Brazilian Dialysis Survey 2022 / Censo Brasileiro de Diálise 2022

Abstract Introduction: The Brazilian Dialysis Survey (BDS) is an annual national survey about patients on chronic dialysis that contributes to health policies. Objective: To report the 2022 epidemiological data from the BDS of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). Methods: A survey was carried out in Brazilian chronic dialysis centers using an online questionnaire that included clinical and epidemiological aspects of patients on chronic dialysis, dialysis therapy data, and dialysis center characteristics. Results: Overall, 28% (n = 243) of the centers answered the questionnaire. In July 2022, the estimated total number of patients on dialysis was 153,831. The estimated prevalence and incidence rates of patients per million population (pmp) were 758 and 214, respectively. Of the prevalent patients, 95.3% were on hemodialysis (HD, 4.6% of these on hemodiafiltration) and 4.7% on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Only 1.3% of patients were not vaccinated against COVID-19. The prevalence of anemia (Hb < 10g/dL) was 27% and hyperphosphatemia (P > 5.5mg/dL) reached 30%. The estimated overall crude annual mortality rate was 17.1%. Conclusions: The absolute number and prevalence rate of patients on chronic dialysis continue to increase. A growing number of patients were receiving hemodiafiltration. The mortality rate decreased, probably due to the end of COVID-19 pandemic. The conclusions were drawn in the context of relatively low voluntary participation, which imposed methodological limitations on our estimates.

Resumo Introdução: O Censo Brasileiro de Diálise (CBD) é uma pesquisa nacional anual sobre pacientes em diálise crônica que contribui para as políticas de saúde. Objetivo: Informar os dados epidemiológicos de 2022 do CBD da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN). Métodos: Foi realizada uma pesquisa em centros brasileiros de diálise por meio de um questionário online que incluiu aspectos clínicos e epidemiológicos de pacientes em diálise crônica, dados da terapia dialítica e características do centro de diálise. Resultados: No total, 28% (n = 243) dos centros de diálise ativos cadastrados na SBN responderam ao questionário. Em julho de 2022, o número total estimado de pacientes em diálise era de 153.831. As taxas estimadas de prevalência e incidência de pacientes por milhão (ppm) de habitantes foram 758 e 214, respectivamente. Dos pacientes prevalentes, 95,3% estavam em hemodiálise (HD; 4,6% desses em hemodiafiltração) e 4,7% em diálise peritoneal (DP). Apenas 1,3% dos pacientes não foram vacinados contra a COVID-19. A prevalência de anemia (Hb < 10g/dL) foi de 27% e de hiperfosfatemia (P > 5,5mg/dL) alcançou 30%. A taxa bruta total anual de mortalidade estimada foi de 17,1%. Conclusões: O número absoluto e a taxa de prevalência de pacientes em diálise crônica continuam a aumentar. Um número crescente de pacientes estava em hemodiafiltração. A taxa de mortalidade diminuiu, provavelmente devido ao fim da pandemia da COVID-19. As conclusões foram de um contexto de participação voluntária relativamente baixa, o que impõe limitações metodológicas às nossas estimativas.

Comparison of 1-year survival between patients initiating chronic hemodialysis under public and private health insurance: register-based data analysis from Brazil.

PURPOSE: Brazil has one of the world's highest numbers of patients on hemodialysis (HD). Most dialysis centers are private and perform HD for patients with private and public health insurance. We compared 1-year survival between patients initiating chronic HD with public and private health insurance. METHODS: This is an HD register-based retrospective cohort. Adult patients starting HD from January 2011 to December 2021 were included. Survival analysis was stratified according to the period entered in the HD register. Multivariate Cox regression focused on 1-year survival differences between private and public patients. RESULTS: In the final sample (n = 5114), 68.5% of participants had public and 31.3% to private health insurance, with overall 1-year survival of 92.8% and 89.9%, respectively (p = 0.002). Crude analysis showed a slightly higher survival rate among patients with public health insurance than those with private health insurance (91 vs. 87%, p = 0.030) in the first period (2019-21). However, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) did not remain significantly higher for patients with private health insurance compared to those with public health insurance (HR = 1.07; 95% CI 0.80-1.41; p = 0.651), even after propensity score matching of the groups by several baseline features. CONCLUSION: Brazilian chronic HD patients funded by either private health plans or the public system have a similar 1-year mortality risk after controlling for several sociodemographic and clinical parameters.

Reducing Airway Occlusion Time Without Losing Accuracy to Predict Successful Mechanical Ventilator Liberation During the Measurement of the Timed Inspiratory Effort Index.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, a new predictor of successful mechanical ventilation liberation named timed inspiratory effort (TIE) index was devised with the normalization of the maximum inspiratory pressure (obtained within 60 s of unidirectional airway occlusion) with the time at which the value was reached. The aim of this study was to verify whether the presence of a sequence of a certain number of inspiratory effort values between 30-60 s > 1.0 cm H2O/s could predict weaning success in a performance comparable to the TIE index. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using 4 databases of previous studies on the TIE index. All patients receiving mechanical ventilation for ≤ 24 h were eligible. Liberation from mechanical ventilation-extubation decisions was made based on performance with spontaneous breathing trials. P < .05 was considered significant. The performance of the TIE index was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve. RESULTS: From 349 eligible patients, 165 subjects were selected for analysis. The AUROC for the TIE index in the studied sample was 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.97, P < .001). A sequence of ≤ 4 inspiratory efforts > 1.0 cm H2O/s was found in 51.5% of the subjects, with successful ventilatory liberation occurring in 95.3%. The highest specificity values belonged to the sequence of ≤ 4 and ≤ 5 inspiratory efforts > 1.0 cm H2O/s; the highest positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio belonged to the sequence of ≤ 4 inspiratory efforts > 1.0 cm H2O/s. The mean time that could have been spared if the procedure were interrupted after the first sequence of 4 inspiratory efforts > 1.0 cm H2O/s was 23 ± 3 s. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a sequence of ≤ 4 inspiratory efforts > 1.0 cm H2O/s during the TIE index measurement was a reliable predictor of weaning success, which could allow timely interruption of the procedure and entail a substantial reduction in airway occlusion time.

Sex-specific differences in a large cohort of Brazilian incident dialysis patients over 12 years: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Sex-specific differences in the epidemiology of chronic kidney disease, such as higher prevalence of women on pre-dialysis and men on chronic dialysis treatment, have been reported worldwide. In this regard, data from non-high-income countries are scarce. We aimed to compare the demographic, clinical, and dialysis characteristics of incident dialysis patients, both men and women, in a large cohort of Brazilian patients over a 12-year period. METHODS: This was a multicentric retrospective cohort study coordinated by the Brazilian Society of Nephrology. The study included all adult incident dialysis patients in the Brazilian Dialysis Registry from January 2011 to December 2022. The variables studied encompassed age, skin color, education, CKD etiology, predialysis nephrologist care, dialysis characteristics, and geographic region. Additionally, the sample was analyzed for each of the three 4-year periods over the 12 years of data collection. RESULTS: A total of 24,632 incident dialysis patients were included. Men were 59.1% of the dialysis population, remaining stable over the three 4-year periods. Besides other differences, women started dialysis younger (58.5 ± 16.2 years vs 59.5 ± 14.4 years; p < 0.001), had a lower educational level (less than 8 years at school: 54% vs 44%; p < 0.001), received more predialysis nephrologist care (46.2% vs 44.2%; p = 0.04), and had a higher prevalence of peritoneal dialysis (4.4% vs 3.5%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: We consistently observed a higher prevalence of men on dialysis and differences in demographic, clinical, and dialysis characteristics. The underlying reasons for these sex differences still necessitate further clarification.

Post-discharge all-cause mortality in COVID-19 recovered patients hospitalized in 2020: the impact of chronic kidney disease.

In Brazil, the COVID-19 burden was substantial, and risk factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates have been extensively studied. However, information on short-term all-cause mortality and the factors associated with death in patients who survived the hospitalization period of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is limited. We analyzed the six-month post-hospitalization mortality rate and possible risk factors of COVID-19 patients in a single center in Brazil. This is a retrospective cohort study focused on a six-month follow-up. The exclusion criteria were death during hospitalization, transference to another hospital, and age under 18. We collected data from the charts of all hospitalized patients from March 2020 to December 2020 with a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, resulting in a sample size of 106 patients. The main outcome was death after hospitalization, whereas comorbidities and demographics were evaluated as risk factors. The crude post-hospitalization death rate was 16%. The first 30 days of follow-up had the highest mortality rate. In a Cox regression model for post-hospitalization mortality, previous chronic kidney disease (HR, 4.06, 95%CI 1.46 - 11.30) and longer hospital stay (HR 1.01, 95%CI 1.00 - 1.02) were the only factors statistically associated with death. In conclusion, a high six-month all-cause mortality was observed. Within the six-month follow-up, a higher risk of death was observed for patients who had prior CKD and longer hospital stay. These findings highlight the importance of more intensive medical surveillance during this period.

Brazilian Dialysis Survey 2022.

INTRODUCTION: The Brazilian Dialysis Survey (BDS) is an annual national survey about patients on chronic dialysis that contributes to health policies. OBJECTIVE: To report the 2022 epidemiological data from the BDS of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). METHODS: A survey was carried out in Brazilian chronic dialysis centers using an online questionnaire that included clinical and epidemiological aspects of patients on chronic dialysis, dialysis therapy data, and dialysis center characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 28% (n = 243) of the centers answered the questionnaire. In July 2022, the estimated total number of patients on dialysis was 153,831. The estimated prevalence and incidence rates of patients per million population (pmp) were 758 and 214, respectively. Of the prevalent patients, 95.3% were on hemodialysis (HD, 4.6% of these on hemodiafiltration) and 4.7% on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Only 1.3% of patients were not vaccinated against COVID-19. The prevalence of anemia (Hb < 10g/dL) was 27% and hyperphosphatemia (P > 5.5mg/dL) reached 30%. The estimated overall crude annual mortality rate was 17.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute number and prevalence rate of patients on chronic dialysis continue to increase. A growing number of patients were receiving hemodiafiltration. The mortality rate decreased, probably due to the end of COVID-19 pandemic. The conclusions were drawn in the context of relatively low voluntary participation, which imposed methodological limitations on our estimates.

Post-discharge all-cause mortality in COVID-19 recovered patients hospitalized in 2020: the impact of chronic kidney disease

ABSTRACT In Brazil, the COVID-19 burden was substantial, and risk factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates have been extensively studied. However, information on short-term all-cause mortality and the factors associated with death in patients who survived the hospitalization period of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is limited. We analyzed the six-month post-hospitalization mortality rate and possible risk factors of COVID-19 patients in a single center in Brazil. This is a retrospective cohort study focused on a six-month follow-up. The exclusion criteria were death during hospitalization, transference to another hospital, and age under 18. We collected data from the charts of all hospitalized patients from March 2020 to December 2020 with a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, resulting in a sample size of 106 patients. The main outcome was death after hospitalization, whereas comorbidities and demographics were evaluated as risk factors. The crude post-hospitalization death rate was 16%. The first 30 days of follow-up had the highest mortality rate. In a Cox regression model for post-hospitalization mortality, previous chronic kidney disease (HR, 4.06, 95%CI 1.46 - 11.30) and longer hospital stay (HR 1.01, 95%CI 1.00 - 1.02) were the only factors statistically associated with death. In conclusion, a high six-month all-cause mortality was observed. Within the six-month follow-up, a higher risk of death was observed for patients who had prior CKD and longer hospital stay. These findings highlight the importance of more intensive medical surveillance during this period.

Hemodialysis in Brazil: differences across geographic regions regarding demographics, laboratory parameters and drug prescription / Hemodiálise no Brasil: diferenças entre regiões geográficas quanto a dados demográficos, parâmetros laboratoriais e prescrição de medicamentos

ABSTRACT Introduction: Brazil has a vast territory divided into five geographic regions with important differences in sociodemographic indices. We aimed to present and compare socio-demographic characteristics, biochemical results, and drug prescription of patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) treatment in the five geographic regions. Methods: We evaluated data from the Brazilian Dialysis Registry of all adult patients undergoing chronic HD in 2021. Variables included sociodemographic characteristics, serum levels of phosphate, calcium, and albumin, hemoglobin, urea reduction rate, and prescription of phosphate binders, erythropoietin, and intravenous iron. Data from the North and Northeast regions were combined into one group. Results: A total of 13,792 patients (57.9 ± 16.0 years old, 58.5% male, median HD vintage of 31 (11-66) months) from 73 dialysis centers were analyzed. Regional distribution was 59.5% in the Southeast; 21.7% in the South; 5.9% in the Midwest; and 12.9% in the North/Northeast. Sociodemographic features, biochemical results, and medication prescriptions differed across regions. The prevalence of elderly patients was lower in the Midwest and North/Northeast. The South region had the highest prevalence of hyperphosphatemia (41.2%) and urea reduction rate <65% (24.8%), while anemia and hypoalbuminemia were more prevalent in the Southeast, 32.7% and 11.6%, respectively. Conclusion: We found differences in socio-demographics, clinical features, and drug prescriptions across Brazilian geographic regions. Some findings reflect the socio-demographic diversity of the country, while others deserve further elucidation.

Introdução: O Brasil possui um vasto território dividido em cinco regiões geográficas com importantes diferenças nos índices sociodemográficos. Nosso objetivo foi apresentar e comparar características sociodemográficas, resultados bioquímicos e prescrição de medicamentos de pacientes em tratamento de hemodiálise crônica (HD) nas cinco regiões geográficas. Métodos: Avaliamos os dados do Registro Brasileiro de Diálise de todos os pacientes adultos submetidos à HD crônica em 2021. As variáveis incluíram características sociodemográficas, níveis séricos de fosfato, cálcio e albumina, hemoglobina, taxa de redução de ureia e prescrição de quelantes de fosfato, eritropoietina e ferro intravenoso. Os dados das regiões Norte e Nordeste foram combinados em um único grupo. Resultados: Foi analisado um total de 13.792 pacientes (57,9 ± 16,0 anos, 58,5% do sexo masculino, mediana de tempo de HD de 31 (11-66) meses) de 73 centros de diálise. A distribuição regional foi de 59,5% dos pacientes provenientes do Sudeste; 21,7% do Sul; 5,9% do Centro-Oeste; e 12,9% do Norte/Nordeste. As características sociodemográficas, os resultados bioquímicos e as prescrições de medicamentos diferiram entre as regiões. A prevalência de pacientes idosos foi menor nas regiões Centro-Oeste e Norte/Nordeste. A região Sul apresentou a maior prevalência de hiperfosfatemia (41,2%) e taxa de redução de ureia < 65% (24,8%), enquanto a anemia e a hipoalbuminemia foram mais prevalentes no Sudeste, 32,7% e 11,6%, respectivamente. Conclusão: Encontramos diferenças nos dados sociodemográficos, nas características clínicas e prescrições de medicamentos nas regiões geográficas brasileiras. Alguns achados refletem a diversidade sociodemográfica do país, enquanto outros demandam maiores esclarecimentos.

Daily ROX index can predict transitioning to mechanical ventilation within the next 24 h in COVID-19 patients on HFNC.

INTRODUCTION: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is used to prevent invasive ventilation in COVID-19-associated hypoxemia. The respiratory rate­oxygenation (ROX) index has been reported to predict failure of HFNC in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia during the intensive care unit stay when measured in first hours of therapy. However, the clinical course of ICU patients may change substantially in the first days of admission. The objective of this study was to investigate whether ROX index obtained in the first four days of ICU admission could predict the need for invasive respiratory support within the next 24 h of measurements. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using a database that included adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated in the ICU. Patients were followed from ICU admission and ROX index was calculated daily on HFNC. Receiver operating characteristics curves (ROCs) were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients were enrolled, 48% of whom require mechanical ventilation (MV). The area under the ROC of the pooled 4-day values of the ROX index as a predictor of transition from HFNC to MV within 24 h of measurements was 0.86 (95%CI 0.83 to 0.88, P < 0.001) with a cutoff point of 4.06. CONCLUSION: In COVID-19 patients in high flow nasal cannula, daily ROX index measurements successfully predicted transition to mechanical ventilation within the next 24 h.

Survival in hemodialysis in Brazil according to the source of payment for the treatment: Public Healthcare System (SUS) versus private insurance / Sobrevida na hemodiálise no Brasil de acordo com a fonte pagadora do tratamento: Sistema Único de Saúde versus convênio privado

ABSTRACT Introduction: Brazil has the largest public and universal healthcare system in the world, but little is known about the outcomes of patients on hemodialysis (HD) in the country according to the source of funding for the treatment. Objective: To compare the profile and survival of patients under HD treatment funded by the Public Healthcare System (SUS) to those with private insurance. Methods: Retrospective analysis of adults undergoing HD between 2012 and 2017 in 21 dialysis centers in Brazil that provided both by the SUS and private health insurance. Participants, regardless of the paying source, received similar dialysis treatment. Data were censored after 60 months of follow-up or at the end of 2019. Results: 4,945 patients were included, 59.7% of which were financed by the SUS. Patients financed by SUS, compared to those with private insurance, were younger (58 vs. 60 years; p < 0.0001) and with a lower prevalence of diabetes (35.8% vs. 40.9%; p < 0.0001). The 60-month survival rates in these groups were 51.1% and 52.1%, respectively (p = 0.85). In the analysis of the subdistribution proportional hazard ratio by the Fine-Gray model, including adjustment for concurrent outcomes, a significant increase in the risk ratio for death was found (1.22 [95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.43]) in patients with treatment funded by the SUS. Conclusions: Patients on HD with treatment funded by the SUS have a higher adjusted risk of death when compared to those with private insurance, despite similar dialysis treatment. Factors not directly related to dialysis therapy could explain this difference.

Resumo Introdução: O Brasil possui o maior sistema público e universal de saúde do mundo, mas pouco se sabe sobre os desfechos dos pacientes em hemodiálise (HD) no país de acordo com a fonte de financiamento do tratamento. Objetivo: Comparar o perfil e a sobrevida dos pacientes que têm o tratamento de HD custeado pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) com aqueles com convênio privado. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva dos adultos incidentes em HD entre 2012 e 2017 em 21 centros de diálise no Brasil que atendiam tanto pelo SUS quanto por convênios privados. Os participantes, independentemente da fonte pagadora, receberam tratamento dialítico semelhante. Os dados foram censurados com 60 meses de acompanhamento ou ao final de 2019. Resultados: Foram incluídos 4945 pacientes, sendo 59,7% financiados pelo SUS. Os pacientes financiados pelo SUS, em comparação aos que tinham convênio privado, eram mais jovens (58 vs 60 anos; p < 0,0001) e com menor prevalência de diabetes (35,8% vs 40,9%; p < 0,0001). As taxas de sobrevida, em 60 meses nesses grupos foram de 51,1% e 52,1%, respectivamente (p = 0,85). Na análise da razão de risco proporcional de subdistribuição pelo modelo de Fine-Gray, incluindo ajuste para desfechos concorrentes, foi encontrado um aumento significativo na razão de risco para morte (1,22 [intervalo de confiança de 95% 1,04 a 1,43]) nos pacientes com tratamento custeado pelo SUS. Conclusões: Pacientes em HD com tratamento custeado pelo SUS têm um risco ajustado de morte mais elevado do que aqueles com convênio privado, apesar do tratamento dialítico semelhante. Fatores não relacionados diretamente à terapia dialítica poderiam justificar esta diferença.

Hemodialysis in Brazil: differences across geographic regions regarding demographics, laboratory parameters and drug prescription.

INTRODUCTION: Brazil has a vast territory divided into five geographic regions with important differences in sociodemographic indices. We aimed to present and compare socio-demographic characteristics, biochemical results, and drug prescription of patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) treatment in the five geographic regions. METHODS: We evaluated data from the Brazilian Dialysis Registry of all adult patients undergoing chronic HD in 2021. Variables included sociodemographic characteristics, serum levels of phosphate, calcium, and albumin, hemoglobin, urea reduction rate, and prescription of phosphate binders, erythropoietin, and intravenous iron. Data from the North and Northeast regions were combined into one group. RESULTS: A total of 13,792 patients (57.9 ± 16.0 years old, 58.5% male, median HD vintage of 31 (11-66) months) from 73 dialysis centers were analyzed. Regional distribution was 59.5% in the Southeast; 21.7% in the South; 5.9% in the Midwest; and 12.9% in the North/Northeast. Sociodemographic features, biochemical results, and medication prescriptions differed across regions. The prevalence of elderly patients was lower in the Midwest and North/Northeast. The South region had the highest prevalence of hyperphosphatemia (41.2%) and urea reduction rate <65% (24.8%), while anemia and hypoalbuminemia were more prevalent in the Southeast, 32.7% and 11.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found differences in socio-demographics, clinical features, and drug prescriptions across Brazilian geographic regions. Some findings reflect the socio-demographic diversity of the country, while others deserve further elucidation.

Obesity and survival in a national cohort of incident hemodialysis patients: An analysis of the Brazilian Dialysis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: A phenomenon called the "obesity paradox" has consistently been reported in several cohorts of patients on chronic hemodialysis. In this setting, a higher body mass index (BMI) is paradoxically associated with better survival. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of BMI on mortality in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis using the Brazilian Dialysis Registry. METHODS: This was a retrospective national cohort study with data on incident hemodialysis patients collected between January 2011 to December 2018. Those aged <18 or > 80 years were excluded from the study. The variables studied were the clinical and laboratory data regularly collected at the dialysis units. The variable of primary interest was BMI, represented as the median of the entire dialysis treatment and stratified into four ranges according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The primary outcome was death within 4 years. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to test associations with mortality. FINDINGS: The analyzed sample consisted of 5489 patients from 73 centers in five regions of the country. Of these, 5.9% were underweight, 48.3% were of normal weight, 31.0% were overweight, and 14.7% were obese. The 4-year survival rates in these BMI ranges were 58%, 70%, 75%, and 80%, respectively. The probability of survival for each BMI extract was significantly different from that in the normal-weight range (p < 0.05). In the fully adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression model, BMI > 24.9 kg/m2 remained an independent protective factor for mortality (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.95, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION: In Brazil, being overweight and obese are protective factors for survival in the chronic hemodialysis population.

Brazilian Dialysis Survey 2021 / Censo Brasileiro de Diálise 2021

ABSTRACT Introduction: The Brazilian Dialysis Survey (BDS) is an important source of national data about people on chronic dialysis that contributes to the formulation of health policies regarding kidney failure. Objective: To report the 2021 epidemiological data from the BDS of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). Methods: A survey was carried out in Brazilian chronic dialysis centers using an online questionnaire covering clinical and epidemiological aspects of patients in chronic dialysis, data on dialysis therapy, characteristics of dialysis centers, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2021. Results: Thirty percent (n = 252) of the centers answered the questionnaire. In July 2021, the estimated total number of patients on dialysis was 148,363. The estimated prevalence and incidence rates of patients per million population (pmp) were 696 and 224, respectively. Of the prevalent patients, 94.2% were on hemodialysis (HD) (1.8% of these on hemodiafiltration), and 5.8% on peritoneal dialysis (PD); 21% were on the transplant waiting list. The incidence rate of confirmed COVID-19 between January and July 2021 was 1,236/10,000 dialysis patients, and the case-fatality rate reached 25.5%. Up to July 2021, 88.6% of patients had received at least one dose of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The estimated overall and COVID-19 crude annual mortality rates were 22.3% and 5.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The absolute number and the prevalence rate of patients on chronic dialysis continue to increase. Most dialysis patients were vaccinated against COVID-19 during the year. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated to the overall mortality rate.

RESUMO Introdução: O Censo Brasileiro de Diálise (CBD) constitui importante fonte de dados nacionais sobre pessoas em diálise crônica que contribui para a formulação de políticas de saúde. Objetivo: Relatar dados epidemiológicos de 2021 do CBD da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN). Métodos: Realizou-se pesquisa em centros brasileiros de diálise crônica utilizando questionário online abrangendo aspectos clínicos e epidemiológicos de pacientes em diálise crônica, dados sobre terapia dialítica, características dos centros de diálise e o impacto da pandemia COVID-19 em 2021. Resultados: Trinta por cento (n = 252) dos centros responderam ao questionário. Em Julho de 2021, o número total estimado de pacientes em diálise foi 148.363. As taxas estimadas de prevalência e incidência de pacientes por milhão da população (pmp) foram 696 e 224, respectivamente. Dos pacientes prevalentes, 94,2% estavam em hemodiálise (HD) (1,8% destes em hemodiafiltração), e 5,8% em diálise peritoneal (DP); 21% estavam na lista de espera para transplante. A taxa de incidência de COVID-19 confirmada entre Janeiro e Julho de 2021 foi 1.236/10.000 pacientes em diálise, e a taxa de letalidade atingiu 25,5%. Até Julho de 2021, 88,6% dos pacientes haviam recebido pelo menos uma dose da vacina anti-SARS-CoV-2. As taxas estimadas de mortalidade bruta anual geral e por COVID-19 foram de 22,3% e 5,3%, respectivamente. Conclusão: O número absoluto e a taxa de prevalência de pacientes em diálise crônica continuam aumentando. A maioria dos pacientes em diálise foram vacinados contra COVID-19 durante o ano. A pandemia COVID-19 contribuiu com a taxa de mortalidade geral.

High prevalence of hyperkalemia in Brazilian chronic dialysis patients and differences across geographic regions / Prevalência elevada de hipercalemia em pacientes brasileiros em diálise crônica e diferenças entre as regiões geográficas

Abstract Introduction: Hyperkalemia is a common multifactorial condition of people on chronic dialysis and is associated with mortality. We aimed to inform and discuss the prevalence of hyperkalemia in a large population of chronic dialysis patients in Brazil and its geographic regions. Methods: Prevalence of hyperkalemia (serum potassium ≥6.0 mEq/L) was assessed in the Brazilian Dialysis Survey (BDS) in July 2019, an online survey of voluntary participation in which all dialysis centers registered at the Brazilian Society of Nephrology were invited. Results: Approximately one-third (n=263 of 805) of the Brazilian dialysis clinics participated. The prevalence of hyperkalemia in the whole population was 16.1% (n=7,457 of 46,193; 95%CI=15.8-16.5%,), and varied from 12.1% in the North to 18.7% in the Northeast. Conclusion: We found a high prevalence of hyperkalemia in a large Brazilian chronic dialysis population. A nationwide investigation of risk factors, treatment options, and whether this high prevalence contributes to dialysis mortality is warranted.

Resumo Introdução: A hipercalemia é uma condição multifatorial comum em pessoas em diálise crônica e está associada à mortalidade. Nosso objetivo foi informar e discutir a prevalência de hipercalemia em uma grande população de pacientes em diálise crônica no Brasil e diferenças entre as regiões geográficas. Métodos: A prevalência de hipercalemia (potássio sérico ≥6,0 mEq/L) foi avaliada por meio do Censo Brasileiro de Diálise (CBD) em Julho de 2019, uma pesquisa online de participação voluntária na qual foram convidados todos os centros de diálise registrados na Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. Resultados: Aproximadamente um terço (n=263 de 805) das clínicas de diálise brasileiras participaram. A prevalência de hipercalemia na população total foi de 16,1% (n=7.457 de 46.193; IC95%=15,8-16,5%), e variou de 12,1% no Norte a 18,7% no Nordeste. Conclusão: Encontramos uma elevada prevalência de hipercalemia em umagrande população brasileira em diálise crônica. É necessária uma investigação nacional dos fatores de risco, opções de tratamento e se esta alta prevalência contribui para a mortalidade desta população.

Effects of pre-analytical sample care and analysis methodology on measures of metabolic acidosis in hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the effects of pre-analytical care on total carbon dioxide (tCO2 ) in hemodialysis patients, as calculated by blood gas analysis (ctCO2 ) or measured by an enzymatic assay (mtCO2 ). METHODS: Blood samples were collected via vascular access before dialysis sessions. For blood gas analysis, eight aliquots were collected, refrigerated or non-refrigerated, and analyzed at 0, 4, 8, and 24 h after collection. A blood sample was then collected for the enzymatic method and distributed into 14 aliquots. Half of the aliquots were refrigerated. The samples analyzed at time point 0 were centrifuged immediately. The remaining aliquots of both the refrigerated and non-refrigerated clusters were centrifuged before storage. Samples were analyzed at 4, 8, and 24 h post-collection. FINDINGS: By blood gas analysis, no significant change was found in bicarbonate values over time, either in the non-refrigerated or refrigerated samples. ctCO2 values during the experiment showed a minor but statistically significant increase of questionable clinical relevance in both non-refrigerated and refrigerated aliquots. In the enzymatic assay, the reduction in mtCO2 levels during the experiment was negligible. The median absolute reductions at the end of the experiment were 1.77, 1.21, 1.04, and 1.12 mmol/L for the non-centrifuged/non-refrigerated, centrifuged/non-refrigerated, non-centrifuged/refrigerated, and centrifuged/refrigerated aliquots, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that measured or calculated tCO2 levels of capped and cooled samples are adequate for analyzing the acid-base status of hemodialysis patients, even when such determination is not performed immediately after collection.

Characteristics and 1-year survival of incident patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis:a large 11-year cohort study.

PURPOSE: Few studies have evaluated patients' characteristics and survival by dialysis modality in Brazil. We evaluated changes in dialysis modality and its survival in the country. METHODS: This is a retrospective database of a cohort with incident chronic dialysis patients from Brazil. Patients' characteristics and one-year multivariate survival risk were assessed considering dialysis modality from 2011 to 2016 and 2017 to 2021. Survival analysis was also performed on a reduced sample after adjustment using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of the 8295 dialysis patients, 5.3% were on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 94.7% on hemodialysis (HD). PD patients had higher BMI, schooling and the prevalence of elective dialysis starting in the first period than those on HD. In the second period, PD patients were predominantly women, non-white, from the Southeast region, and funded by the public health system, having more frequent elective dialysis starting and predialysis nephrologist follow-ups than those on HD. There was no difference in mortality comparing PD and HD (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.39-2.42; and HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.63-2.16; first and second period, respectively). This non-significantly different survival between both dialysis methods was also found in the reduced matched sample. Higher age and non-elective dialysis initiation were associated with higher mortality. In the second period, the lack of predialysis nephrologist follow-up and living in the Southeast region increased the mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Some sociodemographic factors have changed according to dialysis modality over the last decade in Brazil. The one-year survival of the two dialysis methods was comparable.

Survival in hemodialysis in Brazil according to the source of payment for the treatment: Public Healthcare System (SUS) versus private insurance.

INTRODUCTION: Brazil has the largest public and universal healthcare system in the world, but little is known about the outcomes of patients on hemodialysis (HD) in the country according to the source of funding for the treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the profile and survival of patients under HD treatment funded by the Public Healthcare System (SUS) to those with private insurance. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of adults undergoing HD between 2012 and 2017 in 21 dialysis centers in Brazil that provided both by the SUS and private health insurance. Participants, regardless of the paying source, received similar dialysis treatment. Data were censored after 60 months of follow-up or at the end of 2019. RESULTS: 4,945 patients were included, 59.7% of which were financed by the SUS. Patients financed by SUS, compared to those with private insurance, were younger (58 vs. 60 years; p < 0.0001) and with a lower prevalence of diabetes (35.8% vs. 40.9%; p < 0.0001). The 60-month survival rates in these groups were 51.1% and 52.1%, respectively (p = 0.85). In the analysis of the subdistribution proportional hazard ratio by the Fine-Gray model, including adjustment for concurrent outcomes, a significant increase in the risk ratio for death was found (1.22 [95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.43]) in patients with treatment funded by the SUS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on HD with treatment funded by the SUS have a higher adjusted risk of death when compared to those with private insurance, despite similar dialysis treatment. Factors not directly related to dialysis therapy could explain this difference.

Brazilian Dialysis Survey 2021.

INTRODUCTION: The Brazilian Dialysis Survey (BDS) is an important source of national data about people on chronic dialysis that contributes to the formulation of health policies regarding kidney failure. OBJECTIVE: To report the 2021 epidemiological data from the BDS of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). METHODS: A survey was carried out in Brazilian chronic dialysis centers using an online questionnaire covering clinical and epidemiological aspects of patients in chronic dialysis, data on dialysis therapy, characteristics of dialysis centers, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2021. RESULTS: Thirty percent (n = 252) of the centers answered the questionnaire. In July 2021, the estimated total number of patients on dialysis was 148,363. The estimated prevalence and incidence rates of patients per million population (pmp) were 696 and 224, respectively. Of the prevalent patients, 94.2% were on hemodialysis (HD) (1.8% of these on hemodiafiltration), and 5.8% on peritoneal dialysis (PD); 21% were on the transplant waiting list. The incidence rate of confirmed COVID-19 between January and July 2021 was 1,236/10,000 dialysis patients, and the case-fatality rate reached 25.5%. Up to July 2021, 88.6% of patients had received at least one dose of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The estimated overall and COVID-19 crude annual mortality rates were 22.3% and 5.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The absolute number and the prevalence rate of patients on chronic dialysis continue to increase. Most dialysis patients were vaccinated against COVID-19 during the year. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated to the overall mortality rate.

High prevalence of hyperkalemia in Brazilian chronic dialysis patients and differences across geographic regions.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia is a common multifactorial condition of people on chronic dialysis and is associated with mortality. We aimed to inform and discuss the prevalence of hyperkalemia in a large population of chronic dialysis patients in Brazil and its geographic regions. METHODS: Prevalence of hyperkalemia (serum potassium ≥6.0 mEq/L) was assessed in the Brazilian Dialysis Survey (BDS) in July 2019, an online survey of voluntary participation in which all dialysis centers registered at the Brazilian Society of Nephrology were invited. RESULTS: Approximately one-third (n=263 of 805) of the Brazilian dialysis clinics participated. The prevalence of hyperkalemia in the whole population was 16.1% (n=7,457 of 46,193; 95%CI=15.8-16.5%,), and varied from 12.1% in the North to 18.7% in the Northeast. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of hyperkalemia in a large Brazilian chronic dialysis population. A nationwide investigation of risk factors, treatment options, and whether this high prevalence contributes to dialysis mortality is warranted.

Prevalence and Determinants of Predialysis Dietitian Follow-Up: Results From the Brazilian Dialysis Registry.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of predialysis dietitian follow-up in a large cohort of Brazilian dialysis patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from all incident adult dialysis patients included in the Brazilian Dialysis Registry from January 2011 to September 2021. Predialysis dietitian follow-up was classified as present when a period more than 6 months of dietitian care was reported. Gender, age, skin color, education, body mass index, chronic kidney disease etiology, first chronic dialysis program, healthcare provider, and geographic regions were tested in logistic regression models. RESULTS: Ten thousand three hundred and eighty two patients met the inclusion criteria and 1,254 (12.1%) reported predialysis dietitian follow-up, most of them referred by a nephrologist (94.2%). The independent determinants of dietitian follow-up were older age, white skin color, higher education level, not having diabetes, living in North/Northeast and South (compared to Southeast), and having a nonpublic healthcare provider. When considered only patients under a predialysis care of a nephrologist, higher education, hemodialysis as the first dialysis modality, and living in the North/Northeast and South regions (compared with Southeast) were associated with dietitian follow-up. CONCLUSION: Predialysis dietitian follow-up for more than 6 months in a country where the public health system is the main dialysis provider is still very low. The nephrologist is pivotal for referral to dietitians but socioeconomic factors also seem to play a role in this regard.