Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Surg ; 72(6): 491-6, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16808200

RESUMEN

Formation of a neointima is associated with grafted artery or vein, angioplasty, and stent and inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) implantation. Contributing to the neointima is a population of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) that migrates from media and subsequently proliferates within intima. The purpose of this present study was to culture SMC from normal vessel wall and from neointima and to compare migration and growth of these cells. Neointima was stimulated in the vena cava of pigs by placement of an IVCF for 30 days. Tissue was taken from the thickened wall between the struts and from a normal segment of the IVCF. After removal of the endothelium and adventitia, explants were placed in culture dishes and were observed for the migration of cells. Immunoassay for smooth muscle alpha-actin was used to identify cell origin. Proliferation was determined by cell counting. The cell cycle regulator cyclin D1 was detected by Western blot analysis. SMC phenotype was confirmed by positive immunostaining for smooth muscle alpha-actin. Cells migrated from the neointimal explants (NI-SMC) more rapidly than cells from explants of normal media (NM-SMC). Proliferation of NI-SMC was also more rapid than NM-SMC with or without exogenous mitogens. NI-SMC expressed more cyclin D1 than NM-SMC. Injury to the vena cava triggered neointima formation characterized by the expansion of a population of SMC with increased migration and replication compared with SMC from normal regions of the vessel.


Asunto(s)
Movimiento Celular/fisiología , Proliferación Celular , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/fisiología , Túnica Íntima/patología , Filtros de Vena Cava , Vena Cava Inferior/patología , Animales , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Ciclina D1/metabolismo , Porcinos , Túnica Íntima/metabolismo , Vena Cava Inferior/cirugía
2.
J Trauma ; 59(4): 847-52, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16374272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic and prophylactic vena cava filters (VCFs) are used to prevent pulmonary embolism. Concerns exist over placing a permanent filter in a young trauma patient. Recently, retrievable VCFs have become available. One such filter is the OptEase, which has a recommended time of removal of up to 23 days after insertion. Data supporting this recommendation are sparse. Many trauma patients will need filters for more than 2 weeks, and there are no data evaluating the safety of removal after extended time periods. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and reaction of the vena cava when removing the OptEase retrievable VCF at different time intervals. METHODS: Twenty Yorkshire cross pigs (80-113 kg) underwent general anesthesia with tiletamine and zolazepam. Filters were placed in the infrarenal vena cava (VC) through the femoral vein under fluoroscopic guidance. Animals were then divided into four groups. In group 1, filters were removed at 14 days; in group 2, at 30 days; in group 3, at 60 days; and in group 4, at 90 days. Removal was attempted using a snare-and-sheath technique through the femoral vein. Animals with successful filter removal were allowed to recover; then, the animals underwent autopsy (gross and microscopic VC examination) 2 months later. Animals with unsuccessful filter removal underwent autopsy immediately after attempted removal. Venacavograms were taken at filter insertion, at removal, and before autopsy to evaluate any VC abnormalities. RESULTS: Successful removal of the filter in all five pigs (100%) was reliably performed only in the 14-day group. In this group, the initial VC transverse diameter was 19.4 +/- 0.8 mm and was significantly reduced to 9.8 +/- 1.1 mm (p < 0.05) immediately after removal. Sixty days later, before autopsy, VC diameter had increased to 15.3 +/- 1.9 mm, which was significantly larger than at removal (p < 0.05) but not different from the initial value. In the 30-day group, removal was successful in only one of five animals. Although removal was successful in the one pig, autopsy at 2 months postremoval revealed total occlusion of the VC. Filters could not be removed from 60- and 90-day groups. At autopsy, the VCF struts were embedded or protruded through the VC wall. Microscopic examination of the VC revealed significant scarring underneath and between the struts. CONCLUSION: Removal of the retrievable OptEase VCF may be successfully performed up to 14 days after insertion. Strut protrusion through the VC wall prohibited successful and safe removal at extended time intervals.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Filtros de Vena Cava , Vena Cava Inferior/lesiones , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Animales , Falla de Equipo , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Porcinos , Factores de Tiempo , Vena Cava Inferior/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...