Efficacy and safety of azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis of real-world studies.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of azathioprine (AZA) for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), considering the potential predictive factors related to patient response to AZA in this disease. METHODS: We performed a systematic online query in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG DATA, and CQVIP DATA. The available studies on the use of AZA in NMOSD patients were included. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 21 studies including 1016 patients. Results demonstrated that AZA significantly decreased annual relapse rate (ARR) by 1.164 (95% confidence intervals (CI), -1.396 to -0.932; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that AZA significantly decreased ARR in both low-dose group (effect size (ES): -1.545) and moderate-dose group (ES: -2.026). AZA therapy also resulted in a significant reduction of 1.117 (95% CI: -1.668 to -0.566; p < 0.001) in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score. AZA did not affect EDSS score in the low-dose subgroup (ES: -0.535; p = 0.209) or the moderate-dose subgroup (ES: -0.709; p = 0.064). During AZA therapy, 47% of patients did not experience any relapses (95% CI, 39% to 54%). In addition, 13% of patients developed leukopenia, 11% had elevated liver enzyme levels, 8% experienced nausea or vomiting, 5% developed pancytopenia and 6% died during follow-up. CONCLUSION: AZA is effective in reducing relapse and improving patients' neurological function. However, liver function monitoring and routine blood monitoring remain necessary. Within the safe upper limit, a higher dose of AZA may be associated with a better efficacy for NMOSD.

Combined therapy of somatostatin analogues with pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly is a rare, chronic and severe disease. Drug therapy including somatostatin analogues (SAs), dopamine receptor agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (pegvisomant, PEG) are commonly used to treat patients who do not respond to surgery. The use of combination therapy with PEG and SAs has become more common over the last decade. We performed this study to accurately evaluate the effect of combination therapy of SAs with PEG on acromegalic patients. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Trip database were searched for relevant studies. Prospective clinical trials treating acromegaly with the co-administration of SAs and PEG were included. We performed a meta-analysis by using Stata 12.1. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall rate of serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) normalization was 66% (95% CI: 52-78%; I2 = 62.59%). The combination therapy did not significantly change patients' fasting plasma glucose (ES: 0.011 mmol*L- 1; 95% CI: - 0.374 to 0.397 mmol*L- 1; P = 0.954) or glycosylated haemoglobin (ES: - 0.074%; 95% CI: - 0.166 to 0.315%; P = 0.544) while decreasing the fasting plasma insulin (ES: - 21.487 pmol*L-1; 95% CI: - 35.713 to - 7.260 pmol*L-1; P = 0.003). Elevation of liver enzyme levels was found in 14% (95% CI: 8 to 21%) of the patients. There was no significant difference for serious adverse events and treatment discontinuation due to adverse event between SAs monotherapy group and combination therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy of SAs and PEG effectively normalized IGF-1 levels in most of the patients whose IGF-1 level was greater than the upper limit of normal after high dose SAs monotherapy. The therapy also decreased significantly FPI levels with a neutral effect on glucose parameters in acromegaly patients. Moreover, elevated liver enzyme levels were observed in a small number of patients, which suggests a need for liver function monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have our protocol registered in PROSPERO. (Registration number: CRD42019115549 ).

Therapeutic potential of pyruvate therapy for patients with mitochondrial diseases: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial disease is a term used to describe a set of heterogeneous genetic diseases caused by impaired structure or function of mitochondria. Pyruvate therapy for mitochondrial disease is promising from a clinical point of view. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines, the following databases were searched to identify studies regarding pyruvate therapy for mitochondrial disease: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials. The search was up to April 2019. The endpoints were specific biomarkers (plasma level of lactate, plasma level of pyruvate, L/P ratio) and clinical rating scales [Japanese mitochondrial disease-rating scale (JMDRS), Newcastle Mitochondrial Disease Adult Scale (NMDAS), and others]. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies. RESULTS: A total of six studies were included. Considerable differences were noted between studies in terms of study design, patient information, and outcome measures. The collected evidence may indicate an effective potential of pyruvate therapy on the improvement of mitochondrial disease. The majority of the common adverse events of pyruvate therapy were diarrhea and short irritation of the stomach. CONCLUSION: Pyruvate therapy with no serious adverse events may be a potential therapeutic candidate for patients with incurable mitochondrial diseases, such as Leigh syndrome. However, recent evidence taken from case series and case reports, and theoretical supports of basic research are not sufficient. The use of global registries to collect patient data and more adaptive trial designs with larger numbers of participants are necessary to clarify the efficacy of pyruvate therapy.

Precision and accuracy of commercial assays for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring: evaluation based on external quality assessment scheme.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin remains a mainstay of the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. It is crucial to accurately determine vancomycin serum concentration for adequate dose adjustment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of commercial assay techniques for vancomycin concentration and to assess the comparability of vancomycin detection methods in Chinese laboratories. METHODS: Human serum samples spiked with known concentrations of vancomycin were provided to laboratories participating in the external quality assessment scheme (EQAS). Assay methods included chemiluminescence, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and so on. The dispersion of the measurements was analysed and the robust coefficient of variation (rCV), relative percentage difference (RPD) and satisfactory rate for method groups were calculated. Moreover, performance of the Chinese laboratories was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 657 results from 75 laboratories were collected, including 84 samples from 10 Chinese laboratories. The median rCV, median RPD and satisfactory rates classified by methods ranged from 1.85% to 15.87%, -14.75% to 13.34% and 94.59% to 100.00%, respectively. Significant differences were seen in precision, between kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS) and other methods, and in accuracy, between enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and other techniques. Vancomycin detection in China mainly depended on the chemiluminescence and EMIT methods, which tended to result in lower measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Although almost all assays in this study achieved an acceptable performance for vancomycin serum concentration monitoring, obvious inconsistencies between methods were still observed. Chinese laboratories were more likely to underestimate vancomycin concentrations. Thus, recognizing inconsistencies between methods and regular participation in vancomycin EQAS are essential.

Evaluation of Assays to Measure Aminoglycosides in Serum: Comparison of Accuracy and Precision Based on External Quality Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Aminoglycosides require highly accurate therapeutic drug monitoring owing to their narrow therapeutic windows and toxic side effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring varies in different laboratories, and this difference is mainly due to the use of different analytical techniques. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and precision of immunoassays for the measurement of gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin in serum. METHODS: Human plasma samples were spiked with known concentrations of amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin and dispatched to laboratories worldwide. The percentage deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated to compare the accuracy and precision among immunoassays and among antibiotics. RESULTS: We analyzed 273, 534, and 207 amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin measurement results, obtained satisfactory rates of 83.9%, 86.3%, and 93.7%, and coefficients of variation ranging from 1.1% to 15.6%, 2.9% to 25.2%, and 1.8% to 27.0%, respectively. The percentage deviation ranged from -7.5% to 6.6%, -20.8% to 18.7%, and -33.2% to 41.5% for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin, respectively. Significant differences were observed in accuracy and precision among assays for all antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated high variations in results obtained from antibiotic assays conducted at different laboratories worldwide.

Effect of pharmacist-led interventions on medication adherence and inhalation technique in adult patients with asthma or COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), disease control is still suboptimal-incorrect inhalation technique and medication non-adherence are two important reasons for this outcome. Pharmacists' interventions have been shown to have a positive effect on the clinical outcomes of asthma and COPD. Quantitative assessment of the efficacy of pharmacist-led interventions, mainly on inhalation techniques and medication adherence, is needed. Evidence for different interventions is not totally conclusive, and no results of theory-based adherence promotion interventions for asthma and COPD have been published. The objective of our study is to evaluate the effect of pharmacist-led interventions on asthma and COPD management, focusing mainly on inhalation technique and medication adherence, and whether the content of interventions (categorized based on Information-Motivation-Behavioural skills (IMB) model) affects the effectiveness and whether the IMB model is worthy of clinical promotion and application in adults with asthma or COPD. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that involved pharmacist-led interventions among patients with asthma or COPD. We used database-specific vocabulary (eg, Medical Subject Headings) and free text terms expanding from 'asthma', 'COPD' and 'pharmacist' to identify relevant articles. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed in Review Manager 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019144793. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Thirteen studies were eligible for qualitative analysis, and 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pharmacist-led interventions showed a positive effect on medication adherence (1.34 [95% CI 1.18-1.53], P < .0001) and inhalation technique (1.85 [95% CI 1.57-2.17], P < .00001) in COPD and asthma patients. In the subgroup meta-analysis, significant medication adherence improvement was found only in COPD patients (1.41 [1.24-1.61], P < .0001). The subgroup meta-analysis also noted that interventions that included all three Information-Motivation-Behavioural skills (IMB) constructs had a significant improvement in medication adherence (1.41 [1.24-1.61], P < .0001). Subgroup meta-analysis conducted between different diseases, different intervention contents, and different measure tools did not significantly change the heterogeneity. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-led interventions can improve inhalation technique in adult asthma and COPD patients. Significant improvement in medication adherence was found only in COPD patients. The effect among asthmatic patients requires further study. Interventions based on the IMB model may be worthy of clinical promotion and application. More future research is needed to establish solid evidence base for effective interventions and uniform measurement of medication adherence.