 patients treated, 4 case of HCR achieved MBR, the negatively reversed marker gene was AML1/ETO in 1 case, CBFbeta/MYH11 in 1, bcr/abl in 1, and the other 1 was IgH gene rearrangement; 3 patients with positive MRL were reversed to negative. The 3-year CR rate was 75% with a medium CR period of 25 months (10-37 months). Except transient fever and chill in 5 cases, no other remarkable adverse reaction happened during or after DC-CIK infusion. CONCLUSION: The combined treatment of LDK and autologous DC-CIK in treating patients with HCR shows an obvious effect of clearing MRL, it is the appropriate choice for curing leukemia of HCR, and is safety for intravenous infusion, so it has potential clinical prospect.

Clinical observation on the treatment of childhood refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with Dihuang Zhixue Capsule.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect of Dihuang Zhixue Capsule (DZC, a Chinese preparation for cooling blood and dispelling toxic substances) in the treatment of childhood refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (RITP), with cyclosporin A (CsA) used as the control. METHODS: Forty-one children of RITP were randomized into the treated group and the control group. The 21 patients in the treated group were orally given 2 to 3 DZC capsules each time, thrice a day and the 20 in the control group were given 3 mg/kg CsA per day, with 3 months as one therapeutic course. The therapeutic efficacy, platelet count and adverse reaction in the two groups were compared at the end of the course. RESULTS: (1) In the treated group, 1 (4.8%) patient was evaluated as cured, 3 (14.3%) as markedly effective, 5 (23.8%) as effective, 5 (23.8%) as improved, 7 (33.3%) as ineffective, with the total effective rate being 66.7%; while in the control group, the corresponding numbers were 0, 2 (10.0%), 2 (10.0%), 3 (15.0%), 13 (65.0%) and 35.0%, respectively, showing statistical significance in difference between the total effective rates of the two groups (xi(2)=4.11, P=0.0426). (2) As compared with the baseline, the platelet count increased in both groups after 2 months' treatment (P<0.05). After 3 months' treatment, the platelet count was higher in the treated group than in the control group (P<0.05). (3) The improvement of hemorrhage in the treated group after 8 weeks' treatment was better than that in the control group (P<0.05). (4) No apparent adverse reaction was observed in the treated group, while in the control group, hirsutism was shown in 15 cases; gingival hyperplasia in 10; digestive reaction in 5, liver function impairment in 5, hypertension in 2 and renal impairment in 2. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic efficacy of DZC is better than that of CsA, and DZC shows good compliance but brings no obvious adverse reaction.