A complex chromosome rearrangement, der(6)ins(6)(p21.1q25.3q27)inv(6)(p25.3q27), in a child with cleidocranial dysplasia.

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) are structural abnormalities involving >2 chromosomes or >3 breakpoints. It has been suggested that the probability of imbalance increases as the number of breakpoints increase. Here we report a 7-month-old, Hispanic girl presenting with cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) who was found to have a complex chromosome rearrangement of chromosome 6. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies with bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones showed that the rearrangement involved insertion of 6q into 6p disrupting the "Runt related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2)" gene at chromosome 6p21.1. In addition, a pericentric inversion of chromosome 6 was identified. Despite the complex nature of the rearrangement, no cryptic deletions or duplications could be detected by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Partial trisomy and partial monosomy resulting from a reciprocal segregating in a large family.

Partial trisomy 7p with partial monosomy 9p is a rare disorder with only 3 cases reported. Both these abnormalities i.e., partial trisomy 7p and partial monosomy 9p result in distinct clinical phenotypes. However, patients with combined 7p trisomy/9p monosomy present with a phenotype consistent with trisomy 7p. We present a fourth case of trisomy 7p/monosomy 9p with long term follow-up and document the medical complications associated with this disorder. Long term follow-up of patients with chromosome abnormalities provides a unique opportunity to document the medical history and complications associated with such abnormalities.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a unique and complex de novo 8p rearrangement.

Human chromosome 8p is prone to recurrent rearrangements with inv dup del(8p) being most common. Each of these recurrent rearrangements is associated with different clinical manifestations. Some of these recurrent rearrangements at 8p are mediated by an 8p submicroscopic paracentric inversion between the olfactory gene clusters present in one of the parents. However, recent reports have shown that some of the rearrangements are unique and complex and are mediated by other repetitive elements within 8p. Here, we report on a unique and complex 8p rearrangement with seizures as the major presenting feature in the patient. Extensive fluorescence in situ hybridization and microarray analyses with tiling path 8p array showed that the rearrangement is unique in that the 8p duplication is a direct tandem duplication and, unlike the more common inv dup del(8p), is not derived from parental submicroscopic inversion. Also unlike the inv dup del(8p), the phenotype in our case is milder with no central nervous system malformations or cardiac defects.

Do cytogenetic abnormalities precede morphologic abnormalities in a developing malignant condition?

Cytogenetic evaluation of bone marrow and neoplastic tissues plays a critical role in determining patient management and prognosis. Here, we highlight two cases in which the cytogenetic studies challenge the common practice of using hematologic and morphologic changes as key factors in malignant disease management. The first case is that of a lymph node sample from a 40-yr-old non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patient sent for determination of disease progress. Hematologic studies showed no evidence of transformation to high-grade NHL (>15% blasts with rare mitotic figures). Cytogenetic studies of lymph node showed multiple clonal abnormalities, most notably a der(18) from a t(14;18) which is associated with high-grade NHL. After two cycles of chemotherapy with fludarabine, the patient did not show any clinical response, suggesting possible progression to high-grade lymphoma. The second case is of a patient with a history of human immunodeficiency virus and blastic natural killer leukemia/lymphoma. Hematologic studies of ascitic fluid classified the patient as having pleural effusion lymphoma whereas bone marrow analysis showed no malignancy. Bone marrow cytogenetic studies showed multiple clonal abnormalities including a t(8;14), which is commonly associated with Burkitt's lymphoma (BL). To our knowledge, this is the first case wherein a morphologically normal bone marrow showed presence of clonal abnormalities consistent with BL or Pleural effusion lymphoma. After two cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) chemotherapy, the patient's general condition and ascitis improved and she was discharged. These studies clearly demonstrate that genetic changes often precede morphologic changes in a developing malignant condition. Therefore, the critical information needed for care of patients with malignant disorders may be incomplete or inaccurate if cytogenetic evaluation is overlooked.

Subtelomeric rearrangements in idiopathic mental retardation.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements in patients with sporadic and non-syndromic idiopathic mental retardation (IMR). METHODS: A total of 18 IMR patients were taken for the study. Selection criteria included no known syndromes or chromosomes abnormalities and known causes of IMR. All patients signed an informed consent to participate. Chromosome analysis was carried out on all patients to rule out gross chromosome abnormalities. Lymphocyte cultures were initiated and harvested using standard protocols. For fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), Chromoprobe Multiprobe-T system was used. This system consists of 24 embossed areas with each area having one reversibly bound subtelomere probe for a specific chromosome. The subtelomere probes were differentially labeled with green fluorescence for short arm and orange for the long arm. Hybridization, washing and staining are done using standard protocols. A minimum of 5 metaphases were analyzed per chromosome per patient. RESULTS: A total of 2 subtelomeric rearrangements were detected (11.1%). Case 1 involved a 17-year-old with severe MR, profound deafness and dysmorphic features with reciprocal translocation t(3;7)(q26.2; p15.1). The second case involved a 4.6-year-old with mild developmental delay and a terminal deletion of the long arm of chromosome 2, del(2) (q37.3). The frequency of abnormalities detected in our study is in agreement with published reports. CONCLUSION: Subtelomeric screening with FISH is a useful tool for investigation of IMR, however, it is not cost effective in all cases. Conventional chromosome analysis coupled with targeted FISH testing might be the optimal strategy for investigation of IMR.

Position effects due to chromosome breakpoints that map approximately 900 Kb upstream and approximately 1.3 Mb downstream of SOX9 in two patients with campomelic dysplasia.

Campomelic dysplasia (CD) is a semilethal skeletal malformation syndrome with or without XY sex reversal. In addition to the multiple mutations found within the sex-determining region Y-related high-mobility group box gene (SOX9) on 17q24.3, several chromosome anomalies (translocations, inversions, and deletions) with breakpoints scattered over 1 Mb upstream of SOX9 have been described. Here, we present a balanced translocation, t(4;17)(q28.3;q24.3), segregating in a family with a mild acampomelic CD with Robin sequence. Both chromosome breakpoints have been identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization and have been sequenced using a somatic cell hybrid. The 17q24.3 breakpoint maps approximately 900 kb upstream of SOX9, which is within the same bacterial artificial chromosome clone as the breakpoints of two other reported patients with mild CD. We also report a prenatal identification of acampomelic CD with male-to-female sex reversal in a fetus with a de novo balanced complex karyotype, 46,XY,t(4;7;8;17)(4qter-->4p15.1::17q25.1-->17qter;7qter-->7p15.3::4p15.1-->4pter;8pter-->8q12.1::7p15.3-->7pter;17pter-->17q25.1::8q12.1-->8qter). Surprisingly, the 17q breakpoint maps approximately 1.3 Mb downstream of SOX9, making this the longest-range position effect found in the field of human genetics and the first report of a patient with CD with the chromosome breakpoint mapping 3' of SOX9. By using the Regulatory Potential score in conjunction with analysis of the rearrangement breakpoints, we identified a candidate upstream cis-regulatory element, SOX9cre1. We provide evidence that this 1.1-kb evolutionarily conserved element and the downstream breakpoint region colocalize with SOX9 in the interphase nucleus, despite being located 1.1 Mb upstream and 1.3 Mb downstream of it, respectively. The potential molecular mechanism responsible for the position effect is discussed.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a recombinant chromosome rec(22)dup(22q)inv(22)(p13q12.2).

Pericentric inversions occur at a frequency of 0.12-0.7% in humans. However, pericentric inversions of chromosome 22 appear to be common, especially in patients originating from the Guadalajara region of Mexico. Here, we report a seventh case of a pericentric inversion of chromosome 22, the resulting recombinant chromosome, and describe the phenotypic features associated with such a recombinant chromosome. It is interesting that five of the seven patients with inv(22) come from Mexico, and four of the five patients from the Guadalajara region.

A rapid and noninvasive method for detecting tissue-limited mosaicism: detection of i(12)(p10) in buccal smear from a child with Pallister-Killian syndrome.

Pallister-Killian syndrome (PKS), a rare disorder, is characterized by tissue-limited or tissue-specific mosaicism. The characteristic chromosome abnormality associated with PKS is i(12p), which is seen predominantly in skin fibroblast cultures. Diagnosis of i(12p) has been carried out on buccal smears before and was shown to be an easy and feasible method. All previously published studies used alpha-satellite probes for the diagnosis and as such have several pitfalls. Our approach, using dual-color, locus-specific probes, has high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of i(12p). Using statistical analysis, we have also confirmed that the signal pattern in interphase nuclei is consistent with isochromosome 12p.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo unbalanced translocation leading to trisomy 17q25-->qter and monosomy 18p11.3-->pter in a girl with dysmorphic features.

An 18-year-old, gravida 1 underwent percutaneous umbilical blood sampling (PUBS) because of positive triple screen, oligohydramnios and markedly short fetal bones. Chromosome analysis showed an abnormal chromosome 18 with unidentified chromatin at the end of the p-arm. Parental karyotypes were normal. FISH analyses with wcp18 showed additional material of unknown origin on the derivative chromosome 18. Further FISH analysis with subtelomeric probes showed normal signals for the long arm of chromosome 18 (18q23) while no signals were observed for the short arm (18p11.32). These findings were confirmed using a YAC probe from the short arm of 18. The infant was delivered at 30 weeks of gestation. At age 3 months, she was developmentally delayed and has multiple dysmorphic features. Further molecular cytogenetic studies including M-FISH and subtelomere probes showed that the additional material on chromosome 18 consisted of the distal 17q25-->qter region. Based on these studies the karyotype has been interpreted as 46,XX,der(18)t(17;18)(q25;p11.32). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of partial monosomy 18p and partial trisomy 17q in a patient with no major CNS malformations. This case shows the importance of molecular cytogenetic techniques in detailed characterization of de novo chromosome rearrangements.

Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with unbalanced translocation (4;13)(p16;q32) with overlapping features of Patau and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes.

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) and Patau syndrome are two of the most severe conditions resulting from chromosome abnormalities. WHS is caused by a deletion of 4p16, while Patau syndrome is caused by trisomy for some or all regions of chromosome 13. Though the etiologies of these syndromes differ, they share several features including pre- and postnatal growth retardation, microcephaly, cleft lip and palate, and cardiac anomalies. We present here a female fetus with deletion of 4p16 --> pter and duplication of 13q32 --> qter due to unbalanced segregation of t(4;13)(p16;q32) in the father. She displayed overlapping features of both of these syndromes on ultrasound. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a fetus with both partial trisomy 13 and deletion of 4p16, the critical region for WHS.

Chromosome 13q neocentromeres: molecular cytogenetic characterization of three additional cases and clinical spectrum.

We report three new cases of chromosome 13 derived marker chromosomes, found in unrelated patients with dysmorphisms and/or developmental delay. Molecular cytogenetic analysis was performed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome-specific painting probes, alpha satellite probes, and physically mapped probes from chromosome 13q, as well as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). This analysis demonstrated that these markers consisted of inversion duplications of distal portions of chromosome 13q that have separated from the endogenous chromosome 13 centromere and contain no detectable alpha satellite DNA. The presence of a functional neocentromere on these marker chromosomes was confirmed by immunofluorescence with antibodies to centromere protein-C (CENP-C). The cytogenetic location of a neocentromere in band 13q32 was confirmed by simultaneous FISH with physically mapped YACs from 13q32 and immunofluorescence with anti-CENP-C. The addition of these three new cases brings the total number of described inv dup 13q neocentic chromosomes to 11, representing 21% (11/52) of the current overall total of 52 described cases of human neocentric chromosomes. This higher than expected frequency suggests that chromosome 13q may have an increased propensity for neocentromere formation. The clinical spectrum of all 11 cases is presented, representing a unique collection of polysomy for different portions of chromosome 13q without aneuploidies for additional chromosomal regions. The complexity and variability of the phenotypes seen in these patients does not support a simple reductionist view of phenotype/genotype correlation with polysomy for certain chromosomal regions.

Unique case of mosaicism involving two morphologically similar marker chromosomes of different centric origin in a patient with developmental delay.

A five-year-old Caucasian male presented with developmental delay, minor dysmorphic features, and hyperactivity. Cytogenetic analysis showed the presence of a marker chromosome in the majority of cells analyzed. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses using several alpha satellite probes, including D13Z1/D21Z1, did not reveal any signal on the marker chromosome. Subsequent multicolor FISH (M-FISH) indicated the marker to be derived from chromosome 13, and FISH with a chromosome 13 paint confirmed this finding. The absence of D13Z1/D21Z1 signal on the marker suggested that it was analphoid in nature. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was utilized to further characterize the region of chromosome 13 from which the marker originated, and unexpectedly revealed a gain of chromosomal material at both the centromeric regions of chromosomes 3 and 13. In view of the CGH results, extensive FISH studies with D3Z1 and D13Z1/D21Z1 were performed and revealed the presence of four cell lines comprising one normal cell line (50.5%), a cell line with a chromosome 3 derived marker (19%), a cell line containing a marker derived from chromosome 13 (20%), and a cell line with both markers (10.5%). As the two markers appeared morphologically similar by GTG banding, all 47,XY metaphases in the initial analysis were thought to comprise only a single marker. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of the presence of a chromosome 3 and a chromosome 13 marker in mosaic condition in a congenital disorder. In light of our experience, we urge caution in interpreting karyotypes with marker chromosomes. Our case illustrates the limitations of fluorescent DNA probes and sampling errors.