Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 87(3): ajpe8918, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36202422

RESUMEN

Objective. To describe the landscape of well-being content inclusion across schools and colleges of pharmacy in the United States and Canada through identification of content implementation, incorporation, and assessment.Methods. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to all accredited schools and colleges of pharmacy in the United States (n=143) and Canada (n=10). Survey questions included curricular and cocurricular timing, frequency, assessment strategies, and support for well-being initiatives, using a framework of eight dimensions (pillars) of wellness to categorize content.Results. Descriptive data analyses were applied to 99 completed surveys (65%), 89 (62%) in the United States and 10 (100%) in Canada. Well-being content was most prevalent within the cocurricular realm and incorporated into didactic and elective more than experiential curricula. The most content came from intellectual, emotional, and physical pillars, and the least content came from financial, spiritual, and environmental pillars. Less than 50% of schools and colleges of pharmacy include well-being within their strategic plans or core values. Funding is primarily at the level of the university (59%) or the school or college of pharmacy (59%). Almost half of respondents reported inclusion of some assessment, with a need for more training, expertise, and standardization.Conclusion. Survey results revealed a wide range of implementation and assessment of well-being programs across the United States and Canada. These results provide a reference point for the state of well-being programs that can serve as a call to action and research across the Academy.


Asunto(s)
Educación en Farmacia , Estudiantes de Farmacia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Educación en Farmacia/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Facultades de Farmacia , Curriculum , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Canadá
2.
Pharmacy (Basel) ; 6(3)2018 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30223544

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate at which potentially inappropriate medications were administered for patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD). This is a single-center, retrospective, case cohort study with data collected at an academic medical center between January 2010 and December 2013. Participants included all adult patients with admission diagnosis codes for PD. Included patients were screened for administrations of 27 potentially inappropriate medications and two potentially appropriate medications to be used for comparison. There were 1736 patients who met inclusion criteria with 175 documented administrations of potentially inappropriate medications to 77 patients. Patients who received potentially inappropriate medications had a longer mean duration of stay than the baseline population of PD patients (3.3 days vs. 1.9 days, p-value < 0.001). Despite recommendations to avoid certain medications in PD patients, a substantial number of administrations still occurred. The use of these medications can have clinical implications and our findings demonstrate increases in duration of stay. The findings from this study can assist in developing technological alerts to reduce inappropriate prescribing to PD patients. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further investigate the administration of inappropriate medications to patients diagnosed with PD.

3.
Pharmacy (Basel) ; 6(3)2018 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30154389

RESUMEN

Objective: Compare the duration of mechanical ventilation between patients receiving sedation with continuous infusions of propofol alone or combination with the use of dexmedetomidine and propofol. Design: Retrospective, propensity matched (1:1) cohort study, employing eight variables chosen a priori for matching. Timing of exposure to dexmedetomidine initiation was incorporated into a matching algorithm. Setting: Level 1, university-based, 32-bed, adult, mixed trauma and surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Continuous sedation was delivered according to a protocol methodology with daily sedation vacation and spontaneous breathing trials. Choice of sedation agent was physician directed. Patients: Between 2010 and 2014, 149 SICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation for >24 h received dexmedetomidine with propofol. Propensity matching resulted in 143 pair cohorts. Interventions: Dexmedetomidine with propofol or propofol alone. Measurements and Main Results: There was no statistical difference in SICU length of stay (LOS), with a median absolute difference of 5.3 h for propofol alone group (p = 0.43). The SICU mortality was not statistically different (RR = 1.002, p = 0.88). Examining a 14-day period post-treatment with dexmedetomidine, on any given day (excluding days 1 and 14), dexmedetomidine with propofol-treated patients had a 0.5% to 22.5% greater likelihood of being delirious (CAM-ICU positive). In addition, dexmedetomidine with propofol-treated patients had a 4.5% to 18.8% higher likelihood of being above the target sedation score (more agitated) compared to propofol-alone patients. Conclusions: In this propensity matched cohort study, adjunct use of dexmedetomidine to propofol did not show a statistically significant reduction with respect to mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, SICU LOS, or SICU mortality, despite a trend toward receiving fewer hours of propofol. There was no evidence that dexmedetomidine with propofol improved sedation scores or reduced delirium.

4.
Pharmacy (Basel) ; 6(3)2018 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30142920

RESUMEN

Medication reconciliation is an important aspect of a patient's care process that is ideally performed by clinical pharmacists. Despite literature supporting this process in other patient populations, cystic fibrosis (CF) lacks research in this area. To address this, we designed a retrospective, multi-centered, non-controlled, cross-sectional study at four CF Foundation-accredited centers in the United States to evaluate the medication reconciliation process for adult and pediatric CF patients by documenting the number of home medications reconciled by clinical pharmacists and the number of patients with home medications that did not align with the current CF guidelines published in 2013. There were 105 adult patients and 72 pediatric patients included in the study analysis with a mean number of medications reconciled by clinical pharmacists of 17.4 (standard deviation (SD) 6.7) for adults and 13 (SD 4.6) for pediatric patients. The mean number of discrepancies from guidelines per patient was 1.61 (SD 1.2) for adult patients and 0.63 (SD 0.9) for pediatric patients. Pharmacists play an essential role in identifying and managing medication interactions and further research is necessary to investigate pharmacist impact on medication reconciliation.

5.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...