Combination Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: Perspectives of the EU/US CTAD Task Force.

Combination therapy is expected to play an important role for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In October 2018, the European Union-North American Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease Task Force (EU/US CTAD Task Force) met to discuss scientific, regulatory, and logistical challenges to the development of combination therapy for AD and current efforts to address these challenges. Task Force members unanimously agreed that successful treatment of AD will likely require combination therapy approaches that target multiple mechanisms and pathways. They further agreed on the need for global collaboration and sharing of data and resources to accelerate development of such approaches.

Analysis of the Relationship of Cognitive Impairment and Functional Impairment in Mild Alzheimer's Disease in EXPEDITION 3.

BACKGROUND: Clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease is characterized by impairment in cognition and function. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between cognitive and functional impairment in mild Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: Spearman's rank correlations between cognitive and functional measures were calculated. Autoregressive cross-lagged panel analyses were used to determine the temporal relationship between cognitive and functional decline. SETTING: Post-hoc analysis of clinical trial data. PARTICIPANTS: Placebo-treated patients with mild Alzheimer's disease from the Phase 3 solanezumab study EXPEDITION 3. INTERVENTION: Placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive and functional measures were assessed at baseline and at six post-baseline time points through Week 80. RESULTS: Correlation between cognitive and functional measures was 0.41 at baseline and 0.65 at Week 80. Autoregressive cross-lagged panel analysis demonstrated that cognitive impairment preceded and predicted subsequent functional decline, but functional scores did not predict cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the hypothesis that functional impairment predictably follows cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer's disease dementia.

Delayed-Start Analyses in the Phase 3 Solanezumab EXPEDITION3 Study in Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: A delayed-start design has been proposed to assess a potential disease-modifying effect in investigational drugs for Alzheimer's disease that target the underlying disease process. We extended this methodology to recently obtained data from the EXPEDITION3. METHODS: EXPEDITION3 was a Phase 3, double-blind study with participants randomized to solanezumab (400 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks for 80 weeks, with an optional extension of active treatment. The delayed-start analysis was designed to determine if a statistically significant treatment difference established during the placebo-controlled period is maintained (at predefined level) during the delayed-start period, which would suggest the active drug has a disease-modifying effect. The delayed-start analysis was assessed across multiple efficacy measures, and includes data from baseline in the placebo-controlled period and up to 9 months in the delayed-start period. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the placebo and solanezumab treatment groups at the end of the placebo-controlled period for the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive 14-item subscale. A significant treatment difference was observed at the end of the placebo-controlled period for the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living instrumental items, an effect also seen at 6 months in the delayed-start period, and the noninferiority criterion was met. No other efficacy measures met these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-start statistical methodology was used to understand the longitudinal outcomes in EXPEDITION3 and its extension. The small treatment differences observed at the end of the placebo-controlled phase prevented adequate assessment of any putative disease modifying effect.

Correlation between Cognition and Function across the Spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Both cognitive and functional deterioration are characteristic of the clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVES: To systematically assess correlations between widely used measures of cognition and function across the spectrum of AD. DESIGN: Spearman rank correlations were calculated for cognitive and functional measures across datasets from various AD patient populations. SETTING: Post-hoc analysis from existing databases. PARTICIPANTS: Pooled data from placebo-treated patients with mild (MMSE score ≥20 and ≤26) and moderate (MMSE score ≥16 and ≤19) AD dementia from two Phase 3 solanezumab (EXPEDITION/2) and two semagecesatat (IDENTITY/2) studies and normal, late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI) and mild AD patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2-Grand Opportunity (ADNI-2/GO). Intervention (if any): Placebo (EXPEDITION/2 and IDENTITY/2 subjects). MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive and functional abilities were measured in all datasets. Data were collected at baseline and every three months for 18 months in EXPEDITION and IDENTITY studies; and at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months in the ADNI dataset. RESULTS: The relationship of cognition and function became stronger over time as AD patients progressed from preclinical to moderate dementia disease stages, with the magnitude of correlations dependent on disease stage and the complexity of functional task. The correlations were minimal in the normal control population, but became stronger with disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found that measures of cognition and function become more strongly correlated with disease progression from preclinical to moderate dementia across multiple datasets. These findings improve the understanding of the relationship between cognitive and functional clinical measures during the course of AD progression and how cognition and function measures relate to each other in AD clinical trials.

A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Duloxetine has demonstrated analgesic effect in chronic pain states. This study assesses the efficacy of duloxetine in chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: Adult patients with non-radicular CLBP entered this 13-week, double-blind, randomized study comparing duloxetine 20, 60 or 120 mg once daily with placebo. The primary measure was comparison of duloxetine 60 mg with placebo on weekly mean 24-h average pain. Secondary measures included Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24), Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Four hundred four patients were enrolled, 267 completed. No significant differences existed between any dose of duloxetine and placebo on reduction in weekly mean 24-h average pain at end-point. Duloxetine 60 mg was superior to placebo from weeks 3-11 in relieving pain, but not at weeks 12-13. Duloxetine 60 mg demonstrated significant improvement on PGI-I, RMDQ-24, BPI-average pain and BPI-average interference. Significantly more patients taking duloxetine 120 mg (24.1%) discontinued because of adverse events, versus placebo (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine was superior to placebo on the primary objective from weeks 3-11, but superiority was not maintained at end-point. Duloxetine was superior to placebo on many secondary measures, and was well-tolerated.

Predictors of risk for relapse in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder during olanzapine drug therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship of dose decrease, symptom worsening, and baseline covariates on subsequent relapse during olanzapine treatment in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: In two 28-week, randomized, double-blind clinical trials, a Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine potential correlates of relapse (defined as > or =20% worsening on PANSS total and CGI-Severity 3) among patients (N=271) who responded to 8 weeks of olanzapine treatment (10-20mg/day). Variables examined included: demographics, illness characteristics, baseline symptoms, symptom change, dose, adverse events, and functioning. RESULTS: Patients with a lower last dose relative to the preceding visit interval were 4 times more likely to relapse during that visit interval than other patients (p<.001). A similar finding was observed for a decrease in interval modal dose, although this variable was more predictive of relapse in the visit interval immediately following dose decrease (p=.027). In a subgroup analysis by gender, there was a significantly greater incidence of relapse in men with a dose decrease, whereas a dose decrease in women did not correlate with relapse. Relapse was also correlated with the emergence or worsening of a psychiatric adverse event during the same (p<.001) and preceding (p=.007) visit intervals, and with increased rating scale measures of psychopathology. The occurrence of a non-psychiatric adverse event was not associated with relapse. CONCLUSION: Dose decrease is a significant predictor of relapse in male but not female patients. Psychiatric adverse events also predicted relapse. Patients should be periodically reassessed to determine the need for maintenance treatment with appropriate dose.