RESUMEN
Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. Ptosis (eyelid drooping) occurs due to fatigue of the muscles for eyelid elevation and is one symptom widely used by patients and healthcare providers to track progression of the disease. Margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1) is an accepted clinical measure of ptosis and is typically assessed using a hand-held ruler. In this work, we develop an AI model that enables automated measurement of MRD1 in self-recorded video clips collected using patient smartphones. Methods: A 3-month prospective observational study collected a dataset of video clips from patients with MG. Study participants were asked to perform an eyelid fatigability exercise to elicit ptosis while filming "selfie" videos on their smartphones. These images were collected in nonclinical settings, with no in-person training. The dataset was annotated by non-clinicians for (1) eye landmarks to establish ground truth MRD1 and (2) the quality of the video frames. The ground truth MRD1 (in millimeters, mm) was calculated from eye landmark annotations in the video frames using a standard conversion factor, the horizontal visible iris diameter of the human eye. To develop the model, we trained a neural network for eye landmark detection consisting of a ResNet50 backbone plus two dense layers of 78 dimensions on publicly available datasets. Only the ResNet50 backbone was used, discarding the last two layers. The embeddings from the ResNet50 were used as features for a support vector regressor (SVR) using a linear kernel, for regression to MRD1, in mm. The SVR was trained on data collected remotely from MG patients in the prospective study, split into training and development folds. The model's performance for MRD1 estimation was evaluated on a separate test fold from the study dataset. Results: On the full test fold (N = 664 images), the correlation between the ground truth and predicted MRD1 values was strong (r = 0.732). The mean absolute error was 0.822 mm; the mean of differences was -0.256 mm; and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were -0.214-1.768 mm. Model performance showed no improvement when test data were gated to exclude "poor" quality images. Conclusions: On data generated under highly challenging real-world conditions from a variety of different smartphone devices, the model predicts MRD1 with a strong correlation (r = 0.732) between ground truth and predicted MRD1.
RESUMEN
Introduction: We conducted a 3-month, prospective study in a population of patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG), utilizing a fully decentralized approach for recruitment and monitoring (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04590716). The study objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting real-world data through a smartphone-based research platform, in order to characterize symptom involvement during MG exacerbations. Methods: Primary data collection included daily electronically recorded patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) on the presence of MG symptoms, the level of symptom severity (using the MG-Activities of Daily Living assessment, MG-ADL), and exacerbation status. Participants were also given the option to contribute data on their physical activity levels from their own wearable devices. Results: The study enrolled and onboarded 113 participants across 37 US states, and 73% (N= 82) completed the study. The mean age of participants was 53.6 years, 60% were female. Participants were representative of a moderate to severe MG phenotype, with frequent exacerbations, high symptom burden and multiple comorbidities. 55% of participants (N=45) reported MG exacerbations during the study, with an average of 6.3 exacerbation days per participant. Median average MG-ADL scores for participants during self-reported exacerbation and non-exacerbation periods were 7 (interquartile range 4-9, range 1-19) and 0.3 (interquartile range 0-0.8, range 0-9), respectively. Analyses examining relationships between patient-reported and patient-generated health data streams and exacerbation status demonstrated concordance between self-reported MG-ADL scores and exacerbation status, and identified features that may be used to understand and predict the onset of MG symptom exacerbations, including: 1.) dynamic changes in day-to-day symptom reporting and severity 2.) daily step counts as a measure of physical activity and 3.) clinical characteristics of the patient, including the amount of time since their initial diagnosis and their active medications related to MG treatment. Finally, application of unsupervised machine learning methods identified unique clusters of exacerbation subtypes, each with their own specific representation of symptoms and symptom severity. Conclusion: While these symptom signatures require further study and validation, our results suggest that digital phenotyping, characterized by increased multidimensionality and frequency of the data collection, holds promise for furthering our understanding of clinically significant exacerbations and reimagining the approach to treating MG as a heterogeneous condition.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Investigation of the automation of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE: To automate the process of grading lumbar intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies from MRIs. MR imaging is the most common imaging technique used in investigating low back pain (LBP). Various features of degradation, based on MRIs, are commonly recorded and graded, e.g., Modic change and Pfirrmann grading of intervertebral discs. Consistent scoring and grading is important for developing robust clinical systems and research. Automation facilitates this consistency and reduces the time of radiological analysis considerably and hence the expense. METHODS: 12,018 intervertebral discs, from 2009 patients, were graded by a radiologist and were then used to train: (1) a system to detect and label vertebrae and discs in a given scan, and (2) a convolutional neural network (CNN) model that predicts several radiological gradings. The performance of the model, in terms of class average accuracy, was compared with the intra-observer class average accuracy of the radiologist. RESULTS: The detection system achieved 95.6% accuracy in terms of disc detection and labeling. The model is able to produce predictions of multiple pathological gradings that consistently matched those of the radiologist. The model identifies 'Evidence Hotspots' that are the voxels that most contribute to the degradation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Automation of radiological grading is now on par with human performance. The system can be beneficial in aiding clinical diagnoses in terms of objectivity of gradings and the speed of analysis. It can also draw the attention of a radiologist to regions of degradation. This objectivity and speed is an important stepping stone in the investigation of the relationship between MRIs and clinical diagnoses of back pain in large cohorts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.