RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of bariatric surgery (gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding) compared with ordinary treatment in the Finnish healthcare system. METHODS: Analysis was done from a healthcare provider's perspective using a combination of a decision tree and a Markov model, with a time horizon of 10 years. Health-related quality of life was estimated from a representative population survey, and other parameter values were based on registers, systematic reviews, controlled studies and expert opinion. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, bariatric surgery was both more effective and less costly than the ordinary treatment. The mean costs were 33,870 and 50,495, and the mean number of quality-adjusted life-years 7·63 and 7·05, for bariatric surgery and ordinary treatment respectively. Uncertainty around the parameter values was tested comprehensively in sensitivity analyses, and the results were robust. CONCLUSION: Surgery for morbid obesity increases health-related quality of life, and reduces the need for further treatments and total healthcare costs. According to this analysis, non-operative care would be more costly for the Finnish healthcare system on average after 5 years following surgery.
