Graduating resident and fellow readiness for general urologic practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey-based assessment of trainees and program directors.

INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to compare the perceived readiness of graduating urologic residents and fellows to program directors (PDs) in U.S.-based postgraduate training programs. Additionally, we set out to assess the impact of COVID-19 on postgraduation plans to pursue fellowship training. METHODS: Graduating residents, fellows, and PDs of accredited residency/fellowship programs in the U.S. were surveyed. The ranked preparedness of trainees to perform common urologic procedures was measured using a Likert scale from 1 (not comfortable) to 5 (fully proficient). The impact of COVID-19 was measured using a three-point Likert scale. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis analyses were used to compare the groups. RESULTS: From 93 responders, 21 were residents, 19 were fellows, 24 were residency PDs, and 29 were fellowship PDs. The median levels of comfort for transurethral resection of the prostate, hydrocelectomy, vasectomy, and urethral sling were at or above (≥3) moderate for both PDs and trainees. PDs were more likely to report underperformance for hypospadias repair (60% vs. 39%), penile prosthesis implantation (39% vs. 26%), and orthotopic neobladder formation (57% vs. 18%) than the trainees. Fifty-three (57.0%) of the surveyors felt that COVID-19 did not impact the trainees' comfort in performing general urologic procedures. COVID-19 influenced trainees' decision to pursue a fellowship or opt to practice as general urologists (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests there may be a self-reported discrepancy between graduating trainees and their PDs regarding trainees' comfort levels performing general urologic procedures.

Evaluation of Educational Feedback in Urology Training: A Survey-Based Assessment of Trainees and Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate current satisfaction with the feedback provided during post-graduate urological training, including the quality and frequency of feedback, with participants consisting of both trainees and program directors. Additionally, we aimed to identify areas for future improvement in resident and fellow-level urological training. METHODS: Graduating residents, fellows, and program directors from accredited residency/fellowship programs in the United States were surveyed. A total of 575 surveys were sent out. Information on feedback frequency, quality, form, and satisfaction was collected using applicable multiple-choice responses and a five-point Likert scale. An open-ended question gathered suggestions for improving current feedback processes. A chi-square test of independence was used to compare the responses to individual questions. RESULTS: Ninety-two respondents answered our survey: 22 residents, 18 fellows, 25 residency program directors (PDs), and 27 fellowship PDs. The distribution of age, race, and gender categories was not significantly different between PDs and trainees. However, there was a significant difference in their subspecialties and American Urological Association (AUA) sections. The majority of fellowship PDs, residency PDs, fellows, and residents (88 total) reported verbal feedback as the predominant method within their practice. This was followed by written (68 total), electronic (54 total), and app-based feedback (19 total). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that there may be a need for ongoing improvement or standardization of feedback mechanisms in the field of urological training and highlights the perceived discrepancies between learners and educators.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Exercise Intolerance on Graded Exertion Testing for Diagnosing Sport-Related Concussion: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis.

Abstract There is no single gold standard test to diagnose sport-related concussion (SRC). Concussion-related exercise intolerance, that is, inability to exercise to the individual's appropriate level due to exacerbation of concussion-like symptoms, is a frequent finding in athletes early after SRC that has not been systematically evaluated as a diagnostic test of SRC. We performed a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of studies that evaluated graded exertion testing in athletes after SRC. We also included studies of exertion testing in healthy athletic participants without SRC to assess specificity. Pubmed and Embase were searched in January 2022 for articles published since 2000. Eligible studies included those that performed graded exercise tolerance tests in symptomatic concussed participants (> 90% of subjects had an SRC, seen within 14 days of injury), at the time of clinical recovery from SRC, in healthy athletes, or both. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria, most of which were of poor methodological quality. The pooled estimate of incidence of exercise intolerance in participants with SRC equated to an estimated sensitivity of 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.8, 97.2). The pooled estimate of incidence of exercise intolerance in participants without SRC equated to an estimated specificity of 94.6% (95% CI: 91.1, 97.3). The results suggest that exercise intolerance measured on systematic testing within 2 weeks of SRC may have excellent sensitivity for helping to rule in the diagnosis of SRC and excellent specificity for helping to rule out SRC. A prospective validation study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of exercise intolerance on graded exertion testing for diagnosing SRC after head injury as the source of symptoms is warranted.

Authorship Proliferation of Research Articles in Top 10 Orthopaedic Journals: A 70-Year Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Scholarly impact has been used to measure faculty productivity and academic contribution throughout academia. Traditionally, the number of articles authored has been the primary metric for scholarly impact regarding academic promotion and reputation. We hypothesize that over time, the nature of authorship has evolved to include more authors per research article throughout the history of orthopaedic literature. METHODS: Bibliometric data for all original research article abstracts were extracted from PubMED for the 10 highest rated H5-index orthopaedic clinical journals ("American Journal of Sports Medicine," "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume," "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research "Spine," "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy," "Journal of Arthroplasty," "Arthroscopy," "The Spine Journal," "European Spine Journal," and "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume/Bone & Joint Journal"). The number of authors per article was then analyzed over time using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: A total of 106,529 original articles were analyzed over a 70-year period. The number of authors increased significantly over time from a mean of 1.4 authors (SD: 0.62) in 1946 to 5.7 authors (SD: 3.1) in 2019, representing an average relative increase of 4.3% per year (P < 0.05). The three oldest journals had the lowest average authors (Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am Volume: 1946, mean 3.7 authors [SD: eight]; Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Br Volume/Bone & Joint Journal: 1948, mean: 3.6 authors [SD: 7.5]; Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research: 1963, mean 3.3 authors [SD: 2.9]). The three newest journals had the highest average authors (European Spine Journal: 1992, mean 5.3 authors [SD: 3.3]; Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: 1993, mean 5.5 authors [SD: 6.7 authors; The Spine Journal: 2003, mean 5.2 authors [SD: 3.6]). DISCUSSION: Original research articles published in orthopaedic academic journals have experienced an increase in authorship over time. Although our data cannot explain what has driven this change, increasing cooperation between collaborators may represent less contribution per author over time.

Neuraxial vs General Anesthesia: 30-Day Mortality Outcomes Following Transurethral Resection of Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the occurrence of 30-day mortality, and other procedure related morbidities in cohorts of patient receiving neuraxial anesthesia (NAX) or general anesthesia (GA) in the setting of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Historically, NAX has been recommended for patients undergoing TURP permitting monitoring of consciousness and early diagnosis of absorption-related hyponatremia. We aim to analyze a broader comparison of mortality and other associated morbidities regarding the form of anesthesia utilized. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was accessed and queried from January 2010 to December 2016 for TURP. 28,486 TURP cases were identified and further stratified by the type anesthesia administration, NAX 7,261 and GA 21,225. Chi-square analyses and Kaplan-Meier tests were performed for univariate comparisons. Using propensity score, data were optimally (1:1) matched to account for potential confounding variables. Outcomes were then compared for NAX vs. GA with a primary endpoint of 30-day mortality, followed by secondary endpoint of adverse outcomes reported per NSQIP. RESULTS: Prior to matching, 30-day mortality was found to be 0.4% in the NAX cohort and 0.7% GA. 12,180 patients equally matched between the 2 groups. NAX was found to be superior to GA in terms of 30-day survival benefit (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 -0.92, P <0.05), sepsis (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50 -0.73, P <0.001), and return to operating room (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 -0.98, P <0.05) when comparing matched cohorts. NAX was associated with lower incidence of overall adverse clinical outcomes 12.4% vs 13.7% (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: NAX was found to have statistically relevant advantage for 30-day postoperative outcomes when compared to GA for TURP based on NSQIP database reporting.

Surgical Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Brief Review.

Hip fracture is a cause for concern in the geriatric population. It is one of the leading causes of traumatic injury in this demographic and correlates to a higher risk of all-cause morbidity and mortality. The Garden classification of femoral neck fractures (FNF) dictates treatment via internal fixation or hip replacement, including hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. This review summarizes existing literature that has explored the difference in outcomes between internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty for nondisplaced and displaced FNF in the geriatric population, and more specifically highlights the risks and benefits of a cemented vs. uncemented approach to hemiarthroplasty.