International Newborn Screening Practices for the Early Detection of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Newborn screening (NBS) programmes vary internationally in their approach to screening. Guidelines for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) screening recommend the use of two-tier testing and gestational age cutoffs to minimise false-positive results. The aims of this study were to describe (1) the approaches; (2) protocols used; and (3) available outcomes for CAH screening internationally. METHODS: All members of the International Society for Neonatal Screening were asked to describe their CAH NBS protocols, with an emphasis on the use of second-tier testing, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) cutoffs, and gestational age and birth weight adjustments. If available, screening outcomes were requested. RESULTS: Representatives from 23 screening programmes provided data. Most (n = 14; 61%) recommend sampling at 48-72 h of life. Fourteen (61%) use single-tier testing and 9 have a two-tier testing protocol. Gestational age cutoffs are used in 10 programmes, birth weight cutoffs in 3, and a combination of both in 9. One programme does not use either method of adjusting 17OHP cutoffs. Case definition of a positive test and the response to a positive test differed between programmes. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated significant variation across all aspects of NBS for CAH, including timing, the use of single versus two-tier testing and cutoff interpretation. Collaboration between international screening programmes and implementation of new techniques to improve screen efficacy will facilitate ongoing expansion and quality improvement in CAH NBS.

Global impact of COVID-19 on newborn screening programmes.

INTRODUCTION: The global COVID-19 pandemic has presented extraordinary disruption to healthcare services and exposed them to numerous challenges. Newborn screening (NBS) programmes were also affected; however, scarce data exist on the impact of COVID-19 on NBS. METHODS: We conducted an international survey to assess the global impact of COVID-19 on NBS, with the main aim of gathering the experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic from a large and representative number of NBS centres worldwide. RESULTS: The results of our study showed that COVID-19 impacted the NBS programmes, at least partially, in 29 out of 38 responding countries. Majority of the screening centres experienced a broad spectrum of difficulties and most were affected more in the second wave of the pandemic. Delays and unreliability with the postal service as well as flight cancellations caused delays in samples arriving to screening centres and with the provision of laboratory equipment and reagents. The availability of laboratory staff was sometimes reduced due to infection, quarantine or reassignment within the healthcare facility. Sample collection at home, second-tier tests and follow-up were also affected. Social restrictions and interruptions in public transport added to these difficulties. Only a limited number of centres managed to retain a fully functioning NBS programme. CONCLUSION: As the pandemic might continue or could recur in future years, it would be useful to develop guidelines to protect these valuable services.

[Neonatal screening in Europe revisited: An ISNS-perspective on the current state and developments since 2010]. / Dépistage néonatal en Europe - Évolution au cours de la dernière décennie et analyse de la situation actuelle par la Société internationale de dépistage néonatal.

Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders ("conditions") then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990's with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40-50 conditions in one blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular genetics techniques. For this survey we collected data from 51 European countries. We report on the developments between 2010 and 2020, and highlight the achievements made during this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe have matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regards to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. Only by working together can we accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate actions.

TITLE: Dépistage néonatal en Europe - Évolution au cours de la dernière décennie et analyse de la situation actuelle par la Société internationale de dépistage néonatal. ABSTRACT: Le dépistage néonatal a débuté en Europe dans les années 1960 avec celui de la phénylcétonurie. Le nombre de maladies dépistées a, par la suite, augmenté progressivement, de manière plus marquée à la fin des années 1990 avec l'arrivée de la spectrométrie de masse en tandem (MS/MS) qui a permis le dépistage de 40 à 50 maladies sur une seule goutte de sang séché. Les ajouts les plus récents à cette liste de maladies (mucoviscidose, déficits immunitaires combinés sévères et atrophie musculaire spinale) ont été rendus possibles grâce à la génétique moléculaire. À partir des informations provenant de 51 pays d'Europe, nous décrivons dans cette revue l'évolution du dépistage entre 2010 et 2020, ainsi que les progrès réalisés pendant cette période, tout en soulignant les aspects qui méritent d'être améliorés. Des progrès pourront en effet être accomplis grâce aux échanges d'informations et, pour certains pays, en tirant profit de l'expérience acquise dans des pays voisins. La plupart des programmes de dépistage mis en place dans l'Europe « géographique ¼ au cours de cette période ont gagné en maturité en termes méthodologiques (modernisation des techniques) et en termes quantitatifs (augmentation du nombre des maladies dépistées). Ces développements nous montrent que la collaboration entre les différentes organisations s'accélère en Europe. Ce n'est qu'en travaillant ensemble que nous pourrons identifier en temps opportun les nouveau-nés atteints d'une des nombreuses maladies rares détectables et prendre les mesures qui s'imposent.

Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010.

Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders ("conditions") then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40-50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together.

Regulatory landscape of providing information on newborn screening to parents across Europe.

Newborn screening (NBS) is an important part of public healthcare systems in many countries. The provision of information to parents about NBS is now recognised as an integral part of the screening process. Informing parents on all aspects of screening helps to achieve the benefits, promote trust and foster support for NBS. Therefore, policies and guidelines should exist to govern how the information about NBS is provided to parents, taking into account evidence-based best practices. The purpose of our survey was to explore whether any legally binding provisions, guidelines or recommendations existed pertaining to the provision of information about NBS to parents across Europe. Questions were designed to determine the regulatory process of when, by whom and how parents should be informed about screening. Twenty-seven countries participated in the survey. The results indicated that most countries had some sort of legal framework or guidelines for the provision of information to parents. However, only 37% indicated that the provision of information was required prenatally. The majority of countries were verbally informing parents with the aid of written materials postnatally, just prior to sample collection. Information was provided by a neonatologist, midwife or nurse. A website dedicated to NBS was available for 67% of countries and 89% had written materials about NBS for parents. The survey showed that there is a lack of harmonisation among European countries in the provision of information about NBS and emphasised the need for more comprehensive guidelines at the European level.

European Union Should Actively Stimulate and Harmonise Neonatal Screening Initiatives.

Neonatal screening programmes have been introduced in almost all European countries. In practice there are large differences, especially in the panel of conditions that are screened for, often without clear reasons. Policy making on a European level is lacking in contrast to the situation in the USA. Professionals have the knowledge to expand the panels but are dependent on policy-makers for the necessary funds. This paper is a call on the EU Commission to take up a role in providing equal access to neonatal screening for all children within the EU.

Newborn Screening Programmes in Europe, Arguments and Efforts Regarding Harmonisation: Focus on Organic Acidurias.

BACKGROUND: The state of newborn screening (NBS) programmes for organic acidurias in Europe was assessed by a web-based questionnaire in the EU programme of Community Action in Public Health 2010/2011 among the - at that time - 27 EU member states, candidate countries, potential candidates and three EFTA countries. RESULTS: Thirty-seven data sets from 39 target countries were analysed. Newborn screening for glutaric aciduria type I (GA-I) was performed in ten, for isovaleric aciduria (IVA) in nine and for methylmalonic aciduria including cblA, cblB, cblC and cblD (MMACBL) as well as for propionic aciduria (PA) in seven countries. Samples were obtained at a median age of 2.5 days and laboratory analysis began at median age of 4.5 days. Positive screening results were mostly confirmed in specialised centres by analysis of organic acids in urine. Confirmation of a positive screening result usually did not start before the second week of life (median ages: 9.5 days [IVA], 9 days [GA-I], 8.5 days [PA, MMACBL]) and was completed early in the third week of life (median ages: 15 days [IVA, PA, MMA], 14.5 days [GA-I]). Treatment was initiated in GA-I and IVA at a median age of 14 days and in MMACBL and PA at a median age of 15 days. CONCLUSION: NBS for organic acidurias in Europe is variable and less often established than for amino acid disorders. While for GA-I its benefit has already been demonstrated, there is room for debate of NBS for IVA and especially PA and MMACBL.

Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015.

Newborn screening describes various tests that can occur during the first few hours or days of a newborn's life and have the potential for preventing severe health problems, including death. Newborn screening has evolved from a simple blood or urine screening test to a more comprehensive and complex screening system capable of detecting over 50 different conditions. While a number of papers have described various newborn screening activities around the world, including a series of papers in 2007, a comprehensive review of ongoing activities since that time has not been published. In this report, we divide the world into 5 regions (North America, Europe, Middle East and North Africa, Latin America, and Asia Pacific), assessing the current NBS situation in each region and reviewing activities that have taken place in recent years. We have also provided an extensive reference listing and summary of NBS and health data in tabular form.

To know or not to know, disclosure of a newborn carrier screening test result for cystic fibrosis.

PURPOSE: Most newborn screening (NBS) strategies for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) also identify carriers. However, it is unclear if parents want to be informed about their child's carrier status or not. METHODS: Focus group discussions with pregnant couples to explore their opinions about disclosure of a carrier result for CF of their newborn. RESULTS: All (n = 30) wanted to be informed when newborn screening would show their newborn being a CF-carrier. Their main reason was the implication of this knowledge for further family planning. Other family members could be informed and children within the family could be tested. Parents stated they have the right to know, but others also expressed that the choice of not being informed should be offered as well. CONCLUSION: Most parents want to be informed when NBS for CF reveals that their child is a CF-carrier, but the choice of not being informed should also be offered.

The influence of sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion, and timing of the heel prick on the pancreatitis-associated protein concentration in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) is currently discussed as a marker in newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it is not known if PAP concentrations are influenced by sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion or time of collection and what this would mean for NBS for CF. METHODS: In 2008 all newborns in part of the Netherlands were screened for CF by an IRT/PAP protocol. PAP concentration was determined by the MucoPAP ELISA (DynaBio), which was modified to a Dissociation Enhanced Lanthanide Fluoroimmunoassay (DELFIA) method following a protocol of PerkinElmer. RESULTS: In healthy newborns, the median PAP concentration was 0.5 µg/l (Interquartile range (IQR 0.3-0.8) whereas this was 3.2 µg/l (IQR 2.0-12.5) in CF infants. PAP concentrations were lower in premature infants 0.94 and 0.91 times for 25 to 31 + 6 weeks GA and 32 to 36 + 6 weeks respectively. A higher PAP concentration was observed in low-birth-weight infants (<2500 gram)(p = 0.001), per 100 gram birth weight gained the PAP concentration decreased with 0.1 %. PAP levels were higher after a blood transfusion, the 95th percentile increased from 1.3 to 3.6 µg/l leading to a higher false-positive rate. The PAP concentration increased when newborn screening was performed more than 168 hours (day 7) after birth (ß = 1.63), the 95th percentile increased from 1.3-1.6 µg/l to 4.0 µg/l after 168 hours (72,874 newborns were screened). CONCLUSION: Sex, birth weight, and gestational age lead to small differences in PAP concentrations without consequences for the screening algorithm. However, blood transfusion as well as performance of the heel prick after 168 hours (7 days) lead to clinically significant higher PAP levels and to a higher risk on a false-positive screening test result.

Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 1. From blood spot to screening result.

In many European countries neonatal screening has been introduced over the last 50 years as an important public health programme. Depending on health care structure, available funds, local politics, input from professional groups, parent groups, and the general public this introduction has led to different approaches in the way the screening programmes have been set up, financed and governed. To get some insight about the current situation, in 2009 the European Union, via its EAHC agency, put out a call for a tender that was acquired by our project group. An online survey was compiled in which the whole screening programme was covered by a questionnaire. This survey covered the EU member states, (potential) candidate member states and EFTA countries, in total 40 countries. Results showed little consensus concerning 1. information of parents including informed consent; 2. which conditions are screened for, ranging from 1 to around 30 conditions; 3. sampling time post partum; 4. screening methodology including cut-offs values even between screening laboratories within countries.; 5. storage of residual specimens, varying from 3 months to 1000 years. In addition, confirmatory diagnostics and follow-up also show large discrepancies (Burgard et al. http://www.iss.it/cnmr/prog/cont.php?id=1621&lang=1&tipo=64 2011). In addition to the current practices report an expert opinion document has been produced with recommendations to the EU Commission for future improvements, e.g. in parallel to the way the USA has harmonized its practices based on recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics (Watson et al., Pediatrics 117: S296-S307, 2006).

Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2. From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance.

In a survey conducted in 2010/2011 data from the 28 EU member states, four EU candidate states (Croatia, FYROM, Iceland, Turkey), three potential EU candidate states (Bosnia Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia), and two EFTA states (Norway and Switzerland) were collected. The status and function of newborn screening (NBS) programmes were investigated from the information to prospective parents and the public via confirmation of a positive screening result up to decisions on treatment. This article summarises the results from screening laboratory findings to start of treatment. In addition we asked about the existence of feedback loops reporting the conclusions of confirmation of screening results to the screening laboratory and communication of long-term outcome to diagnostic units and possibly existing central registries. Parallel to the description of actual practices of where, how and by whom the different steps of the programmes are executed, we also asked for the existence of guidelines or directives regulating the screening programmes, material to support information of parents about diagnoses and treatment and training facilities for professionals involved in the programmes. This survey gives a first comprehensive overview of the steps following a positive screening result in European NBS programmes. The 37 data sets reveal substantial variation of national screening panels, but also a lot of similarities. Analysis across all countries revealed that actual practice is often organised but not regulated by guidelines. Material to inform patients is available more often for explaining treatment (69 %) than explaining the necessity of confirmatory diagnostics (41 %). Training of professionals is rarely regulated by a guideline (2 %), but is offered for paediatricians (40 %) and dieticians (29 %) and only rarely for other professions (e.g. geneticists, clinical nurse specialists, psychologists). Registry-based evaluation of long-term outcome is as yet almost nonexistent (3 %).

Improving test properties for neonatal cystic fibrosis screening in the Netherlands before the nationwide start by May 1st 2011.

When new technical possibilities arise in health care, often attunement is needed between different actors from the perspectives of research, health care providers, patients, ethics and policy. For cystic fibrosis (CF) such a process of attunement in the Netherlands started in a committee of the Health Council on neonatal screening in 2005. In the balancing of pros and cons according to Wilson and Jungner criteria, the advantages for the CF patient were considered clear, even though CF remains a severe health problem with treatment. Nevertheless, screening was not started then, mainly since the specificity of the tests available at that time was considered too low. Many healthy infants would have been referred for sweat testing and much uncertainty would arise in their parents. Also the limited sensitivity for immigrants and the detection of less severe phenotypes and carriers were considered problematic. The Health Council recommended a pilot screening project which was subsequently performed in some provinces, leading to a 4-step protocol: IRT, PAP, screening for a CFTR mutation panel, and sequencing of the CFTR gene. This would lead to the identification of 23 cases of classical CF, two infants with less severe forms and 12 carriers per year in the Netherlands. Thus many CF patients can be diagnosed early, while limiting the number of referrals, the number of infants with less severe forms diagnosed and the number of carriers identified. Technical solutions were found to limit the ethical problems. A nationwide program using this four step protocol started by 1 May 2011.

Novel strategies in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a prospective controlled study.

CONTEXT: Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is included in many routine programmes but current strategies have considerable drawbacks, such as false-positive tests, equivocal diagnosis and detection of carriers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the test performance of two newborn screening strategies for CF. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In 2008 and 2009, CF screening was added to the routine screening programme as a prospective study in part of The Netherlands. INTERVENTIONS: Two strategies were performed in all newborns. In the first strategy, concentrations of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) were measured. In the second method, samples with IRT ≥60 µg/litre were analysed for 36 CFTR mutations, followed by sequencing when a single mutation was detected. Tests were positive only with two identified CFTR mutations. MAIN OUTCOME: Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of both screening strategies. RESULTS: 145,499 infants were screened. The IRT/PAP approach showed a sensitivity of 95.0%, a specificity of 99.897% and a PPV of 12.3%. Test properties for the IRT/DNA/sequencing strategy were respectively 100%, 100% and 64.9%. Combining both strategies (IRT/PAP/DNA/sequencing) led to a sensitivity of 95.0%, a specificity of 100% and a PPV of 87.5%. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, all strategies performed well. Although there was no statistically significant difference in test performance, the IRT/DNA/sequencing strategy detected one infant that was missed by IRT/PAP (/DNA/sequencing). IRT/PAP may be the optimal choice if the use of DNA technology must be avoided. If identification of carriers and equivocal diagnosis is considered an important disadvantage, IRT/PAP/DNA/sequencing may be the best choice.

Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in the Netherlands: birth prevalence and risk factors.

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common congenital viral infection worldwide. The sequela encountered most frequently is hearing impairment, affecting approximately one out of five infants congenitally infected. Data on the birth prevalence and risk factors of congenital CMV infection in the Netherlands are scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the birth prevalence of congenital CMV in the Netherlands. A sample of 6,500 dried blood spots (DBS) from infants born in the Netherlands was tested anonymously for CMV DNA. The sample was stratified by the number of live births in different regions of the Netherlands of the year 2007. Additionally, on a regional level, risk factors for congenital CMV were analyzed. The birth prevalence of congenital CMV in the Netherlands was 0.54% (35/6,433, 95%CI 0.36-0.72). Congenital CMV infection was significantly higher in regions with more than 15% young children (0-5 years) compared with regions with a lower proportion of young children (OR 5.9, 95%CI 1.4-25.2). Congenital CMV infection was significantly higher in regions with more than 30% immigrants compared with regions with a lower proportion of immigrants (OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.1-4.6). This association was strongest for regions with more than 30% non-Western immigrants (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.5-7.5). Based on the knowledge of the natural history of congenital CMV infection, approximately 1,000 children are born with congenital CMV infection in the Netherlands annually, of whom eventually approximately 180 children (0.1% of all newborns) will be affected by long term sequelae, with hearing loss being the symptom encountered most frequently.

Implementing neonatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The birth prevalence of severe haemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell disease (SCD) in the Netherlands has been estimated to be at least 50 newborns per year. Neonatal screening for SCD was added to the Dutch screening programme in January 2007. We here evaluated three high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) systems for application in neonatal screening for haemoglobinopathies, and present the results of a subsequent pilot screening programme. METHODS: The Variant NewBorn Screening (Vnbs) HPLC system (Bio-Rad) was validated by analysing 131 blood samples and blood mixtures. Subsequently, the performance of the G7 (Tosoh BioScience) and Ultra (Primus Corporation) was compared with the Vnbs. The three HPLC analysers were tested in a pilot screening programme on 21,969 dried blood spot samples from the routine Dutch neonatal screening programme. RESULTS: The pilot screening resulted in 188 abnormal patterns. The three HPLC devices presented comparable within- and between-run precision and detected the abnormal samples similarly. The high throughput, sampling systems, presentation of results, and integration of the chromatograms, however, were different. CONCLUSION: All three analysers detected the same abnormal haemoglobins satisfactorily, but integrated the chromatograms with variable imprecision. Comparison of the results suggested that the Bio-Rad Vnbs was the preferred system. However, software adjustments were required to improve the diagnostic potential of this device for screening for beta- and alpha-thalassaemia.

Legal issues in neonatal screening.

Legal issues arise if some persons or institutions feel wrongfully treated whether or not this feeling is justified. In neonatal screening, the following topics may be causing legal issues: no screening programme where such a programme should be (UN Convention for the right of the child); neonate(s) not screened for conditions within the established programme; no consent when it should have been given; error(s) in sampling, analysis, reporting; no follow-up available, error(s) in confirmatory diagnostics and treatment; irregular storage of dried blood spot specimen. Legal issues can be solved easily when responsibilities of parties concerned have been established and documented. Unfortunately, legal systems vary from country to country and what has become "normal" practice in one jurisdiction may still be battled about in another. The management of a neonatal screening programme should try to define as best as possible the performance criteria and to have the programme assessed and accredited to certain internationally accepted standards. It diminishes the chances for errors and it helps to avoid legal issues.

Neonatal screening in Europe; the situation in 2004.

This report outlines the status of neonatal screening in Europe in 2004. Out of the 45 member states of the Council of Europe plus the regions Scotland and Wales (in total 47 'countries'), no data at all were available from 3 (Albania, Azerbaijan and Georgia). From the other 44, varying amounts of data were received. Apart from Armenia, Finland and Malta, all countries have a national programme for phenylketonuria (PKU), although in some countries those programmes do not yet have 100% coverage. Moldova and Ukraine have no national programme for congenital hypothyroidism (CH), the other countries do. Twelve countries screen for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), 6 for cystic fibrosis (CF) and 7 for galactosaemia (GAL), 6 for biotinidase deficiency (BD) and 4 for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD). Some countries have pilot programmes for certain conditions or different programmes per screening laboratory. The prevalences for PKU vary from 1:3000 to 1:30,000, and for CH from 1:1300 to 1:13,000. Methodologies vary within and between countries. There appears to be no relationship between the cut-off limits and the recall rate. A first priority is to help those countries where the basic screening programmes have less than 100% coverage. In addition, continuous monitoring of the European programmes will help to decrease the variation in design and methodology by making use of the knowledge and expertise available from the global membership of the International Society for Neonatal Screening (ISNS). The huge difference of recall rates illustrate one obvious and important area for improvement of programme performances that could be aided by strengthened European cooperation.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of the thyroxine/thyroxine-binding globulin ratio to detect congenital hypothyroidism of thyroidal and central origin in a neonatal screening program.

CONTEXT: Since the introduction of screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in 1974, the optimal laboratory strategy has been the subject of debate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various types of thyroxine (T(4))-based strategies to screen for CH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In the Netherlands, since January 1, 1995, a primary T(4) determination with supplemental thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and T(4)-binding globulin (TBG) measurements has been used. Results were calculated from cumulative findings for 1181079 children screened between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of detection of patients with CH of thyroidal origin (CH-T) or CH of central origin (CH-C), false-positive rates, laboratory costs, and costs of initial diagnostic evaluations. RESULTS: All known infants (n = 393) with CH-T and 92% (n = 66) of infants with CH-C were detected on the basis of low T(4) levels, TSH elevation, and/or low T(4)/TBG ratios. If the decision to refer had been based solely on TSH elevation, then 94% of patients with CH-T and none of the patients with CH-C would have been detected. If low T(4) levels (