Non-Invasive Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma: Photodynamic Therapy Following Curettage.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effectiveness, safety, patient satisfaction, and cosmetic outcome of Methyl Aminolevulinate-Photodynamic Therapy (MAL-PDT) following curettage in order to make recommendations for its use in dermatology practices. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who received MAL-PDT following curettage for the indication of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) between 2009 and 2016 at a single private clinic in Ontario, Canada. Two hundred and seventy-eight patients with 352 BCC lesions were included, consisting of 44.2% males (n=123) and 55.8% females (n=155) with a mean age of 57.24 years. The primary outcome measurement consisted of the cure rate. Secondary outcome measurements included side effects, patient satisfaction, and cosmetic outcome, as reported in the medical charts. RESULTS: The overall cure rate was 90.3% (n=318). After controlling for age, sex, and lesion type, nasal lesions were approximately 2.82 (95% CI: 1.24-6.40, P=0.01) times more likely to experience a recurrence. 18.3% of patients (n=51) reported side effects, the most common being burning (n=19). Of those who expressed satisfaction, 100% (n=25) reported being happy. Of lesions with cosmetic data, 90.3% displayed a good response (n=149). CONCLUSION: MAL-PDT following curettage is an effective and safe treatment option for BCC lesions with a good cosmetic outcome and suggested high patient satisfaction. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(5): doi:10.36849/JDD.7133.

Prospective, Single-arm, Split-face Pain Management Evaluation of Nitrous Oxide System During Micro-Focused Ultrasound With Visualization.

BACKGROUND: Although micro-focused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) has great cosmetic results, patients can be hesitant or decline the treatment due to the pain experienced during the treatment. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of pain management of the nitrous oxide system during MFU-V treatment. The secondary objectives include patient satisfaction and efficacy on reducing facial laxity and improving aesthetic appearance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-arm, split-face, open-label study. Ten patients were treated with MFU-V without use of a self-administered nitrous oxide system on the right side of the face, followed by use of the nitrous oxide system on the left. A patient-reported Visual Analog Pain Intensity Scale was used to assess pain on the right and left sides at 3 different treatment time points. Patient satisfaction was measured using a 5-point Likert scale and efficacy was measured using the Investigator GAIS and the Facial Laxity Score. RESULTS: Clinically significant differences were seen between pain ratings for the treated and untreated sides at 2 of the 3 time points. 100.0% of patients (n=9) who had completed the study were very satisfied (55.6%) or somewhat satisfied (44.4%). Five patients (55.6%) were scored as Improved on the GAIS and 4 patients (44.4%) were scored as Much Improved. 90.00% (n=9) of patients had moderate lower face and neck laxity prior to treatment, compared with 11.11% (n=1) and 22.22% (n=2) with moderate laxity at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The nitrous oxide system provides clinically significant pain reduction, increases patient satisfaction, and improves cosmetic results of MFU-V treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(11):1228-1234. doi:10.36849/JDD.7030.

Concomitant Therapy of Oral Isotretinoin with Multiplex Pulsed Dye Laser and Nd: YAG Laser for Acne.

Objective: To evaluate concomitant therapy of oral isotretinoin with multiplex pulsed dye laser and Nd:YAG laser. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who received treatment of oral isotretinoin and non-ablative laser therapy to treat acne vulgaris at a single outpatient dermatology clinic site in Ontario, Canada between 2009 and 2017. Results: 187 patients were included, consisting of 45.5 percent males (n=85) and 54.5 percent females (n=102) with a mean age of 21.4 years. 31.6 percent (n=59) of patients reported experiencing side effects from concomitant isotretinoin and NAL therapy, the most common being eczema (n=14), erythema (n=11), significant dry skin/lips/eyes (n=8), flushing (n=6), and bruising (n=6). 99.2 percent of patients achieved clear or almost clear at treatment completion. Of those who expressed satisfaction, 65.2 percent (n=122) reported being satisfied with the treatment and the remaining patients did not report satisfaction nor dissatisfaction. Limitations: Limitations exist mainly due to the absence of standardized lesion counts and a comparator cohort. Thus, it is not possible to comment on whether the combination of isotretinoin and NAL is more efficacious that either treatment alone. Conclusion: Concomitant use of isotretinoin and non-ablative laser therapy is a safe and effective treatment option for acne vulgaris that provides patient satisfaction.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Split-Body Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Outcomes of a Topical Product Pre and Post Aesthetic Surgical Body Procedures.

Background: Skin preconditioning prior to and following procedures, has previously been demonstrated to hasten and optimize healing, and decrease the symptoms and signs associated with invasive surgery. These trials involved the use of multiple topical products. In an effort to control costs and to increase patient compliance, a single surgical product was developed, with actives aimed at decreasing swelling, bruising, induration, and internal fibrous banding. Objectives: This multi-center trial was designed to measure the efficacy of this single product in these mentioned parameters. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, split body, clinical study was undertaken in 29 patients involving 38 surgical procedures. Assessments included photography, biopsies, ultrasound imaging, and blinded investigator and participant assessments. Results: Differentiated results between test comparator sides became apparent at postop day 10-14 (as previously observed). Thus, blinded investigator and participant assessment scores demonstrated statistical significance exclusive to the test product side at postop day 10-14 for ecchymoses and then extending to skin discoloration, edema, induration and subcutaneous fibrous banding, at weeks 3, 4, 6, and 12. Ultrasound evaluation confirmed the earlier dissolution of fibrous banding on the test side in the subcutaneous tissue at the 3-6-week postop period. In addition, biopsies assessing the pre-conditioned period prior to surgery confirmed that the topical test product stimulated a remodeled extracellular matrix without comparative changes on the opposite side. Conclusions: A single peri-surgical product designed for the use with invasive surgery produced significant differences in ecchymosis, skin discoloration, edema, induration and ongoing resolution of fibrous banding over many weeks. This study validation provides an additional adjunct to surgical procedures.

Concomitant therapy of surgical shave excision and intralesional injections for ear keloids: Early results from a retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Keloids are hypertrophic scars that commonly arise in the ear region. The authors' objectives were to (1) evaluate effectiveness of surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections; and (2) evaluate safety and patient satisfaction. Methods and Materials: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who received treatment of extralesional surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections to treat ear keloids at a single outpatient dermatology clinic. A prospective patient questionnaire was administered to the same patient population to collect recurrence and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 45 patients were included, consisting of 84.4% females (n = 38) and 15.6% males (n = 7) with a mean age of 25.5 years. Through retrospective chart review, early recurrence was seen in 6.7% of patients (n = 3), and via the prospective patient questionnaire, 11.1% of patients noted early keloid recurrence (n = 5). Of the patients who expressed their level of satisfaction in-clinic, 96.0% (n = 24) reported being satisfied or very satisfied and 4.0% (n = 1) were dissatisfied. Satisfaction was also assessed through the prospective patient questionnaire; of those who consented to the questionnaire, 100.0% (n = 24) were satisfied or very satisfied. Only 20.0% (n = 9) of all patients reported experiencing side effects, consisting of pruritus (11.1%; n = 5), tenderness (4.4%; n = 2), pain (2.2%; n = 1), and mild atrophy (2.2%; n = 1). Conclusion: Extralesional surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections may represent a promising treatment option for ear keloids.Evidence Level: 3 retrospective cohort study. Lay Summary: Keloids are a type of raised scar, which can be painful and itchy for patients. Keloids can occur on various part of the body, including on the ear. They are challenging to treat and tend to come back. There are many treatment options, however, there is not one universal best treatment for keloids on the ear. We hoped to discover if shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections is effective at treating keloids on the ear. In order to answer this we completed a chart review of clinic patients, who have already completed the following combination treatment for keloids on the ear. The keloids were treated first by physically removing the bulk of the keloid with a scalpel, which is called shave excision. After the removal, triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA were injected directly into the keloid. The rate of patient satisfaction and the rate of the keloid returning were collected during in-clinic visits and an optional post-clinic patient questionnaire. The treatment effectiveness and side effects experienced were reported during in-clinic visits. This indicated that with the low rate of side effects, high patient satisfaction, and low rate of keloid return, this treatment combination should be considered as an option for keloids on the ear. However, since this review was completed at one clinic with a small population of patients, it is not fully known if this treatment combination will work for all patients.

Intralesional cryotherapy with triamcinolone and onabotulinumtoxinA injections for umbilical keloid: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Keloid scars are therapeutically challenging and although many treatment options exist, there are no specific guidelines, and few reports have discussed keloids in the umbilical region. METHODS: Here, we present a successful treatment of a 31-year-old female with a history of a recurrent keloid in the umbilical region. The keloid was treated using intralesional cryotherapy followed by intralesional onabotulinumtoxinA and triamcinolone acetonide injections. DISCUSSION: The patient expressed high satisfaction, minimal side effects, and no recurrence. CONCLUSION: Overall, due to the low rate of side effects, high patient satisfaction, and absence of recurrence, this treatment modality should be considered as an option for umbilical keloids. LAY SUMMARY: Background to subject: Keloids are a type of scar that are difficult to treat. There are many treatment options available, but there is no single best treatment for keloids that form around the belly button region. Question being asked: Is intralesional cryotherapy with intralesional onabotulinumtoxinA and triamcinolone acetonide injections effective at treating keloids in the belly button region? How the work was conducted: We treated a 31-year-old female with a keloid around the belly button region that returned after prior treatment. The keloid was treated using combination therapy of freezing the keloid from the inside out, which is called intralesional cryotherapy. This was followed by two types of injections, called onabotulinumtoxinA and triamcinolone acetonide, directly into the keloid. What we learned: Overall, due to the low rate of side effects, high patient satisfaction and the keloid not returning, this treatment plan should be considered as an option for keloids in the belly button region. What we did not learn: This treatment may or may not be effective and safe for all patients of all skin types and demographics as this treatment was performed for only one patient.