Topical ethyl chloride to reduce pain associated with venous catheterization: a randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pain associated with venous catheterization after administration of topical ethyl chloride vs placebo among emergency department health care providers. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial among a convenience sample of health care provider volunteers in a tertiary care urban emergency department. We randomly allocated subjects to initial treatment (ethyl chloride vs sterile water aerosol spray) and catheterization site (left or right antecubital fossa). After venous catheterization placement and discontinuation, subjects underwent a 5-minute washout period. All subjects then underwent venous catheterization in the contralateral antecubital fossa after administration of the alternative agent. We measured all outcomes after discontinuation of the second catheter. The primary outcome was difference in pain verbal numeric rating scale score (0-10) between the 2 agents. Secondary outcomes included preferred agent (binary) and future willingness to use agent on patients (5-point Likert scale). RESULTS: Thirty-eight health care providers were recruited; all completed the study. Median pain verbal numeric rating scale scores were 4 (interquartile range, 2-5) for placebo vs 2 (1-4) for ethyl chloride. The effect size for pain reduction with ethyl chloride compared with placebo was 2 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-2; P = .001). Most subjects (68.4%) preferred ethyl chloride to placebo. Five-point Likert scale scores measuring willingness to use preferred product on future patients were higher by 2 (95% confidence interval, 1-3) among subjects preferring ethyl chloride vs placebo. CONCLUSIONS: We found that topical ethyl chloride yields a greater reduction in pain associated with venous catheterization compared with topical placebo.

Isopropyl Alcohol Nasal Inhalation for Nausea in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We compare nasal inhalation of isopropyl alcohol versus placebo in treating nausea among emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: A convenience sample of adults with chief complaints of nausea or vomiting was enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in an urban tertiary care ED. Patients were randomized to nasally inhaled isopropyl alcohol versus nasally inhaled normal saline solution. Patient nausea and pain were measured with previously published 11-point verbal numeric response scale scores; patient satisfaction was measured by a 5-point Likert scale. The primary outcome was reduction in nausea 10 minutes poststart. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and pain reduction measured at 10 minutes poststart. RESULTS: Of 84 recruited patients, 80 (95.2%) completed the study. Thirty-seven (46.3%) received nasally inhaled isopropyl alcohol and 43 (53.8%) received nasally inhaled normal saline solution. At 10 minutes postintervention, median nausea verbal numeric response scale score was 3 in the isopropyl alcohol arm versus 6 in the placebo arm, for an effect size of 3 (95% confidence interval 2 to 4). Median satisfaction score was 4 in the isopropyl alcohol arm versus 2 in the placebo arm, for an effect size of 2 (95% confidence interval 2 to 2). There were no significant differences between the 2 arms in median pain verbal numeric response scale scores or subsequent receipt of rescue antiemetics. CONCLUSION: We found that nasally inhaled isopropyl alcohol achieves increased nausea relief compared with placebo during a 10-minute period.