Comparison between Percutaneous Screw Fixation and Plate Fixation via Sinus Tarsi Approach for Calcaneal Fractures: An 8-10-Year Follow-up Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term outcomes after percutaneous reduction (PR) and screw fixation versus plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach (STA) for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF). METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 150 patients (June 2008-August 2011), comprising 85 men and 65 women (mean age, 38.4 years), who were assigned to the PR group or the STA group. The inclusion criteria were DIACF (>2 mm) including Sanders type II and III, closed fracture, unilateral fracture, no history of smoking or no smoking during hospitalization and 3 months after surgery, and follow-up time not less than 8 years. The exclusion criteria were clear surgical contraindications (severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases), local or systemic infection symptoms, diagnosis with diabetes or lower extremity vascular disease, and Sanders type IV or open fractures. Outcomes were assessed by means of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, radiographic images, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 8.7 years (range, 8.0-10.0 years). The AOFAS scores in the PR group during the follow-up period were 54.2 ± 5.1, 85.8 ± 4.0, 88.1 ± 3.8, 87.9 ± 3.6, 87.8 ± 3.9, 86.9 ± 3.9, respectively, and in the STA group were 55.0 ± 5.6, 84.5 ± 5.2, 87.1 ± 3.8, 86.9 ± 3.8, 87.7 ± 3.3, and 87.6 ± 2.8, respectively. There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores, Bohler's angle, Gissane's angle, calcaneal length, and height between the two groups (P > 0.05). The good to excellent rate of the PR group (80.8%) was less than that of the STA group (91.7%) (P = 0.055). For Sanders III fractures, the good to excellent rate of the PR group (33.3%) was less than that of the STA group (76.9%) (P = 0.029). For calcaneal width recovery, the STA group performed better than the PR group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the PR group (12.8%) was lower than that in the STA group (27.8%) (P = 0.026), of which the incidence of wound complications was 3.8% in the PR group and 13.9% in the STA group (P = 0.041). In addition, there was no significant difference in other postoperative complications such as sural nerve injury, peroneus longus and brevis muscle injury, calcaneal valgus symptoms, lateral impingement symptoms, and subtalar arthritis (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: From the 8-10-year follow-up results of PR and STA as surgical procedures for the treatment of DIACF, it was found that there was no significant difference in the overall efficacy between them. STA was found to be superior to the PR in terms of the recovery of calcaneal width, providing more stable fixation for Sanders III fractures. PR was found to be more effective in reducing wound complications.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Syndesmotic Plate Compared With Traditional Screw and Suture Button Fixation.

Many lateral malleolus fractures have been found to have syndesmosis injuries after anatomic reduction. The main methods for the treatment of syndesmosis injuries are screw fixation and suture-button flexible fixations. In pursuit of innovation, we have designed a novel syndesmotic plate (NSP) for simultaneous fixation of lateral malleolus fractures and distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the NSP to syndesmotic screw and suture-button fixations. Twelve adult cadaveric specimens were used in this experiment. Axial loading as well as rotation torque were applied in 3 different ankle positions: neutral, dorsiflexion, and plantarflexion. After the initial specimens were tested, they were made into a pronation-abduction III fracture model as described by Lauge-Hansen. Subsequently, the specimens were fixed sequentially using a distal fibular anatomic locking plate (DFALP) combined with syndesmotic screws, DFALP combined with suture button, and NSP. Then the above tests were repeated. The syndesmotic displacement and the strain of the tibia and fibula were recorded during the experiment. In most cases, the displacements and strains of the NSP group and the screw group were smaller than the suture button groups and the native (SBGAN) (p < .05), and the displacements and strains of the NSP group were also slightly smaller than the screw group in most cases, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The NSP we developed has a fixed strength no less than the traditional syndesmotic screw fixation. This provides us a new idea for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries.