A Pragmatic Approach to Managing Long-Term Adverse Effects in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Long-term outcomes have significantly improved with treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. With proper treatment, most patients will achieve similar survival rates compared to an age-matched population. Treatment-free remission is not attainable for over half of patients and chronic treatment carries with it unique challenges. We provide a pragmatic approach to the monitoring and management of chronic adverse effects (AEs). RECENT FINDINGS: In the presence of severe or intolerable AEs, switching tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is reasonable but is not without risk. Dose reductions can be attempted when response is stable to reduce AE intensity. More frequent molecular monitoring with any change is essential. Treatment strategies must adapt to the personalized treatment goal of each patient. Long-term survival remains good even when response is less than a complete molecular response. Consider risks of new AEs when changing therapy and evaluate for dose reductions when appropriate.

The Association Between Inflammation and Immunosuppression: Implications for ICI Biomarker Development.

Evasion of immune destruction is considered one of the hallmarks of cancer. Chronic inflammation can enable immune escape by suppressing immune surveillance and permitting the development of tumors and creating a tumor microenvironment that sustains cancer. This includes generating mechanisms that prevent the effectiveness of anti-tumor treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In this review, we explore the interplay of inflammation and immunosuppression, their effects on the tumor microenvironment, and their implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy particularly in the context of predictive biomarkers for their use.

Revisiting a lower starting dose of alectinib in ALK-Positive non-small cell lung cancer.

We present here a case of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma that has been started on Alectinib. Treatment has been initiated at the recommended initial dose, but it subsequently required a dose adjustment following adverse drug events. Alectinib is a second-generation, CNS-active, tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Its efficacy as a first-line treatment and as a second-line agent after Crizotinib has been proven across several trials both in terms of overall response rate and progression-free survival. The use of Alectinib is associated with side effects that occasionally lead to treatment discontinuation, interruption, or dose adjustment. Several studies have used two starting doses - 300 mg and 600 mg twice daily - across different populations and have consistently shown efficacy of Alectinib for both treatment doses. Results of these studies have also revealed that body weight, rather than race, affect the pharmacokinetics of Alectinib. Randomized trials have shown that the 600 mg dose is associated with more grade ≥3 adverse events and more changes in treatment in contrast to the 300 mg dose. A lower dose of Alectinib may limit treatment disruptions and dose reductions particularly for specific patient populations-particularly those with a lower body weight.

What Will Keep Me Coming Back to the Clinic: Factors Identified by Filipino Colorectal Cancer Patients Seen at a National Academic Referral Center.

Health-care decisions in the Philippines are widely affected by various factors such as family, community, health-care access, and educational attainment. We designed a questionnaire to evaluate patient views at the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital colorectal multidisciplinary clinic to identify factors that contribute to continued follow-up at the colorectal multidisciplinary clinic. A total of 128 patients, 62% of whom were being treated with curative intent participated in the study. We found that trust in their physicians, presence of family support, and affordability of treatment were factors highly valued by patients consulting at the clinic.

FIP1L1-PDGFRA-Positive Hypereosinophilia Presenting with Bilateral Extracranial Carotid Artery Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of an adult female Filipino with hypereosinophilia and bilateral carotid artery aneurysms who subsequently developed bilateral cerebral hemisphere strokes following aneurysm stenting. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 57-year-old female patient with persistent hypereosinophilia presented with progressively enlarging bilateral neck masses, revealed to be carotid artery aneurysms on computed tomography angiography. Following surgical exploration, she later developed right-sided hemiplegia, aphasia, and right hemianopia. Cranial computed tomography revealed infarcts on both middle cerebral artery territories. Bone marrow biopsy and fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed findings suggestive of hypereosinophilic syndrome. She was started on standard aspirin and statin therapy and was discharged sixteen days after the procedure. Partial improvement of neurologic deficits was noted two months later on follow up. Chemotherapy with imatinib was initiated. CONCLUSIONS: This patient's prothrombotic state from FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive hypereosinophilia may have led to large carotid artery aneurysm formation and intramural thrombosis. This case demonstrates a possible and heretofore undocumented neurovascular sequela of hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Prognostic utility of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic inflammation is associated with prognosis in solid tumors. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker for the general immune response to various stress stimuli. Studies have shown correlation of NLR to outcomes in immune checkpoint blockade, peripheral neutrophil count to intratumor neutrophil population, and NLR to intratumoral levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Studies have shown elevated peripheral blood regulator T cells accompanied by elevated NLR are associated with poor outcomes further highlighting the importance of inflammation in the prognosis of cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of published articles on the utility of baseline NLR in predicting outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using Review Manager, version 5.3. Seven studies on the prognostic utility of NLR in ICI treatment were included in this analysis. For outcomes of interest, the hazard ratios (HRs) were computed. Subgroup analyses were planned based on type of malignancy and type of immune checkpoint inhibitor. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: A high NLR resulted in worse overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29-2.87; p=0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.38-2.01; p<0.00001) across types of malignancies studied (melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and genitourinary cancer). Subgroup analysis across different types of malignancies treated with ICI showed similar results for OS and PFS. The single study on genitourinary cancers also showed worse OS and PFS (OS: HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.29-2.87; p=0.001 and PFS: HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.97-3.44; p=0.06). A high NLR also showed worse OS and PFS across all ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab, and unspecified or pooled pembrolizumab and nivolumab; OS: HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29-2.87; p=0.001 and PFS: HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.38-2.01; p<0.00001). Subgroup analysis by type of ICI showed similar results. CONCLUSION: A high NLR is associated with poorer outcomes across studies. This shows that NLR has the potential as a readily available prognostic indicator for patients receiving ICI based on available studies. Studies utilizing more stringent design may serve to better determine the utility of this tool.