Evaluation of efficacy and safety in the use of cytarabine for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in a reference hospital in northeastern Brazil.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) is widely used in the treatment of patients with hematological neoplasms. Since these cells circulate in small quantities in the periphery, the use of regimens that promote their mobilization is essential. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of using intermediate doses of cytarabine (1.6 g/m²) + filgrastim (10 mcg/kg/day) in the mobilization of stem cells in 157 patients treated by the Unified Health System at the Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Service of the Hospital Real Português de Beneficência, in Recife, Pernambuco. The sample included patients with multiple myeloma (MM) (58.6 %), lymphomas (29.9 %), and other neoplasms (11.5 %). The target of 2.0 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg was achieved by 148 (94.3 %) patients, in most cases (84.1 %) in a single apheresis and the median number of cells collected was 9.5 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg. No episode of febrile neutropenia was observed, however, 79 patients (50.3 %) required platelet transfusion (no cases attributed to bleeding). The median engraftment time was 11 days. Given these results, we suggest that the use of intermediate doses of cytarabine, combined with filgrastim, is safe and effective in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG in Castleman Disease.

A 35-year-old woman with rectal neuroendocrine tumor, Ki-67 proliferation index less than 2%, and a mediastinal mass on CT postoperatively was referred for restaging with PET/CT Ga-DOTATATE. The examination showed uptake on the pelvic lymph node and mediastinal mass. Because of differences in lesions' SUVs and clinical presentation, the hypothesis of lymphoma for the mediastinal mass was raised, and F-FDG PET/CT was performed, which showed glycolytic hypermetabolism in the mediastinal mass and absence of hypermetabolism in pelvic lymph nodes. Transthoracic biopsy of the mass revealed atypical large-cell lymphoid proliferation, and immunohistochemistry study was compatible with Castleman disease.

Minimizing the uncertainties regarding the effects of delaying radiotherapy for Glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have provided no clear conclusions regarding the effects of delaying radiotherapy (RT) in GBM patients. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the effect of delayed RT on the overall survival (OS) of GBM patients. METHODS: A systematic search retrieved 19 retrospective studies published between 1975 and 2014 reporting on the waiting time (WT) to RT for GBM patients. The meta-analysis was performed by converting WT to RT studies intervals into a regression coefficient (ß) and standard error expressing the effect size on OS per week of delay. RESULTS: Data required to calculate the effect size on OS per week of delay were available for 12 studies (5212 patients). A non-adjusted model and a meta-regression model based on well-recognized prognostic factors were performed. No association between WT to RT, per week of delay, and OS was found (HR=0.98; 95% CI 0.90-1.08; p=0.70). The meta-regression adjusted for prognostic factors weighted by the inverse-variance (1/SE(2)) showed no clear evidence of the effect of WT to RT, per week of delay, on OS. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis, despite limitations, provided no evidence of a true effect on OS by delaying RT in GBM patients.

Waiting time to radiotherapy as a prognostic factor for glioblastoma patients in a scenario of medical disparities.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of waiting time (WT) to radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) of glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a reliable prognostic variable in Brazil, a scenario of medical disparities. METHOD: Retrospective study of 115 GBM patients from two different health-care institutions (one public and one private) in Brazil who underwent post-operative RT. RESULTS: Median WT to RT was 6 weeks (range, 1.3-17.6). The median OS for WT ≤ 6 weeks was 13.5 months (95%CI , 9.1-17.9) and for WT > 6 weeks was 14.2 months (95%CI, 11.2-17.2) (HR 1.165, 95%CI 0.770-1.762; p = 0.470). In the multivariate analysis, the variables associated with survival were KPS (p < 0.001), extent of resection (p = 0.009) and the adjuvant treatment (p = 0.001). The KPS interacted with WT to RT (HR 0.128, 95%CI 0.034-0.476; p = 0.002), showing that the benefit of KPS on OS depends on the WT to RT. CONCLUSION: No prognostic impact of WT to RT could be detected on the OS. Although there are no data to ensure that delays to RT are tolerable, we may reassure patients that the time-length to initiate treatment does not seem to influence the control of the disease, particularly in face of other prognostic factors.

Waiting time to radiotherapy as a prognostic factor for glioblastoma patients in a scenario of medical disparities / Tempo de espera para a radioterapia como um fator prognóstico em pacientes com glioblastoma em um cenário de disparidades médicas

Objective To evaluate the effect of waiting time (WT) to radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) of glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a reliable prognostic variable in Brazil, a scenario of medical disparities. Method Retrospective study of 115 GBM patients from two different health-care institutions (one public and one private) in Brazil who underwent post-operative RT. Results Median WT to RT was 6 weeks (range, 1.3-17.6). The median OS for WT ≤ 6 weeks was 13.5 months (95%CI , 9.1-17.9) and for WT > 6 weeks was 14.2 months (95%CI, 11.2-17.2) (HR 1.165, 95%CI 0.770-1.762; p = 0.470). In the multivariate analysis, the variables associated with survival were KPS (p < 0.001), extent of resection (p = 0.009) and the adjuvant treatment (p = 0.001). The KPS interacted with WT to RT (HR 0.128, 95%CI 0.034-0.476; p = 0.002), showing that the benefit of KPS on OS depends on the WT to RT. Conclusion No prognostic impact of WT to RT could be detected on the OS. Although there are no data to ensure that delays to RT are tolerable, we may reassure patients that the time-length to initiate treatment does not seem to influence the control of the disease, particularly in face of other prognostic factors. .

Objetivo Avaliar o efeito do tempo de espera (TE) até radioterapia na sobrevida global de pacientes com glioblastoma como um fator prognóstico confiável. Método Estudo retrospectivo de 115 pacientes com glioblastoma, que foram submetidos à radioterapia pós-operatória, em dois serviços diferentes no Brasil (um público e outro privado). Resultados Mediana de TE para radioterapia foi de 6 semanas (variação, 1,3-17,6). A mediana de sobrevida para TE ≤ 6 semanas foi de 13,5 meses (IC95%, 9,1-17,9) e para TE > 6 semanas foi de 14,2 meses (IC95%, 11,2-17,2) (HR 1,165, 0,770-1,762; p = 0,470). Na análise multivariada, as variáveis associadas à sobrevida foram perfomance status (p < 0,001), extensão da ressecção (p = 0,009) e tratamento adjuvante (p = 0,001). Conclusão Não se observou impacto prognóstico para TE até a radioterapia na sobrevida. Diante de outros fatores prognósticos, é possível assegurar de que o espaço de tempo até a radioterapia não parece influenciar o controle da doença. .

Initial care and outcome of glioblastoma multiforme patients in 2 diverse health care scenarios in Brazil: does public versus private health care matter?.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological and survival features of patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated in 2 health care scenarios--public and private--in Brazil. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, treatment, and outcome characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme patients from 2003 to 2011 at 2 institutions. RESULTS: The median age of the 171 patients (117 public and 54 private) was 59.3 years (range, 18-84). The median survival for patients treated in private institutions was 17.4 months (95% confidence interval, 11.1-23.7) compared with 7.1 months (95% confidence interval, 3.8-10.4) for patients treated in public institutions (P < .001). The time from the first symptom to surgery was longer in the public setting (median of 64 days for the public hospital and 31 days for the private institution; P = .003). The patients at the private hospital received radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy in 59.3% of cases; at the public hospital, only 21.4% (P < .001). Despite these differences, the institution of treatment was not found to be an independent predictor of outcome (hazard ratio, 1.675; 95% confidence interval, 0.951-2.949; P = .074). The Karnofsky performance status and any additional treatment after surgery were predictors of survival. A hazard ratio of 0.010 (95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.033; P < .001) was observed for gross total tumor resection followed by radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite obvious disparities between the hospitals, the medical assistance scenario was not an independent predictor of survival. However, survival was directly influenced by additional treatment after surgery. Therefore, increasing access to resources in developing countries like Brazil is critical.

Is there publication bias towards Brazilian articles on cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether Brazilian articles on cancer are published in journals with an impact factor and/or repercussion (measured by the number of citations) inferior to those that come from foreign organizations. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed for the MeSH term "neoplasm" with the limits clinical trial, affiliation of the Brazilian author(s), and interval from July 1st, 2009 to June 30, 2010. Selected for matching were non-Brazilian related articles published from three months prior to three months after the date of publication of the Brazilian study. The numbers of citations were obtained from two databases, as well as the impact factor for the journals in which the articles were published. RESULTS: Forty-three national and 876 related international articles were identified. The Brazilian publications had a mean impact factor of 3.000 versus 3.430 of the international ones (p=0.041). There was no statistically significant difference as to the number of citations between the two groups. The affiliation of the first author with a Brazilian or foreign organization did not significantly influence the number of citations or the impact factor. CONCLUSION: Brazilian articles are significantly less accepted in journals with higher impact factors, although it does not compromise its repercussion on the scientific community.

Existe viés de publicação para artigos brasileiros sobre câncer? / Is there publication bias towards Brazilian articles on cancer?

OBJETIVO: Investigar se artigos brasileiros sobre câncer são publicados em periódicos de fator impacto e/ou repercussão (medida pelo número de citações) inferiores aos oriundos de instituições estrangeiras MÉTODOS: Pesquisou-se, no PubMed, o MeSH Term "neoplasm" com os limitadores: clinical trial, afiliação de autor(es) brasileira e intervalo de 1º de julho de 2009 a 30 de junho de 2010. Foram selecionados para pareamento artigos relacionados, não brasileiros, publicados entre três meses antes e três meses depois da data de publicação do estudo brasileiro. Foram obtidos os números de citações, em duas bases de dados, assim como o fator de impacto para as revistas nas quais os artigos foram publicados. RESULTADOS: Identificaram-se 43 artigos nacionais e 876 internacionais relacionados. Os brasileiros apresentaram fator de impacto médio de 3.000 contra 3.430 dos internacionais (p=0,041). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa quanto ao número de citações entre os grupos. A afiliação do primeiro autor à instituição brasileira ou estrangeira também não influenciou significativamente no número de citações nem no fator de impacto. CONCLUSÃO: Artigos brasileiros são significativamente menos aceitos em revistas de maior impacto sem aparente comprometimento de sua repercussão na comunidade científica.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether Brazilian articles on cancer are published in journals with an impact factor and/or repercussion (measured by the number of citations) inferior to those that come from foreign organizations. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed for the MeSH term "neoplasm" with the limits clinical trial, affiliation of the Brazilian author(s), and interval from July 1st, 2009 to June 30, 2010. Selected for matching were non-Brazilian related articles published from three months prior to three months after the date of publication of the Brazilian study. The numbers of citations were obtained from two databases, as well as the impact factor for the journals in which the articles were published. RESULTS: Forty-three national and 876 related international articles were identified. The Brazilian publications had a mean impact factor of 3.000 versus 3.430 of the international ones (p=0.041). There was no statistically significant difference as to the number of citations between the two groups. The affiliation of the first author with a Brazilian or foreign organization did not significantly influence the number of citations or the impact factor. CONCLUSION: Brazilian articles are significantly less accepted in journals with higher impact factors, although it does not compromise its repercussion on the scientific community.

Patterns of care and outcomes in elderly patients with glioblastoma in Sao Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze how elderly patients with glioblastoma are managed in Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 30 patients aged ≥ 65 years treated between 2003 and 2011 at Albert Einstein Hospital in Sao Paulo. We retrospectively reviewed medical records to obtain data on clinical variables, treatment and outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using a Wilcoxon log-rank test. RESULTS: The median age was 73 years. The majority of patients (73.2%) underwent surgical intervention. Following surgery, 80% received radiotherapy (RT), and of those, 79.2% were treated with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). The median progression free survival and OS were 5 and 10.6 months, respectively. Patients with a KPS ≥ 70 had a median OS of 16.2 months, compared to 6.4 months for those with a KPS <70 (p=0.032). For those patients in whom biopsy only was performed, the median OS was 5.3 months, as compared to 7.8 months for those who underwent partial resection and 18.6 months for those treated with gross total resection (p=0.021). A longer survival was found among patients who received RT versus those who did not (11 months vs. 1 month, p=0.003), as well as for those treated with chemoradiation (13.6 months vs. 6.4 months, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study brings new information about the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma in Brazil. Our data may suggest that elderly patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant RT with concurrent TMZ can do better than those with less aggressive treatment.