The Relationship Between Height and Income With Potential Application to Treatment of Limb Length Discrepancy.

Purpose When treating limb length discrepancy (LLD), decisions regarding lengthening versus contralateral shortening require careful consideration of deformity and patient factors. Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) database, and income as a quantitative representation of overall socioeconomic benefit, we sought to determine the height at which incremental gains in height have the greatest value. Methods Using the NLSY79 database, we collected demographic data, height, yearly income from wages, college education (full- or part-time), and receipt of government financial aid. Multiple-linear regression and graphical analysis were performed. Results The study population included 9,652 individuals, 4,775 (49.5%) males and 4,877 (50.5%) females. Mean heights were 70.0±3.0 inches and 64.3±2.6 inches for males and females, respectively. Multiple-linear regression analysis (adjusted-r²=0.33) demonstrated height had a standardized-ß=0.097 (p<0.001), even when accounting for confounding factors. Using graphical analysis, we estimated cut-offs of 74 inches for males and 69 inches for females, beyond which income decreased with incremental height. Conclusions Using income as a quantitative representation of socioeconomic value, our analysis found income increased with incremental height in individuals with predicted heights up to 74 inches for males and 69 inches for females. Shortening procedures might receive more consideration at predicted heights greater than these cut-offs, while lengthening might be more strongly considered at the lower ranges of height. Additionally, our multiple-linear regression analysis confirms the correlation between height and income, when factoring in other predictors of income.

Optimizing calibration of modern skeletal maturity systems.

Purpose: Greulich and Pyle is the most used system to estimate skeletal maturity but has significant drawbacks, prompting the development of newer skeletal maturity systems, such as the modified Fels skeletal maturity systems based on knee radiographs. To create a new skeletal maturity system, an outcome variable, termed a "skeletal maturity standard," must be selected for calibration of the system. Peak height velocity and 90% of final height are both considered reasonable skeletal maturity standards for skeletal maturity system development. We sought to answer two questions: (1) Does a skeletal maturity system developed using 90% of final height estimate skeletal age as well as it would if it was instead developed using peak height velocity? (2) Does a skeletal maturity system developed using 90% of final height perform as well in lower extremity length prediction as it would if it was instead developed using peak height velocity? Methods: The modified Fels knee skeletal maturity system was recalibrated based on 90% of final height and peak height velocity skeletal maturity standards. These models were applied to 133 serially obtained, peripubertal antero-posterior knee radiographs collected from 38 subjects. Each model was used to estimate the skeletal age of each radiograph. Skeletal age estimates were also used to predict each patient's ultimate femoral and tibial length using the White-Menelaus method. Results: The skeletal maturity system calibrated with 90% of final height produced more accurate skeletal age estimates than the same skeletal maturity system calibrated with peak height velocity (p < 0.05). The 90% of final height and peak height velocity models made similar femoral and tibial length predictions (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Using the 90% of final height skeletal maturity standard allows for simpler skeletal maturity system development than peak height velocity with potentially more accuracy.

Developmental Anatomy of the Radial Bow in Pediatric Patients using 3D Imaging.

BACKGROUND: While radial bow shape is well characterized in adults, its development in children is not well understood. Previous studies on the radial bow use radiographs, thus, rotational positioning of the forearm could alter bowing measurements. This study used 3D imaging to better assess the pediatric radial bow. METHODS: Computed tomography scans from the New Mexico Decedent Image Database were obtained for ages 2 to 16 (females) and 18 (males) (n=152). 3D models were generated using Slicer and Rhino software. Length of the entire radial bow (bicipital tuberosity to sigmoid notch), maximum radial bow, location of the maximum radial bow (bicipital tuberosity to the point of maximum bowing), and distal, middle, and proximal third radial bows were measured. RESULTS: The length of the entire bow increased with age, with a strong correlation with age (r=0.90, P<0.01). The maximum bow increased with age, with a strong correlation with age (r=0.78, P<0.01). The maximum bow normalized to the length of the entire bow increased mildly with age, mean 0.059 ± 0.012 (r=0.24, P=0.0024), but seems to plateau around age 8. The location of the maximum bow increased with age (r=0.85, P<0.01). The normalized location of the maximum bow remained constant between ages, with a mean of 0.41 ± 0.10 (r=0.12, P=0.14). The normalized distal third bow mildly increased with age (r=0.34, P<0.01), the normalized middle third bow mildly increased with age (r=0.25, P<0.01), and the normalized proximal third bow remained constant between ages (r=0.096, P=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Normalized values for maximum, distal third, and middle third radial bow increase with age, while normalized values for location and proximal third radial bow remain relatively constant, suggesting the proportional shape of the radius changes during development, although qualitatively plateaus after age 8. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level-III.

The Addition of Hand-specific Skeletal Maturity Parameters Does Not Improve Skeletal Maturity Estimation Accuracy of the Modified Fels Wrist System.

BACKGROUND: The Modified Fels Wrist system is potentially the most accurate clinically accessible skeletal maturity system utilizing hand or wrist radiographs. During development, parameters distal to the metacarpals were excluded. We attempted to further optimize the Modified Fels wrist system through the inclusion of hand parameters distal to the metacarpals. METHODS: Forty-three new anteroposterior (AP) hand radiographic parameters were identified from the Fels and Greulich and Pyle (GP) skeletal maturity systems. Twelve parameters were eliminated from further evaluation for poor correlation with skeletal maturity, poor reliability, and lack of relevance in the peripubertal years. In addition to the 8 previously described Modified Fels Wrist parameters, 31 hand radiographic parameters were evaluated on serial peripubertal AP hand radiographs to identify the ones most important for accurately estimating skeletal age. This process produced a "Modified Fels hand-wrist" model; its performance was compared with (1) GP only; (2) Sanders Hand (SH) only; (3) age, sex, and GP; (4) age, sex, and SH; and (5) Modified Fels Wrist system. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-two radiographs from 42 girls and 38 boys were included. Of the 39 radiographic parameters that underwent full evaluation, 9 remained in the combined Modified Fels Hand-Wrist system in addition to chronological age and sex. Four parameters are wrist specific, and the remaining 5 are hand specific. The Hand-Wrist system outperformed both GP and SH in estimating skeletal maturity ( P <0.001). When compared with the Modified Fels Wrist system, the Modified Fels Hand-Wrist system performed similarly regarding skeletal maturity estimation (0.36±0.32 vs. 0.34±0.26, P =0.59) but had an increased (worse) rate of outlier predictions >1 year discrepant from true skeletal maturity (4.9% vs. 1.9%, P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of hand parameters to the existing Modified Fels Wrist system did not improve skeletal maturity estimation accuracy and worsened the rate of outlier estimations. When an AP hand-wrist radiograph is available, the existing Modified Fels wrist system is best for skeletal maturity estimation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Association of Idiopathic Cam Morphology With Femoral and Acetabular Version: Analysis of 986 Cadaveric Hips.

Background: Studies have correlated symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with femoral retroversion and cam lesions. Purpose: To investigate any association between femoral and acetabular versions with cam deformity in a largely asymptomatic population. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 986 cadaveric hips were selected from a historical osteologic collection. Each hip was assessed to determine the femoral and acetabular versions, anterior offset, and alpha angle. Cam morphology was defined as an alpha angle >60°. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between age, femoral version, acetabular version, and either alpha angle or anterior femoral offset. Results: The mean alpha angle and anterior offset for the sample population were 48.1°± 10.4° and 0.77 ± 0.17 cm, respectively, with cam morphology in 149 of the 986 (15.1%) specimens. No significant difference was observed between hips with and without cam morphology with respect to the femoral (10.8°± 10° vs 10.3°± 9.6°; P = .58) or acetabular versions (17.4°± 6° vs 18.2°± 6.3°; P = .14). Multiple regression analysis did not demonstrate an association between the femoral or acetabular versions and the alpha angle, and it showed a small association between the increasing femoral and acetabular versions and a decreased anterior femoral offset (both P < .01). Conclusion: In a large random sample of cadaveric hips, cam morphology was not associated with femoral or acetabular retroversion. Combined with the existing literature, these findings suggest that retroversion is not associated with cam development. Clinical Relevance: This study provides insight into the development of cam morphology, which may eventually aid in the evaluation and treatment of FAI.

Less common than expected: late displacement after minimally displaced pediatric lateral condyle fractures of the elbow.

The incidence of late displacement among pediatric lateral condyle fractures has been described as 1.3-26%. However, prior studies are limited by small cohort sizes. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of late displacement and delayed union among lateral condyle fractures following immobilization in a large cohort and to establish additional radiographic criteria to help surgeons choose between immobilization and operative fixation for minimally displaced fractures. We performed a dual-center retrospective study of patients with lateral condyle fractures between 1999 and 2020. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, time to orthopedic presentation, duration of cast immobilization, and complications following casting were recorded. There were 290 patients with lateral condyle fractures included. The initial management in 61% of patients (178/290) was nonoperative, of which four had delayed displacement at follow-up and two developed delayed union requiring surgery (failure in 6/178, 3.4%). The mean displacement on the anteroposterior view was 1.3 ±â€…1.1 mm and the lateral view was 0.50 ±â€…1.0 mm in the nonoperative cohort. In the operative cohort, the mean displacement on AP was 6.6 ±â€…5.4 mm and the lateral view was 5.3 ±â€…4.1 mm. Our analysis found the rate of late displacement in patients treated with immobilization was lower than previously reported (2.5%; 4/178). The mean displacement on the lateral film in the cast immobilization cohort was 0.5 mm, suggesting that necessitating near anatomic alignment on the lateral film to consider nonoperative management may lead to a lower incidence of late displacement than previously reported. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The Modified Fels and Abbreviated Modified Fels Knee Skeletal-Maturity Systems in the Prediction of Leg-Length Discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: The Modified Fels (mFels) and Abbreviated Modified Fels (abFels) knee systems have been recently developed as options for grading skeletal maturity without the need for a separate hand radiograph. We sought to determine the interobserver reliability of these systems and to compare their prediction accuracy with that of the Greulich and Pyle (G-P) atlas in a cohort managed with epiphysiodesis for leg-length discrepancy (LLD). METHODS: Three reviewers scored 20 knee radiographs using the mFels system, which includes 5 qualitative and 2 quantitative measures as well as a quantitative output. Short leg length (SL), long leg length (LL), and LLD prediction errors at maturity using the White-Menelaus (W-M) method and G-P, mFels, or abFels skeletal age were compared in a cohort of 60 patients managed with epiphysiodesis for LLD. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for the 2 quantitative variables and the quantitative output of the mFels system using 20 knee radiographs ranged from 0.55 to 0.98, and kappa coefficients for the 5 qualitative variables ranged from 0.56 to 1, indicating a reliability range from moderate to excellent. In the epiphysiodesis cohort, G-P skeletal age was on average 0.25 year older than mFels and abFels skeletal ages, most notably in females. The majority of average prediction errors between G-P, mFels, and abFels were <0.5 cm, with the greatest error being for the SL prediction in females, which approached 1 cm. Skeletal-age estimates with the mFels and abFels systems were statistically comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The mFels skeletal-age system is a reproducible method of determining skeletal age. Prediction errors in mFels and abFels skeletal ages were clinically comparable with those in G-P skeletal ages in this epiphysiodesis cohort. Further work is warranted to optimize and validate the accuracy of mFels and abFels skeletal ages to predict LLD and the impact of epiphysiodesis, particularly in females. Both the mFels and abFels systems are promising means of estimating skeletal age, avoiding additional radiation and health-care expenditure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Reliability of the Modified Fels Knee Skeletal Maturity System.

BACKGROUND: The recently described Modified Fels knee skeletal maturity system (mFels) has proven utility in prediction of ultimate lower extremity length in modern pediatric patients. mFels users evaluate chronological age, sex, and 7 anteroposterior knee radiographic parameters to produce a skeletal age estimate. We developed a free mobile application to minimize the learning curve of mFels radiographic parameter evaluation. We sought to identify the reliability of mFels for new users. METHODS: Five pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, 5 orthopaedic surgery residents, 3 pediatric orthopaedic nurse practitioners, and 5 medical students completely naïve to mFels each evaluated a set of 20 pediatric anteroposterior knee radiographs with the assistance of the (What's the Skeletal Maturity?) mobile application. They were not provided any guidance beyond the instructions and examples embedded in the app. The results of their radiographic evaluations and skeletal age estimates were compared with those of the mFels app developers. RESULTS: Averaging across participant groups, inter-rater reliability for each mFels parameter ranged from 0.73 to 0.91. Inter-rater reliability of skeletal age estimates was 0.98. Regardless of group, steady proficiency was reached by the seventh radiograph measured. CONCLUSIONS: mFels is a reliable means of skeletal maturity evaluation. No special instruction is necessary for first time users at any level to utilize the (What's the Skeletal Maturity?) mobile application, and proficiency in skeletal age estimation is obtained by the seventh radiograph. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Correlations Between Eight Comprehensive Skeletal Maturity Systems in a Modern Peripubertal Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Several skeletal maturity systems allow for accurate skeletal age assessment from a wide variety of joints. However, discrepancies in estimates have been noted when applying systems concurrently. The aims of our study were to (1) compare the agreement among 8 different skeletal maturity systems in modern pediatric patients and (2) compare these discrepancy trends qbetween modern and historic children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective (January 2000 to May 2022) query of our picture archiving and communication systems and included peripubertal patients who had at least two radiographs of different anatomic regions obtained ≤3 months apart for 8 systems: (1) proximal humerus ossification system (PHOS), (2) olecranon apophysis ossification staging system (OAOSS), (3) lateral elbow system, (4) modified Fels wrist system, (5) Sanders Hand Classification, (6) optimized oxford hip system, (7) modified Fels knee system, and (8) calcaneal apophysis ossification staging system (CAOSS). Any abnormal (ie, evidence of fracture or congenital deformity) or low-quality radiographs were excluded. These were compared with a cohort from a historic longitudinal study. SEM skeletal age, representing the variance of skeletal age estimates, was calculated for each system and used to compare system precision. RESULTS: A total of 700 radiographs from 350 modern patients and 954 radiographs from 66 historic patients were evaluated. In the modern cohort, the greatest variance was seen in PHOS (SEM: 0.28 y), Sanders Hand (0.26 y), and CAOSS (0.25 y). The modified Fels knee system demonstrated the smallest variance (0.20 y). For historic children, the PHOS, OAOSS, and CAOSS were the least precise (0.20 y for all). All other systems performed similarly in historic children with lower SEMs (range: 0.18 to 0.19 y). The lateral elbow system was more precise than the OAOSS in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The precision of skeletal maturity systems varies across anatomic regions. Staged, single-parameter systems (eg, PHOS, Sanders Hand, OAOSS, and CAOSS) may correlate less with other systems than those with more parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective study.

Prospective Multicenter Preliminary Validation of Limb Deformity-modified Scoliosis Instruments in Pediatric Patients With Limb Deformity.

INTRODUCTION: There are few disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in pediatric limb deformity (LD), with authors instead relying on generic PROMs such as the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) to assess treatment outcomes from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this study was to perform preliminary validation of 2 disease-specific PROMs in pediatric patients with LD. METHODS: LD modifications were created by substituting the word "limb" for "back" in the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ, ages 10 and younger) and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS, ages 11 to 18) survey, creating the LD-EOSQ and LD-SRS instruments. Children were preoperatively administered the age-appropriate LD-PROMs (n=34 LD-EOSQ; n=30 LD-SRS) and PODCI questionnaires. LD-PROMs were assessed for construct (convergent and discriminant) validity, floor and ceiling effects, content validity, and minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS: Both LD-EOSQ and LD-SRS demonstrated excellent preliminary convergent validity with similar PODCI domains and discriminant validity with demographic information, deformity data, and LLRS-AIM scores. There were minimal floor or ceiling effects. Content validity was achieved in 100% of LD-EOSQ surveys and more than 80% of LD-SRS surveys. Minimal clinically important difference was 0.4 for LD-EOSQ and 0.3 for LD-SRS. CONCLUSIONS: The LD-EOSQ for patients aged 10 and under and LD-SRS for patients aged 11 to 18 demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability in the pediatric LD population. These measures provide more information specifically related to familial impact in younger children and self-image and mental health in adolescents compared to the PODCI and should be further evaluated for use in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic. Prospective cross-sectional cohort design.

Correlation between Femoral Neck Version, Sagittal Femoral Bowing Angle and Sagittal Offset of the Femoral Head from the Distal Femur Axis in an Osteological Collection.

Aim: Radiographic analysis of lower limb alignment is crucial for the planning and evaluation of deformity correction. Assessment in the sagittal plane is often overlooked compared with the coronal plane for a variety of reasons. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the femoral head in the sagittal plane and femoral neck version in the axial plane, and how sagittal femoral bowing angle (sFBA) may contribute. Materials and methods: Twenty-five each of high (1-2 standard deviations above mean), normal (2.5° below to 2.5° above the mean), and low (1-2 standard deviations below the mean) version femurs were randomly selected from an osteological collection database, photographed and measured for sFBA and sagittal offset of femoral head from the distal femur axis. Lines were drawn within the proximal and distal quartiles of the shaft to create sFBA. The offset of the distal quartile line and the femoral head was also measured. High intra- and inter-observer correlations were established. The relationship between parameters was assessed using the Pearson coefficient (r). Results: Sagittal offset of the femoral head from the distal femur axis was found to be highly correlated with sFBA (r = 0.78), and only mildly with femoral neck version (r = 0.52). Sagittal femoral bowing angle and femoral neck version share no relationship (r = 0.05). Conclusions: Neither the sFBA nor sagittal femoral head offset is strongly associated with femoral neck version. Clinical significance: Our data reinforce the need for long leg lateral films to include the femoral head in sagittal deformity analysis, as imaging limited to the knee will not account for the effect of bowing on femoral head position. How to cite this article: Ho D, Liu RW, Mcclure PK. Correlation between Femoral Neck Version, Sagittal Femoral Bowing Angle and Sagittal Offset of the Femoral Head from the Distal Femur Axis in an Osteological Collection. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(1):12-15.

Assessment and Validation of Anterior Humeral Line for Diagnosing Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in the Pediatric Population.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are commonly evaluated using the anterior humeral line (AHL) on a lateral radiograph. Rotational variations in radiographic projection are common due to child discomfort and could lead to changes in management based on where the AHL intersects the capitellum. The purpose of this study was to establish whether rotational variations in elbow rotation leads to significant changes in AHL position and whether drawing the AHL based on the distal humerus versus shaft is more tolerant to rotation. METHODS: Fifty children with nonoperative supracondylar humerus fractures were identified with sub optimally positioned injury and well positioned follow-up lateral radiographs. The proportion of the bone anterior to the intersection of the AHL and the capitellum was measured using the humeral shaft versus distal humerus to guide position of the AHL. This process was repeated on ten pediatric humerus dry cadaveric specimens which were imaged in 5-degree rotational increments along the axis of the humeral shaft from -20 to +20 degrees. RESULTS: AHL position correlated poorly when measured on rotated lateral radiographs of clinical patients versus non-rotated lateral radiographs when using the distal humerus as a guide (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.14), compared with when using the humeral shaft as a guide (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81). When assessing the pediatric humerus dry cadavers between the 2 techniques, there was greater statistically significant variation in rotated positions compared with the neutral position in the distal humerus AHL measurement approach compared with the humeral shaft AHL measurement approach, with the mean AHL within the central third of the capitellum for more rotational positions when using the shaft compared with the distal humerus. CONCLUSIONS: With rotated lateral elbow radiographs in supracondylar humerus fractures, utilizing the humeral shaft provides more consistent AHL measurements than utilizing the distal humerus, and thus drawing the line starting at the shaft of the humerus is recommended for surgical decision making.

Intramedullary Fixation for Pediatric Femoral Nonunion in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric femoral shaft nonunion after use of a plate or intramedullary nail (IMN) is uncommon in the United States. In low and middle-income countries, as defined by The World Bank, these complications may occur with greater frequency. We assessed the rates of union and painless weight-bearing after IMN fixation of pediatric femoral shaft nonunion in lower-resource settings. METHODS: We queried the SIGN (Surgical Implant Generation Network) Fracture Care International online database to identify all pediatric femoral shaft nonunions that had occurred since 2003 and had ≥3 months of follow-up after their treatment; our query identified 85 fractures in 83 patients. We defined nonunion as failure of initial instrumentation >90 days following its placement, lack of radiographic progression on radiographs made >3 months apart, or the absence of signs of radiographic healing >6 months after initial instrumentation. We evaluated the most recent follow-up radiograph to determine a Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) score. We also recorded rates of painless full weight-bearing as assessed by the treating surgeon. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with pediatric femoral shaft nonunions (including 42 male and 15 female patients from 18 countries) were included. The average age (and standard deviation) at the time of revision surgery was 13.8 ± 3.0 years (range, 6 to 17 years). The median duration of follow-up was 67 weeks (range, 13 weeks to 7.7 years). The initial instrumentation that went on to implant failure included plate constructs (56%), non-SIGN IMNs (40%), and SIGN IMNs (4%). At the time of the latest follow-up, 52 patients (91%) had a RUST score of ≥10 and 51 (89%) had painless full weight-bearing. No patient had radiographic evidence of femoral head osteonecrosis at the time of complete fracture-healing or the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric femoral shaft nonunion can occur after both plate and IMN fixation in low and middle-income countries. IMN fixation is an effective and safe treatment for these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Disparities in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic Pre-vaccine and Post-Vaccine Availability.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant disruptions in medical care, resulting in an estimated 40% of US adults avoiding care. However, the return to baseline health care utilization following COVID-19 restrictions within the pediatric orthopedic population remains unexplored. We sought to analyze the visit volume and demographics of pediatric orthopedic patients at 3 timepoints: prepandemic (2019), pandemic (2020), and pandemic post-vaccine availability (2021), to determine the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on our single-center, multisite institution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 6318 patients seeking treatment at our institution from May through August in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Patient age, sex, address, encounter date, and ICD-10 codes were obtained. Diagnoses were classified into fractures and dislocations, non-fracture-related trauma, sports, elective, and other categories. Geospatial analysis comparing incidence and geospatial distribution of diagnoses across the time periods was performed and compared with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) social vulnerability index (SVI). RESULTS: The total number of pediatric orthopedic visits decreased by 22.2% during the pandemic ( P <0.001) and remained 11.6% lower post-vaccine availability compared with prepandemic numbers ( P <0.001). There was no significant difference in age ( P =0.097) or sex ( P =0.248) of the patients across all 3 timepoints; however, patients seen during the pandemic were more often White race (67.7% vs. 59.3%, P <0.001). Post-vaccine availability, trauma visits increased by 18.2% ( P <0.001) and total fractures remained 13.4% lower than prepandemic volume ( P <0.001). Sports volume decreased during the pandemic but returned to prepandemic volume in the post-vaccine availability period ( P =0.298). Elective visits did not recover to prepandemic volume and remained 13.0% lower compared with baseline ( P <0.001). Geospatial analysis of patient distribution illustrated neighborhood trends in access to care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with fewer patients from high SVI and low socioeconomic status neighborhoods seeking fracture care during the pandemic than prepandemic. Post-vaccine availability, fracture population distribution resembled prepandemic levels, suggesting a return to baseline health care utilization. CONCLUSION: Pediatric orthopedic surgery visit volume broadly decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic and did not return to prepandemic levels. All categories increased in the post-vaccine availability time point except elective visits. Geospatial analysis revealed that neighborhoods with a high social vulnerability index (SVI) were associated with decreased fracture visits during the pandemic, whereas low SVI neighborhoods did not experience as much of a decline. Future research is needed to study these neighborhood trends and more completely characterize factors preventing equitable access to care in the pediatric orthopedic population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Study, Level III.

Applicability of Shoulder, Olecranon, and Wrist-based Skeletal Maturity Estimation Systems to the Modern Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: The proximal humerus ossification system (PHOS), olecranon apophyseal ossification system (OAOS), and modified Fels wrist skeletal maturity system (mFWS) were recently developed or updated using a historical, mostly White, pediatric population. These upper extremity skeletal maturity systems have demonstrated skeletal age estimation performance superior or equivalent to Greulich and Pyle in historical patients. Their applicability to modern pediatric populations has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: We reviewed anteroposterior shoulder, lateral elbow, and anteroposterior hand and wrist x-rays of 4 pediatric cohorts: White males, Black males, White females, and Black females. Peripubertal x-rays were evaluated: males 9 to17 years and females 7 to 15 years. Five nonpathologic radiographs for each age and joint were randomly selected from each group. Skeletal age estimates made by each of the 3 skeletal maturity systems were plotted against the chronological age associated with each radiograph and compared between cohorts, and with the historical patients. RESULTS: Five hundred forty modern radiographs were evaluated (180 shoulders, 180 elbows, and 180 wrists). All radiographic parameters had inter- and intra-rater reliability coefficients at or above 0.79, indicating very good reliability. For PHOS, White males had delayed skeletal age compared with Black males (Δ-0.12 y, P =0.02) and historical males (Δ-0.17 y, P <0.001). Black females were skeletally advanced compared with historical females (Δ0.11 y, P =0.01). For OAOS, White males (Δ-0.31 y, P <0.001) and Black males (Δ-0.24 y, P <0.001) had delayed skeletal age compared with historical males. For mFWS, White males (Δ0.29 y, P =0.024), Black males (Δ0.58 y, P <0.001), and Black females (Δ0.44 y, P <0.001) had advanced skeletal age compared with historical counterparts of the same sex. All other comparisons were not significant ( P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PHOS, OAOS, and mFWS have mild discrepancies in skeletal age estimates when applied to modern pediatric populations depending on the race and sex of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - retrospective chart review.

Applicability of the Modified Fels and Optimized Oxford Skeletal Maturity Estimation Systems to the Modern Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: The recently developed modified Fels knee and optimized Oxford hip skeletal maturity systems (SMS) have demonstrated impressive performance compared with the Greulich and Pyle skeletal age atlas when applied to the same historical, mostly white, pediatric population. We sought to determine whether these 2 systems require modification before being used in modern children. METHODS: We collected knee and hip radiographs between January 2015 and September 2020 from our electronic medical record from 4 groups of children: (1) white males, (2) black males, (3) white females, and (4) black females. Males between 9 and 17 years and females between 7 and 15 years were included. After reliability analyses, 5 nonpathologic radiographs for each age and joint were randomly selected from each group and evaluated with the appropriate SMS. The mean discrepancy between each group's chronological age at the time of radiograph and estimated skeletal age was compared between our modern cohort and the historical Bolton-Brush children. After normality testing, paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed, as appropriate. A Bonferroni correction was applied to address multiple testing. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty modern radiographs were evaluated (180 knees and 180 hips). All 7 modified Fels knee parameters and all 5 optimized Oxford hip parameters had inter and intrarater reliability coefficients ≥0.7, indicating good to very good reliability. For the modified Fels knee SMS, white males (Δ0.74 y, P <0.001), black males (Δ0.69 y, P <0.001), and black females (Δ0.4 y, P =0.04) had advanced skeletal age compared with their historical counterparts of the same sex. No differences were found between historical and modern patients for the optimized Oxford hip SMS. No differences were found for either SMS comparing modern patients along racial lines ( P >0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies in skeletal age estimates made by the modified Fels knee SMS exist between modern pediatric white males, black males, and black females and their historic counterparts. No differences were found when using optimized Oxford hip SMS. Future studies should evaluate how these translate to clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective chart review.

A Cadaveric Anatomical Study of the Relationship between Proximal Tibial Slope and Coronal Plane Deformity.

Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) are commonly used to characterize the geometry of proximal tibia and are important considerations in lower extremity realignment procedures and total knee arthroplasty. This study utilized a large cadaveric collection to explore relationships between tibial slope and coronal plane deformity of the tibia. We utilized 462 well-preserved skeletons (924 tibiae), excluding any with fracture or obvious rheumatologic or infectious findings. Custom cards were made with different sized arcs on the bottom surface, so that they could rest on the anterior and posterior aspects of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus of each bone to measure PPTA. Previously measured MPTA values for the same bones were also utilized. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationship between MPTA and medial and lateral PPTAs. The mean age was 56 ± 10 years, with 13% female and 31% African American (remainder Caucasian). The mean MPTA was 87.2 ± 2.4 degrees. The mean medial plateau PPTA was 81.5 ± 3.8 degrees and mean lateral plateau PPTA was 81.3 ± 3.7 degrees. Regression analysis found that MPTA was significantly associated with both medial and lateral PPTAs (standardized betas 0.197 and 0.146, respectively, p < 0.0005 for both). There was a significant correlation between lateral and medial PPTAs (r = 0.435, p = 0.03). The clinical significance of these findings warrants further investigation and emphasizes the importance of carefully assessing the sagittal plane when planning reconstruction of a tibia with varus or valgus deformity, particularly high tibial osteotomies.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Associated With Athletic Activity.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist regarding the association of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and sporting activities. HYPOTHESIS: There is no association between SCFE and sporting activities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of all SCFE cases at our institution from 2010 through March 2021. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: All patients with idiopathic SCFE were reviewed looking for the presence/absence of sporting activities and symptom onset. Also collected were the age, symptom duration, and weight/height of the patient, sex, race, and stable/unstable nature of the SCFE. The severity of the SCFE was measured using the lateral epiphyseal-shaft angle. RESULTS: There were 193 children (110 boys, 83 girls) with idiopathic SCFEs. The SCFE was stable in 147, unstable in 45, and unknown in 1. The average age was 12.1 ± 1.8 years, average SCFE angle 38° ± 20° and symptom duration 4.0 ± 5.1 months. An association with a sporting activity was present in 64 (33%). The sporting activity was basketball (18), football (11), baseball/softball (10), and others (23). Football, basketball, and soccer predominated in boys, baseball and running sports were equal between boys and girls, and cheerleading/gymnastics/dancing predominated in girls. Differences showed that those involved in sports had a slightly lower body mass index (BMI) (88th percentile vs 95th percentile, P = 0.00). There were no differences between those involved and those not those involved in sporting activities for symptom duration, SCFE severity, sex, race, or stable/unstable SCFE type. CONCLUSION: Sporting activities are associated with the onset of symptoms in 1 of 3 of patients with SCFE, refuting the null hypothesis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A high level of suspicion for SCFE should be given when any peripubertal athlete presents with hip or knee pain regardless of BMI/obesity status, and appropriate imaging performed.

Which Application Factors Are Associated With Outstanding Performance in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency?

BACKGROUND: Identifying ideal candidates for orthopaedic surgery residency is difficult. Data available for applicant selection are evolving; preclinical grades and the Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) honors society are being phased out at some medical schools. Similarly, three-digit United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores have been eliminated. There is renewed interest in improving resident selection to provide a diverse, comprehensive educational opportunity that produces orthopaedic surgeons who are prepared for practice. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to identify whether (1) academic achievements, (2) letters of recommendation, (3) research activity, and (4) miscellaneous factors available on Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) applications were associated with outstanding residency performance. METHODS: Ten faculty members (22% of all full-time faculty) with extensive educational involvement for at least 7 years, whose expertise covered all subspecialty departments at an urban, academic orthopaedic surgery residency program, were given an anonymous survey on the performance of the four most recent classes of residency graduates (24 residents). This survey was developed due to the lack of a validated residency outcomes tool or objective metrics for residency performance. The evaluated criteria were decided upon after discussion by a relatively large group of academic orthopaedic surgeons considering the factors most important for graduating orthopaedic residents. The faculty were selected based on their long-term knowledge of the residency, along with their diversity of specialty and backgrounds; there were no nonresponders. Faculty graded each resident on a scale from 1 to 10 (higher is better) on six criteria: surgical technical skills, research productivity, clinical knowledge, professionalism, personality, and fellowship match. The mean of the faculty ratings made by all faculty for all six criteria was calculated, producing the overall residency performance score. Factors available on each resident's ERAS application were then correlated with their overall residency performance score. Categorical ERAS factors, including AOA status, five or more honors in core clerkships, at least three exceptional letters of recommendation, collegiate athletics participation, expertise with a musical instrument, and research (6-year) track residents, were correlated with overall residency performance score via point biserial analysis. Continuous ERAS factors including USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores, number of publications before residency, number of research years before residency, medical school ranking, and number of volunteer experiences were correlated with overall residency performance score via Pearson correlation. USMLE Step 1 three-digit scores were evaluated despite their recent elimination because of their historic importance as a screening tool for residency interviews and for comparison to USMLE Step 2, which retains a three-digit score. Application factors with a p < 0.2 on univariate analysis (five or more honors in core clerkships, at least three exceptional letters of recommendation, research track residents) were included in a stepwise linear regression model with "overall residency performance score" as the outcome variable. All p values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The mean overall residency performance score was 7.9 ± 1.2. Applicants with at least five honors grades in core clerkships had overall residency performance scores 1.2 points greater than those of their peers (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 2.0; p = 0.01, Cohen ƒ 2 = 0.2, representing a small effect size). ERAS applications including at least three exceptional letters of recommendation were associated with a 0.9-point increase in residency performance (95% CI 0.02 to 1.7; p = 0.046, Cohen ƒ 2 = 0.1, representing a small effect size). Participation in the residency research (6-year) track was associated with a 1-point improvement in residency performance (95% CI 0.1 to 1.9; p = 0.03, Cohen ƒ 2 = 0.2, again, representing a small effect size). Together, these three factors accounted for 53% of the variance in overall residency performance score observed in this study. CONCLUSION: Past clinical excellence, measured by core clerkship grades and exceptional letters of recommendation, is associated with slightly improved overall orthopaedic residency performance scores. Applicants meeting both criteria who also complete a research track residency may perform substantially better in residency than their counterparts, as these three factors accounted for half of all the variance observed in the current study. Although minimum requirements are necessary, traditionally used screening factors (such as USMLE scores, AOA status, medical school rank, and number of publications) may be of less utility in identifying successful future residents than previously thought. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.