Influence of irradiation and oncologic surgery on head and neck microsurgical reconstructions.

Despite the refinement of microsurgical techniques, microsurgical free flap transfer in patients with a history of previous radiotherapy, neck dissection or free flaps remains a challenge in oncologic reconstructive surgery. Previous studies on the prognostic factors for postoperative complications have been largely retrospective and shown conflicting results. Our aim was to design a prospective study to identify negative outcome predictors of free flap surgery in previously treated oral cancer patients. Prospective study including all patients who required microsurgical free flap transfer for reconstruction of the oral cavity between July of 2007 and June of 2010 with subset analysis of those cases in whom previous surgical or nonsurgical oncological treatment for head and neck cancer had been carried out. A total of 360 free flaps were performed in 358 patients, of whom 61 had previous neck dissection and 58 had undergone radiation therapy. Operation time was significantly found to be longer in irradiated patients. The need for microsurgical revision, postoperative wound infection and free flap loss were significantly associated with the ASA score and a previous neck dissection. Wound infection was seen significantly more often after radiotherapy. Previous neck dissections and radiotherapy as well as the ASA score are significant negative predictors for success in free flap transfer. For patients with prior oncologic treatments in their medical history, we recommend detailed preoperative assessment of the vascular status and an intensified postoperative care to reduce complication rates to improve outcome in oncologic reconstructive surgery.

Maxillary reconstruction using microvascular free flaps.

OBJECTIVE: Loss of all or part of the maxilla as a result of tumor ablation has both functional and aesthetic consequences. Reconstruction of the maxilla remains a challenge despite the availability of several flaps and the skills of the prosthodontist. We have analyzed a series of maxillary resections that underwent flap reconstruction to guide planning of the rehabilitation of patients with such defects. STUDY DESIGN: The authors present 83 patients with various types of maxillary defects that were reconstructed with different microvascular free flaps. All clinical data, including data on the functional and aesthetic outcome, are analyzed. RESULTS: Flap transfer was successful in 80 of 83 patients who underwent maxillary reconstruction. Separation of the oral and nasal cavities was achieved in all cases. Flap compromise occurred in 6 cases, which made revision necessary. Three of these flaps were salvaged and 3 flaps failed. In 10 of 28 patients with transferred bone, osseointegrated implants were inserted and dentally rehabilitated with excellent functional and aesthetic results. CONCLUSION: Various types of maxillary defects can be reconstructed successfully using different microvascular free flaps. This procedure is challenging because of the anatomical site of reconstruction creating a steep learning curve. If the reconstruction is successful, both facial appearance and oral function can be improved. Microvascular flaps containing bone of the fibula, scapula, or iliac crest facilitate complete dental rehabilitation.