The Interaction between Diabetes, Body Mass Index, Hepatic Steatosis, and Risk of Liver Resection: Insulin Dependent Diabetes Is the Greatest Risk for Major Complications.

Background. This study aimed to assess the relationship between diabetes, obesity, and hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection and to determine if these factors are independent predictors of major complications. Materials and Methods. Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing liver resection between 2005 and 2012 was undertaken. Background liver was assessed for steatosis and classified as <33% and ≥33%. Major complications were defined as Grade III-V complications using the Dindo-Clavien classification. Results. 504 patients underwent liver resection, of whom 56 had diabetes and 61 had steatosis ≥33%. Median BMI was 26 kg/m(2) (16-54 kg/m(2)). 94 patients developed a major complication (18.7%). BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.001) and diabetes (P = 0.018) were associated with steatosis ≥33%. Only insulin dependent diabetes was a risk factor for major complications (P = 0.028). Age, male gender, hypoalbuminaemia, synchronous bowel procedures, extent of resection, and blood transfusion were also independent risk factors. Conclusions. Liver surgery in the presence of steatosis, elevated BMI, and non-insulin dependent diabetes is not associated with major complications. Although diabetes requiring insulin therapy was a significant risk factor, the major risk factors relate to technical aspects of surgery, particularly synchronous bowel procedures.

Liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases involving the caudate lobe.

BACKGROUND: Up to 5 per cent of liver resections for colorectal cancer metastases involve the caudate lobe, with cancer-involved resection margins of over 50 per cent being reported following caudate lobe resection. METHODS: Outcomes of consecutive liver resections for colorectal metastases involving the caudate lobe between 1996 and 2009 were reviewed retrospectively, and compared with those after liver surgery without caudate resection. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent caudate and 432 non-caudate liver resection. Caudate resection was commonly performed as part of extended resection. There were no differences in operative complications (24 versus 21·1 per cent; P = 0·727) or blood loss (median 300 versus 250 ml; P = 0·234). The operating time was longer for caudate resection (median 283 versus 227 min; P = 0·024). Tumour size was larger in the caudate group (median 40 versus 27 mm; P = 0·018). Resection margins were smaller when the caudate lobe was involved by tumour, than in resections including tumour-free caudate or non-caudate resection; however, there was no difference in the proportion of completely excised tumours between caudate and non-caudate resections (96 versus 96·1 per cent; P = 0·990). One-year overall survival rates were 90 and 89·3 per cent respectively (P = 0·960), with 1-year recurrence-free survival rates of 62 and 71·2 per cent (P = 0·340). CONCLUSION: Caudate lobe surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases does not increase the incidence of resection margin involvement, although when the caudate lobe contains metastases the margins are significantly closer than in other resections.

'Close shave' in liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal size of clear liver resection margin width in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of margin width on long-term survival after liver resection for CRLM with a policy of standard neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=238) who underwent liver resection for CRLM were included over a ten-year period. All patients with synchronous or early (<2 years) metachronous tumours were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Data were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Overall survival of the cohort at 1, 3 and 5 years were 90.3%, 68.1% and 56.1% respectively. The incidence of cancer involved resection margins (CIRM) was 5.8%. Patients with macroscopically involved resection margins had a poorer overall survival than those with microscopically involved margins (p=0.04). Involved resection margins had a poorer overall survival (p=0.002) than patients with clear margins. Width of clear resection margin did not affect long-term survival. CONCLUSION: CIRM independently predicts poor outcome in patients with CRLM. Clear margin width does not affect survival. A standard policy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with a low incidence of CIRM and improved long-term outcome of sub-centimetre margin widths, resembling those with >1cm resection margins.

Survival and recurrence after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and liver resection for colorectal metastases: a ten year study.

BACKGROUND: Currently liver resection offers the only potential cure for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We prospectively audited the outcome of CRLM treated by a combination of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. METHODS: 283 consecutive patients underwent liver resection for CRLM over 10 years with curative intent. Patients received chemotherapy preoperatively for synchronous and early (< 2 years) metachronous metastases. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors. RESULTS: Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 90%, 59.2% and 46.1%, respectively. Disease free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 68.1%, 34.8% and 27.9%, respectively. Operative mortality was 2.1% and morbidity was 23.7%. Patients with macroscopic diaphragm invasion by tumour, CEA > 100 ng/ml, tumour size > 5 cm or cancer involved resection margins (CIRM) had a significantly worse overall survival. Incidence of CIRM and re-resection was 4.9% and 4.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver surgery is associated with improved survival and low CIRM and re-resection rates.

A comparison of right and extended right hepatectomy with all other hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases: a ten-year study.

AIMS: Colorectal liver metastases are treated by a combination of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection. In this study we compared all major right-sided resections with left or parenchymal sparing resections. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=283) who had successful hepatic resections for colorectal metastases from September 1996 to November 2006 were prospectively studied. Early and late outcomes of those who had right and extended right hepatectomies (RH) were compared with those who had all other types of liver resection (AOLR). Adjuvant therapy and pre-operative assessment were standardised for all. RESULTS: The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the RH group were 84.1%, 54.3% and 38.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the AOLR group were 95.4%, 65.9% and 53.3%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates in the RH group were 69.5%, 34.4% and 25.5%, respectively and 68.4%, 34.91% and 34.91%, respectively in the AOLR group (p=0.46). Operative mortality was 3.9% in the RH group and 0.7% in the AOLR group (p=0.04). Morbidity was 31.3% in the RH group and 18% in the AOLR group. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing right and extended right hepatectomies for colorectal metastases have a greater operative morbidity and mortality and have a significantly worse overall survival compared to all other liver resections for the same disease.

A 10-year study of outcome following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases - The effect of evaluation in a multidisciplinary team setting.

AIMS: Colorectal carcinoma is the second most common cause of cancer death in the western world and nearly 50% of patients develop liver metastases. Many cancers are managed via a multidisciplinary team process. This study compares the long term outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer referred via a multidisciplinary team including a liver surgeon (MDT) with those referred directly to a specialist hepatobiliary unit. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This is a prospective study of 331 consecutive referrals made to a specialist hepatobiliary unit over ten years out of which 108 patients were referred via a colorectal MDT which included a liver surgeon and 223 were directly referred via colorectal MDTs without a liver surgeon. Pre-operative assessment and management were standardised and short and long term data were recorded. RESULTS: Patients referred via the MDT had 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 89.6%, 67.5% and 49.9% respectively and 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival of 65.4%, 31% and 27.2% respectively. Patients referred directly had 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 90.3%, 54.1% and 43.3% respectively and 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates of 70.3%, 37.6% and 27.9% respectively. The difference in overall survival was significant (P=0.0001), although the difference in disease-free survival was not (P=0.21). CONCLUSION: Assessing, managing and referring patients with metastatic colorectal cancer via a multidisciplinary team including a liver surgeon is associated with improved overall survival.

Does the laparoscopic colorectal surgery learning curve adversely affect the results of colorectal cancer resection? A 3-year prospective study in a district general hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is slowly being adopted across the UK. We present a 3-year prospective study of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in a district general hospital. METHOD: Data relating to premorbid, operative and postoperative parameters were recorded for all patients undergoing laparoscopic, open, planned converted (laparoscopic assisted) and unplanned converted resections prospectively from April 2003 to April 2006. RESULTS: A total of 238 colorectal resections were performed, 153 of which were for cancer. Of these 44 (29%) were open, 77 (50%) were laparoscopic and 32 (21%) were converted [26 (17%) planned and six (4%) unplanned]. Blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (P = 0.02) as was intra-operative fluid replacement (P = 0.01). Time to requiring oral analgesia alone was shorter (P = 0.001) and bowel function returned earlier (P = 0.001) in the laparoscopic group. This is reflected in a trend towards a shorter hospital stay for the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (P = 0.049). The operating time of the laparoscopic group was not significantly longer (P = 0.38). The complication rate was similar between groups (P = 0.31) and the mortality in the laparoscopic group was 1.3%. CONCLUSION: Changing from open to laparoscopic dissection for colorectal cancer is safe even during the initial learning curve. There are clear potential short-term benefits for patients and the technique can be introduced without penalties in terms of reduced surgical throughput.

Following anterior resection for rectal cancer, defunctioning ileostomy closure may be significantly delayed by adjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: A temporary loop ileostomy is often created to minimize the impact of peritoneal sepsis from an anastomotic dehiscence following colo-anal or low colorectal anastomosis. These stomas are not without complications. Clinicians tend to advise patients that their loop ileostomy will be reversed within 6-12 weeks of formation. However, factors such as adjuvant chemotherapy may affect the timing of closure. The aim of this study was to review the time between formation and closure of loop ileostomies following total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. METHOD: A retrospective study of 50 patients with loop ileostomies to defunction total mesorectal excisions for rectal cancer, between April 2002 and July 2005. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients with defunctioning loop ileostomies, 24 received adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, and 26 did not. There was a 28% morbidity. The overall median time from formation to closure was 142 days (35-575). Median time from formation to closure in those with adjuvant therapy was 197 days (35-575) and in those with no adjuvant therapy was 133 days (75-395). This was a significant delay (P = 0.049). Sixteen stomas were not closed to date. CONCLUSION: Time between formation and closure of loop ileostomy following anterior resection of rectum is significantly delayed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Because of their high morbidity, defunctioning ileostomies should be closed as early as medically possible, especially if adjuvant chemotherapy is planned.