Participación ciudadana en la adaptación de la Guía NICE sobre participación comunitaria: aprendizajes y claves de futuro / Citizen involvement in the adaptation of the NICE Guideline on community involvement: lessons learnt and keys for the future

El estudio multicéntrico AdaptaGPS surge con el objeto de traducir y adaptar al contexto español las recomendaciones de la Guía NICE NG44 Community engagement: improving health and wellbeing and reducing health inequalities.Parte del proceso de adaptación contó con el asesoramiento de 11 proyectos de participación en salud del Estado español que valoraron la comprensibilidad y adaptabilidad de las recomendaciones a nuestro contexto. Un grupo de ciudadanía fue consultado en cada uno de los proyectos, lo cual ha supuesto un hecho novedoso, ya que hasta el momento la contribución de la ciudadanía en la elaboración o adaptación de guías de salud se había centrado principalmente en participar en la creación de versiones ciudadanas. Este paso innovador coincide con un interés cada vez más nutrido en incluir la participación ciudadana en la investigación.Las aportaciones realizadas por los grupos de la ciudadanía de los proyectos consultados en el proceso AdaptaGPS han supuesto una oportunidad para aproximarnos al modo en que la población movilizada concibe la participación, las barreras que observa y las propuestas de mejora que expresa, así como ejemplos de cómo en la práctica incorporan las recomendaciones. (AU)

Factors related to the development of health-promoting community activities in Spanish primary healthcare: two case-control studies.

OBJECTIVE: Spanish primary healthcare teams have the responsibility of performing health-promoting community activities (CAs), although such activities are not widespread. Our aim was to identify the factors related to participation in those activities. DESIGN: Two case-control studies. SETTING: Performed in primary care of five Spanish regions. SUBJECTS: In the first study, cases were teams that performed health-promoting CAs and controls were those that did not. In the second study (on case teams from the first study), cases were professionals who developed these activities and controls were those who did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Team, professional and community characteristics collected through questionnaires (team managers/professionals) and from secondary sources. RESULTS: The first study examined 203 teams (103 cases, 100 controls). Adjusted factors associated with performing CAs were percentage of nurses (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.14), community socioeconomic status (higher vs lower OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.95) and performing undergraduate training (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.93). In the second study, 597 professionals responded (254 cases, 343 controls). Adjusted factors were professional classification (physicians do fewer activities than nurses and social workers do more), training in CAs (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1), team support (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7), seniority (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09), nursing tutor (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.5), motivation (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.5), collaboration with non-governmental organisations (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1) and participation in neighbourhood activities (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9 to 5.1). CONCLUSIONS: Professional personal characteristics, such as social sensitivity, profession, to feel team support or motivation, have influence in performing health-promoting CAs. In contrast to the opinion expressed by many professionals, workload is not related to performance of health-promoting CAs.

Observational study on factors related to health-promoting community activity development in primary care (frAC Project): a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: According to Spanish health regulations, primary care professionals have the responsibility to carry out health-promoting community activities (CAs). However, in practice, their implementation is not as widespread as it should be. The aims of this study were to identify factors within the team, the community and the professionals that influence the development of these activities and to describe the community interventions in progress. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an observational analytical retrospective study. The information will be collected from five Spanish regions: Catalonia, Madrid, the Balearic Islands, Navarra and Aragón. The authors will contact primary care teams (PCTs) and identify the CAs from the previous year. The research team will conduct a peer review whether the inclusion criteria are met. In the health centres where CAs are implemented, the authors will select professionals carrying them out and randomly select an identical number of professionals not doing these activities. In the centres where no CA is implemented, three professionals will be randomly selected. The selected professionals will complete the questionnaires for individual-level variables. Information about the registered population and the PCTs will be collected through questionnaires and secondary sources. OUTCOMES: Variables will be collected from the community, the PCTs, the individual professionals and CAs. ANALYSIS: A descriptive analysis of all the variables will be carried out, along with a bivariate and a logistic regression analysis, with CAs being the primary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Jordi Gol y Gurina Foundation in Barcelona and area 11 in Madrid. The questionnaire distributed to the professionals will be anonymous.