Sleep disturbance as a predictor of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men and women from the general population.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To examine gender specific associations between sleep disturbance and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in a representative population sample in Germany. METHODS: The study was based on 4,140 men and 4,129 women (aged 25-74 years) who participated in one of the three MONICA Augsburg surveys between 1984 and 1995, and who were free of diabetes at baseline. Incident cases of type 2 diabetes were assessed using a follow-up questionnaire in 1998. Gender specific hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 119 cases of incident type 2 diabetes among men and 69 among women were registered during the mean follow-up period of 7.5 years. In both sexes, difficulty maintaining sleep was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes. After adjustment for age, survey, hypertension, dyslipidemia, parental history of diabetes, history of angina pectoris, regular smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, body mass index and education, the hazard ratio in men was 1.60 (95% CI: 1.05-2.45) and the hazard ratio in women was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.20-3.29). In contrast, difficulty initiating sleep was not associated with a significantly increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus after multivariable adjustment in both sexes in the present study. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Difficulty maintaining sleep was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women from the general population. Although, the causal pathway is not entirely clear, it seems that both insulin resistance and chronic low-grade systemic inflammation may be involved.

Overall alcohol intake, beer, wine, and systemic markers of inflammation in western Europe: results from three MONICA samples (Augsburg, Glasgow, Lille).

AIM: Anti-inflammatory effects of moderate alcohol consumption have been proposed to explain why moderate alcohol intake lowers coronary heart disease risk. We investigated the relationship between overall alcohol, beer or wine consumption and markers of systemic inflammation in three different geographical areas in Europe. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross-sectional samples, each representative of the general population from Germany, Scotland, and France (MONICA Augsburg 1994/95, 2275 men and 2186 women, 25-74 years; Glasgow MONICA 1994/95, 561/616, 25-74 years, and MONICA Lille 1994/95, 581/574, 35-64 years) were studied. Alcohol intake was assessed by standardized interview. Adjusted means of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, white blood cell (WBC) count, plasma viscosity (PV), and albumin were calculated among categories of alcohol intake, and separately for beer or wine consumption, by multiple linear regression. Self-reported moderate daily alcohol intake up to 40 g was associated with lower concentrations of CRP, fibrinogen, PV and WBC count, compared to non-drinking and heavy drinking, even after adjustment for various potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate consumption of either wine or beer is associated with lower levels of systemic inflammatory markers in three different European areas, suggesting that ethanol itself might be largely responsible for the potential anti-inflammatory effects of these beverages.

What is the real hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction? Epidemiological vs clinical view.

AIMS: To examine the general influence of the definition of fatal and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and coronary deaths on the estimation of in-hospital case-fatality, and to show how the definition of acute myocardial infarction influences time-trends of hospital mortality over 11 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of the World Health Organization's MONICA (multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Project in Augsburg all patients aged 25-74 years with a suspected diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction who were hospitalized in the study region's major clinic were registered prospectively between 1985 to 1995 (n=4889). Patient information, including short-term survival status, was obtained from medical records, by interview of surviving patients, and municipal death certificate files which were validated by an extended identification and validation process. In-hospital case fatality was estimated according to different definitions which closely followed the international MONICA criteria. Epidemiological definitions comprised definite and possible acute myocardial infarction, and events with unclassifiable deaths, while the clinical definition was restricted to definite infarction. Overall, case fatality by the epidemiological definitions was 28 to 29.8% (23.5% of those treated in a coronary care unit) compared to 13.5% using the clinical definition. While over the 11 years, the reduction in case fatality according to the epidemiological definitions was modest, highly significant decreases were observed by applying the clinical definition (from 15.8% in 1985-1988 to 10.8% in 1993-1995, P<0.001 adjusted for age and sex). The discrepancy in case fatality between the definitions is explained by the high proportion of patients who die very early (about 70% of all fatal events during the first 24 h) with the consequence of missing data which may preclude a definite diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a broader definition of acute myocardial infarction reveals that in-hospital mortality is higher than believed until now, and it implies that our efforts must be intensified to reduce overall in-hospital coronary heart disease mortality.

Do siblings of myocardial infarction patients have a specific management of hypertension?

The aim of this study was to determine whether the management of hypertension differs between siblings of myocardial infarction patients and the general population. Siblings aged 35 to 74 years, unaffected by myocardial infarction, were drawn from the Augsburg Family Heart Study, conducted in 1996-1997 in southern Germany (n = 524). The reference group consisted of participants of the third MONICA population-based survey conducted in 1994-1995 in the same area, who were aged 35 to 74 years and also unaffected by myocardial infarction (n = 3802). Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension (defined by blood pressure > or = 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication) were compared between the two groups. The result was that the prevalence of hypertension was higher in the siblings (men: age-adjusted OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.99-1.75; women: age-adjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.39-2.41). Male hypertensive siblings were more often aware and treated for hypertension than male hypertensives of the reference group whereas the level of awareness and treatment was comparable between female hypertensives of the two groups. In both genders, no difference in the degree of control was shown between hypertensives of the two groups. In conclusion the siblings and their physicians should pay more attention to the family history of myocardial infarction in order to improve the management of hypertension in this high risk group.