Usefulness of ultrasound in sub-Saharan patients with a serological diagnosis of schistosomiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound examination in patients with just a serological diagnosis of schistosomiasis but no other evidence of active infection. METHODS: 346 sub-Saharan patients with possible schistosomiasis that presented at a Tropical Medicine Unit between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively selected. Possible schistosomiasis was considered in those patients with a positive serology for schistosomasis in the absence of direct microbiological isolates, hematuria and/or eosinophilia. Data from ultrasound examinations before and after treatment with praziquantel were collected and categorized following the World Health Organization-Niamey score to standardize the use of ultrasonography for the assessment of schistosomiasis-related morbidity. RESULTS: Ultrasound examinations were abnormal in only ten patients (2.89%). Main findings were focal thickening of the bladder wall (n = 6), ureteral dilatation (n = 3) and grade I hydronephrosis (n = 1). No malignant lesions, hepatic lesions nor hepatobiliary related disorders were found. After treatment, the S. haematobium global score (5 vs 3.4, p = 0.06) and the urinary bladder score (2 vs 1, p = 0.059) showed a trend towards improvement after treatment. In three patients the score after treatment dropped to 0, and in another three it remained the same although with signs of improvement. No worsening of the score was observed in any case. CONCLUSION: For those patients with a diagnosis of schistosomiasis based solely in a positive serology, the ultrasound examination could safely be spared due to the low prevalence of pathological findings and its response to treatment anyway.

Severe complications of imported schistosomiasis, Spain: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic schistosomiasis silently leads to severe organ-specific disorders, such as hydroureter, bladder cancer or portal hypertension in around 10% of infected people in endemic zones. However, in non-endemic areas, information on schistosomiasis' severe complications and their actual prevalence is scarce because diagnosis is usually reached when such complications are well established. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of data obtained from a screening protocol designed for sub-Saharan migrants including search for stool parasites and schistosoma serology. After screening 3090 sub-Saharans, 326 (10.5%) confirmed cases of schistosomiasis were found, based on detection of ova in feces, urine or in biopsy samples. Another 830 patients (26.9%) were diagnosed of probable schistosomiasis (positive serology and/or suggestive imaging findings). RESULTS: Only patients with confirmed schistosomiasis were included in the final analysis. Among them, 13 (4%) presented severe complications at the time of diagnosis. Depending on the location, they account for 5% of patients with hepatointestinal schistosomiasis and 3.5% of patients with urogenital infection. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted systematic screening could reduce the prevalence of severe complications by enabling early diagnosis and treatment. Having indigenous transmission been demonstrated in southern Europe, prevention of future cases in non-endemic countries might be another sound reason supporting such screening.

Submicroscopic Malaria in Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, Spain.

In a screening program, we detected submicroscopic malaria in 8.9% of recent migrants to Spain from sub-Saharan Africa. Hemoglobinopathies and filarial infection occurred more frequently in newly arrived migrants with submicroscopic malaria than in those without. Our findings could justify systematic screening in immigrants and recent travelers from malaria-endemic areas.

Symptomatic Falciparum Malaria After Living in a Nonendemic Area for 10 Years: Recrudescence or Indigenous Transmission?

AbstractWe report the case of a patient from Mali who, after 10 years of living in Spain, presented with symptomatic Plasmodium falciparum malaria without having visited an endemic area during that time. We cannot completely rule out the possibility of indigenous transmission, but this case most likely represents recrudescence of an infection acquired over 10 years earlier.