The analysis of benefit and risk of combined pancreatic and renal transplantation versus renal transplantation alone.

Currently, diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of renal failure in adults. However, combined pancreatic and renal transplantation (PRT) remains controversial when compared with renal transplantation alone (RTA) in diabetic recipients. We analyzed the results and morbidity in four age-matched groups--31 patients with Type I diabetes undergoing PRT before dialysis, 30 patients with diabetes who are dependent of dialysis undergoing PRT, 31 concurrent and historic patients with Type I diabetes undergoing RTA and 31 concurrent patients without diabetes undergoing RTA. All patients received cadaver donor organs and were managed with cyclosporine and prednisone immunosuppression with selective OKT3 induction. The four groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, duration and severity of diabetes, dialysis type, number of retransplants, degree of sensitization, preservation time and matching. The groups differed with regard to duration of dialysis and period of follow-up evaluation, pretransplant blood transfusions, racial distribution and OKT3 induction therapy. PRT was associated with a greater morbidity rate as evidenced by a slightly higher incidence of rejection, infections and reoperations. The number of readmissions and hospitalization period during the first 12 months was also greater after PRT versus RTA. However, none of these differences were significant. No detrimental effect was noted on renal allograft function at one year; patient and graft survival was actually higher in the PRT groups. Quality of life was improved in nearly 90 percent of PRT recipients. Although the improved results after PRT may be attributed to selection bias, only lesser differences were noted among the four study groups. The aforementioned data suggest that appropriate patient selection can overcome the morbidity associated with PRT, resulting in excellent patient and graft survival with the potential for complete rehabilitation.

Plasma lipid changes in young adult couples consuming polyunsaturated meats and dairy products.

Twenty-five young couples consumed either a saturated or polyunsaturated fat diet for a 20-week period. The polyunsaturated beef, lamb and dairy products, high in linoleic acid, were produced by feeding ruminant animals "protected lipid" feeds which prevent hydrogenation of fats in the rumen. The experimental design provided for four dietary groups: A) saturated diet for 20 weeks; B) polyunsaturated diet for 20 weeks; C) saturated diet for 10 weeks then polyunsaturated diet for 10 weeks; and D) polyunsaturated for 10 weeks then saturated diet for 10 weeks. Polyunsaturated-to-saturated ratios (linoleic: total saturated fatty acids) for the diets were: prestudy, 0.43-0.56; saturated 0.11-0.14; polyunsaturated, 0.56-0.62. Factors other than diet that appeared to affect cholesterol responses were carefully considered. During the initial 3 weeks (regimentation period) plasma cholesterol concentration decreased in all groups irrespective of diet. This was followed by two experimental periods in which the effects of the prescribed diets were readily apparent (response periods I and II). The final 4 weeks of the study were characterized by diminishing compliance with the dietary discipline (abatement period). Subjects in each group (A,B,C,D) were subdivided into high and low on a basis of each group's initial median cholesterol level. Those in the high subgroups were very responsive to dietary changes whereas those in the low subgroups were not. Combined responses of high subjects were: polyunsaturated diet, -10.7 mg/dl (P less than 0.025), saturated diet, d8 mg/dl (P less than 0.05). Combined difference between saturated and polyunsaturated diets was 18.5 mg/dl or approximately a 10% cholesterol difference between the experimental polyunsaturated and saturated diets.