Diseño de un nuevo indicador de mortalidad en el síndrome coronario agudo al ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos / Design of a new mortality indicator in acute coronary syndrome on admission to the Intensive Care Unit

Objetivo: Diseñar un indicador de mortalidad del síndrome coronario agudo (SCA) en el servicio de medicina intensiva (SMI). Diseño: Estudio descriptivo observacional multicéntrico. Participantes: Pacientes con SCA ingresados en SMI incluidos en el registro ARIAM- SEMICYUC entre enero del 2013 y abril del 2019. Intervenciones: Ninguna. Variables de interés principales: Las variables analizadas fueron demográficas, tiempo de acceso al sistema sanitario y estado clínico. Se analizó la terapia de revascularización, los fármacos y la mortalidad. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística de COX y posteriormente se diseñó una red neuronal. Se elaboró una curva ROC para calcula la potencia del nuevo score. Finalmente, la utilidad clínica o relevancia del indicador ARIAM se evaluará mediante un gráfico de Fagan. Resultados: Se incluyó a 17.258 pacientes, con una mortalidad al alta del SMI del 3,5% (605). Las variables analizadas con significación estadística (p<0,001) fueron introducidas en el modelo predictivo supervisado, una red neuronal artificial. El nuevo indicador ARIAM mostro una media de 0,0257 (IC del 95%, 0,0245-0,0267) en los pacientes dados de alta de UCI y de 0,27085 (IC del 95%, 0,2533-0,2886) en los que fallecieron, p <0,001. El área ROC del modelo conseguido fue de 0,918 (IC del 95%, 0,907-0,930). En el test de Fagan se demostró que el indicador ARIAM muestra que la probabilidad de fallecimiento es del 19% (IC del 95%, 18-20%) cuando es positivo y del 0,9% (IC del 95%, 0,8-1,01%) cuando es negativo. Conclusiones: Es posible crear un nuevo indicador de mortalidad del SCA en el SMI que sea más exacto, reproducible y actualizable periódicamente. (AU)

Objective: To design a mortality indicator for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Multicenter observational descriptive study. Participants: ACS patients admitted to SMI included in the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry between January 2013 and April 2019. Interventions: None. Main variables of interest: Variables analyzed were demographic, time of access to the health system, and clinical condition. Revascularization therapy, drugs, and mortality were analyzed. A COX regression analysis was performed and subsequently a neural network was designed. An ROC curve was developed to calculate the power of the new score. Finally, the clinical utility or relevance of the ARIAM's indicator will be evaluated using a Fagan test. Results: 17,258 patients were included, with a 3.5% (605) mortality at discharge from the ICU. The variables analyzed with statistical significance (p<0.001) were entered into the supervised predictive model, an artificial neural network. The new ARIAM's indicator showed a mean of 0.0257 (95% CI: 0.0245–0.0267) in patients discharged from the ICU and 0.27085 (95% CI: 0.2533–0.2886) in those who died, p<0.001. The ROC area of the model achieved was 0.918 (95% CI: 0.907–0.930). The Fagan test showed that the ARIAM's Indicator shows that the probability of death is 19% (95% CI: 18%–20%) when it is positive and 0.9% (95% CI: 0.8%–1.01%) when it is negative. Conclusions: It is possible to create a new mortality indicator for ACS in the ICU that is more accurate, reproducible, and periodically updated. (AU)

Design of a new mortality indicator in acute coronary syndrome on admission to the Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To design a mortality indicator in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: A multicenter, observational descriptive study was carried out. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with ACS admitted to the ICUs included in the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry between January 2013 and April 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Demographic parameters, time of access to the healthcare system, and clinical condition. Revascularization therapy, drugs and mortality were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was performed, followed by the design of a neural network. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to calculate the power of the new score. Lastly, the clinical utility or relevance of the ARIAM indicator (ARIAM's) was assessed using a Fagan test. RESULTS: A total of 17,258 patients were included in the study, with a mortality rate of 3.5% (n = 605) at discharge from the ICU. The variables showing statistical significance (P < .001) were entered into the supervised predictive model, an artificial neural network. The new ARIAM's yielded a mean of 0.0257 (95%CI: 0.0245-0.0267) in patients discharged from the ICU versus 0.27085 (95%CI: 0.2533-0.2886) in those who died (P < .001). The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.918 (95%CI: 0.907-0.930). Based on the Fagan test, the ARIAM's showed the mortality risk to be 19% (95%CI: 18%-20%) when positive and 0.9% (95%CI: 0.8%-1.01%) when negative. CONCLUSIONS: A new mortality indicator for ACS in the ICU can be established that is more accurate and reproducible, and periodically updated.

Dynamics of disease characteristics and clinical management of critically ill COVID-19 patients over the time course of the pandemic: an analysis of the prospective, international, multicentre RISC-19-ICU registry.

BACKGROUND: It remains elusive how the characteristics, the course of disease, the clinical management and the outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) worldwide have changed over the course of the pandemic. METHODS: Prospective, observational registry constituted by 90 ICUs across 22 countries worldwide including patients with a laboratory-confirmed, critical presentation of COVID-19 requiring advanced organ support. Hierarchical, generalized linear mixed-effect models accounting for hospital and country variability were employed to analyse the continuous evolution of the studied variables over the pandemic. RESULTS: Four thousand forty-one patients were included from March 2020 to September 2021. Over this period, the age of the admitted patients (62 [95% CI 60-63] years vs 64 [62-66] years, p < 0.001) and the severity of organ dysfunction at ICU admission decreased (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment 8.2 [7.6-9.0] vs 5.8 [5.3-6.4], p < 0.001) and increased, while more female patients (26 [23-29]% vs 41 [35-48]%, p < 0.001) were admitted. The time span between symptom onset and hospitalization as well as ICU admission became longer later in the pandemic (6.7 [6.2-7.2| days vs 9.7 [8.9-10.5] days, p < 0.001). The PaO2/FiO2 at admission was lower (132 [123-141] mmHg vs 101 [91-113] mmHg, p < 0.001) but showed faster improvements over the initial 5 days of ICU stay in late 2021 compared to early 2020 (34 [20-48] mmHg vs 70 [41-100] mmHg, p = 0.05). The number of patients treated with steroids and tocilizumab increased, while the use of therapeutic anticoagulation presented an inverse U-shaped behaviour over the course of the pandemic. The proportion of patients treated with high-flow oxygen (5 [4-7]% vs 20 [14-29], p < 0.001) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (14 [11-18]% vs 24 [17-33]%, p < 0.001) throughout the pandemic increased concomitant to a decrease in invasive mechanical ventilation (82 [76-86]% vs 74 [64-82]%, p < 0.001). The ICU mortality (23 [19-26]% vs 17 [12-25]%, p < 0.001) and length of stay (14 [13-16] days vs 11 [10-13] days, p < 0.001) decreased over 19 months of the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Characteristics and disease course of critically ill COVID-19 patients have continuously evolved, concomitant to the clinical management, throughout the pandemic leading to a younger, less severely ill ICU population with distinctly different clinical, pulmonary and inflammatory presentations than at the onset of the pandemic.

Gangrena simétrica periférica en los pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Peripheral symmetric gangrena in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection

Introducción:la infección por COVID-19, aunque principalmente con afectación respiratoria, ha puesto de manifiesto diversas manifestaciones clínicas a nivel extrapulmonar. La afectación vascular es frecuente en la unidad de cuidados intensivos aunque su fisiopatología no está del todo clara a día de hoy.Caso clínico:presentamos el caso de un varón de 73 años, con antecedente de crioglobulinemia, ingresado la unidad de cuidados intensivos debido a una neumonía bilateral por COVID-19. Precisó inicio de drogas vasoactivas a dosis bajas, y progresivamente se evidenció isquemia distal de las cuatro extremidades, estableciendo el diagnóstico diferencial entre microangiopatía trombótica o reactivación de la crioglobulinemia.Discusión:la aparición de procesos trombóticos y el riesgo elevado de hemorragia en los pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2 ha supuesto uno de los mayores retos en cuanto al tratamiento de esta patología. Las complicaciones vasculares de pequeño vaso, debido en su mayor parte a procesos microangiopáticos distales, han puesto en la palestra el riesgo/beneficio tanto de la anticoagulación, la dosis adecuada, así como su duración.(AU)

Introduction:COVID-19 infection, although mainly with respiratory involvement, has revealed various clinical manifestations at the extrapulmonary level. Vascular involvement is common in the intensive care unit, although its pathophysiology is not clear today.Case report:we present the case of a 73-year-old man, with a history of cryoglobulinemia, admitted to the intensive care unit due to bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia. It required the initiation of vasoactive drugs at low doses, and distal ischemia of the four extremities was progressively evident, establishing the differential diagnosis between thrombotic microangiopathy or reactivation of cryoglobulinemia.Discussion:the appearance of thrombotic processes and the high risk of hemorrhage in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been one of the greatest challenges regarding the treatment of this pathology. Small-vessel vascular complications, mostly due to distal microangiopathic processes, have brought to the fore the risk / benefit of anticoagulation, the appropriate dose, and its duration.(AU)

Encefalitis como manifestación neurológica del COVID-19 / Encephalitis as a neurological manifestation of COVID-19

Introducción: En el contexto de la pandemia mundial por COVID-19, las distintas manifestaciones clínicas de esta infección suponen un reto para los profesionales sanitarios. La afectación respiratoria, síntoma principal de la infección por SARS-CoV-2, hace que otras manifestaciones, como las neurológicas, pasen a un segundo plano, con el consecuente retraso en el diagnóstico y tratamiento.Material y métodosTodo paciente COVID-19 que ha ingresado con sintomatología neurológica o diagnosticado de encefalitis desde marzo de 2020 en un hospital de tercer nivel en Zaragoza, España.ResultadosDos pacientes con infección COVID-19 confirmada por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) nasofaríngea y cuyo cuadro clínico consistía en alteraciones neurológicas compatibles con encefalitis. La microbiología del líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) fue negativa para bacterias y virus, incluido el SARS-CoV-2 pero, ante la sospecha clínica de encefalitis por este último, se instauró tratamiento antiviral, con inmunoglobulinas y plasmaféresis de forma precoz. A pesar de ello la evolución no fue satisfactoria.ConclusionesLa encefalitis por COVID-19 es una entidad clínica descrita recientemente, cuya fisiopatología aún se desconoce y no se dispone, hasta la fecha, de un tratamiento con evidencia clínica. (AU)

Introduction: In the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the different clinical manifestations of this infection pose a challenge for healthcare professionals. Respiratory involvement, the main symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection, means that other manifestations, such as neurological, take a back seat, with the consequent delay in diagnosis and treatment.Material and methodsAll COVID-19 patients admitted with neurological symptoms or diagnosed with encephalitis since March 2020 in a tertiary hospital in Zaragoza, Spain.ResultsTwo patients with COVID-19 infection confirmed by nasopharyngeal PCR and whose clinical picture consisted of neurological alterations compatible with encephalitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) microbiology was negative for bacteria and viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 but, given the clinical suspicion of encephalitis due to the latter, antiviral treatment with immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis was started early. Despite this, the evolution was not satisfactory.ConclusionsCOVID-19 encephalitis is a recently described clinical entity, whose pathophysiology is still unknown and no treatment with clinical evidence is available to date. (AU)

Encephalitis as a neurological manifestation of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: In the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the different clinical manifestations of this infection pose a challenge for healthcare professionals. Respiratory involvement, the main symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection, means that other manifestations, such as neurological, take a back seat, with the consequent delay in diagnosis and treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All COVID-19 patients admitted with neurological symptoms or diagnosed with encephalitis since March 2020 in a tertiary hospital in Zaragoza, Spain. RESULTS: Two patients with COVID-19 infection confirmed by nasopharyngeal PCR and whose clinical picture consisted of neurological alterations compatible with encephalitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) microbiology was negative for bacteria and viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 but, given the clinical suspicion of encephalitis due to the latter, antiviral treatment with immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis was started early. Despite this, the evolution was not satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 encephalitis is a recently described clinical entity, whose pathophysiology is still unknown and no treatment with clinical evidence is available to date.

INTRODUCCIÓN: En el contexto de la pandemia mundial por COVID-19, las distintas manifestaciones clínicas de esta infección suponen un reto para los profesionales sanitarios. La afectación respiratoria, síntoma principal de la infección por SARS-CoV-2, hace que otras manifestaciones, como las neurológicas, pasen a un segundo plano, con el consecuente retraso en el diagnóstico y tratamiento. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Todo paciente COVID-19 que ha ingresado con sintomatología neurológica o diagnosticado de encefalitis desde Marzo de 2020 en un hospital de tercer nivel en Zaragoza, España. RESULTADOS: Dos pacientes con infección COVID-19 confirmada por PCR nasofaríngea y cuyo cuadro clínico consistía en alteraciones neurológicas compatibles con encefalitis. La microbiología del líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) fue negativa para bacterias y virus, incluido el SARS-CoV-2 pero, ante la sospecha clínica de encefalitis por este último, se instauró tratamiento antiviral, con inmunoglobulinas y plasmaféresis de forma precoz. A pesar de ello la evolución no fue satisfactoria. CONCLUSIONES: La encefalitis por COVID-19 es una entidad clínica descrita recientemente, cuya fisiopatología aún se desconoce y no se dispone, hasta la fecha, de un tratamiento con evidencia clínica.

[Encephalitis as a neurological manifestation of COVID-19]. / Encefalitis como manifestación neurológica del COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: In the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the different clinical manifestations of this infection pose a challenge for healthcare professionals. Respiratory involvement, the main symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection, means that other manifestations, such as neurological, take a back seat, with the consequent delay in diagnosis and treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All COVID-19 patients admitted with neurological symptoms or diagnosed with encephalitis since March 2020 in a tertiary hospital in Zaragoza, Spain. RESULTS: Two patients with COVID-19 infection confirmed by nasopharyngeal PCR and whose clinical picture consisted of neurological alterations compatible with encephalitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) microbiology was negative for bacteria and viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 but, given the clinical suspicion of encephalitis due to the latter, antiviral treatment with immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis was started early. Despite this, the evolution was not satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 encephalitis is a recently described clinical entity, whose pathophysiology is still unknown and no treatment with clinical evidence is available to date.

Implications of early respiratory support strategies on disease progression in critical COVID-19: a matched subanalysis of the prospective RISC-19-ICU cohort.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty about the optimal respiratory support strategies in critically ill COVID-19 patients is widespread. While the risks and benefits of noninvasive techniques versus early invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are intensely debated, actual evidence is lacking. We sought to assess the risks and benefits of different respiratory support strategies, employed in intensive care units during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic on intubation and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rates. METHODS: Subanalysis of a prospective, multinational registry of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Patients were subclassified into standard oxygen therapy ≥10 L/min (SOT), high-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC), noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIV), and early IMV, according to the respiratory support strategy employed at the day of admission to ICU. Propensity score matching was performed to ensure comparability between groups. RESULTS: Initially, 1421 patients were assessed for possible study inclusion. Of these, 351 patients (85 SOT, 87 HFNC, 87 NIV, and 92 IMV) remained eligible for full analysis after propensity score matching. 55% of patients initially receiving noninvasive respiratory support required IMV. The intubation rate was lower in patients initially ventilated with HFNC and NIV compared to those who received SOT (SOT: 64%, HFNC: 52%, NIV: 49%, p = 0.025). Compared to the other respiratory support strategies, NIV was associated with a higher overall ICU mortality (SOT: 18%, HFNC: 20%, NIV: 37%, IMV: 25%, p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19, a trial of HFNC appeared to be the most balanced initial respiratory support strategy, given the reduced intubation rate and comparable ICU mortality rate. Nonetheless, considering the uncertainty and stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, SOT and early IMV represented safe initial respiratory support strategies. The presented findings, in agreement with classic ARDS literature, suggest that NIV should be avoided whenever possible due to the elevated ICU mortality risk.