TLR4 preconditioning is associated with low success of OK-432 treatment for lymphatic malformations in children.

PURPOSE: We have recently shown that the relative TLR4 expression on monocytes of low responding pediatric patients after OK-432 treatment is significantly reduced after stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) compared with high responding children. The aim of this study was to perform further analysis to explain this observation. METHODS: Monocytes from children with high (HR, n = 5) and low response (LR, n = 6) after previous OK-432 treatment were stimulated with LPS for 20 h and analyzed with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI; level of significance P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Mean MFI after LPS stimulation was comparable in both groups (HR 1142 ± 652 units, LR 839 ± 427 units, P = 0.85). Significant changes after LPS stimulation are explained by higher pre-stimulation values in the LR group compared with the HR group (950 ± 718 vs. 477 ± 341, P = 0.25) with considerable differences of the mean expression changes after LPS stimulation (HR 665 ± 683 vs. LR -111 ± 605, P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The previously shown reduced TLR4 upregulation on monocytes after LPS stimulation in the LR group compared with the HR group can be primarily explained by TLR preconditioning. This observation implies the use of absolute values with definite thresholds.

Dynamic Toll-like receptor expression predicts outcome of sclerotherapy for lymphatic malformations with OK-432 in children.

BACKGROUND: Sclerotherapy with OK-432 is recommended as a first-line treatment for lymphatic malformations. However, 40% of patients show poor response, defined by involution to <50% of the original size. It has been suggested that the OK-432 effect is highly dependent on the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4-dependent expression of TLR7 in antigen-presenting cells. We hypothesized that the ability for TLR expression in monocytes after treatment with the TLR4-ligand lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can be used to predict successful OK-432 treatment. METHODS: Blood was taken from children with low responder (LR, n = 6) and high responder (HR, n = 5) of previous OK-432 treatment. Monocytes were stimulated with LPS for 20 h. TLR expression was analyzed with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (mean fluorescence intensity). The level of significance was P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in the HR group was 1.4 ± 0.9 y and in the LR group 2.8 ± 2.9 y (P = 0.31). The mean TLR4 upregulation after LPS stimulation in the HR group was significantly higher than in the LR group (factor 3.6 versus factor 1 compared with nonstimulated controls; P = 0.037). The mean TLR7 expression did not show significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic TLR4 expression represents most probably a predictive parameter for the treatment of lymphatic malformations with OK-432 and should be further investigated.