The Perceived Impact of COVID-19 among Treatment-Seeking Smokers: A Mixed Methods Approach.

The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on behavioral health, including tobacco use, are not fully known. The current study sought to measure the perceived impact of COVID-19 and the resulting stay-at-home orders in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Buffalo, New York on smokers enrolled in four smoking cessation trials between March 2020 and July 2020. The survey collected quantitative data regarding life changes due to COVID-19, health/exposure status, and the impact on their cessation attempt (e.g., motivation to quit, change in triggers). The questionnaire collected qualitative data to better understand how such changes could explain changes in smoking behavior. Of the 42 participants surveyed, approximately half indicated that COVID-19 changed their motivation and ability to quit or remain quit. Among those who reported that it was easier to quit following the stay-at-home orders (n = 24), most attributed this to concerns regarding the severity of COVID-19 among smokers. Among those who reported more difficulty quitting (n = 15), most attributed this to their increased stress due to the pandemic and the inability to access activities, places, or people that could help them manage triggers. Given public health warnings of continued surges in COVID-19, these data provide insight into who may benefit from further smoking cessation support should existing restrictions or new stay-at-home orders be enacted.

Patterns of lapses and recoveries during a quit attempt using varenicline and behavioral counseling among smokers with and without HIV.

Addressing tobacco use among HIV+ smokers is a priority. Lack of knowledge about how HIV+ smokers respond to tobacco use treatments limits our ability to effectively treat this population of smokers. Using data from 2 clinical trials that provided 12 weeks of varenicline and behavioral counseling, 1 with smokers with HIV (n = 89) and 1 with smokers without HIV (n = 179), we used mixed logistic regression modeling to compare point-prevalence abstinence rates and adherence to the initial target quit date (TQD) and Cox regression for repeated outcomes to evaluate lapse and recovery dynamics between the groups. Sixty percent of HIV- smokers refrained from smoking at the TQD while only 33% of HIV+ smokers did (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32, 95% CI [0.18, 0.56], p < .001). The point-prevalence abstinence rates at Week 12 were 31% (HIV-) and 28% (HIV+; OR = 0.7, 95% CI [0.42, 1.16], p = .16) and the point prevalence abstinence rates at Week 24 were 22% (HIV-) and 15% (HIV+; OR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.49, 1.57], p = .65). Although there was no interaction between HIV status and lapse risk, χ2(3) < 1, there was a significant interaction for the recovery model, (χ2(3) = 20.4, p < 0.001): as the number of events increased, the time to the next recovery became longer among smokers with HIV, compared to smokers without HIV. Although HIV+ smokers were treated effectively with varenicline, compared to HIV- smokers, they showed significantly lower initial cessation at the TQD and took increasingly longer to recover following lapses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Got chocolate? Bilateral prefrontal cortex stimulation augments chocolate consumption.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the mechanisms behind exerting self-control may reveal why health behaviors are resistant to change. Activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) plays a role in self-control processes and may be modulated using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). OBJECTIVE: In this early phase behavioral research study, we investigated whether anodal stimulation over the rIFG with cathodal stimulation over the left IFG (versus sham) reduced chocolate consumption. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy females (ages 18-35) completed two tDCS sessions (2.0 mA vs. sham; order counterbalanced) in a within-subject, double-blind, randomized design with a 4-week washout. Participants were self-reported "chocolate cravers" and restrained eaters. Self-report assessments on disinhibited eating were completed at intake. Delay discounting and inhibitory control were assessed at the remaining visits. During stimulation, participants completed an inhibitory control training task (chocolate go/no-go task) and were randomized to the chocolate no-go condition (inhibit all responses to chocolate cues) or the control condition (inhibit responses to chocolate cues on half the trials). Following stimulation, participants completed a 15-min chocolate "taste test" with chocolate rating forms. Afterwards, staff measured the remaining chocolate to determine total consumption. RESULTS: Contrary to our hypotheses, active tDCS significantly increased chocolate consumption vs. sham (mean = 43.2 vs. 32.2, p=0.005) in both task conditions, but had no effect on chocolate ratings (ps > 0.05). Higher delay discounting and self-reported disinhibited eating predicted greater consumption (ps < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest widespread activation of the prefrontal cortex may reduce the ability to resist chocolate. Our data highlights important methodological considerations for conducting tDCS studies to target health behaviors.