Fetal gut cell-like differentiation in esophageal adenocarcinoma defines a rare tumor subtype with therapeutically relevant claudin-6 positivity and SWI/SNF gene alteration.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the deadliest tumor entities worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 25%. Unlike other tumor entities, personalized therapy options are rare, partly due to the lack of knowledge about specific subgroups. In this publication, we demonstrate a subgroup of patients with EAC in a large screening cohort of 826 patients, characterized by specific morphological and immunohistochemical features. This subgroup represents approximately 0.7% (6/826) of the total cohort. Morphological features of this subgroup show a striking clear cytoplasm of the tumour cells and the parallel existence of rare growth patterns like yolk sac-like differentiation and enteroblastic differentiation. Immunohistochemistry reveals expression of the fetal gut cell-like proteins Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4), claudin-6, and glypican 3. Interestingly, we find a correlation with alterations of SWI/SNF-complex associated genes, which are supposed to serve as tumor suppressor genes in various tumour entities. Our results suggest a possible implication of rare tumour subtypes in the WHO classification for EACs according to the classification for gastric cancer. Furthermore, claudin-6 positive tumors have shown promising efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in the recently published BNT-211-01 trial (NCT04503278). This represents a personalized therapeutic option for this tumor subtype.

Extent and clinical significance of the therapy-relevant tight junction protein Claudin 18.2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - real-world evidence.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor prognosis, wherefore targeted therapies have experienced increasing interest. Zolbetuximab is a novel targeted therapy under investigation in patients with PDAC and targets Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), which is a component of tight junctions and is of significance in various solid tumors. As its role in PDAC is not definitively elucidated, this study aims to clarify the significance of CLDN18.2 expression in PDAC in a real-world setting. METHODS: All patients (n = 309) were recruited at one of the PANCALYZE study centers and received pancreatic resection with curative intention. Paraffin samples were analyzed using an antibody against CLDN18.2, which is known to be comparable to the antibody used by the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW studies. RESULTS: 94 PDACs are positive for CLDN18.2 (30.4 %). Positive CLDN 18.2 expression was associated with significantly better cancer differentiation (p < 0.001). Patients with positive CLDN18.2 expression showed significantly better overall survival when compared to patients with negative expression (median OS: 30 versus 18 months, p = 0.003). Additionally, in multivariable analyses, CLDN18.2 expression was identified as an independent factor for better survival in patients with PDAC (HR = 0.686, 95 %CI = 0.492-0.956, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in survival could be demonstrated by adding Zolbetuximab to known chemotherapy regimes in patients with gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma with at least 75 % CLDN18.2 positive cancer cells. Our findings demonstrate, that 30.4 % of the included patients with PDAC would potentially be eligible for therapy with Zolbetuximab in a real-world patient cohort. Results of trials targeting Claudin 18.2 are pending in patients with PDAC.

The role of length of oral resection margin and survival in esophageal cancer surgery after neoadjuvant therapy: A retrospective propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal therapy regimens became the standard of care for patients with esophageal cancer, whereas surgical resection remains at the center of curative treatment modalities. Current guidelines provide no recommendations on the extent of the oral resection margin, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the oral tumor-free resection margin and overall survival. METHODS: Retrospective study with 382 1:1 propensity-matched patients out of 660 patients, operated between 2013 and 2019, with an Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant therapy. Independent pathologists measured the oral resection margin after formalin fixation. RESULTS: The mean oral tumor-free resection margin was 37.2 ± 0.6 mm. The ideal cut-off for survival differences was determined for 33 mm. Patients with an oral resection margin of more than 33 mm had a better median overall survival (≤33 mm: 45.0 months, 95% confidence interval: 22.4-67.6 months, >33 mm: not reached, P = .005). An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm proved to be an independent favorable prognostic factor for patients' overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analyses (P = .049). CONCLUSION: This study analyzed a patient cohort retrospectively after curative intended Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm is a factor for improved overall survival. Therefore, a minimum resection margin of 34 mm after fixation could be suggested.

Surgical and multimodal treatment of metastatic oesophageal cancer: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-established multimodal therapy for localized oesophageal cancer, the metastatic stage is commonly treated only with systemic therapy as current international guidelines recommend. However, evidence suggesting that multimodal therapy including surgery could benefit selected patients with metastasized oesophageal cancer is increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic oesophageal cancer after different treatment regimens. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study of patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus with synchronous or metachronous metastases who underwent Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy between 2010 and 2021. Each patient received an individual treatment for their metastatic burden based on an interdisciplinary tumour board conference. Survival differences between different treatments were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, as well as univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: Out of 1791 patients undergoing Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy, 235 patients diagnosed with metastases were included. Of all of the included patients, 42 (17.9%) only underwent surgical resection of their metastatic disease, 37 (15.7%) underwent multimodal therapy including surgery, 78 (33.2%) received chemotherapy alone, 49 (20.9%) received other therapies, and 29 (12.3%) received best supportive care. Patients who underwent resection or multimodal therapy including surgery of their metastatic burden showed superior overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone (median overall survival of 19.0, 18.0, and 11.0 months respectively) (P < 0.001). This was confirmed in subcohorts of patients with metachronous solid-organ metastases and with a single metastasis. In multivariable analyses, resection with or without multimodal therapy was an independent factor for favourable survival. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection could be a feasible treatment option for metastasized oesophageal cancer, improving survival in selected patients. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and define reliable selection criteria.

Treatment of local recurrence of esophageal cancer following Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy-Experiences of a high-volume center.

PURPOSE: Patients with local recurrence of esophageal cancer have a highly decreased overall survival. There is currently no standardized treatment algorithm for this group. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the survival of patients with local recurrence, despite receiving individualized treatment options. METHODS: 241 of 1791 patients were diagnosed with a local recurrence following Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at the University Hospital of Cologne. 59 patients, who were diagnosed only with a local recurrence of adeno- or squamous cell carcinoma and received their individualized therapy regimes at our high-volume center, were included. RESULTS: The study included 52 patients with adenocarcinoma and 7 with squamous cell carcinoma. Among these, 6 patients underwent resection, 19 received solely chemotherapy, 29 received chemoradiotherapy, and 5 were provided with best supportive care. Patients who underwent resection showed a better survival outcome compared to patients without resection (median OS: not reached vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.012). Best supportive care and palliative care were found to be independent risk factors for shorter overall survival compared to curative intended treatment options like local resection or chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION: In this study, different treatment strategies for patients with local recurrence of esophageal cancer were depicted. Resection as well as chemoradiotherapy could play a role in selected patients. Further prospective studies are needed to improve the selection of eligible patients.

Upregulation of the histone γ-H2AX correlates with worse patient survival and basal-like subtype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have yet to experience significant benefits from targeted therapy. Olaparib is currently the only active substance in BRCA-mutated PDACs that successfully influences the DNA repair of carcinoma cells. H2AX belongs to the histone family and is known as a part of the DNA repair system. The inhibition of γ-H2AX could lead to the inhibition of mitotically active tumor cells. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the γ-H2AX in patients with PDAC. METHODS: All included patients (n = 311) received a pancreatic resection with curative intention in one of our PANCALYZE study centers. Subsequently, they were enrolled in a standardized follow-up protocol. Immunohistochemical stainings for γ-H2AX were conducted on tissue microarrays. RESULTS: Patients exhibiting high levels of γ-H2AX expression experience more frequent R1 resections, indicating advanced tumor stages in this subgroup. Additionally, patients with high γ-H2AX expression demonstrated significantly poorer survival compared to those with low expression (median OS: 15 vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, high γ-H2AX expression could be identified as an independent risk factor for worse patient survival. Moreover, high γ-H2AX expression could be more frequently observed in the more aggressive basal-like subtype. CONCLUSION: γ-H2AX can be characterized as a predictive biomarker for poorer patient survival. Consequently, upcoming clinical trials focused on the efficacy of targeted therapies influencing the DNA repair system and radiotherapy should evaluate γ-H2AX as a potential biomarker for therapy response. Furthermore, γ-H2AX may serve as a viable target for treatment in the future.

Co-expression patterns of cancer associated fibroblast markers reveal distinct subgroups related to patient survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rapidly increasing in high income countries due to its association with persistent high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Recent scientific advances have highlighted the importance of the tumor microenvironment in OPSCC. In this study, including 216 OPSCC patients, we analyze the composition of four established markers of cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the context of intratumoral CD8 T-cell infiltration. Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for fibroblast activation protein (FAP), platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRb), periostin, alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and CD8 were analyzed digitally and their association with survival, tumor- and patient characteristics was assessed. Results: Co-expression of CAF markers was frequent but not associated with HPV status. FAPhigh and PDGFRbhigh expression were associated with increased CD8 T-cell infiltration. Low expression of PDGFRb improved patient survival in female patients but not in male patients. We identified PDGFRblow periostinlow α-SMAlow status as an independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio 0.377, p = 0.006). Conclusion: These findings elucidate the co-expression of four established CAF markers in OPSCC and underscore their association with T-cell infiltration and patient survival. Future analyses of CAF subgroups in OPSCC may enable the development of individualized therapies.

cIAPs control RIPK1 kinase activity-dependent and -independent cell death and tissue inflammation.

Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) are RING-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases that ubiquitylate receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) to regulate TNF signalling. Here, we established mice simultaneously expressing enzymatically inactive cIAP1/2 variants, bearing mutations in the RING domains of cIAP1/2 (cIAP1/2 mutant RING, cIAP1/2MutR ). cIap1/2MutR/MutR mice died during embryonic development due to RIPK1-mediated apoptosis. While expression of kinase-inactive RIPK1D138N rescued embryonic development, Ripk1D138N/D138N /cIap1/2MutR/MutR mice developed systemic inflammation and died postweaning. Cells expressing cIAP1/2MutR and RIPK1D138N were still susceptible to TNF-induced apoptosis and necroptosis, implying additional kinase-independent RIPK1 activities in regulating TNF signalling. Although further ablation of Ripk3 did not lead to any phenotypic improvement, Tnfr1 gene knock-out prevented early onset of systemic inflammation and premature mortality, indicating that cIAPs control TNFR1-mediated toxicity independent of RIPK1 and RIPK3. Beyond providing novel molecular insights into TNF-signalling, the mouse model established in this study can serve as a useful tool to further evaluate ongoing therapeutic protocols using inhibitors of TNF, cIAPs and RIPK1.

Copy-number-gain of telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma exhibits one of the highest mortality rates among all cancer entities. Multimodal therapy strategies have improved patients' survival significantly. However, patients in early stages are currently limited to receiving only local therapies, even though some patients within this group showcase short survival periods. Until now, there has been no widely established clinically used biomarker to detect these high-risk patients. Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), a gene encoding a crucial subunit of the telomerase enzyme, plays a significant role in establishing cancer cell immortality and is under suspicion for its potential contribution to tumor progression. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the TERT amplification status. We included 643 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at the University Hospital of Cologne. The TERT amplification status was characterized using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clinicopathological values and patients' overall survival were compared between patients with and without TERT amplification. Further sub-cohort analyses were conducted for patients with pT1N0-3 tumor stage. Eighty-One patients (12.6%) exhibited TERT amplification. Patients with amplified TERT showed significantly worse overall survival (median OS: 22.6 vs. 36.8 months, p = 0.009). Interestingly, TERT amplification could be characterized as an independent risk factor for worse overall survival in multivariate analysis in patients with pT1N0-3 tumor stage (HR = 2.440, 95% CI 1.095-5.440, p = 0.029). In this study, we describe the TERT amplification status as an independent risk factor for worse survival in patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma at pT1N0-3 tumor stage, encompassing cases involving tumor infiltration of the lamina propria, muscularis mucosae, and/or submucosa. Based on our findings, we put forth the proposition that evaluating the TERT amplification status may serve as a valuable tool in identifying a specific subgroup of patients, namely those with TERT amplification and pT1N0-3 tumor-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma. The patients of this subgroup could potentially benefit from enhanced follow-up protocols, more aggressive treatment approaches, or possible targeted TERT inhibition therapies, all aimed at improving their overall clinical outcomes.

Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Heterogeneity and Its Influence on the Extracellular Matrix and the Tumor Microenvironment.

The tumor microenvironment comprises multiple cell types, like cancer cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells. In recent years, there have been massive research efforts focusing not only on cancer cells, but also on other cell types of the tumor microenvironment, thereby aiming to expand and determine novel treatment options. Fibroblasts represent a heterogenous cell family consisting of numerous subtypes, which can alter immune cell fractions, facilitate or inhibit tumor growth, build pre-metastatic niches, or stabilize vessels. These effects can be achieved through cell-cell interactions, which form the extracellular matrix, or via the secretion of cytokines or chemokines. The pro- or antitumorigenic fibroblast phenotypes show variability not only among different cancer entities, but also among intraindividual sites, including primary tumors or metastatic lesions. Commonly prescribed for arterial hypertension, the inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system have recently been described as having an inhibitory effect on fibroblasts. This inhibition leads to modified immune cell fractions and increased tissue stiffness, thereby contributing to overcoming therapy resistance and ultimately inhibiting tumor growth. However, it is important to note that the inhibition of fibroblasts can also have the opposite effect, potentially resulting in increased tumor growth. We aim to summarize the latest state of research regarding fibroblast heterogeneity and its intricate impact on the tumor microenvironment and extracellular matrix. Specifically, we focus on highlighting recent advancements in the comprehension of intraindividual heterogeneity and therapy options within this context.

The tight junction protein claudin 6 is a potential target for patient-individualized treatment in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma and is associated with poor prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) remains poor, and new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Claudin 6 (CLDN6) is an oncofetal antigen that is largely absent in healthy tissues and upregulated in several cancers, making it a promising therapeutical target. In this study, the expression of CLDN6 was assessed in an large Caucasian EAC and GAC cohort. METHODS: RNA-Seq data from 89 EACs and 371 GACs were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas project and EAC/GAC cases were stratified by CLDN6 mRNA expression based on a survival-associated cutoff. For groups with CLDN6 expression above or below this cutoff, differential gene expression analyses were performed using DESeq, and dysregulated biological pathways were identified using the Enrichr tool. Additionally, CLDN6 protein expression was assessed in more than 800 EACs and almost 600 GACs using a CLDN6-specific immunohistochemical antibody (clone 58-4B-2) that is currently used in Phase I/II trials to identify patients with CLDN6-positive tumors (NCT05262530; NCT04503278). The expression of CLDN6 was also correlated with histopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: EACs and GACs with high CLDN6 mRNA levels displayed an overexpression of pathways regulating the cell cycle, DNA replication, and receptor / extracellular matrix interactions. CLDN6 protein expression was associated with shorter OS in EAC and GAC, both in treatment-naïve subgroups and cohorts receiving neoadjuvant therapy. In multivariate analysis, CLDN6 protein expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor in EAC associated with a shorter OS (HR: 1.75; p = 0.01) and GAC (HR: 2.74; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: High expression of CLDN6 mRNA is associated with the dysregulation of distinct biological pathways regulating cell growth, proliferation, and cell-matrix interactions. Clinically, the expression of CLDN6 protein is a valuable adverse prognostic marker in EAC and GAC.

High NANOG expression correlates with worse patients' survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer demonstrate a low overall survival even despite the established multimodal therapy as the current standard of care. Therefore, further biomarkers for patients with high-risk and additional therapy options are needed. NANOG is a transcription factor, which can be found in stem cells and is known to support tumorigenesis. METHODS: Six hundred sixty patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, who were operated at the University of Cologne with a curative intent, were included. Immunohistochemical stainings for NANOG were performed. The study population was divided into NANOG-positive and -negative subgroups. RESULTS: Positive NANOG expression correlates significantly with worse overall survival (p = 0.002) and could be confirmed as an independent risk factor for worse patient survival in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.40, 95%CI = 1.09-1.80, p = 0.006). This effect could be detected in the subgroup of primarily operated patients, but not in patients after neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a NANOG-positive subgroup of patients with esophageal cancer, who exhibit worse overall survival in a large patient cohort. This discovery suggests the potential use of NANOG as a biomarker for both intensified therapy and stricter follow-up regimes. Additionally, NANOG-positive stem cell-like cancer cells could be used as a new antitumoral treatment target if validated in mechanistic and clinical studies.

Specific Subtypes of Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts Are Correlated with Worse Survival in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancer entities. Effective therapy options are still lacking. The tumor microenvironment possibly bears further treatment possibilities. This study aimed to describe the expression patterns of four established carcinoma-associated fibroblast (CAFs) markers and their correlation in PDAC tissue samples. METHODS: This project included 321 patients with PDAC who underwent surgery with a curative intent in one of the PANCALYZE study centers. Immunohistochemical stainings for FAP, PDGFR, periostin, and SMA were performed. The expression patterns of each marker were divided into low- and high-expressing CAFs and correlated with patients' survival. RESULTS: Tumors showing SMAhigh-, PeriostinhighSMAhigh-, or PeriostinhighSMAlowPDGFRlowFAPhigh-positive CAFs demonstrated significantly worse survival. Additionally, a high expression of SMA in PDAC tissue samples was shown to be an independent risk factor for worse survival. CONCLUSION: This project identified three subgroups of PDAC with different expression patterns of CAF markers which showed significantly worse survival. This could be the base for the further characterization of the fibroblast subgroups in PDAC and contribute to the development of new targeted therapy options against CAFs.

Cytokeratin 6 identifies basal-like subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with decreased survival.

PURPOSE: Rising incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) bind with insufficient therapy options showcases a great medical challenge. Further biomarkers are required to identify patients, who will benefit from more aggressive therapy. METHODS: 320 patients were included by the PANCALYZE study group. Cytokeratin 6 (CK6) immunohistochemical staining as a putative marker for the basal-like subtype of PDAC was performed. The correlation between CK6 expression patterns and survival data, as well as various markers of the (inflammatory) tumor microenvironment, were analyzed. RESULTS: We divided the study population based on the expression pattern of CK6. Patients with a high CK6 tumor expression had a significantly shorter survival (p = 0.013), confirmed in a multivariate cox regression model. CK6-expression is an independent marker for a decreased overall survival (HR = 1.655, 95% CI 1.158-2.365, p = 0.006). In addition, the CK6-positive tumors showed significantly less plasma cell infiltration and more cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) expressing Periostin and SMA. CONCLUSIONS: CK6 could be considered as an independent biomarker for a shorter overall survival. CK6 is a clinically easily accessible biomarker for the identification of the basal-like subtype of PDAC. Therefore, it could be taken into consideration in deciding for the more aggressive therapy regimes. Prospectively, studies addressing the chemosensitive characteristics of this subtype are required.

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein is a prognostic marker for a favorable outcome in three identified subsets in resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Therefore, building further subgroups as well as enabling individual patient therapy and diagnostics are needed. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is known to modulate apoptotic and inflammatory pathways. Its expression was found to correlate with patients' survival in other tumor entities. This study aims to examine the role of XIAP in patients with PDAC in relation to the inflammatory microenvironment. METHODS: The PANCALYZE multicenter study group included 257 patients with PDAC. Paraffin-embedded tumor samples were stained immunohistochemically for CD3, CD20, CD38, CD56, CD66b, CD117, and CD163 and XIAP. These stainings were further analyzed digitally with QuPath and survival analyses were done. RESULTS: XIAP-positive patients with T-cell, respectively, neutrophil enriched tumors survived significantly longer compared to XIAP-negative patients (CD3: 37.6 vs. 24.6 months, p = 0.028; CD66b: 34.1 vs. 14.9 months, p = 0.027). Additionally, XIAP-positive patients showed better survival in the lymph node-negative population (48.4 vs. 24.2 months, p = 0.019). Regarding the total population, our findings did not show a correlation between XIAP expression and survival. In multivariate cox regression analyzes XIAP proves to be an independent factor for better survival in the identified subgroups (CD3: p = 0.043; CD66b: p = 0.012, N0: p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: We found XIAP-positive subgroups with significantly better survival in patients with PDAC in T-cell-rich, neutrophil-rich, or lymph node-negative cohorts. This could lead to further individualized cancer treatment with less aggressive therapy protocols for XIAP-positive tumors or more intensive follow-up for XIAP-negative tumors.