Perilesional edema diameter associated with brain metastases as a predictive factor of response to radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Different prognostic scales exist in patients with brain metastasis, particularly in lung cancer. The Graded Prognostic Assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA index) for brain metastases is a powerful prognostic tool that effectively identifies patients at different risks. However, these scales do not include perilesional edema diameter (PED) associated with brain metastasis. Current evidence suggests that PED might compromise the delivery and efficacy of radiotherapy to treat BM. This study explored the association between radiotherapy efficacy, PED extent, and gross tumor diameter (GTD). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracranial response (iORR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and overall survival (OS) according to the extent of PED and GT. Methods: Out of 114 patients with BM at baseline or throughout the disease, 65 were eligible for the response assessment. The GTD and PED sum were measured at BM diagnosis and after radiotherapy treatment. According to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, cutoff values were set at 27 mm and 17 mm for PED and GT, respectively. Results: Minor PED was independently associated with a better iORR [78.8% vs. 50%, OR 3.71 (95% CI 1.26-10.99); p = 0.018] to brain radiotherapy. Median iPFS was significantly shorter in patients with major PED [6.9 vs. 11.8 months, HR 2.9 (95% CI 1.7-4.4); p < 0.001] independently of other prognostic variables like the Lung-molGPA and GTD. A major PED also negatively impacted the median OS [18.4 vs. 7.9 months, HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.3); p = 0.001]. Conclusion: Higher PED was associated with an increased risk of intracranial progression and a lesser probability of responding to brain radiotherapy in patients with metastatic lung cancer. We encourage prospective studies to confirm our findings.

Current uses and applications of stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a modality that delivers high doses of radiation to a well-defined tumor target in a single or a few fractions and with high precision, which significantly reduces the dose received by surrounding normal tissues. SBRT is indicated for inoperable, early stage (T1 and T2) primary non-small cell lung cancer, lung metastases with a controlled primary tumor, prostate tumors and oligometastatic disease. Despite the lack of long-term or phase III studies, efficacy results in local control are higher than 90%, with similar toxicity to that reported with conventional fractionated radiotherapy. This article describes SBRT technology and technique, along with clinical applications, indications and limitations of this therapeutic modality.

La radioterapia corporal estereotáctica es una modalidad que con alta precisión administra dosis alta de radiación a un objetivo tumoral bien definido, en una o en pocas fracciones, y reduce significativamente la dosis que reciben los tejidos sanos circundantes. Está indicada en cáncer primario de pulmón de células no pequeñas en estadios tempranos (T1 y T2) no operable, metástasis pulmonares con un tumor primario controlado, tumores prostáticos y enfermedad oligometastásica. A pesar de la falta de estudios a largo plazo o fase III, los resultados de su eficacia en el control local es superior a 90 %, con toxicidad similar a la reportada con fraccionamientos convencionales de radioterapia. Este artículo describe la tecnología y la técnica de radioterapia corporal estereotáctica, con las aplicaciones clínicas, indicaciones y limitaciones de esta modalidad terapéutica.

Usos y aplicaciones actuales de la radioterapia corporal estereotáctica / Current uses and applications of stereotactic body radiation therapy

Resumen La radioterapia corporal estereotáctica es una modalidad que con alta precisión administra dosis alta de radiación a un objetivo tumoral bien definido, en una o en pocas fracciones, y reduce significativamente la dosis que reciben los tejidos sanos circundantes. Está indicada en cáncer primario de pulmón de células no pequeñas en estadios tempranos (T1 y T2) no operable, metástasis pulmonares con un tumor primario controlado, tumores prostáticos y enfermedad oligometastásica. A pesar de la falta de estudios a largo plazo o fase III, los resultados de su eficacia en el control local es superior a 90 %, con toxicidad similar a la reportada con fraccionamientos convencionales de radioterapia. Este artículo describe la tecnología y la técnica de radioterapia corporal estereotáctica, con las aplicaciones clínicas, indicaciones y limitaciones de esta modalidad terapéutica.

Abstract Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a modality that delivers high doses of radiation to a well-defined tumor target in a single or a few fractions and with high precision, which significantly reduces the dose received by surrounding normal tissues. SBRT is indicated for inoperable, early stage (T1 and T2) primary non-small cell lung cancer, lung metastases with a controlled primary tumor, prostate tumors and oligometastatic disease. Despite the lack of long-term or phase III studies, efficacy results in local control are higher than 90%, with similar toxicity to that reported with conventional fractionated radiotherapy. This article describes SBRT technology and technique, along with clinical applications, indications and limitations of this therapeutic modality.

Re-irradiation in patients with progressive or recurrent brain metastases from extracranial solid tumors: A novel prognostic index.

BACKGROUND: Most studies evaluating factors associated with the survival of patients with brain metastases (BM) have focused on patients with newly diagnosed BM. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with survival after brain re-irradiation in order to develop a new prognostic index. METHODS: This 5-year retrospective study included patients treated with repeat-radiotherapy for recurrent BM at the "Instituto Nacional de Cancerología" of Mexico between 2015 and 2019. Significant variables in the multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to create the brain re-irradiation index (BRI). Survival and group comparisons were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients receiving brain re-irradiation were identified. Most patients were women (75.4%) with a mean age at BM diagnosis of 51.4 years. Lung and breast cancer were the most prevalent neoplasms (43.9% each). Independent prognostic factors for shorter survival after re-irradiation were: Age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR]:2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.8]; p = 0.026), uncontrolled primary tumor (HR:5.5 [95% CI, 2.2-13.5]; p < 0.001), lesion size >20 mm (4.6 [95% CI, 1.7-12.2]; p = 0.002), and an interval <12 months between radiation treatments (HR:4.3 [95% CI, 1.7-10.6]; p = 0.001). Median survival (MS) after re-irradiation was 14.6 months (95% CI, 8.2-20.9).MS of patients stratified according to the BRI score was 17.38, 10.34, and 2.82 months, with significant differences between all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The new BRI can be easily implemented for the prognostic classification of cancer patients with progressive or recurrent BM from extracranial solid tumors.

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Quality of Life and Neurocognitive Analysis of a Randomized Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: To this date, studies regarding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus standard of care (SoC) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer have shown limited benefit in survival outcomes, in addition to the potential effects on quality of life (QoL) and neurocognitive function (NCF). This randomized, phase II study evaluated the role of PCI in QoL and NCF, in a population comprised of subjects at a high risk for development of brain metastases (BM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer without baseline BM, harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at diagnosis. Participants were assigned to receive SoC or SoC plus PCI (25 Gy in 10 fractions). Primary endpoint was BM at 24 months (BM-24), for which the study was powered. Secondary endpoints included QoL assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Lung Cancer module (LC13) and NCF assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Patients were followed every 3 months for a year for QoL and NCF. RESULTS: From May 2012 to December 2017, 84 patients were enrolled in the study, 41 were allocated to PCI while 43 received SoC. Efficacy outcomes are discussed in a separate article. The global health-QoL scores were similar at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization between both study arms, with no significant differences when comparing by groups. At 1-year postrandomization, median global health QoL scores were 83 (p25-p75: 75-83) and 83 (p25-p75: 75-83) in the control and experimental arms, respectively. There were no significant changes in terms of the mean differences between subjects in either study arm when analyzing the change between baseline and 12-month scores (16.4 ± 19.9 vs 12.9 ± 14.7; P = .385). Seventeen patients were alive at database lockdown in February 2020, without significant differences in median MMSE (30 [p25-75: 29-30] vs 30 [p25-75: 28-30]) or QLQ-C30 scores (75.0 [p25-75: 50-87.2] vs 67.0 [p25-75: 50.0-100.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Among a selected high-risk population for developing BM, PCI did not significantly decrease QoL or neurocognitive function as assessed using the MMSE. Future studies are warranted to assess this observation, using more varied and sensitive tools available to date.

Radiation-induced lung injury: current evidence.

Chemo-radiotherapy and systemic therapies have proven satisfactory outcomes as standard treatments for various thoracic malignancies; however, adverse pulmonary effects, like pneumonitis, can be life-threatening. Pneumonitis is caused by direct cytotoxic effect, oxidative stress, and immune-mediated injury. Radiotherapy Induced Lung Injury (RILI) encompasses two phases: an early phase known as Radiation Pneumonitis (RP), characterized by acute lung tissue inflammation as a result of exposure to radiation; and a late phase called Radiation Fibrosis (RF), a clinical syndrome that results from chronic pulmonary tissue damage. Currently, diagnoses are made by exclusion using clinical assessment and radiological findings. Pulmonary function tests have constituted a significant step in evaluating lung function status during radiotherapy and useful predictive tools to avoid complications or limit toxicity. Systemic corticosteroids are widely used to treat pneumonitis complications, but its use must be standardized, and consider in the prophylaxis setting given the fatal outcome of this adverse event. This review aims to discuss the clinicopathological features of pneumonitis and provide practical clinical recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and management.

Consolidative stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to intrapulmonary lesions is associated with prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in oligometastatic NSCLC patients: A prospective phase 2 study.

OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) has shown high rates of local control and prolonged survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), though its role in oligometastatic disease is undefined. This study aimed to evaluate SABR as a local consolidative therapy (LCT) in oligometastatic NSCLC patients. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm phase 2 trial, we sought to evaluate SABR in patients with stage IV NSCLC, with ≤ five lesions, including the primary tumor. Patients received initial systemic therapy according to international guidelines. Patients without progression after front-line therapy (two months of targeted therapy and ≥ four cycles of chemotherapy) were evaluated by an 18F-FDG-PET/CT to receive consolidative SABR (45-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions) to the primary and all intrapulmonary metastatic sites. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 58.9 years, 59.6 % were female, 87.2 % had adenocarcinoma histology, and the contralateral lung was the main site of metastases in 42.6 %. All patients received systemic front-line therapy, chemotherapy in 61.7 %, and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 38.3 %. Disease control rate (DCR) and complete metabolic response (CMR) to SABR were 93.6 % and 70.2 %. Median PFS was 34.3 months (95 %CI; 31.1-38.8) for the total cohort; patients with a CMR had a median PFS of 53.9 monthsvs.31.9 months in those without CMR (p = 0.011). Median OS was not reached.Grade 1, 2, and 3 pneumonitis were observed in 79.5 % (31/39), 12.8 % (5/39) and 7.7 % (3/39), respectively. No grade ≥4 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: The use of SABR as LCT in oligometastatic NSCLC patients was well tolerated and showed favorable results regarding PFS and OS compared with historical data. The benefit was significantly higher in patients who reached a CMR as assessed by 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

Radiation oncology in Mexico: Current status according to Mexico's Radiation Oncology Certification Board.

AIM: Describe the results of the first national census of radiotherapy in Mexico in order to make a situational diagnosis of radiotherapy availability, offer more accurate information to radiation oncologists, and promote an adequate scientific based investment for the country. BACKGROUND: According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the density of radiotherapy (RT) machines per million habitants in Mexico is approximately 1.7-1.8. Other international organizations such as DIRAC-IAEA report 1.15 per million habitants. National organizations collect data indirectly and previous surveys had a low accrual rate (32.5%). Therefore, a precise census is required. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Mexican Radiation Oncology Certification Board (CMRO for its acronym in Spanish) conducted a nationwide census from January through November 2019. Gathered information was combined with CMRO database for sociodemographic information and human resources. RESULTS: The study included 103 RT centers [95.1% answered the survey], with a median of 2 centers by state (ranging from 0 in Tlaxcala to 20 in Mexico City) and with a report of only 1 center in 11 states (34.4%). Fifty-six (54.3%) of the centers are public. Fourteen centers (13.6%) have residency-training programs. The total number of RT machines is 162 [141 clinical and linear accelerators (87%) and 21 radionuclide units (13%)] with a median of 3 machines by state (0 in Tlaxcala to 46 in Mexico City) and with ≤3 machines in 18 states (56.25%). The overall calculated density of RT machines per million habitants is 1.32, varying from 0 in Tlaxcala to 5.16 in Mexico City. The density of linear and clinical accelerators per million population is 1.19. The total number of brachytherapy units is 66, with a median of 1 center with brachytherapy unit per state and 29 states with ≤3 centers with a brachytherapy unit (90.6%). Thirty-seven brachytherapy units (56.1%) have automated afterload high-dose rate. The overall rate of brachytherapy units per million inhabitants is 0.55, varying from 0 in 5 states (15.6%), 0.1-0.49 in 8 states (25%), 0.5-0.99 in 13 states (40.6%), 1-1.49 in 5 states (15.6%) and 1.5-1.99 in Mexico City (3.1%). The Mexican CMRO has 368 radiation oncologists certified (99 women and 269 men), of whom only 346 remain as an active part of Mexico's workforce. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time the CMRO conducts a national census for a radiotherapy diagnostic situation in Mexico. The country currently holds a density of clinical and linear accelerators of 1.19 per million habitants. Brachytherapy density is 0.55 devices per million habitants, and 57% of radiotherapy centers have brachytherapy units.

Locoregional control and toxicity after pleurectomy/decortication and intensity-modulated pleural radiation therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents a major challenge for oncologists. Multimodality treatment, which generally involves induction chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy have recently shown promising results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the locoregional control and toxicity of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after pleurectomy and decortication (P/D) as part of trimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced MPM. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data from 20 patients with MPM treated at a single tertiary-care institution. Initially every patient received induction chemotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, patients without progression underwent P/D, and if feasible, hemi-thoracic IMRT was administered at a planned dose of 50.4-54 Gy in 28-30 fractions and treated with 9-11 noncoplanar fields. RESULTS: A total of 15 of the 20 enrolled patients underwent P/D followed by IMRT to the hemi-thoracic cavity. The median total radiotherapy dose was 48.7 Gy (23.4-54 Gy). Radiation pneumonitis (RP) developed in nine patients (60%), and of these, two patients (13.3%) experienced G3 or G4 RP. The estimated locoregional-relapse-free survival at two years was 75.9%, and the main pattern of recurrence was distant (72.7%). For the entire cohort median follow-up was 22.7 months, median progression-free survival was 18.9 months and median overall survival 23.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by lung-sparing surgery (P/D) and IMRT is a feasible and safe treatment modality that yields acceptable locoregional control in patients with locally advanced MPM; however, these results should be corroborated in larger studies.

Pelvic radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy after renal transplant: A report of 3 cases.

AIM: Describe characteristics and outcomes of three patients treated with pelvic radiation therapy after kidney transplant. BACKGROUND: The incidence of pelvic cancers in kidney transplant (KT) recipients is rising. Currently it is the leading cause of death. Moreover, treatment is challenging because anatomical variants, comorbidities, and associated treatments, which raises the concern of using radiotherapy (RT). RT has been discouraged due to the increased risk of urethral/ureteral stricture and KT dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the electronic health records and digital planning system of patients treated with pelvic RT between December 2013 and December 2018 to identify patients with previous KT. CASES DESCRIPTION: We describe three successful cases of KT patients in which modern techniques allowed full standard RT for pelvic malignances (2 prostate and 1 vaginal cancer) with or without elective pelvic nodal RT, without allograft toxicity at short and long follow-up (up to 60 months). CONCLUSION: When needed, RT modern techniques remain a valid option with excellent oncologic results and acceptable toxicity. Physicians should give special considerations to accomplish all OAR dose constraints in the patient's specific setting. Recent publications recommend KT mean dose <4 Gy, but graft proximity to CTV makes this unfeasible. We present 2 cases where dose constraint was not achieved, and to a short follow-up of 20 months renal toxicity has not been documented. We recommend the lowest possible mean dose to the KT, but never compromising the CTV coverage, since morbimortality from recurrent or progressive cancer disease outweighs the risk of graft injury.

Response rate of patients with baseline brain metastases from recently diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy according to EGFR, ALK and KRAS mutation status.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified that patients with EGFR mutations tend to have better responses to targeted therapy, as well as chemotherapy; however, the effect of genetic alterations in terms of radiotherapy (RT)-related outcomes has not been fully assessed. We studied the impact of common non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) genetic alterations (EGFR, ALK and KRAS) in relation to objective response rate (ORR) to RT in patients with brain metastases. METHODS: From 2009-2015, 153 patients with an available genotyping status were treated with whole-brain irradiation (WBI) before receiving systemic therapy. Primary outcome was ORR; secondary outcomes included intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, ORR was 47.1%. ORR to RT varied significantly according to molecular status: EGFR (64.5%) ALK (54.5%) KRAS (20%) and WT (35.4%) (P = 0.001). EGFR mutation was the only independently associated factor for response to WBI (RR 3.52 [95% CI 1.6-7.7]; P = 0.002). Median IPFS was 10.8 months [95% CI 8.2-13.5] overall; however, IPFS also varied significantly according to molecular status: EGFR (18.2 months), ALK (18.4 months), KRAS (6.0 months) and WT (8.7 months) (P < 0.0001). OS for EGFR, ALK, KRAS and WT patients was 36.6, 32.2, 15.5 and 22.4 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Intracranial-ORR (HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2-0.6], P < 0.001) and mutation status (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.6-0.9], P < 0.042) were independently associated with a higher OS. CONCLUSIONS: RT response varies as per tumor molecular status. The presence of EGFR mutations favors the organ-specific response to RT, and is associated with longer OS in patients with NSCLC and BM. KEY POINTS: This study addressed for the first time the difference in radiotherapy-related outcomes in patients with different genotypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before they received systemic therapy. Results show that response to radiotherapy varies as per tumor molecular status, particularly EGFR-mutated tumors, have a favorable response to radiotherapy, contrary to KRAS-mutated tumors.

The importance of image guided radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer: Case report and review of literature.

AIM: Describe the anatomical changes and tumor displacement due to a rapid response of a patient's small cell lung cancer (SCLC) during definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: The treatment for SCLC is based on CRT. If interfractional changes during RT are incorrectly assessed they might compromise adequate coverage of the tumor or increase dose to organs at risk. Image guided RT with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows to identify daily treatment variations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Describe a SCLC case with rapid changes in size, shape and location of the primary tumor during RT. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old woman was diagnosed with SCLC with complete obstruction of the anterior and lingular bronchi and incomplete left thorax expansion due to a 12 × 15 cm mass. During CRT (45 Gy in 1.5 Gy per fraction, twice daily) the patient presented rapid tumor response, leading to resolution of bronchi obstruction and hemithorax expansion. Tumor shifted up to 4 cm from its original position. The identification of variations led to two new simulations and planning in a 3-week treatment course. CONCLUSIONS: The complete radiological response was possible due to systematic monitoring of the tumor during CRT. We recommend frequent on-site image verification. Daily CBCT should be considered with pretreatment tumor obstruction, pleural effusion, atelectasis, large volumes or radiosensitive histology that might resolve early and rapidly and could lead to a miss of the tumor or increased toxicity. Further research should be made in replanning effect in coverage of microscopic disease since it increases uncertainty in this scenario.

Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials demonstrated the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in diverse clinical settings. Patients with cancer were not routinely included in these studies. METHODS/RESULTS: Literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials was conducted to identify studies that assessed one-year all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients with historical or active cancer. Using the random effects model, we computed risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals for the dichotomous and continuous measures and outcomes, respectively. Of 171 articles evaluated in total, 5 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. In total, 33,175 patients receiving PCI were analyzed, of whom 3323 patients had cancer and 29,852 no cancer history. Patients in the cancer group had greater all-cause mortality [RR 2.22 (1.51-3.26; p<0.001)], including cardiovascular mortality [RR 1.34 (1.1-1.65; p=0.005)] and non-cardiovascular mortality [RR 3.42 (1.74-6.74; p≤0.001], at one-year compared to non-cancer patients. Patients in the cancer group had greater one-month all-cause mortality [RR 2.01 (1.24-3.27; p=0.005)] and greater non-cardiovascular mortality [RR 6.87 (3.10-15.21; p≤0.001)], but no difference in one-month cardiovascular mortality compared to non-cancer patients. Meta-regression analyses showed that the difference in one-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality between both groups was not attributable to differences in baseline characteristics, index PCI characteristics, or medications prescribed at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer undergoing PCI have worse mid-term outcomes compared to non-cancer patients. Cancer patients should be managed by a multi-specialist team, in an effort to close the mortality gap.

National Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-small cell lung cancer in early, locally advanced and metastatic stages. Extended version. / Guía de Práctica Clínica Nacional para el manejo del cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas en estadios tempranos, localmente avanzados y metastásicos.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is one the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Symptomatic manifestations of the disease generally occur in the advanced-stage setting, and therefore an important number of patients have advanced or metastatic disease by the time they are diagnosed. This situation contributes to a poor prognosis in the treatment of lung cancer. Evidencebased clinical recommendations are of great value to support decision-making for daily practice, and thus improving health care quality and patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This document was an initiative of the Mexican Society of Oncology (SMEO) in collaboration with Mexican Center of Clinical Excellence (Cenetec) according to Interna- tional Standards. Such standards included those described by the IOM, NICE, SIGN and GI-N. An interdisciplinary Guideline Development Group (GDG) was put together which included medical oncologists, surgical oncologistsc, radiation therapists, and methodologists with expertise in critical appraisal, sys- tematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines development. RESULTS: 62 clinical questions were agreed among members of the GDG. With the evidence identified from systematic reviews, the GDG developed clinical recommendations using a Modified Delphi Panel technique. Patients' representatives validated them. CONCLUSIONS: These Clinical Practice Guideline aims to support the shared decision-making process for patients with different stages of non-small cell lung cancer. Our goal is to improve health-care quality on these patients.

OBJETIVO: El cáncer de pulmón es una de las principales causas de mortalidad alrededor del mundo. Su historia natural, con la manifestación de síntomas en etapas avanzadas y el retraso en su diagnóstico hacen que una gran proporción de pacientes se diagnostiquen en estadios tardíos de la enfermedad, lo que hace muy complicado el tratamiento exitoso de la misma. De esto deriva la importancia de dar origen a recomendaciones basadas en evidencia para soportar la toma de decisiones clínicas por parte de los grupos interdisicplinarios que se encargan del manejo de este padecimiento. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Este documento se desarrolló por parte de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología en colaboración con el Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tec- nológica de México (Cenetec) a través de la dirección de integración de Guías de Práctica Clínica en cumplimiento a estándares internacionales como los descritos por el Ins- tituto de Medicina de EUA (IOM, por sus siglas en inglés), el Instituto de Excelencia Clínica de Gran Bretaña (NICE, por sus siglas en inglés), la Red Colegiada para el Desarrollo de Guías de Escocia (SIGN, por sus siglas en inglés), la Red Internacional de Guías (G-I-N, por sus siglas en inglés); entre otros. Se integró en representación de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología un Grupo de Desarrollo de la Guía (GDG) de manera interdisciplinaria, considerando oncólogos médicos, cirujanos oncólogos, cirujanos de tórax, radio-oncólogos, y metodólogos con experiencia en revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura y guías de práctica clínica. RESULTADOS: Se consensuaron 62 preguntas cllínicas que abarcaron lo establecido previamente por el GDG en el documento de alcances de la Guía. Se identificó la evidencia científica que responde a cada una de estas preguntas clínicas y se evaluó críticamente la misma, antes de ser incorporada en el cuerpo de evidencia de la Guía. El GDG acordó mediante la técnica de consenso formal de expertos Panel Delphi la redacción final de las recomendaciones clínicas. C. CONCLUSIONES: Esta Guía de Práctica Clínica pretende proveer recomendaciones clínicas para el manejo de los distintos estadios de la enfermedad y que asistan en el proceso de toma de decisiones compartida. El GDG espera que esta guía contribuya a mejorar la calidad de la atención clínica en las pacientes con cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas.

The role of para-aortic nodal irradiation in cervical cancer.

The current standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer is whole pelvis and para-aortic radiation when indicated, delivered concomitantly with chemotherapy and brachytherapy. Para-aortic node involvement is a predictor of survival in locally advanced disease but presence of metastases is difficult to determine because the currently available imaging methods lack enough sensitivity to be able to detect accurately para-aortic metastases when surgical staging is not feasible. The objective of this review is to describe the current status of para-aortic lymph node irradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. It includes analysis of the diagnostic imaging and surgical approaches for assessment of para-aortic lymph node dissemination, together with indications for radiotherapy and radiotherapeutic techniques.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Lung Function in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: In lung cancer patients, radiation therapy modifies lung architecture, resulting in functional deterioration, which worsens symptoms and reduces quality of life. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study was conducted in a cohort of patients with locally advanced and oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). A wide array of pulmonary function tests (forced spirometry, body plethysmography, impulse oscillometry, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, arterial blood gases, and 6-minute walk test) were used to evaluate lung function at baseline; after radiation therapy; and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks after CCRT. Relative changes in test results (percentages) were estimated at the aforementioned intervals and compared with baseline results. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients completed the follow-up and were included in the analysis. After CCRT, patients showed a maximum decline in lung volumes as follows: (1) 31% in forced expiratory volume in the first second after 24 weeks (P = .008), (2) 9.6% in forced vital capacity after 48 weeks (P = .04), and (3) 15.1% in total lung capacity after 48 weeks (P = .0015). Similarly, at 12 weeks after CCRT, patients showed a 21.8% decrease in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (P = .002). Increases were found in total airway resistance (respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz), frequency dependence of resistance (change in respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz-respiratory system resistance at 20 Hz, P = .012), and reactance (P = .0003 for respiratory system reactance at 5 Hz and P = .001 for reactance area), which together indicate small-airway dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal evaluation of lung function through pulmonary function tests detects CCRT-induced damage before the appearance of clinical symptoms associated with CCRT lung toxicity.