Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Microb Drug Resist ; 25(9): 1266-1274, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216222

RESUMEN

Aim: The aims of the study are to evaluate the activity of sulbactam, meropenem, and polymyxin B alone and in combination against six isolates of extremely drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and to determine dosing regimens that achieve a sufficient joint probability of target attainment (PTA) based on combination antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. Materials and Methods: The combinations were evaluated by the checkerboard method and were considered synergistic when the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) ≤0.5. Pharmacodynamic analyses were carried out by evaluating dosing regimens that achieve ≥90% joint PTA at the percentage of time over a 24-h period wherein the free drug concentration is above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT> MIC) of 40% and 60% for meropenem and sulbactam, respectively, and 20 for the ratio of the area under the free drug concentration-time curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC) for polymyxin B. Results: For both polymyxin B-resistant and susceptible isolates, the addition of sulbactam in combination with meropenem and subinhibitory concentration of polymyxin B showed important synergistic activity (five isolates; FICI ≤0.281); the recommended dosing regimens were 2/4 g meropenem/sulbactam q8 hours and 0.5 mg/kg polymyxin B q12 hours. Conclusion: This in vitro study showed that sulbactam can significantly improve the action of meropenem and polymyxin B in OXA-producing A. baumannii isolates, especially when there are no new treatment options available for infections caused by these microorganisms.


Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Meropenem/farmacología , Polimixina B/farmacología , Sulbactam/farmacología , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Área Bajo la Curva , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Humanos , Meropenem/administración & dosificación , Meropenem/farmacocinética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Polimixina B/administración & dosificación , Polimixina B/farmacocinética , Sulbactam/administración & dosificación , Sulbactam/farmacocinética
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28607025

RESUMEN

Fosfomycin is widely used for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and it has recently been recommended that fosfomycin be used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli. Whether urine acidification can improve bacterial susceptibility to fosfomycin oral dosing regimens has not been analyzed. The MIC of fosfomycin for 245 Gram-negative bacterial isolates, consisting of 158 Escherichia coli isolates and 87 Klebsiella isolates which were collected from patients with urinary tract infections, were determined at pH 6.0 and 7.0 using the agar dilution method. Monte Carlo simulation of the urinary fosfomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) after a single oral dose of 3,000 mg fosfomycin and the MIC distribution were used to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA). Fosfomycin was effective against E. coli (MIC90 ≤ 16 µg/ml) but not against Klebsiella spp. (MIC90 > 512 µg/ml). Acidification of the environment increased the susceptibility of 71% of the bacterial isolates and resulted in a statistically significant decrease in bacterial survival. The use of a regimen consisting of a single oral dose of fosfomycin against an E. coli isolate with an MIC of ≤64 mg/liter was able to achieve a PTA of ≥90% for a target pharmacodynamic index (AUC/MIC) of 23 in urine; PTA was not achieved when the MIC was higher than 64 mg/liter. The cumulative fractions of the bacterial responses (CFR) were 99% and 55% against E. coli and Klebsiella spp., respectively, based on simulated drug exposure in urine with an acidic pH of 6.0. A decrease of the pH from 7.0 to 6.0 improved the PTA and CFR of the target pharmacodynamic index in both E. coli and Klebsiella isolates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Klebsiella/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Área Bajo la Curva , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Klebsiella/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...