Endoscopic sinus surgery with medical therapy versus medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a common operation for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) when medical therapy alone is insufficient. No randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of ESS have been published. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ESS plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP. METHODS: We performed an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial in three tertiary care centres and 12 secondary care centres in 11 cities in the Netherlands (Almere, Amstelveen, Amsterdam, Blaricum, Den Haag, Deventer, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, Hoorn, Leiderdorp, and Rotterdam). Adults (aged ≥18 years) with CRSwNP and an indication for ESS were randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation (block sizes of six), stratified by study centre, to receive either ESS plus medical therapy or medical therapy. ESS was performed according to local practice, although anterior ethmoidectomy was mandatory. Medical therapy was prescribed at the patient's otorhinolaryngologist's discretion, and could be, but was not limited to, nasal corticosteroids, nasal rinsing, systemic corticosteroids, or systemic antibiotics. The primary outcome was disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 12 months of follow up, measured with the validated Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22; where each item is scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated no problems and 5 indicates problems as bad as can be, with a total score of 0-110 points), and the minimal clinically important difference of the SNOT-22 is 9·0 points. Primary and safety analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. The ITT population comprised all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment according to their randomisation group and without any protocol violation. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR4978, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2015, and Aug 27, 2019, 371 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 238 were eligible, willing to participate, and randomly assigned to ESS plus medical therapy (n=121) or medical therapy (n=117) and 234 were included in the baseline ITT population (n=118 ESS plus medical therapy; n=116 medical therapy). 142 (61%) of 234 patients at baseline were men and 92 (39%) were women, and the mean age was 50·4 years (SD 12·7). 206 participants were analysed at 12 months for the primary outcome (n=103 in the ESS plus medical therapy group; n=103 in the medical therapy group). At 12 months follow-up, the mean SNOT-22 score in the ESS plus medical therapy group was 27·9 (SD 20·2; n=103) and in the medical therapy group was 31·1 (20·4; n=103), with an adjusted mean difference of -4·9 (95% CI -9·4 to -0·4), favouring ESS plus medical therapy. Adverse events were similar between the groups. The most common adverse events were minor epistaxis or gastrointestinal problems. No treatment-related deaths occurred, but one patient died due to congestive heart failure. INTERPRETATION: ESS plus medical therapy is more efficacious than medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP, although the minimal clinically important difference was not met. Long-term follow-up data are needed to determine whether the effect persists. The current results are a basis for further development of evidence-based guidelines. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).

Prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis in the general population based on sinus radiology and symptomatology.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) measured in epidemiologic studies is 5% to 12%. This might be an overestimation because of overlap with other diseases, such as allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to calculate the prevalence of CRS using a combination of epidemiologically based CRS according to the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) together with sinonasal opacification on imaging. METHODS: Subjects who underwent a computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scan of the head for any nonrhinologic indication were asked to fill in the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network survey containing EPOS symptom criteria. The scans were evaluated according to the Lund-Mackay (LM) scoring system. Epidemiologically based CRS is based on nasal symptoms according to EPOS; clinically based CRS also encompasses endoscopy and/or CT scanning. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-four subjects were included. One hundred seven (12.8%) had epidemiologically based CRS according to EPOS. Of these subjects, 50% had an LM score of 0, 26% had an LM score of 1 to 3, and 23% had an LM score of 4 or greater. Twenty-five (3.0%) subjects had clinically based CRS (based on LM score ≥4), and 53 (6.4%) subjects had clinically based CRS (based on LM score >0). Allergic rhinitis was reported by 167 (20%) subjects. In subjects who did not report upper airway symptoms, 57% had an LM score of 0, 30% had an LM score of 1 to 3, and 12% had an LM score of 4 or greater. CONCLUSION: We found a prevalence of 3.0% to 6.4% of clinically based CRS (depending on an LM cutoff point; ie, LM ≥ 4 or LM > 0, respectively) in a relatively randomly selected group of subjects.

Endoscopic sinus surgery in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (PolypESS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is a chronic disease frequently seen in otorhinolaryngological practice. Along with its chronic disease burden it creates high societal costs. Therapy consists of long-term use of medication and, if insufficient, endoscopic sinus surgery. No consensus exists on the right timing and extent of disease that warrants surgery. Furthermore, there is lack of clinical knowledge about the benefit of surgery over medication only. The current trial evaluates the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sinus surgery in addition to drug treatment versus medication exclusively in the adult patient group with nasal polyps. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled (PolypESS) trial in 238 patients aged 18 years or older selected for primary or revision endoscopic sinus surgery by the otorhinolaryngologist was designed. Patients will be randomised to either endoscopic sinus surgery in addition to medication or medical therapy only. Relevant data will be collected prior to randomisation, at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after start of treatment. Complete follow-up will be 24 months. Primary outcome is disease-specific Health-related Quality of Life quantified by the SNOT-22 after 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are generic Health-related Quality of Life, cost-effectiveness, objective signs of disease and adverse effects of treatment. Subgroup analyses will be performed to verify whether treatment effects differ among patient phenotypes. DISCUSSION: The PolypESS trial will investigate tailored care in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and will result in improved clinical pathways to help to determine in which circumstances to perform surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register, NTR4978 . Registered on 27 November 2014.

Post-operative morbidity and 1-year outcomes in CO2-laser tonsillotomy versus dissection tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVE: In this study a type of partial tonsil surgery, CO2-laser tonsillotomy, was compared to regular tonsillectomy. The effectiveness and post-operative recovery rate of both interventions in adult patients was assessed by using a questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective follow-up non-randomized cohort study. METHOD: One hundred and seven adults were included; 46 tonsillectomies and 61 tonsillotomies were performed. Patients in the tonsillectomy group underwent general anaesthesia, while tonsillotomy was performed in an ambulatory setting with local anaesthesia. Post-operative questionnaires were administered by mail after 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year to assess recovery rate and symptom recurrence. RESULTS: In total, 72.5% of patients were cured from their initial symptoms after tonsillotomy. Three patients (7.5%) required re-surgery for their initial complaints. After tonsillectomy, 97.2% of patients were cured. Both groups showed equally high satisfaction scores after treatment. Post-operative evaluation after 2 weeks showed a mean pain-intensity score of 5.4 (Visual Analogue Scale 0-10) after tonsillotomy and a mean pain-intensity score of 7.7 after tonsillectomy. The post-operative use of analgesics was twice as long in the tonsillectomy group compared to the tonsillotomy group and the tonsillectomy group required twice as many days for full recovery. After tonsillectomy a higher rate of major post-operative haemorrhage was seen. CONCLUSION: CO2-laser tonsillotomy is associated with a shorter and less painful recovery period. Both surgical methods are equal in terms of long-term satisfaction, although tonsillotomy comes with a higher recurrence rate of mild symptoms. A strict pre-operative patient selection for CO2-laser tonsillotomy is necessary.