Pathologists' Use of Second Opinions in Interpretation of Melanocytic Cutaneous Lesions: Policies, Practices, and Perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Research examining the role of second opinions in pathology for diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess current laboratory policies, clinical use of second opinions, and pathologists' perceptions of second opinions for melanocytic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data collected from 207 pathologists in 10 US states who diagnose melanocytic lesions. The web-based survey ascertained pathologists' professional information, laboratory second opinion policy, use of second opinions, and perceptions of second opinion value for melanocytic lesions. RESULTS: Laboratory policies required second opinions for 31% of pathologists and most commonly required for melanoma in situ (26%) and invasive melanoma (30%). In practice, most pathologists reported requesting second opinions for melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential (85%) and atypical Spitzoid lesions (88%). Most pathologists perceived that second opinions increased interpretive accuracy (78%) and protected them from malpractice lawsuits (62%). CONCLUSION: Use of second opinions in clinical practice is greater than that required by laboratory policies, especially for melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential and atypical Spitzoid lesions. Quality of care in surgical interventions for atypical melanocytic proliferations critically depends on the accuracy of diagnosis in pathology reporting. Future research should examine the extent to which second opinions improve accuracy of melanocytic lesion diagnosis.

Population-Based Analysis of Histologically Confirmed Melanocytic Proliferations Using Natural Language Processing.

Importance: Population-based information on the distribution of histologic diagnoses associated with skin biopsies is unknown. Electronic medical records (EMRs) enable automated extraction of pathology report data to improve our epidemiologic understanding of skin biopsy outcomes, specifically those of melanocytic origin. Objective: To determine population-based frequencies and distribution of histologically confirmed melanocytic lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants: A natural language processing (NLP)-based analysis of EMR pathology reports of adult patients who underwent skin biopsies at a large integrated health care delivery system in the US Pacific Northwest from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2012. Exposures: Skin biopsy procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was histopathologic diagnosis, obtained using an NLP-based system to process EMR pathology reports. We determined the percentage of diagnoses classified as melanocytic vs nonmelanocytic lesions. Diagnoses classified as melanocytic were further subclassified using the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) reporting schema into the following categories: class I (nevi and other benign proliferations such as mildly dysplastic lesions typically requiring no further treatment), class II (moderately dysplastic and other low-risk lesions that may merit narrow reexcision with <5-mm margins), class III (eg, melanoma in situ and other higher-risk lesions warranting reexcision with 5-mm to 1-cm margins), and class IV/V (invasive melanoma requiring wide reexcision with ≥1-cm margins and potential adjunctive therapy). Health system cancer registry data were used to define the percentage of invasive melanoma cases within MPATH-Dx class IV (stage T1a) vs V (≥stage T1b). Results: A total of 80 368 skin biopsies, performed on 47 529 patients, were examined. Nearly 1 in 4 skin biopsies were of melanocytic lesions (23%; n = 18 715), which were distributed according to MPATH-Dx categories as follows: class I, 83.1% (n = 15 558); class II, 8.3% (n = 1548); class III, 4.5% (n = 842); class IV, 2.2% (n = 405); and class V, 1.9% (n = 362). Conclusions and Relevance: Approximately one-quarter of skin biopsies resulted in diagnoses of melanocytic proliferations. These data provide the first population-based estimates across the spectrum of melanocytic lesions ranging from benign through dysplastic to malignant. These results may serve as a foundation for future research seeking to understand the epidemiology of melanocytic proliferations and optimization of skin biopsy utilization.

The influence of tumor regression, solar elastosis, and patient age on pathologists' interpretation of melanocytic skin lesions.

It is not known whether patient age or tumor characteristics such as tumor regression or solar elastosis influence pathologists' interpretation of melanocytic skin lesions (MSLs). We undertook a study to determine the influence of these factors, and to explore pathologist's characteristics associated with the direction of diagnosis. To meet our objective, we designed a cross-sectional survey study of pathologists' clinical practices and perceptions. Pathologists were recruited from diverse practices in 10 states in the United States. We enrolled 207 pathologist participants whose practice included the interpretation of MSLs. Our findings indicated that the majority of pathologists (54.6%) were influenced toward a less severe diagnosis when patients were <30 years of age. Most pathologists were influenced toward a more severe diagnosis when patients were >70 years of age, or by the presence of tumor regression or solar elastosis (58.5%, 71.0%, and 57.0%, respectively). Generally, pathologists with dermatopathology board certification and/or a high caseload of MSLs were more likely to be influenced, whereas those with more years' experience interpreting MSL were less likely to be influenced. Our findings indicate that the interpretation of MSLs is influenced by patient age, tumor regression, and solar elastosis; such influence is associated with dermatopathology training and higher caseload, consistent with expertise and an appreciation of lesion complexity.

Variation among pathologists' treatment suggestions for melanocytic lesions: A survey of pathologists.

BACKGROUND: The extent of variability in treatment suggestions for melanocytic lesions made by pathologists is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We investigated how often pathologists rendered suggestions, reasons for providing suggestions, and concordance with national guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of pathologists. Data included physician characteristics, experience, and treatment recommendation practices. RESULTS: Of 301 pathologists, 207 (69%) from 10 states (California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Utah, and Washington) enrolled. In all, 15% and 7% reported never and always including suggestions, respectively. Reasons for offering suggestions included improved care (79%), clarification (68%), and legal liability (39%). Reasons for not offering suggestions included referring physician preference (48%), lack of clinical information (44%), and expertise (29%). Training and caseload were associated with offering suggestions (P < .05). Physician suggestions were most consistent for mild/moderate dysplastic nevi and melanoma. For melanoma in situ, 18 (9%) and 32 (15%) pathologists made suggestions that undertreated or overtreated lesions based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, respectively. For invasive melanoma, 14 (7%) pathologists made treatment suggestions that undertreated lesions based on NCCN guidelines. LIMITATIONS: Treatment suggestions were self-reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologists made recommendations ranging in consistency. These findings may inform efforts to reduce treatment variability and optimize patterns of care delivery for patients.

Patient-reported outcomes of azelaic acid foam 15% for patients with papulopustular rosacea: secondary efficacy results from a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Patient-reported treatment outcomes are important for evaluating the impact of drug therapies on patient experience. A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study was conducted in 961 participants to assess patient perception of efficacy, utility, and effect on quality of life (QOL) of an azelaic acid (AzA) 15% foam formulation for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (PPR). Secondary end points included patient-reported global assessment of treatment response, global assessment of tolerability, and opinion on cosmetic acceptability and practicability of product use. Quality of life assessments included the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) and Rosacea Quality of Life Index (RosaQOL). Self-reported global assessment of treatment response favored AzA foam over vehicle foam (P<.001), with 57.2% of the AzA foam group reporting excellent or good improvement versus 44.7% in the vehicle foam group. Tolerability was rated excellent or good in 67.8% of the AzA foam group versus 78.2% of the vehicle foam group. Mean overall DLQI scores at end of treatment (EoT) were improved (P=.018) in favor of the AzA foam group compared with the vehicle foam group. Both treatment groups showed improvements in RosaQOL. Treatment with AzA foam was associated with improved QOL and meaningful reductions in the patient-perceived burden of PPR, which correlates with earlier reported primary end points of this study and supports the inclusion of patient perspectives in studies evaluating the effects of topical dermatologic treatments.

Resident perspectives on a dermatology Quality Improvement curriculum: the University of Colorado experience.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have prioritized the objective of optimizing quality healthcare though quality improvement initiatives, yet research on dermatology-specific QI programs and their perceptions among dermatology residents remains limited. We explore residents' opinions of a dermatology-specific QI scholarly project curriculum implemented at University of Colorado Denver (UCD) in 2010 and also evaluate residents' attitudes regarding the value of this curriculum in aiding them to meet ACGME core competencies.

Evaluation of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) classification scheme for diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms: Results from the International Melanoma Pathology Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Pathologists use diverse terminology when interpreting melanocytic neoplasms, potentially compromising quality of care. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) scheme, a 5-category classification system for melanocytic lesions. METHODS: Participants (n = 16) of the 2013 International Melanoma Pathology Study Group Workshop provided independent case-level diagnoses and treatment suggestions for 48 melanocytic lesions. Individual diagnoses (including, when necessary, least and most severe diagnoses) were mapped to corresponding MPATH-Dx classes. Interrater agreement and correlation between MPATH-Dx categorization and treatment suggestions were evaluated. RESULTS: Most participants were board-certified dermatopathologists (n = 15), age 50 years or older (n = 12), male (n = 9), based in the United States (n = 11), and primary academic faculty (n = 14). Overall, participants generated 634 case-level diagnoses with treatment suggestions. Mean weighted kappa coefficients for diagnostic agreement after MPATH-Dx mapping (assuming least and most severe diagnoses, when necessary) were 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.71) and 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.73), respectively, whereas correlation between MPATH-Dx categorization and treatment suggestions was 0.91. LIMITATIONS: This was a small sample size of experienced pathologists in a testing situation. CONCLUSION: Varying diagnostic nomenclature can be classified into a concise hierarchy using the MPATH-Dx scheme. Further research is needed to determine whether this classification system can facilitate diagnostic concordance in general pathology practice and improve patient care.

Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology.

Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation, with specific challenges for dermatopathology, yet little is known about pathologists' practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI for interpretation of melanocytic lesions. A national sample of pathologists (N = 207) was recruited from 864 invited pathologists from ten US states (CA, CT, HI, IA, KY, LA, NJ, NM, UT, and WA). Pathologists who had interpreted melanocytic lesions in the past year were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. The survey included questions on pathologists' experience, WSI practice patterns and perceptions using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists' use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were between 40 and 59 years of age (62%) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (71%). Use of WSI was seen more often among dermatopathologists and participants affiliated with an academic medical center. Experience with WSI was reported by 41%, with the most common type of use being for education and testing (CME, board exams, and teaching in general, 71%), and clinical use at tumor boards and conferences (44%). Most respondents (77%) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and 59% agreed that benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. However, 78% of pathologists reported that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (49%) or not (51%). The majority of pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions do not use WSI, but among pathologists who do, use is largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.

Grading of atypia in genital skin lesions: routine microscopic evaluation and use of p16 immunostaining.

BACKGROUND: p16 immunostaining has been used to aid and improve the histopathologic evaluation of equivocal cervical lesions with associated low-grade or high-grade dysplasia. However, the utility of p16 immunostaining in the diagnosis of atypical genital skin lesions remains debatable. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of genital skin lesions with varying degrees of atypia. Four pathologists assessed lesional atypia and interpreted hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and p16 immunostaining without knowledge of original diagnosis. Our primary outcomes were diagnostic agreement and test performance of p16 immunostaining compared to consensus H&E diagnosis. RESULTS: Our sample was comprised of 23 cases of atypical genital skin lesions. p16 immunostaining was negative in all cases of reactive atypia (n = 3) and the majority (n = 7 of 8; 88%) of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs). The majority (n = 10 of 12; 83%) of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were p16 positive. Diagnostic agreement for histopathologic assessment using H&E staining was moderate (kappa = 0.44), while inter-observer agreement of p16 immunostaining was excellent (kappa = 0.87). Compared to consensus diagnosis using H&E staining, p16 immunostaining performed well (sensitivity 83.3%; specificity 90.9%). CONCLUSIONS: p16 immunostaining may be a useful adjunctive marker for assessing dysplasia in genital skin lesions and increasing diagnostic agreement among pathologists.

Delay of Surgery for Melanoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

IMPORTANCE: Timely delivery of surgery for cancer affects health care quality and outcomes. However, population-based studies characterizing the delay of surgery for melanoma in the United States have not been performed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the delay of surgery for melanoma by tumor-, patient-, and physician-level characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed as having melanoma from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2009, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. We included all patients undergoing surgical excision of melanoma diagnosed by means of results of skin biopsy. EXPOSURES: Anatomic location and stage of the tumor, patient sociodemographic characteristics, prior melanoma, Elixhauser comorbidities, and the specialties of the physicians who performed the biopsy and surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Surgical delay, measured as the time from the biopsy to surgical excision. We estimated risk-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and marginal probabilities of delay with 95% CIs for each covariate using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 32 501 cases of melanoma. Most of the patients were white (95.4%), male (63.1%), married (47.9%), and 75 years or older (60.8%) and did not have a prior melanoma (93.7%). Melanomas were most frequently located on the head and neck (40.5%) and staged as in situ disease (48.2%). More than three-quarters of cases (25 269 [77.7%]) underwent excision within 1.5 months of biopsy. Among those treated after 1.5 months (7232 [22.3%]), 2620 (8.1% of all cases) experienced a delay of longer than 3 months. The incidence of a risk-adjusted surgical delay longer than 1.5 months was significantly increased among patients 85 years or older compared with those younger than 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.05-1.55]; P = .02), those with a prior melanoma (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.08-1.34]; P = .001), and those with an increased comorbidity burden (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.09-1.27]; P < .001). Melanomas that underwent biopsy and excision by dermatologists had the lowest likelihood of delay (probability, 16% [95% CI, 14%-18%]). The highest likelihood of delay (probability, 31% [95% CI, 24%-37%]) occurred when the biopsy was performed by a nondermatologist and excised by a primary care physician. Similar findings were observed for a delay longer than 3 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Approximately 1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries experience a delay of surgery for melanoma that is longer than 1.5 months. Those patients undergoing biopsy and surgery by dermatologists have the lowest risk for delay, highlighting potential opportunities for improved access to and coordination of dermatologic care.

Comparing burden of dermatologic disease to search interest on google trends.

Google Trends is a publicly available resource for comparing Internet search query frequency and trends interest in queries over time. The tool provides country, region, and city-specific data for term search volume on Google Search. Our study sought to compare the relative search interest to the burden of disease for the fifteen skin conditions studied by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 project. Searches on Google Trends were conducted by using the most inclusive terms and true ICD code definitions as possible for the skin conditions studied. We report that relative interest on Google Trends did largely correlate to burden of disease reported by the GBD 2010 study, though some conditions were either underrepresented or overrepresented. Acne and herpes were the most Googled skin disease terms. This study provides further insight into what may be the most burdensome skin diseases because those with more burdensome diseases likely sought out information on their condition.

Clinical characteristics associated with Spitz nevi and Spitzoid malignant melanomas: the Yale University Spitzoid Neoplasm Repository experience, 1991 to 2008.

BACKGROUND: Spitz nevi and Spitzoid malignant melanomas are uncommon and may be difficult to distinguish histopathologically. Identification of clinical features associated with these lesions may aid in diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify clinical characteristics associated with Spitz nevi and Spitzoid malignant melanomas. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Spitz nevi and Spitzoid malignant melanomas from the Yale University Spitzoid Neoplasm Repository diagnosed from years 1991 through 2008. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare select patient- and tumor-level factors associated with each lesion. RESULTS: Our cohort included 484 Spitz nevi and 54 Spitzoid malignant melanomas. Spitz nevi were more common (P = .03) in females (65%; n = 316) compared with Spitzoid malignant melanomas (50%; n = 27), occurred more frequently in younger patients (mean age at diagnosis 22 vs 55 years; P < .001), and more likely presented as smaller lesions (diameter 7.6 vs 10.5 mm; P < .001). Increasing age (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI [1.09, 1.14]; P< .001) and male gender (odds ratio 2.77, 95% CI [1.17, 6.55]; P< .02) predicted Spitzoid malignant melanoma diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, unmeasured confounding, and restriction to a single institution may limit the accuracy and generalizability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: Age and gender help predict diagnosis of Spitz nevi and Spitzoid malignant melanomas.

Clinicopathologic features and survival in Spitzoid malignant melanoma and conventional malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Although recent advances in genetics have revealed distinct mutational profiles and molecular signaling pathways associated with Spitzoid malignant melanoma (SMM), less is known about the clinicopathologic characteristics and behavior of SMM compared with conventional melanoma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the clinicopathologic characteristics and mortality risk associated with SMM and conventional malignant melanoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 30 patients with SMM and 30 patients with conventional melanoma. The two groups were matched by age, gender, and depth of tumor invasion. Additional patient- and tumor-level characteristics were compared between groups and regression modeling was used to assess relative mortality risk. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses of SMM and conventional malignant melanoma revealed no significant differences in clinical impression, anatomic location, mitotic rate, and presence of ulceration. Sentinel lymph node biopsy, completion lymphadenectomy, and visceral metastases did not differ between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression showed no differences in mortality between Spitzoid and conventional melanoma. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, short follow-up duration, and residual confounding may limit the accuracy and generalizability of our results. CONCLUSIONS: SMM and conventional malignant melanoma differ in some clinicopathologic features. We did not find a statistically significant difference in mortality between the two.

Mortality from nonneoplastic skin disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The mortality burden from nonneoplastic skin disease in the United States is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate mortality from nonneoplastic skin disease as underlying and contributing causes of death. METHODS: Population-based death certificate data detailing mortality from nonneoplastic skin disease for years 1999 to 2009 were used to calculate absolute numbers of death and age-adjusted mortality by year, patient demographics, and 10 most commonly reported diagnoses. RESULTS: Nonneoplastic skin diseases were reported as underlying and contributing causes of mortality for approximately 3948 and 19,542 patients per year, respectively. Age-adjusted underlying cause mortality (per 100,000 persons) were significantly greater (P < .0001) for patients who were black/African American (3.4), women (1.4), and residing in the South (1.6). Most deaths occurred in patients ages 65 years and older (34,248 total deaths). Common underlying causes of death included chronic ulcers (1789 deaths/y) and cellulitis (1348 deaths/y). LIMITATIONS: Errors in death certificate data and inability to adjust for patient-level confounders may limit the accuracy and generalizability of our results. CONCLUSION: Mortality from nonneoplastic skin disease is uncommon yet potentially preventable. The elderly bear the greatest burden of mortality from nonneoplastic skin disease. Chronic ulcers and cellulitis constitute frequent causes of death.