Lifestyle intervention Tai Chi for adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a PRIO-harms based overview of 17 systematic reviews.

Objective: To systematically summarize current evidence and determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of Tai Chi for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in adults by conducting an overview of systematic reviews (SRs). Methods: A systematic search encompassing five electronic databases was conducted until July 30, 2023, to identify relevant systematic reviews (SRs) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning Tai Chi for T2DM. The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool. The Preferred Reporting Items for Overview of Systematic Review (PRIO-harms) checklist was used to promote a more balanced reporting of benefits and harms in this overview. Corrected covered area (CCA) was used to calculate the degree of overlapping primary studies. Primary outcome measures were glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose (FBG), while secondary outcomes encompassed health-related quality measures. The GRADE (Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework was utilized to assess the quality of evidence for the outcome measures. Results: A total of 17 eligible SRs were included in this overview. One SR reported negative conclusions, while the remaining 16 reported positive ones on different outcomes. A total of 4 SRs reported adverse events, either absent or minor. Most of the SRs exhibited critically low quality (15/17) and a high risk of bias (14/17), as indicated by AMSTAR2 and ROBIS, respectively. The CCA was 12.14%, indicating a high degree of primary study overlapping. Evidence from 135 results for 24 outcomes concerning Tai Chi for T2DM was evaluated using the GRADE approach, most of which were rated very low. Conclusion: Tai Chi shows promise as a potentially effective and safe lifestyle intervention for adults with T2DM, particularly in improving HbA1c, FBG, BMI, and overall quality of life (QoL). However, these results should be cautiously interpreted due to methodological flaws observed in the current SRs and the low quality of the SRs based on GRADE. Furthermore, there is a compelling need for additional well-designed, high-quality RCTs and SRs to establish robust and conclusive evidence regarding the efficacy of Tai Chi for managing T2DM in the future. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD 42019140988.

Tai Chi for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Tai Chi is gaining an increasing popularity in rehabilitation management of chronic conditions. Yet no consensus has reached on its efficacy and safety of type 2 diabetes despite that several systematic reviews (SRs) were published on this topic. Therefore, we will conduct an overview to critically evaluate current SRs and implement an updated metaanalysis with recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A systematic literature search of relevant RCTs-based SRs will be conducted in electronic databases including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from their inceptions to search date without language restrictions. Eligible SRs will be methodologically assessed by the assessment of multiple SRs 2 and Risk of Bias in SRs tool and their RCTs included will be extracted for further evidence synthesis. To update current meta-analysis on this topic, a supplementary search will be implemented for related newly emerged RCTs. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool will be applied for RCTs quality evaluation. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation will be utilized for evidence quality assessment of outcomes. Study characteristic information on participants, interventions, outcomes, comparisons and conclusions will be described in detail. Review Manager V5.3 will be used for risk of bias assessment and Stata 14.0 for meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The study results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal publication or conference presentation. CONCLUSIONS: This study finding will provide an updated evidence of Tai Chi for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), thus to help inform clinical physicians, T2DM patients and their families to develop better rehabilitation plans and to draw more attention of decision-makers in exercise rehabilitation related policy-making.This study protocol has been applied for registration on PROSPERO platform (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/), with an assigned ID: CRD42019140988.

Rehabilitation for balance impairment in patients after stroke: a protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple rehabilitation therapies have been reported to be effective for poststroke balance impairment. However, the comparative effectiveness of these rehabilitation therapies is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to summarise evidence and identify the most effective rehabilitation therapy for poststroke balance impairment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following databases will be searched: China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data, the Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, Medline, Excerpt Medical Database (EMBASE), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, from inception to June 2019. All randomised controlled trials that have used rehabilitation interventions to treat poststroke balance impairment will be included. The primary outcomes are the Berg Balance Scale, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (balance), the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, as well as the function in sitting test, the Sitting Balance Scale, the Ottawa Sitting Scale, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, the Overall Balance Index and the Brunel Balance Assessment. The secondary outcomes include the Barthel Index, the Functional Ambulation Category Scale, fall rates, the Timed Up and Go test, the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and adverse events. To ensure that all relevant studies are included without personal bias, study selection, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Review Manager V.5.3 software will be used to make bias risk diagram and pairwise meta-analysis, while network data synthesis will be performed using WinBUGS V.1.4.3 and R software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for systematic review and network meta-analysis. The results will be submitted to a peer review journal or at a conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD 42018107441).

TCM nonpharmacological interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nonpharmacological interventions are gaining an increasing popularity for chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD) treatment and rehabilitation, yet their comparative effectiveness and safety remains unclear. Therefore, this study will aim to compare their effectiveness and safety for COPD by implementing a network-meta analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases including MEDLINE via Ovid, and EMBASE via Ovid, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) will be searched for related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inceptions to the search date without language restrictions. RCTs that compare TCM nonpharmacological interventions with placebo or conventional treatments will be included. The primary outcome will be lung function measures, dyspnea level and COPD-specified life quality and secondary ones will include functional exercise capacity, and general health-related life quality. Both classical meta-analysis and network meta-analysis will be implemented to investigate direct and indirect evidences on this topic. Continuous data will be expressed as standard mean differences (SMDs) and categorical data as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. The evidence transitivity and consistency within network will be evaluated with Cochrane Q statistic and net-heat plot. RESULTS: The study results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal publication or conference presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The review findings will provide a ranking evidence of current TCM nonpharmacological interventions and help to inform clinical practitioners, COPD patients, and policy-makers in the decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019126554.