RESUMEN
Tinnitus assessment is a precursor for individualized treatment and outcome measurement. In the recent years, several studies proposed two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) recursive matching as a method to determine tinnitus pitch-match frequency in a standardized reliable manner. Currently, pure tones are used as comparison stimuli to assess pitch-match frequency. In this study, we investigated the psychometric quality of the method comparing different sound types. We measured 20 chronic tinnitus patients in 2 runs on 3 days. To assess pitch-match frequency, we used 2AFC recursive matching and compared results between pure tones and narrow band noise (NBN). Test-retest reliability between runs and across sound types was high (α>0.9) and increased across days. Perceived matching difficulty and time to completion decreased over repetitions. Importantly, the difference of matched frequencies (DMF) between runs was significantly less for NBN. When patients matched the spectral bandwidth of a test tone to their tinnitus, consistency was high (α=0.86) and no patient indicated continuously a pure tone. In conclusion, we recommend using NBN sounds in 2AFC recursive matching to assess pitch-match frequency as a standardized reliable method. Such a procedure could be offered as smartphone-based application to monitor tinnitus symptomatology for individualized assessment and treatment outcome.