Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 59(2): 587-598, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37220191

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The delineation of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is crucial for subsequent treatment planning. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Applying deep learning to automatically detect and segment bAVM might help to improve clinical practice efficiency. PURPOSE: To develop an approach for detecting bAVM and segmenting its nidus on Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using deep learning methods. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: 221 bAVM patients aged 7-79 underwent radiosurgery from 2003 to 2020. They were split into 177 training, 22 validation, and 22 test data. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T, Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography based on 3D gradient echo. ASSESSMENT: The YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 algorithms were utilized to detect bAVM lesions and the U-Net and U-Net++ models to segment the nidus from the bounding boxes. The mean average precision, F1, precision, and recall were used to assess the model performance on the bAVM detection. To evaluate the model's performance on nidus segmentation, the Dice coefficient and balanced average Hausdorff distance (rbAHD) were employed. STATISTICAL TESTS: The Student's t-test was used to test the cross-validation results (P < 0.05). The Wilcoxon rank test was applied to compare the median for the reference values and the model inference results (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The detection results demonstrated that the model with pretraining and augmentation performed optimally. The U-Net++ with random dilation mechanism resulted in higher Dice and lower rbAHD, compared to that without that mechanism, across varying dilated bounding box conditions (P < 0.05). When combining detection and segmentation, the Dice and rbAHD were statistically different from the references calculated using the detected bounding boxes (P < 0.05). For the detected lesions in the test dataset, it showed the highest Dice of 0.82 and the lowest rbAHD of 5.3%. DATA CONCLUSION: This study showed that pretraining and data augmentation improved YOLO detection performance. Properly limiting lesion ranges allows for adequate bAVM segmentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Humanos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugía , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano
2.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 2023 Aug 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37572087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Deep learning-based segmentation algorithms usually required large or multi-institute data sets to improve the performance and ability of generalization. However, protecting patient privacy is a key concern in the multi-institutional studies when conventional centralized learning (CL) is used. PURPOSE: To explores the feasibility of a proposed lesion delineation for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) scheme for federated learning (FL), which can solve decentralization and privacy protection concerns. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: 506 and 118 vestibular schwannoma patients aged 15-88 and 22-85 from two institutes, respectively; 1069 and 256 meningioma patients aged 12-91 and 23-85, respectively; 574 and 705 brain metastasis patients aged 26-92 and 28-89, respectively. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, spin-echo, and gradient-echo [Correction added after first online publication on 21 August 2023. Field Strength has been changed to "1.5T" from "5T" in this sentence.]. ASSESSMENT: The proposed lesion delineation method was integrated into an FL framework, and CL models were established as the baseline. The effect of image standardization strategies was also explored. The dice coefficient was used to evaluate the segmentation between the predicted delineation and the ground truth, which was manual delineated by neurosurgeons and a neuroradiologist. STATISTICAL TESTS: The paired t-test was applied to compare the mean for the evaluated dice scores (p < 0.05). RESULTS: FL performed the comparable mean dice coefficient to CL for the testing set of Taipei Veterans General Hospital regardless of standardization and parameter; for the Taichung Veterans General Hospital data, CL significantly (p < 0.05) outperformed FL while using bi-parameter, but comparable results while using single-parameter. For the non-SRS data, FL achieved the comparable applicability to CL with mean dice 0.78 versus 0.78 (without standardization), and outperformed to the baseline models of two institutes. DATA CONCLUSION: The proposed lesion delineation successfully implemented into an FL framework. The FL models were applicable on SRS data of each participating institute, and the FL exhibited comparable mean dice coefficient to CL on non-SRS dataset. Standardization strategies would be recommended when FL is used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...