Model for Achieving a Coordinated Access to Lung Cancer Care in Selected Public Health Facilities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Timely delivery of high-quality cancer care to all patients is barely achieved in South Africa and many other low- and middle-income countries, mainly due to poor care coordination and access to care services. After health care visits, many patients leave facilities confused about their diagnosis, prognosis, options for treatment, and the next steps in their care continuum. They often find the health care system disempowering and inaccessible, thereby making access to health care services inequitable, with the resultant outcome of increased cancer mortality rates. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to propose a model for cancer care coordination interventions that can be used to guide and achieve coordinated access to lung cancer care in the selected public health care facilities in KwaZulu-Natal. METHODS: This study will be conducted through a grounded theory design and an activity-based costing approach that will include health care providers, patients, and their caregivers. The study participants will be purposively selected, and a nonprobability sample will be selected based on characteristics, experiences of the health care providers, and the objectives of the study. With the study's objectives in mind, communities in Durban and Pietermaritzburg were selected as study sites, for the study along with the 3 public health facilities that provide cancer diagnosis, treatment, and care in the province. The study involves a range of data collection techniques, namely, in-depth interviews, evidence synthesis reviews, and focus group discussions. A thematic and cost-benefit analysis will be used. RESULTS: This study receives support from the Multinational Lung Cancer Control Program. The study obtained ethics approval and gatekeeper permission from the University's Ethics Committee and the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Department of Health, as it is being conducted in health facilities in KwaZulu-Natal province. As of January 2023, we had enrolled 50 participants, both health care providers and patients. Dissemination activities will involve community and stakeholder dissemination meetings, publications in peer-reviewed journals, and presentations at regional and international conferences. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide comprehensive data to inform and empower patients, professionals, policy architects, and related decision makers to manage and improve cancer care coordination. This unique intervention or model will address the multifactorial problem of cancer health disparities. If successful, this study will affect the design and implementation of coordination programs to promote optimal cancer care for underserved patients. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/34341.

Lung Cancer Patients' Conceptualization of Care Coordination in Selected Public Health Facilities of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients commonly receive care, including comprehensive treatment options, from multiple specialists within and across facilities offering varying levels of care. Given this multi-layered approach to cancer care, there is a need for coordinated care enhanced through integrated information flow for optimal patient care and improved health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore how patients conceptualized cancer care coordination in an integrated health care system in KwaZulu-Natal. METHODS: The study employed a grounded theory design to qualitatively explore the patients' experiences and views on cancer care coordination using in-depth interviews. Guided by the grounded theory principles, data generation and analysis were conducted iteratively, followed by systematic thematic analysis to organize data, and review and interpret comprehensive findings. This process culminated in the development of themes relating to barriers to cancer care coordination and the interface between the primary and tertiary settings. Theoretical saturation was achieved at 21 in-depth interviews with consenting respondents. RESULTS: This study revealed that care coordination was affected by multilevel challenges, including pertinent health system-level factors, such as difficulty accessing specialty care timeously, weak communication between patients and healthcare providers, and unmet needs concerning supportive care. We found that negative experiences with cancer care erode patient trust and receptiveness to cancer care, and patients advocated for better and proactive coordination amongst different care facilities, services, and providers. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated care coordination setup is essential to create and sustain a high-performance health care system. These findings make a case for developing, implementing, and evaluating interventions to enhance the quality of cancer care for patients and ultimately improve health outcomes for patients in KwaZulu-Natal. This study will provide comprehensive data to inform professionals, policymakers, and related decisionmakers to manage and improve cancer care coordination.

Coordination Models for Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: The coordination of cancer care among multiple providers is vital to improve care quality and ensure desirable health outcomes across the cancer continuum, yet evidence is scarce of this being optimally achieved in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: Through this scoping review, our objective was to understand the scope of cancer care coordination interventions and services employed in LMICs, in order to synthesise the existing evidence and identify key models and their elements used to manage and/or improve cancer care coordination in these settings. METHODS: A detailed search strategy was conducted, aligned with the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Articles were examined for evidence of coordination interventions used in cancer care in LMICs. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension Guidelines for Scoping Reviews, which included a checklist and explanation. The PRISMA flow diagram was utilised to report the screening of results. Data were extracted, categorised and coded to allow for a thematic analysis of the results. RESULTS: Fourteen studies reported on coordination interventions in cancer care in LMICs. All studies reported a positive impact of cancer coordination interventions on the primary outcome measured. Most studies reported on a patient navigation model at different points along the cancer care continuum. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based and culturally sensitive plan of care that aims to promote coordinated and efficient multidisciplinary care for patients with suspicion or diagnosis of cancer in LMICs is feasible and might improve the quality of care and efficiency.

Improving Timely Access to Diagnostic and Treatment Services for Lung Cancer Patients in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Priority-Setting through Nominal Group Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide, and it disproportionately affects low-income countries (LICs), where over 58% of cases occur. It is an important public health concern, given its poor healthcare outcomes, yet it is under-researched compared to other cancers. Lung cancer is also very difficult for primary care physicians to diagnose. In many settings, health researchers and clinicians' resort to engaging in collaborative efforts to determine the best way to implement evidence into routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a grounded theory study comprising seven experts providing oncological services. A Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to articulate ideas, identify key problems and reach consensus on the order of priorities for the identified problems. RESULTS: The study findings revealed that access to healthcare facilities providing oncology services and diagnosis was the major barrier to lung cancer care. This was further exacerbated by the manner in which health systems are configured in South Africa. The priorities for the health providers were focused on the lack of specialized resources, whereby referral of patients suspected to have lung cancer was delayed and compounded by the limited availability of treatment. CONCLUSION: The inadequacy of supportive systems for access to healthcare services negates the government efforts to curb the rising lung cancer-related fatalities in South Africa.

Cancer care reform in South Africa: A case for cancer care coordination: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: This review provides an overview of the existing literature on the importance of care coordination for lung cancer care and other cancers in general. The review is inclusive of the burden of cancer, with a special reference to lung cancer, as well as challenges and achievements relating to cancer care coordination. METHOD: We conducted a search of online databases of peer-reviewed studies published in the English language. The analysis for this review has been packaged into themes in order to generate results that can inform researchers and cancer health professionals, on the existing gaps necessary for developing appropriate intervention strategies and policy guidelines. RESULTS: Cancer is a complex condition that often requires multiple interventions provided by a variety of health professionals within the healthcare continuum. This paper reviewed research studies that explored the supportive care needs of cancer patients. The results are presented in three superordinate themes, namely (a) cancer as a healthcare priority in South Africa (SA), (b) making a case for coordinated cancer care in SA, and (c) care coordination: a poorly defined, yet complex concept. One major need identified was the requirement of informational support. Other essential needs included referral, emotional, and financial support. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The identification of current obstacles has the potential to guide the development of a model to improve quality coordinated cancer health care. It remains that limited research exists around cancer services and cancer care in the South African region. This narrative review identified common elements and barriers to care for lung cancer patients and survivors, and offers recommendations for developing clinical care models.

Consensus study on the health system and patient-related barriers for lung cancer management in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the highest incident cancer globally and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality particularly if identified at a late stage. Poor patient outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC's) might reflect contextual patient and health system constraints at multiple levels, that act as barriers to prevention, disease recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Lung cancer screening, even for high-risk patients, is not available in the public health sector in South Africa (SA), where the current HIV and tuberculosis (TB) epidemics often take precedence. Yet, there has been no formal assessment of the individual and health-system related barriers that may delay patients with lung cancer from seeking and accessing help within the public health care system and receiving the appropriate and effective diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to derive consensus from health-system stakeholders in the urban Gauteng Province of SA on the most important challenges faced by the health services and patients in achieving optimum lung cancer management and to identify potential solutions. METHODS: The study was undertaken among 27 participant stakeholders representing clinical managers, clinicians, opinion leaders from the public health sector and non-governmental organisation (NGO) representatives. The study compromised two components: consensus and engagement. For the consensus component, the Delphi Technique was employed with open-ended questions and item ranking from five rounds of consensus-seeking, to achieve collective agreement on the most important challenges faced by patients and the health services in achieving optimal lung cancer management. For the engagement component, the Nominal Group Technique was used to articulate ideas and reach an agreement on the group's recommendations for solution strategies and approaches. RESULTS: Public health sector stakeholders suggested that a lack of knowledge and awareness of lung cancer, and the apparent stigma associated with the disease and its risk factors, as well as symptoms and signs, are critical to treatment delay. Furthermore, delays in up-referral of patients with suspected lung cancer from district health care level were attributed to inadequate knowledge arising from a lack of in-service training of nurses and doctors regarding oncologic symptoms, risk factors, need for further investigation, interpretation of x-rays and available treatments. At a tertiary level, participants suggested that insufficient availability of specialised diagnostic resources (imaging, cytological and pathological services including biomolecular assessment of lung cancer), theatres, cardiothoracic surgeons, and appropriate therapeutic modalities (chemotherapeutic agents and radiation oncology) are the main barriers to the provision of optimal care. It was suggested that a primary prevention programme initiated by the government that involves private-public partnerships may improve lung cancer management nationally. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable barriers to the early identification and treatment of lung cancer exist. Finding solutions to overcome both individual and health-system level obstacles to lung cancer screening and management are vital to facilitate early identification and treatment, and to improve survival. Furthermore, research on inexpensive biomarkers for asymptomatic disease detection, the introduction of diagnostic imaging tools that utilise artificial intelligence to compensate for inadequate human resources and improving clinical integration across all levels of the healthcare system are essential.

Multisector Collaborations and Global Oncology: The Only Way Forward.

PURPOSE: At the 12th meeting of AORTIC (African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer) in Maputo, Mozambique, held between November 5 and November 8, 2019, a special workshop was organized to focus on the need for collaboration and coordination between governments and health systems in Africa with academic, industry, association, and other nongovernmental organizations to effect sustainable positive change for the care of patients with cancer. METHODS: Representatives from seven different projects in Africa presented implementation science and demonstration projects of their to date efforts in cancer system improvement including patient access, South-South partnerships, in-country specialized training, palliative care consortium, treatment outcomes, and focused pathology and diagnostic capacity building. Key partners of the various projects served as moderators and commentators during the session. RESULTS: From across all the presentations, lessons learned and exemplary evidence of the value of partnerships were gathered and summarized. CONCLUSION: The concluding synthesis of the presentations determined that with the broad needs across cancer requiring in-depth expertise at each point on a patient's journey, no single organization can effect change alone. Multipartner collaborations not only should be the norm but should also be coordinated so that efforts are not duplicated and maximum patient access to cancer diagnosis and care is achieved.

The barriers to initiating lung cancer care in low-and middle-income countries.

Lung cancer in low-and middle-income countries is the leading and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in males and females, respectively. This, in part, is due to late presentation of patients in health facilities and late diagnosis, thereby compromising the effectiveness of treatment and resulting in poor treatment outcomes. Investigating patients' late presentation to health facilities and late diagnosis, as barriers to achieving good treatment outcomes, is an important step towards improving the existing pathways of care. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to critically review the published and unpublished literature, including government reports on lung cancer care, with regards to the barriers to patient access, referral, diagnosis and treatment in low-and middle-income countries. The emphasis is on access point and the primary care continuum. This review has been packaged into themes in order to efficiently inform researchers and cancer health professionals, on the existing gaps necessary for developing appropriate intervention strategies and policy guidelines. This review has revealed that the timeous and correct diagnosis of lung cancer enables lung specialists to engage on options for improved patient care. Currently, there are variations in lung cancer management in low-and middle-income countries. Many of the factors impacting on health care outcomes are a function of patient circumstances and/or understanding, leading to delays in presentation to health facilities. Factors pertaining to individual patient circumstances are further compounded by inefficiencies within the health care system. Therefore, limited health system capacities and competing health priorities in these settings require action.

Exploring barriers to lung cancer patient access, diagnosis, referral and treatment in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: the health providers' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The burden of cancer is increasingly emerging as a key public health problem in South Africa. This burden is aggravated by low suspicion index by patients and healthcare providers alike, limited financial and human resource investment, weak healthcare systems, and limited quality care. Patients typically present to health facilities very late, resulting in poor treatment outcomes, hence there is a pervasive hopelessness associated with a diagnosis of lung cancer in South African public health systems. Research on the barriers to lung cancer patient care, especially from the perspectives of the healthcare professionals, is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the health professionals' understanding and experiences on the barriers to lung cancer care in the three health facilities providing oncology services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. METHODS: This was a grounded theory study comprising of 18 health providers (seven specialist oncologists, four radiotherapists, one pulmonologist, two social workers, one psychologist and three nurses) from three health facilities providing oncology services in KwaZulu-Natal. Theoretical saturation was achieved at 19 in-depth interviews with consenting participants. In-depth interview transcripts were thematically analysed. RESULTS: The in-depth interviews generated rich data on the diverse issues regarding barriers to lung cancer care. The healthcare professionals perceived limited access to oncology services and poor diagnosis, as some of the leading barriers to effective lung cancer care. Lack of psycho-social and supportive care, resources and basic infrastructure mean that, for most patients, there is limited access to lung cancer screening, early diagnosis, treatment and/or palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: The public sector faces infrastructural and key personnel shortages. Therefore, infrastructural and human resource challenges should be prioritised by policy-makers and administrators. Additionally, the vital contributions of psycho-social professionals should be incorporated in policies and programs supporting cancer care, in order to improve the cancer patient care. The results of this study may help decision makers to further improve cancer care in South Africa.